Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Still in nappies at school

329 replies

ivehearditallthistime · 11/06/2025 16:20

As the title says some children at 4-5 and 6 years old are going to school in nappies and are still not potty toilet trained.
I understand that some will and still have accidents at night and during the day.

But to have a child at that age still in nappies is just laziness.
It is not a teachers job to change nappies is it.
Ive just got back from my sisters whos son has a 4&5 year old still in nappies the school said he or the mum will have to come in school to change them as the teachers will not.

They now think this is all wrong and it is the teachers job.
And are removing both kids from school one does half day and going to home school.
I said no its your job stop being so f=ing lazy if home schooling is anything like your potty training good luck.

My eldest sister a teacher agrees with it and said this is happing more and more now.
A mum in her school has taken her child out of school because teachers will not change her childs nappy hes almost 6.
Said mum had a rant at the school because the school reported it to SS.

Dose anyone agree this is just lazy parenting now.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Kirbert2 · 17/06/2025 06:16

Valeriekat · 16/06/2025 19:14

It still isn’t the teachers responsibility.

That's exactly what pp said.

Valeriekat · 16/06/2025 19:14

Candyflosscrochet · 11/06/2025 16:49

My son is 4 next week, at preschool now and starting reception in September.
He is still in nappies, still having regular accidents, will only use the toilet a few times a day when physically taken to the loo but has not got the hang of it independently.
I used to be of the thought that it was lazy parenting or SEN, but I can assure you, I have tried everything over the past 18months to potty train him. He doesn't have SEN, is a bright child, just is choosing not to train.
I've had him in pants several times for several weeks each time, but the amount of washing generated and the time spent by his preschool teachers cleaning him up became unreasonable.
We've done sticker charts, rewards, and explanations. Nothing is working. Even had him cleaning it up.
He's been checked by the gp, diet is good, and now have a visit with the toilet training health visitor next week, both of which I have reached out for.
He is my 4th child, the first 2 were trained by 2.5yrs and the 3rd by 4yrs (but he had recurrent UTIs that caused issues).
I agree it isn't a teachers job to change nappies, and I am hopeful still we might crack it before September, and i do agree there is a cohert that perhaps do have lazy parenting or SEN. But don't assume or cast judgement. You don't know the details or ins and outs. I am certainly not lazy. And I am working with the school because of my concerns and pressures it puts on the the staff.

It still isn’t the teachers responsibility.

ExtraordinaryMachine1 · 16/06/2025 11:04

Definitely agree with others that the shift from cloth nappies to disposables has made a massive difference in potty training age. As @menopausalmare says, cloth nappies are a hassle and so potty training becomes about parental readiness as much as children's! But I wonder if another factor is about parents having to literally get their hands dirty. When you're used to picking up cloth nappies and putting them in the washing machine, or sloshing off poo-y nappies in the loo, cleaning up after accidents whilst potty training is no biggie. Cleaning wee off the floor is less effort than changing and washing a cloth nappy. So while we did used to potty train younger, standards have probably changed too. Cloth nappy users in ye olden days - we didn't expect there not to be mess, mess was part of the deal. My three were all in cloth nappies (teens and young adults now, so I was seen as terribly old fashioned using terry squares in the early 2000s), and all potty trained daytime by age 3 with one with some SEN. Night-time is completely different, one took until age 10 to crack that and I was very glad of the disposable nappies then.

But then, cloth nappies are a pain when both parents are working. It was easy for me because I didn't have a job then, and I didn't plan ahead and now I don't have a career. Tricky, I don't think there is a good answer.

PansyPotter84 · 16/06/2025 09:13

“Waking up cold, wet and smelly every morning, and being shamed for wetting my pants every day in Reception made
me the man I am today!”

Mr. [insert name here]

PansyPotter84 · 16/06/2025 09:08

I do wonder if those who feel so strongly against nappies for older children are those who were denied them but clearly needed them a bit later than most?

I remember loads of kids having frequent accidents at school and had a few friends who wet the bed (no DryNites then- they presumably just had to launder the sheets daily and had smelly bedrooms).

Just like those who defend the right to smack are often those who say “it didn’t do me any harm!” when it clearly did…

Inyournewdress · 15/06/2025 18:55

It’s absolutely no good at all saying ‘oh but of course we don’t mean children with medical issues or similar’. People won’t always know which is which and you can’t create a hostile environment to one group without risking affecting the other. It is like trying to create a hostile environment for fraudulent benefits claimants or for immigrants and then saying ‘oh but of course not the genuine cases’. The general public often can’t identify the genuine cases, so if you create a certain public attitude it is going to make things harder for everyone.

golemmings · 13/06/2025 21:02

x2boys · 11/06/2025 19:30

And he didn't think to ask a female member of staff to help,

Doing that would have left another class with no adult. When the TA has the class it's an indication that there aren't many spare adults around. And personal care generally takes 2 staff for safeguarding .I suppose the business manager could have helped the y5/6 teacher . But she is almost 5 with no sen. There is no reason she can't wipe her bum other than lack of experience, practice and support at home.

x2boys · 12/06/2025 22:14

lizzyBennet08 · 12/06/2025 18:54

My oldest was 3 and 2 months when he trained as a) I was waiting for him to be ready ( never happened) and b for the summer months to let him run around in just pants .
I do remember though that I used to be gagging changing his nappies at that stage I just don’t think I have it in me to change older children soiled nappies as a teacher , it was hard enough to change my own child’s!

