Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
19
MrsSunshine2b · 18/06/2025 11:08

OpheliaWasntMad · 18/06/2025 10:50

There are specific issues related to the Pakistani grooming gangs and linking them to other abuse scandals obfuscates some of the issues

I went down a rabbit hole about this last night.

It seems like most of Pakistani immigrants to the UK, and most of the grooming gangs, weren't just Pakistani but from a region called the Mirpur valley, which is a fascinating history and has been largely isolated from the rest of Pakistan due to it's remote location for centuries.

I read a couple of articles about the honour-based approach to sexual conduct and the clan structures in the area and how this culture could have contributed to the abuse.

You might be aware already but it was all new to me and very interesting.

It also highlighted the problems with calling the gangs "Asian", as there is no increased risk associated with large Indian or Bangladeshi populations in an area. It's not the Asian diaspora, it's Pakistan, and a very small region of Pakistan at that.

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 11:00

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 18/06/2025 10:55

It’ll be a white wash, and full of mealy mouthed ‘lessons learned’.

I agree. It's because nobody want to start looking at the uncomfortable bits : like why are certain communities segregating themselves ? What's going on that is making them feel it is ok to not mix with white British people ? (Majority) And looking at why it doesn't get talked about. I should imagine cries of "racist!" "White tears/white fragility" is what stops a lot of it.... You literally are cornered from starting conversations.

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 18/06/2025 10:55

It’ll be a white wash, and full of mealy mouthed ‘lessons learned’.

OpheliaWasntMad · 18/06/2025 10:50

There are specific issues related to the Pakistani grooming gangs and linking them to other abuse scandals obfuscates some of the issues

OpheliaWasntMad · 18/06/2025 10:48

Puzzledandpissedoff · 18/06/2025 10:37

The Church has made statements/ apologies / commissioned lay people to conduct enquiries reviews/ reports

Yes, and then sidelined / discredited and otherwise led to resign so that they could carry on doing exactly as they wish ... as in the local church which has re-imported the priest who originally skipped back to Ireland ahead of the police

Ditto so many other institutions - churches, government, local authorities and hospital boards included, where a public "show of doing something" replaces actually doing it but fools some while they wait for attention to move onto something else

The whole process of hide/deflect/rationalise is so deep rooted - and depressingly so widespread - that it's going to take a lot more than current circumstances to change mindsets, and that's if it can ever be done

If you and others want to talk about the ( horrendous) failings of the Catholic Church in Ireland can I suggest you start a new thread?

LizzieW1969 · 18/06/2025 10:39

Fetaface · 15/06/2025 23:02

They are going off the NPCC which relates to all child sex offences including grooming so lumps them all together and which says the same that the majority of perpetrators are white. The 13.7% was from removing some data such as sports groups and church groups. When they are included that percentage is lower is what the report says.

The debate is that they are on about how many perpetrators out of 1000 who are white/black/asian etc if the fractions had the same denominator. It is equivalent fractions - making them equivalent to compare.

So how white make up about 82% of the population of the UK so if everyone offended at the same rate there would be the same average per white person, per black person, per asian person etc they are saying as a fraction there are more offenders per amount of asian people than there are per amount of white not per whole population. They are taking each group and looking at the fraction per that group and then comparing it.

So for every 1000 white men X are perpetrators and for every 1000 asian men Y are perpetrators. It is comparing it as a like fraction which still shows black perpetrators are the main per 1000. They then apply that to the whole population to generalise about how many sex offenders there are per that group. The data does warn not to do this but hey ho!

They are saying that it shows as an equivalent that asian men are the main issue. It doesn't as it shows children as the main issue when it comes to sex crimes against children.

When it comes to grooming the problem lies in that it is not called grooming when it is a white man who does it. They are called paedophile rings. So if you call it one thing when it is a certain ethnicity and one thing when it is another then you get a whole range of different data as some will collect on one thing and some on another. When the reality is they are all grooming gangs and all paedophile rings. Both a much of a muchness.

This is very true; I’m an SA survivor, of a white ‘paedophile ring’, of which my F was a member, as is my DSis. That was in the 70s and early 80s. So I’m in agreement that such ‘rings’ function the same as grooming gangs. Although I suspect that they’re far more secretive about what they’re doing. That might go some way to explain why the stats suggest that CSA is more prevalent per capita in the Pakistani community.

