Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Is gentle parenting effective

237 replies

Lifeisinteresting · 15/06/2025 07:23

I was born in mid 80s so my parents parented like typical 80s parents, more tough love than softer approach. My daughter was born in the 00s we took a boundaries, firm but fair approach. I see posts on MN or with my friends who now have young kids who gentle parent and can't help but think half the reactions are down to not setting reasonable boundaries and responses.

OP posts:
ItsUpToYou · 15/06/2025 09:09

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 09:02

Comprehension not your strong point?
'Darling, you really must read the words'. 🫣

They did comprehend? Look at the thread - it’s roughly equal in people saying both of these things - “gentle parenting is just normal parenting” (ergo, most parents are doing it anyway), vs. “gentle parenting is the reason children are badly behaved”. If that’s the case, most people’s children must be badly behaved, no?

ButteredRadishes · 15/06/2025 09:06

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:55

Exactly - schools aren’t going to follow’gentle’ parenting style in the classroom.

🤣🤣🤣

They definitely do. When's the last time a teacher angrily shouted at a 5 year old, yanked a toy away from them, told them to shut up, smacked them round the head....?

They get the child to comply with out the fear of pain, it anger etc.

They "gentle parent" these kids, by talking to them, setting clear and firm boundaries, building a relationship of respect and trust, acknowledging they have feelings etc.

User2454664 · 15/06/2025 09:06

ItsUpToYou · 15/06/2025 08:52

This is a very interesting point! I think there could be some truth in this.

It makes a lot of sense as many families are more concerned about how they look from the outside. Especially with very big families, often overlapping with very religious as well, it's would be humanly impossible to gentle parent 3-5 kids of various ages and make sure all their emotional needs are taken care of. From what I gleaned with friends growing up like that, there was always some form of abuse going on behind closed doors. Eg A very angry, violent father which was pretty normal for 90s times. Other times, the children are simply ignored and nobody cares what their true interests or personalities are. The single most important part was getting along with your siblings but beyond that, nobody gave a shit about your interests or hobbies or identities.

Hoooray · 15/06/2025 09:05

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 09:02

Comprehension not your strong point?
'Darling, you really must read the words'. 🫣

Sorry the joke went over your head, darling. Mummy will make a more intellectually appropriate one next time.

MyCyanReader · 15/06/2025 09:05

When my 10 year old nephew told me to fuck off after I asked him and my son to keep the noise down as the younger ones were sleeping, I was not impressed to see my brother go in and say "be polite" and that was it. My nephew just laughed.

My own son (13) was horrified at the lack of punishment. He would have had his phone taken away for a week and made to apologise!

Gentle parenting is fine but there needs to be consequences for actions, clear boundaries and rules.

Passive parenting is the problem.

ItsUpToYou · 15/06/2025 09:05

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:55

Exactly - schools aren’t going to follow’gentle’ parenting style in the classroom.

Schools follow exactly this approach. It’s not called “gentle parenting” but behaviour systems in primary and secondary often include things like Zones of Regulation displays, time-out passes, reflective consequences, etc. to support the child in managing their behaviour and understanding the consequences of their actions.

ButteredRadishes · 15/06/2025 09:04

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:54

Why call it gentle parenting? Parenting doesn’t need an extra title.

Because there's different styles.

Parent 1 will hit the child to get them to comply
Parent 2 might shout or throw things
Parent 3 might talk and explain
Parent 4 might ignore everything

They're all "parenting".

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 09:02

Hoooray · 15/06/2025 08:56

Schroedinger's gentle parenting - simultaneously the reason kids are little shits in public, and also the thing all good parents have being doing all along anyway.

Comprehension not your strong point?
'Darling, you really must read the words'. 🫣

Hoooray · 15/06/2025 09:01

IwasDueANameChange · 15/06/2025 08:52

That's gentle parenting - authoritative but respectful. A permissive approach would be to allow the behaviour to continue, an authoritarian approach would be to punish the 'disobedience' of the second throw

What is wrong with punishing disobedience? This is where one of the great blindness of "gentle parents" comes in. They think their child is well behaved because they can eventually be coaxed to do as you've asked. They visit my home & I think they are badly behaved because they:

  • don't do as they are told first time, even great big kids of 8/9
  • question instructions, wasting time & disrupting activities for others
  • have to be nagged several times/don't listen when told no.

People always give example of toddlers with gentle parenting/natural consequences, but in RL what I see is ineffective toddler approaches but with a child of 6 or 7. They are still doing things a second or third time after being told not to.

Suggesting that the parenting has not prevented recurring behaviour. What do you do when it keeps recurring?