That's my point changing an older child can be an unpleasant experience, I did it for years with my Disabled child ,so how can some posters think this is preferable to toilet training a child assuming they are typical and the parents are being lazy?

lizzyBennet08 · 12/06/2025 18:54

My oldest was 3 and 2 months when he trained as a) I was waiting for him to be ready ( never happened) and b for the summer months to let him run around in just pants .
I do remember though that I used to be gagging changing his nappies at that stage I just don’t think I have it in me to change older children soiled nappies as a teacher , it was hard enough to change my own child’s!

FlossTea · 12/06/2025 16:39

atriskacademic · 11/06/2025 23:07

I am getting really angry at these threads. My son is suffering from encopresis - chronic constipation causing soiling, in our case also urinary incontinence. It is about the shittiest (excuse the pun) chronic childhood condition out there. It has no lobby - have you ever read about it, seen a documentary about it on TV? Probably not, but childhood diabetes / every conceivable childhood cancer / childhood whatever are covered. Not saying that these conditions don't deserve coverage, but nobody touches encopresis because of its mucky connotations.

And yes, we have tried everything - the medical route, complimentary therapies. At the moment, we are in a good place - accidents are becoming rarer and smaller, but not fully sorted. And yes, in infant school my son needed a lot of help - it is not what I wanted for him, but we were lucky to have had a school which understood this is a MEDICAL condition, in the same way Betty from his class (not her actual name) had type 1 diabetes and needed an insulin pump. Would you want to deny my son an education because of his condition?

Rant over.

For full disclosure: My first son was toilet trained at 3. No problems whatsoever. I tried everything with my No2 and now reward system, no consistency, no whatever helped because his body can't control his body functions - in the same way a Type 1 diabetic child can't produce insulin

Rant properly over now.

I'm totally with you. We've been going through it with my son for years, it's completely soul destroying and managing it is so far from "lazy parenting" it's unreal. My son also has both urinary and faecal incontinence, I've been thinking about setting up a parent peer support group as the stigma around it (as seen on threads like this) means people don't often talk about it, and trying to cope with it all alone was really detrimental to my mental health in my son's first year of school. Sending solidarity, people who haven't been through it have absolutely no idea.

x2boys · 12/06/2025 15:19

Kirbert2 · 12/06/2025 15:05

It is part of their job. 2 of the TA's are only there because of my son's needs, including his physical care.

No child should have to sit in their own mess waiting for their parent to come and change them. Diagnosed needs or not.

Agreed even if the parents are lazy and neglectful ,how does neglecting a child's needs at school help ?

Kirbert2 · 12/06/2025 15:05

JudgeJ · 12/06/2025 14:44

The TA is being taken away from their proper job to deal with nappies. If a child has no established special needs, not just Mummy's opinion, then the parent should be available all day to deal with their child.

It is part of their job. 2 of the TA's are only there because of my son's needs, including his physical care.

No child should have to sit in their own mess waiting for their parent to come and change them. Diagnosed needs or not.

funinthesun19 · 12/06/2025 14:55

JudgeJ · 12/06/2025 14:44

The TA is being taken away from their proper job to deal with nappies. If a child has no established special needs, not just Mummy's opinion, then the parent should be available all day to deal with their child.

What if they haven’t had a diagnosis yet though? It can take years. Luckily my DS was diagnosed very early because our health visitor was so on the ball. Sometimes all children have for a long time is their their primary carer’s view on things based on the reality of their lives. Their primary carer is sometimes the only one advocating for them for a while before the professionals get involved so why shouldn’t they be listened to? You have a massive chip on your shoulder.

Inyournewdress · 12/06/2025 14:47

My DD is due to start primary this year and while she is fully trained, it was a long struggle and I dread a regression. I am sure there are parents whose approach is all wrong, but I would just beg anyone not to jump to conclusions because there will be some individuals who have been working day and night for over a year to train with no success. They are already at the end of their tether, please don’t label them with the others!

JudgeJ · 12/06/2025 14:44

Kirbert2 · 12/06/2025 11:54

At my son's school it is never the school teacher who changes him, it is always his TA's.

The TA is being taken away from their proper job to deal with nappies. If a child has no established special needs, not just Mummy's opinion, then the parent should be available all day to deal with their child.

x2boys · 12/06/2025 14:41

Again for all the posters insisting it's lazy parenting ,can anyone explain why it's preferable to keep a child in nappies and have to clean them up etc rather than just toilet training them ?
And I'm not buying thst a typical 5/6 year old is happy to stay in nappies ,other kids can be cruel either intentionally or not
Ew," Bob" smells of poo etc .

WearyAuldWumman · 12/06/2025 12:48

My experience is secondary, but I was on primary liaison in the '90s and recall primary colleagues then speaking of this problem increasing.