I also disagree with the suggestion that white families don’t protect abusers. They certainly do! Children are accused of lying/asking for it in much the same way. They’re also threatened into silence. So very few children report the abuse.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 18/06/2025 10:37

The Church has made statements/ apologies / commissioned lay people to conduct enquiries reviews/ reports

Yes, and then sidelined / discredited and otherwise led to resign so that they could carry on doing exactly as they wish ... as in the local church which has re-imported the priest who originally skipped back to Ireland ahead of the police

Ditto so many other institutions - churches, government, local authorities and hospital boards included, where a public "show of doing something" replaces actually doing it but fools some while they wait for attention to move onto something else

The whole process of hide/deflect/rationalise is so deep rooted - and depressingly so widespread - that it's going to take a lot more than current circumstances to change mindsets, and that's if it can ever be done

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 10:30

miraxxx · 18/06/2025 10:28

💯It is a tactic to wear you down, these pps are not arguing in good faith. They have been doing it from page 1 and we are onto pg 6 now. Same old same. It is very illustrative for the bystanders.

Thanks, I'm glad it's not just me (am I allowed this 'childish emoji ? 🫩) funny with the liberals, always resorting to insults when they can't brainwash and accept others perfectly valid reasoning.

miraxxx · 18/06/2025 10:28

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 10:19

Luckily others are reading this thread. I'll make it simple for you : you keep harping on and on about the catholics as whatabouttery: I agreed with you, yes leaders should come out and deplore those awful crimes from "their own".

I also said Muslim leaders should too.

But you can't agree on that. You seem to keep going round in circles everytime I mention it. With "AHH but the catholics" and I'm saying "yes I agree, same with the Muslim community" then you come along again "AHH but the catholics" ... 🥱

💯It is a tactic to wear you down, these pps are not arguing in good faith. They have been doing it from page 1 and we are onto pg 6 now. Same old same. It is very illustrative for the bystanders.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 10:25

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 10:19

Luckily others are reading this thread. I'll make it simple for you : you keep harping on and on about the catholics as whatabouttery: I agreed with you, yes leaders should come out and deplore those awful crimes from "their own".

I also said Muslim leaders should too.

But you can't agree on that. You seem to keep going round in circles everytime I mention it. With "AHH but the catholics" and I'm saying "yes I agree, same with the Muslim community" then you come along again "AHH but the catholics" ... 🥱

That's not an argument, it's an exercise in condescension (you're very adept) followed by a childish emoji. Exploring other instances of institutional cover ups whilst talking about institutional cover ups is not 'whatabouttery'. It's on point. Personal attacks because you don't have an intelligent response, are not.

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 10:19

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 10:12

You're calling me blinkered! Thanks for the laugh.

Luckily others are reading this thread. I'll make it simple for you : you keep harping on and on about the catholics as whatabouttery: I agreed with you, yes leaders should come out and deplore those awful crimes from "their own".

I also said Muslim leaders should too.

But you can't agree on that. You seem to keep going round in circles everytime I mention it. With "AHH but the catholics" and I'm saying "yes I agree, same with the Muslim community" then you come along again "AHH but the catholics" ... 🥱

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 10:12

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 09:59

It's whatabouttery. Remember that tired old example that I'm getting out of breath repeating on here : Spanish/Vs British drunkenness. So we include all drunken behaviour from all nationalities including the Spanish. We can't simply extrapolate a theme of "there's a lot of Brits coming here causing drunken chaos "???

I don't get how you cannot see your blinkered view. Well thank goodness, your type of 'look, look over there' it's everyone at it', is fast becoming unfashionable. I think most of us would like balance. But in your head, anyone who points out uncomfortable truths about a minority instantly is saying they hate all black and brown people. It's crazy !

Edited

You're calling me blinkered! Thanks for the laugh.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 10:09

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 09:54

You're talking in extremes. It's a common tactic of the liberals. I never once said "all Muslims should be held accountable for the acts of terrorists" never said it.

I don't get what you find so difficult to understand about this : Muslim and islam is not a western world religion. We've embraced multiculturalism (it's a lovely idea and it's a shame it isn't working so successfully) so when In a majority white, majority Christian/atheist small island , all recent terrorist attacks have been done by people labelling themselves as "Muslim" : I would think it's an absolute no brainer for Muslim community leaders to start advertising "not in our name ". Otherwise hatred and prejudice and hostility and division starts spreading. Especially when we hear "the Muslim community are appalled by these atrocities done in their name" yet we hear very little from the actual Muslim community.....

Yet again you're homogonising. I'm not 'all liberals', we're not the borg.

