Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Holiday offer revoked

581 replies

Singineletricdreams · 14/06/2025 10:52

I am in the midst of a divorce from DH, which on the most part is fairly civil.

Although we don’t have any children together, I have 2 children from my previous marriage, and every summer we would go to the US and visit DH’s family. DH’s extended family would be there and it’s a lovely relaxing time, and there are lots of cousins etc for my kids to socialise with. They own several holiday homes in the US, and we would have our own house for 3-4 weeks.

Last week, I received a short WhatsApp message from his sister telling me they’ll miss not having the kids visit. This came as a surprise as I was expecting to go. Although DH and I are seperating, I don’t see why his family would want to cut of contact . I phoned DH to explain that we still planned to visit but was politely told not to come.

AIBU to think this is shitty behaviour?

OP posts:
TheSquareMile · 15/06/2025 11:11

@Singineletricdreams

I think that it's an outcome which was always on the cards, to be honest.

Could you make arrangements to take the children to another part of the US yourself this year?

How old are they? I wonder whether they would like New York, if they have never been there before.

Treesandsheepeverywhere · 15/06/2025 10:59

OP, are you going to keep inviting and hosting any of his family who used to visit the family home?

Some men don't have much to do with their own biological kids after a divorce.

New wife & kids take priority.

Yes there are people who keep in touch with ex-step kids, but they're a minority.

It's hard enough keeping in touch with blood nephews and nieces, can't imagine having time to keep in touch with a sibling's ex wife's kids.

Breaking free properly gives space to grieve the relationship and to nurture a new one.
You need to explain and prepare the kids for when he has a new girlfriend, wife, or family.

Why would you want to go away with someone who dumped you, unless you did the dumping but expect to keep the benefits of the marriage?

daisychain01 · 15/06/2025 10:57

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 14/06/2025 20:59

This is such double standards. Mumsnet goes on and on about treating step children like biological children and yet directly the couple are no longer together the conversation always jumps to ‘why would you expect X or Y, they aren’t related to you’. Well which is it? Are these kids being treated like family or not?!!

This is definitely not double-standards and has nothing to do with the example you've given, you sound confused.

The OP did not have children with the STBXDH. The children in this story are hers, fathered by someone else. The children have no blood ties to either the ex nor his family. There are no shared children. The ex's family have no obligation to give the OP and her kids a freeby holiday.

It is where there is inequality of treatment, where there are biological children and step children and treatment of these two types of relationships is two-tiered and the step children begin to realise over time that they are second class citizens through no fault or choice their own. MNers quite rightly see that as an unacceptable way to treat children, and it could scar them for life.

the OPs kids are not going to be forever scarred by not going on a freeby holiday, the OP will have to sort that out in future. The OP would do well to point out to her offspring that, sadly because of the split, things like holidays will change but as their mother they are still loved and cared about.

daisychain01 · 15/06/2025 10:39

Please be prepared for your DC drifting from wanting to keep contact with your ex. Once they become adults, build their own social life, go to Uni, get jobs, get their drivers license, they will make their own adult choices, and the likelihood will be their lives will rapidly move on and he won't be relevant.

and when your ex meets someone else .... he has no obligation to keep in touch and he will move forward with his new life (quite rightly, we all have just one life, it isnt a rehearsal!)

DontReplyIWillLie · 15/06/2025 10:26

Lostcat · 15/06/2025 09:45

What? 😡

What are you angry about?

DontSpareTheTalons · 15/06/2025 10:04

Singineletricdreams · 14/06/2025 11:32

He is the only father figure they know and has been a key part of their lives for so long. It’s cruel to discard children like a used tissue. He is still involved and will see them on an ad hoc basis.

He is not discarding them. He is still in their lives. A divorce changes the dynamic and ends family ties. You were not close to his family (they live on the other side of the world) and they were very generous to you and the step-children, but it would be weird to continue this generosity now that you are no longer together. Would you still expect to share a house with him, even though you are divorced? Would you expect them to give you a house to use for just you and the kids?

It's like you think the fact that you have kids should give you a free pass to make use of one of their houses every year.

BadLad · 15/06/2025 09:58

Genevieva · 14/06/2025 12:00

I think you need to have a proper discussion about what their relationship with him will be going forward. Ad hoc is unsettling for children. Either he is their de facto father and they maintain proper contact or he isn’t and they cut ties. If he is, you should consider him adopting them and becoming formally their Dad. He would then take his kids to the US to see their adopted family.