In addition, pupils were coming into reception unable to sit at a table and use cutlery - they'd start screaming because they wanted to use their fingers to pick up food.

I remember my husband being appalled when he saw this with his own granddaughter. Her parents then sent her to an independent school where, according to them, she was taught "lovely manners". It didn't go down well when DH asked "Is that not your job?"

The granddaughter is now a graduate in her mid-twenties.

C8H10N4O2 · 12/06/2025 12:41

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 11/06/2025 19:57

It also meant no in person health visitor appointments, so missed milestone delays, it meant no baby and toddler groups so no peer support, it meant to access to older relatives so it meant no village or community sources of information, advice or tips.

It meant parents juggling work and entertaining children in less than ideal living circumstances when people were in a state of survival, for many it meant repetitive bouts of a new illness that took months to recover from each time.

I don't think lockdown is the sole issue but I do think it is a contributing factor.

It was four years ago that lockdown ended and communication with peers and family was possible throughout in a way that previous generations could only dream of. In person meeting was restricted heavily but not throughout the whole year of covid.

Generations of parents have potty trained their children, taught them to brush their teeth and dress themselves and use cutlery without HV visits to tell them how to do it.

I’d also cite the primary teachers describing this trend as starting before Covid and being too common to be explained by eg moderate SEN.

Dramatic · 12/06/2025 12:37

atriskacademic · 12/06/2025 09:26

The tripple whammy of encopresis is that 1) it has no lobby so not known, 2) it is associated with mucky stuff (poo) 3) it is a chronic but not deadly condition. If you treat diabetes incorrectly, child might die. If you don't treat cancer, child likely to die. If you don't treat encopresis or take the perspective of much of the health system that it doesn't matter enough, your child won't die. It will just get miserable and drag their parents into a mental health decline. And get judgment piled on you by other parents, teachers and so on. Because they don't understand.

I don't wish this condition on anyone. We are in a good (well, better) place now, but for a long term my happiness was determine by whether my son did a big poo in the morning (normally meant a day with little soiling) or not.

It's very strange that you keep comparing your child's condition to cancer and diabetes, my daughter has a health condition and I've never felt the need to compare it to things like cancer.

funinthesun19 · 12/06/2025 12:22

JudgeJ · 12/06/2025 11:40

So society has to pick up even more of the parental responsibilities, 'developmentally delayed' is a cop out. Why did it used to be possible for the majority of 3 year olds to be out of nappies yet now all the jargon has been invented to excuse idle parents.

Three of my four children were toilet trained by the time they were 2 and 3 and before they started nursery.

It was just one of my children, my second born, who struggled. He was developmentally delayed and he wasn’t out of pull ups by the time he started nursery. It wasn’t a cop out at all. He was out of pull ups by the time he started Reception. Not that it would have been a bad thing if he wasn’t! He is 12 now and has learning difficulties. Is that a cop out too? Am I not doing enough for him?

TiswasPhantomFlanFlinger · 12/06/2025 12:20

justkeepswimingswiming · 11/06/2025 17:31

My son was in nappies in reception. He has a learning disability. Am I lazy?

Of course you’re not lazy.
So many PPs are saying that it can’t be expected for all SEN children to be toilet trained by the time they start school. Some may be but many won’t.

Kirbert2 · 12/06/2025 11:54

JudgeJ · 12/06/2025 11:44

So that's two people having to take themselves away from their real job to deal with the failure of lazy parents. If a child is in nappies at school then the parents should be doing the changing, no-one else, it might be the kick in the rear they need to do their job as a parent.

At my son's school it is never the school teacher who changes him, it is always his TA's.

JudgeJ · 12/06/2025 11:44

Annoyeddd · 11/06/2025 23:57

Yes it is the class teacher who will sometimes have to change nappies plus another adult has to be there to ensure there is nothing untoward happening. And sometimes it could be the headteacher doing it or more likely being the helper/chaperone.
And from what I have been told these are not SEN or ND children.

So that's two people having to take themselves away from their real job to deal with the failure of lazy parents. If a child is in nappies at school then the parents should be doing the changing, no-one else, it might be the kick in the rear they need to do their job as a parent.

JudgeJ · 12/06/2025 11:40

x2boys · 12/06/2025 10:49

It's Discrimination becsuse ifca child is in nappies at school age thsn they are developmentally delayed regardless of the reason for this.

So society has to pick up even more of the parental responsibilities, 'developmentally delayed' is a cop out. Why did it used to be possible for the majority of 3 year olds to be out of nappies yet now all the jargon has been invented to excuse idle parents.

x2boys · 12/06/2025 11:27

tralalal · 12/06/2025 11:20

there Is no reason why virtually all 3 year olds shouldn’t be trained. Some kids with SEN may not be trained but many other parents of kids with SEN will just use it as an excuse and not bother. I’ve 3 children and even at nursery at 3 only about 1 or 2 kids out of 60 were in nappies

And you would know this how?
BTW ,Sen covers a very broad spectrum.

Swipe left for the next trending thread