Your argument is very confused. You are talking about the Muslim 'communitiy' being held accountable and taking responsibility for the actions of a minority. Yet when I mention other 'communities' doing the same thing, that's denigrating them.

This is becoming circular because you're just repeating yourself. We didn't expect Catholic leaders and members to take responsibility for the actions of the IRA because most were sensible enough to understand that they didn't represent over a billion people.

What happens when you get tunnel vision, is that you don't see things in a wider context. For example, I see this scandal as an example of ingrained misogyny both from the gang members and society as a whole. It went on for decades because the survivors were seen as "trash" by all involved.

They were revictimised by everyone meant to help them. In fact, I'm sure one of them fled to Australia with her family because no one would protect her. That says a lot about how VAWAG is seen in society. We should be focused on shining a light on how this happened and making sure it doesn't continue.

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 09:59

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 09:24

Interesting how you denigrate people who disagree with you and say they're 'brainwashed' when they talk about all systemic abuse and injustice rather than pin it all on ethnic minorities. It seems as though some don't want to hear the uncomfortable truths they keep talking about.

It's whatabouttery. Remember that tired old example that I'm getting out of breath repeating on here : Spanish/Vs British drunkenness. So we include all drunken behaviour from all nationalities including the Spanish. We can't simply extrapolate a theme of "there's a lot of Brits coming here causing drunken chaos "???

I don't get how you cannot see your blinkered view. Well thank goodness, your type of 'look, look over there' it's everyone at it', is fast becoming unfashionable. I think most of us would like balance. But in your head, anyone who points out uncomfortable truths about a minority instantly is saying they hate all black and brown people. It's crazy !

C8H10N4O2 · 18/06/2025 09:55

OpheliaWasntMad · 18/06/2025 09:49

I don’t disagree with any of this but it is a deflection

From the subject of the thread? Yes fair enough. A thread on the general issue of why communities look the other way and how to change that would be interesting. There is no one size fits all - its inherent in society since the dawn of society.

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 09:54

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 09:18

Why are you so desperate to scapegoat people? I'm pointing out that there are failures in all institutions, irrespective of ethnicity and you seem determined to blame only one section of society.

Catholics are a minority in England, the majority of Christians are C of E. Catholics have also been persecuted for their faith, singling them out from the majority.

I'm arguing that everyone in a community shouldn't be held responsible for the actions of a few. I don't expect every Catholic I meet to prostrate themselves and beg forgiveness and I don't expect every Muslim to either.

You're talking in extremes. It's a common tactic of the liberals. I never once said "all Muslims should be held accountable for the acts of terrorists" never said it.

I don't get what you find so difficult to understand about this : Muslim and islam is not a western world religion. We've embraced multiculturalism (it's a lovely idea and it's a shame it isn't working so successfully) so when In a majority white, majority Christian/atheist small island , all recent terrorist attacks have been done by people labelling themselves as "Muslim" : I would think it's an absolute no brainer for Muslim community leaders to start advertising "not in our name ". Otherwise hatred and prejudice and hostility and division starts spreading. Especially when we hear "the Muslim community are appalled by these atrocities done in their name" yet we hear very little from the actual Muslim community.....

OpheliaWasntMad · 18/06/2025 09:49

C8H10N4O2 · 18/06/2025 09:36

I don’t agree that ordinary Irish Catholics didn’t look the other way. Girls sent to the Laundries were sent by their own families. If they ran away they would be rounded up by locals and the Garda and taken back. If abused girls were pregnant they would blame the girls.

The abusers in the clergy were able to get away with such wide scale abuse because too many ordinary people in communities looked the other way and did not want to see, refused to believe victims who spoke out, just as some in modern Ireland refuse to see the problems with racism in society.

This is certainly not unique to Ireland. The phenomenon of wilfully not seeing things for personal convenience or a reluctance to speak out cross every culture, race and religion. If you speak to French families in the south of France every family was connected to the Resistance - if just half of them were true then the Vichy regime would have collapsed on day 2.

Denial of this phenomenon is part of the problem. All we can do is talk about it, talk about how individuals might have behaved differently, accept that the whole community had some accountability and encourage people to speak up (which is broadly how West Germany tackled Nazism in schools after WW2). It is why safeguarding can never have sacred cows and shutting down debate is toxic.