The STBXH adopting them now, in the middle of divorcing their mother? You can’t be serious.

76evie · 15/06/2025 09:48

Singineletricdreams · 14/06/2025 11:32

He is the only father figure they know and has been a key part of their lives for so long. It’s cruel to discard children like a used tissue. He is still involved and will see them on an ad hoc basis.

Still see them on a ad hoc basis…….

ok start preparing your kids (& yourself) things not going to happen. He won’t stay involved and won’t see them on a ad hoc basis. Prepare, this will save you from the shock when it happens.

Re the holiday, I think you were unreasonable to expect this to continue. Maybe try to look at it as it was lovely they were so fully included in the past instead. You see so many threads on here where the step kids aren’t treated as family whilst the parent is still married to the step parent, so it’s good that you didn’t have this experience whilst married….count your blessings.

daisychain01 · 15/06/2025 09:45

Although DH and I are seperating, I don’t see why his family would want to cut of contact . I phoned DH to explain that we still planned to visit but was politely told not to come.

You're getting a divorce.

you need to back off contact with his family, you won't get freeby holidays anymore. Thats how it works when you get a divorce.

wanting something for free is being a grifter.

Lostcat · 15/06/2025 09:45

Orderofthephoenixparody · 15/06/2025 01:40

They are not his children and if he did bring them his family would have to have some words with him.

What? 😡

Figgygal · 15/06/2025 09:43

I'm just surprised you're surprised op
Sorry

Caroparo52 · 15/06/2025 09:42

This is what happens when you split up. Why would they offer you this free holiday? It will be difficult all round. Dxh can still take advantage of their hospitality. You are out in the cold.

neverbeenskiing · 15/06/2025 09:32

Lostcat · 14/06/2025 19:48

How could you think that is irrelevant?? If they were married a couple of years and the kids were teenagers, obviously the behaviour is totally reasonable. If they’ve been married a decade since the kids were babies/ toddlers then it’s awful for the wider family to cast the kids aside because the parents are divorcing

The wider family have not "cast the kids aside" at all. A member of their family married a woman with children, and now he's divorcing her. That's not their fault is it?

What exactly do you want his family to do? Tell him that they will be inviting his ex-wife into their home every year when he visits whether he likes it or not, because they're all fond of her children? Its very sad, but this is one of the risks with blending families unfortunately.

neverbeenskiing · 15/06/2025 09:23

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 14/06/2025 20:59

This is such double standards. Mumsnet goes on and on about treating step children like biological children and yet directly the couple are no longer together the conversation always jumps to ‘why would you expect X or Y, they aren’t related to you’. Well which is it? Are these kids being treated like family or not?!!

But OP wasnt just expecting the kids to be included in the Ex DH's family holidays was she? She was also expecting to go herself. I think that's what people are reacting to.

I think that if OP had posted saying "I'm feeling upset that he's been like a father figure to my DC but now that were getting divorced he doesn't want to take them to visit his family anymore" she would have gotten different responses. People would, rightly, have pointed out that he has no obligation to keep taking her DC on holiday. But I think they would have understood why she felt sad for her DC that these yearly trips were coming to an end. OP assuming that she would still be welcome to tag along with her Ex DH on his family holiday is what people are struggling with I think.

neverbeenskiing · 15/06/2025 09:10

Steelworks · 14/06/2025 18:07

@neverbeenskiing

You were asking why the length of marriage was important. The reason is to establish what sort of relationship the Dh (and extended family) had with the children.

If he was involved from a very young age, then he has effectively been the children’s default father all their life, and to go from that to ‘ad hoc’ is a little unfair on the children. Also, if the children have been going to America for several years, then they would have developed a relationship with the extended family.

I do know of (ex) stepmums who have continued relationships with their (ex) stepchildren which I think is lovely.

But, as I said, none of that would mean OP was reasonably entitled to assume that her ex DH would carry on taking her on holiday to visit his family post-divorce.

In an ideal world, it would be lovely if he wanted to keep taking her DC to visit his family. But OP's automatic assumption that they would all continue to holiday together as a family of 4, and that she would be welcome to stay with his family is not logical, regardless of the length of the marraige or his role in her children's lives.

forensicdetective · 15/06/2025 09:02

Absolutely bizarre to assume you and the children were still going. It was decent of your soon to be exDH's sister to let you know, to save you any potential embarrassment or wasted money and plans.