There are no real consequences of risking it, and often a child gets away with bad behaviour because older children don't always have grown ups hovering a few metres away the way toddlers do. The sorts of transgressions older children make often don't really have a natural consequence they care about either:

  • Bully that kid you don't like - natural consequence, he won't play with you - you don't care, he's not one of your mates anyway. Other children don't tend to exclude the popular bully either so there's no meaningful natural consequence.
  • don't do your homework - natural consequence, bad marks - you don't care until its too late to remedy.

Schools, police, society, need children to learn to obey first time, in group context where they won't get a one on one adult managing behaviour. If you don't apply real, meaningful consequences (i.e. punishments!!) for bad behaviour, in what sense are you maintaining firm boundaries?

Edited

I think it's a fallacy to suggest that punishment is the reason children learn to be good humans.

If the only reason your child isn't bullying another child is because they know they'll get punished if they do, what stops them from being bullies in situations where they won't get caught? If they only do their homework because they're punished if they don't, what happens when they get to university and nobody is grounding them for not completing their essays?

Gentle parenting gives children a framework in which to grow into empathetic, independent, self-motivated individuals. If you respect your child's feelings and give them strategies for emotional regulation they will grow up respecting other people's feelings too.

If you raise children to behave in order to avoid punishment, you're relying on someone or something to always be there to inflict that punishment, and there won't always be.

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 09:00

MidnightPatrol · 15/06/2025 08:54

I think you’re over-egging the amount (and depth) of discussion when asking a child not to do something here.

Everything isn’t a massive discussion - ‘no you cannot do X, because of reason Y. We do not do x in y situation’

Explaining in the moment relates the activity to the instruction, doing it days later means they’ll probably have forgotten what they did, how it felt, the impact it had etc.

‘no’ becomes meaningless very quickly if just barked repeatedly without context IMO.

I think you've not met some of the so called gentle (but also annoyingly loud) parents I've come across. They're performance parenting Gold medal winners.

Simonjt · 15/06/2025 08:58

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:55

Exactly - schools aren’t going to follow’gentle’ parenting style in the classroom.

I think you’ll find a lot do, a good school will have strong boundaries that children are aware, those boundaries are enforced and children after the event will have a quick chat with the adult to ensure the child understands why x action is wrong. I guess in some areas some schools have teachers screaming at children, others allowing poor behaviour and manners, but that hasn’t been a thing anywhere I’ve been.

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 08:58

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:54

Why call it gentle parenting? Parenting doesn’t need an extra title.

Agreed.
(I've said this already)

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 08:56

ItsUpToYou · 15/06/2025 08:52

This is a very interesting point! I think there could be some truth in this.

Or, some children are just lovely little people, who realise that they can behave and have fun, and they don't need to whine/tantrum because they're loved and secure.
I also think we have to note that some bad behaviour isn't bad behaviour at all, but overstimulation (in ND, but also sometimes in NT, children) and/or children learning to regulate their emotions.

Hoooray · 15/06/2025 08:56

Schroedinger's gentle parenting - simultaneously the reason kids are little shits in public, and also the thing all good parents have being doing all along anyway.

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:55

IwasDueANameChange · 15/06/2025 08:52

That's gentle parenting - authoritative but respectful. A permissive approach would be to allow the behaviour to continue, an authoritarian approach would be to punish the 'disobedience' of the second throw

What is wrong with punishing disobedience? This is where one of the great blindness of "gentle parents" comes in. They think their child is well behaved because they can eventually be coaxed to do as you've asked. They visit my home & I think they are badly behaved because they:

  • don't do as they are told first time, even great big kids of 8/9
  • question instructions, wasting time & disrupting activities for others
  • have to be nagged several times/don't listen when told no.

People always give example of toddlers with gentle parenting/natural consequences, but in RL what I see is ineffective toddler approaches but with a child of 6 or 7. They are still doing things a second or third time after being told not to.

Suggesting that the parenting has not prevented recurring behaviour. What do you do when it keeps recurring?

There are no real consequences of risking it, and often a child gets away with bad behaviour because older children don't always have grown ups hovering a few metres away the way toddlers do. The sorts of transgressions older children make often don't really have a natural consequence they care about either:

  • Bully that kid you don't like - natural consequence, he won't play with you - you don't care, he's not one of your mates anyway. Other children don't tend to exclude the popular bully either so there's no meaningful natural consequence.
  • don't do your homework - natural consequence, bad marks - you don't care until its too late to remedy.

Schools, police, society, need children to learn to obey first time, in group context where they won't get a one on one adult managing behaviour. If you don't apply real, meaningful consequences (i.e. punishments!!) for bad behaviour, in what sense are you maintaining firm boundaries?