I don’t disagree with any of this but it is a deflection

C8H10N4O2 · 18/06/2025 09:36

OpheliaWasntMad · 17/06/2025 23:01

Well I’m Catholic and I’m horrified. We do talk about it - everyone I know is completely sickened. If you speak to Irish Catholics you would know how very strongly they feel about these atrocities. The abusers were clergy and the abuse was covered up by clergy . Not ordinary Irish Catholics. Ordinary Irish Catholic families were victims.
It will take generations for the wounds to properly heal .

I don’t agree that ordinary Irish Catholics didn’t look the other way. Girls sent to the Laundries were sent by their own families. If they ran away they would be rounded up by locals and the Garda and taken back. If abused girls were pregnant they would blame the girls.

The abusers in the clergy were able to get away with such wide scale abuse because too many ordinary people in communities looked the other way and did not want to see, refused to believe victims who spoke out, just as some in modern Ireland refuse to see the problems with racism in society.

This is certainly not unique to Ireland. The phenomenon of wilfully not seeing things for personal convenience or a reluctance to speak out cross every culture, race and religion. If you speak to French families in the south of France every family was connected to the Resistance - if just half of them were true then the Vichy regime would have collapsed on day 2.

Denial of this phenomenon is part of the problem. All we can do is talk about it, talk about how individuals might have behaved differently, accept that the whole community had some accountability and encourage people to speak up (which is broadly how West Germany tackled Nazism in schools after WW2). It is why safeguarding can never have sacred cows and shutting down debate is toxic.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 09:24

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 08:46

Well said. I think that particular poster is only comfortable denigrating majority UK+Irish white groups. But it's a deflection tactic we've accepted as the norm for the past couple of decades, so, I guess it's going to take time to unbrainwash some people and realise you can also speak uncomfortable truths about minority groups too - (and shock horror, most people have got the ability to not instantly hate all brown or black people because of it !)

Interesting how you denigrate people who disagree with you and say they're 'brainwashed' when they talk about all systemic abuse and injustice rather than pin it all on ethnic minorities. It seems as though some don't want to hear the uncomfortable truths they keep talking about.

miraxxx · 18/06/2025 09:23

It is quite gratifying to see their desperation and indefatigability. Slow clap for the effort. But you are doomed to fail. There are too many survivors and too much abuse, a lot of it still ongoing. They will speak - and many more ordinary people are now aware and will listen.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 18/06/2025 09:18

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 08:48

Ps catholics are not a minority group in the UK , they're a 'type' of Christian. The majority UK religion. So your whatabouttery when comparing to Muslims doesn't work.

Why are you so desperate to scapegoat people? I'm pointing out that there are failures in all institutions, irrespective of ethnicity and you seem determined to blame only one section of society.

Catholics are a minority in England, the majority of Christians are C of E. Catholics have also been persecuted for their faith, singling them out from the majority.

I'm arguing that everyone in a community shouldn't be held responsible for the actions of a few. I don't expect every Catholic I meet to prostrate themselves and beg forgiveness and I don't expect every Muslim to either.

miraxxx · 18/06/2025 09:16

Don't allow these posters to bog you down with stats, outrage and the same circular reasoning. It is time to laugh them out of the room.

miraxxx · 18/06/2025 09:11

This is what is happening on this thread. The same whatabouttery by the same kind of actors who feign concern about victims.
https://x.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1935066071201161517?t=4Meg7c7MvtqrEN6ALwXoYw&s=19

https://x.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1935066071201161517?s=19&t=4Meg7c7MvtqrEN6ALwXoYw

EasternStandard · 18/06/2025 09:08

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 08:46

Well said. I think that particular poster is only comfortable denigrating majority UK+Irish white groups. But it's a deflection tactic we've accepted as the norm for the past couple of decades, so, I guess it's going to take time to unbrainwash some people and realise you can also speak uncomfortable truths about minority groups too - (and shock horror, most people have got the ability to not instantly hate all brown or black people because of it !)

It’s just more of the same tactics that got us here.

SquashedMallow · 18/06/2025 09:04

Sadly, I think the majority of us can see that views such as the particular poster up thread are the reason we're in this sorry mess as a society.

All under the guise of an "educated" viewpoint. Which is why it has gained traction. Sometimes you need to take away all the over analysis and tying yourself in knots to prove otherwise and simply 'say what you see' most often, the most obvious answer, is usually the correct one(in this case that there's a very strong link with Pakistani perpetrators in the UK ) I expect it'll blow that posters mind that I have Pakistani male colleagues in my profession that I manage to get on with very well indeed without discriminating against them or hating on them. Doesn't stop the truth of these gangs though does it ?

Swipe left for the next trending thread