DontReplyIWillLie · 15/06/2025 09:01

Maybe it was presumptuous of op to presume the usual holiday arrangement would continue, but no one had told her any different, and in fact, the sil actually messaged to say she’d miss seeing them this year. (Fortunately she did, otherwise op would have been none the wiser).

Maybe nobody thought the OP needed to be told any different. Maybe everyone thought it was obvious that, if you are getting a divorce, you no longer go on holiday with your husband’s family (and seemingly at their expense). Look at the vast majority of responses on this thread.

This is why OP needs a proper conversation about what this “ad hoc” ongoing relationship really means. To OP, it seems to mean nothing changing other than the fact that she is no longer married. It clearly means something different to her soon to be ex-husband and, for the sake of her children, she should get clarity on this.

SIL probably messaged out of kindness, assuming the OP and her kids might be feeling a bit upset when the holiday time was coming up. And I’m sure her kids genuinely did enjoy having others their own age around. But that’s not to say she or any of the other in-laws are thinking OP should be there this summer. She’s not the only one going through a divorce - her husband’s family are going to want to support him. That’s before you even consider that this is supposed to be a holiday for everyone in the family. Who wants to spend their holiday walking on eggshells around a divorcing couple?

zapzapp · 15/06/2025 08:59

I think OP understands now after being told hundreds of times.

GAJLY · 15/06/2025 08:55

If the kids were your husband's then it would be expected to still go. However your kids aren't his, so why would they want to see you all? They only invited you in the past, because you were with their relative. In this situation I would not have expected to go.

Ineffable23 · 15/06/2025 08:55

I can see that must feel hard OP. We had a similar thing where my uncles got divorced from aunties who had been around since my parents were teenagers and well before I was born and they then disappeared out our lives. It was really upsetting and definitely not what we would have chosen our side. I have managed to get back in touch with one now that her divorce has settled and in the past.

I don't have an answer and I think it probably is unreasonable to expect to continue to go and have a free holiday every summer, but maybe wording it along the lines of "we view you as family and would love to come and see you periodically" and not expecting to stay for free, might be the answer?

tuffinmops · 15/06/2025 08:53

Singineletricdreams · 14/06/2025 10:52

I am in the midst of a divorce from DH, which on the most part is fairly civil.

Although we don’t have any children together, I have 2 children from my previous marriage, and every summer we would go to the US and visit DH’s family. DH’s extended family would be there and it’s a lovely relaxing time, and there are lots of cousins etc for my kids to socialise with. They own several holiday homes in the US, and we would have our own house for 3-4 weeks.

Last week, I received a short WhatsApp message from his sister telling me they’ll miss not having the kids visit. This came as a surprise as I was expecting to go. Although DH and I are seperating, I don’t see why his family would want to cut of contact . I phoned DH to explain that we still planned to visit but was politely told not to come.

AIBU to think this is shitty behaviour?

Of course it’s been revoked! How bonkers to expect otherwise! They’re his family, not yours…

pestowithwalnuts · 15/06/2025 08:50

Divorce changes things.. You can't still play happy families and think that everything will carry on as normal
You're a cf op.

Ellie1015 · 15/06/2025 08:47

It is not appropriate for you and ex to be going on holiday with his family so it has come to a natural end rather than being revoked. If he was biological dad she may be invited with him for part of it if it wasnt too long for her or you. As only ad hoc it feels like that wouldn't work.

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 15/06/2025 08:45

Tiedbutchorestodo · 15/06/2025 07:44

I have only read a couple of pages but I’m a little surprised at the reactions.

I think it’s very dependent on ages of children and length of marriage. I wouldn’t expect to still be going as the ex wife but in my case my DH has basically been my DDs dad since she was 3 and she’s now a mid teen. He’s always treated her and says he loves her the same as our child together, I’d be incredibly disappointed and she’d be incredibly upset if she was suddenly not treated as his dd just because we were getting divorced.

So if it’s a similar length of “parenting” relationship I can see why OP would think he’s being unreasonable.

I see where you're coming from, but very few step-parents are going to stay in the life of a child they're not biologically related to, or legally responsible for. It's a very, very big ask.

Goingawayistricky · 15/06/2025 08:31

There are always so many threads where a mother has one or more children from a previous relationship, meets a new man and has a child/children with them, and then is heartbroken that his family don't see all the children as being members of the family in exactly the same way as each other.

Having a child together as well as previous children makes a difference though. The ex would be expected to remain in contact ,the children would be step sibling.

The Op has no children with her ex DH.