Edited

Exactly - schools aren’t going to follow’gentle’ parenting style in the classroom.

ItsUpToYou · 15/06/2025 08:54

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:49

That’s parenting - you never hit anyone let alone a child. Why give parenting a title?

Because a surprising amount of people think that screaming, shouting and hitting, or, on the other side of the scale, ignoring their children and letting them “get on with it” is also “just parenting”.

MidnightPatrol · 15/06/2025 08:54

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 08:50

Sometimes a 'no, you cannot' or 'please stop that now' is appropriate, with the discussions regarding why taking place later. The discussion does not have to happen there and then every single time.

I think you’re over-egging the amount (and depth) of discussion when asking a child not to do something here.

Everything isn’t a massive discussion - ‘no you cannot do X, because of reason Y. We do not do x in y situation’

Explaining in the moment relates the activity to the instruction, doing it days later means they’ll probably have forgotten what they did, how it felt, the impact it had etc.

‘no’ becomes meaningless very quickly if just barked repeatedly without context IMO.

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:54

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 08:50

Again, who is suggesting we do this?
Ah, yes, nobody.

Why call it gentle parenting? Parenting doesn’t need an extra title.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 15/06/2025 08:53

This thread is like banging your head against a brick wall 😂

Allowing the behaviour to continue while attempting to have an ineffective negotiation there and then - not gentle parenting.

Redirecting / removing the child from the situation and then immediately having an age-appropriate conversation about why - gentle parenting.

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 08:53

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 15/06/2025 08:48

So gentle parenting is good parenting?

There we go, happy days.

No.
There's no need to call good/proper parenting 'gentle'. 🫣

IwasDueANameChange · 15/06/2025 08:52

That's gentle parenting - authoritative but respectful. A permissive approach would be to allow the behaviour to continue, an authoritarian approach would be to punish the 'disobedience' of the second throw

What is wrong with punishing disobedience? This is where one of the great blindness of "gentle parents" comes in. They think their child is well behaved because they can eventually be coaxed to do as you've asked. They visit my home & I think they are badly behaved because they:

  • don't do as they are told first time, even great big kids of 8/9
  • question instructions, wasting time & disrupting activities for others
  • have to be nagged several times/don't listen when told no.

People always give example of toddlers with gentle parenting/natural consequences, but in RL what I see is ineffective toddler approaches but with a child of 6 or 7. They are still doing things a second or third time after being told not to.

Suggesting that the parenting has not prevented recurring behaviour. What do you do when it keeps recurring?

There are no real consequences of risking it, and often a child gets away with bad behaviour because older children don't always have grown ups hovering a few metres away the way toddlers do. The sorts of transgressions older children make often don't really have a natural consequence they care about either:

  • Bully that kid you don't like - natural consequence, he won't play with you - you don't care, he's not one of your mates anyway. Other children don't tend to exclude the popular bully either so there's no meaningful natural consequence.
  • don't do your homework - natural consequence, bad marks - you don't care until its too late to remedy.

Schools, police, society, need children to learn to obey first time, in group context where they won't get a one on one adult managing behaviour. If you don't apply real, meaningful consequences (i.e. punishments!!) for bad behaviour, in what sense are you maintaining firm boundaries?

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 08:52

Hoooray · 15/06/2025 08:49

Fab. What shall we call it when people are permissive, or hit and shout at their kids? Unparenting? Nonparenting?

Bad parenting.
Quite straightforward.
(If you're concerned about how bad it is, be 'that person' and report it, for the child's sake).

ItsUpToYou · 15/06/2025 08:52

User2454664 · 15/06/2025 08:44

I saw a good opinion somewhere that perfectly behaved children in public are usually the result of horrific/abusive parenting. This is why it feels the standard of kids behaviour has gone down over the years compared to the 80s-90s. No child innately wants to sit still and not make a noise for 2 hours during a meal or flight or whatever. But if they do this just because a parent told them too, you can only imagine what consequences they would be facing at home for disobeying.

This is a very interesting point! I think there could be some truth in this.

CornflowerDusk · 15/06/2025 08:51

Hoooray · 15/06/2025 08:49

Fab. What shall we call it when people are permissive, or hit and shout at their kids? Unparenting? Nonparenting?

Shit parenting! Or further up the scale, child abuse

KeineBedeutung · 15/06/2025 08:50

Parker231 · 15/06/2025 08:49

That’s parenting - you never hit anyone let alone a child. Why give parenting a title?

Again, who is suggesting we do this?
Ah, yes, nobody.