Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dog lovers aren’t animal lovers

387 replies

Namechanger1993 · 11/06/2025 08:31

I’ve been lurking in various dog related threads recently and it’s become abundantly clear how few dog owners on MN actually love animals. Not all. But lots.

Posters not caring about health tests on parents, or the breeders experience or ability or what happens to the bitch (mother of the pups) after as their desire for expensive mix outweighs their ethics about puppy farming or dogs being born in pain with chronic health issues as a result of bad breeding. Posters admitting their dogs have soiled themselves for a year before they put their dog to sleep. No matter which way you look at it (and believe me, I understand how hard it is to say goodbye), people who love their dogs don’t let them sleep in their shit for a year. Posters not exercising their dog sufficiently or not giving it mental stimulation and then wondering why its badly behaved.

Time and time again I’ve seen posters put their desire for a dog above any morals they might have about animal welfare (including their own dogs). welfare. Honestly, it’s quite shocking how little so many posters care about their dogs, or indeed the dogs use to produce their cute puppy.

OP posts:
tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 23:02

hididdlyho · 11/06/2025 22:57

Dogs and cats cause significantly less harm to the ecosystem and planet than humans! I would never have kids and would never breed animals for pets or money, but don't see an issue with looking after an animal someone has dumped in a shelter and giving it the best life I can. If everyone stopped taking animals from shelters tomorrow, all that would happen is those animals would die.

If we dissect every environmentally damaging/selfish thing a human does in their daily life, there wouldn't be anything 'fun' left. Also who gets to be the final moral arbiter of what is acceptable and what isn't? If someone eats meat and has a pet dog, but doesn't have children and never travels abroad, is that worse for the environment than a vegan with a couple of kids who goes on holiday every year? How do people quantify these things in their mind to get worked up over people making different life choices to them? Are vets allowed to eat meat or does that go against the work they do to help animals?

The impact of our existence is so insignificant in the grand scheme of time and space that arguing that over whether someone didn't do life as well as you because they ate meat or had a pet dog is a bit silly really.

Very well said.

Having children is one of the worst things we can do environmentally yet we have posters here with multiple kids berating anyone who owns a dog 🙈

hididdlyho · 11/06/2025 22:57

Dogs and cats cause significantly less harm to the ecosystem and planet than humans! I would never have kids and would never breed animals for pets or money, but don't see an issue with looking after an animal someone has dumped in a shelter and giving it the best life I can. If everyone stopped taking animals from shelters tomorrow, all that would happen is those animals would die.

If we dissect every environmentally damaging/selfish thing a human does in their daily life, there wouldn't be anything 'fun' left. Also who gets to be the final moral arbiter of what is acceptable and what isn't? If someone eats meat and has a pet dog, but doesn't have children and never travels abroad, is that worse for the environment than a vegan with a couple of kids who goes on holiday every year? How do people quantify these things in their mind to get worked up over people making different life choices to them? Are vets allowed to eat meat or does that go against the work they do to help animals?

The impact of our existence is so insignificant in the grand scheme of time and space that arguing that over whether someone didn't do life as well as you because they ate meat or had a pet dog is a bit silly really.

EdithStourton · 11/06/2025 22:57

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 21:12

This is really interesting.
Please correct me if I am wrong, I don’t know too much about the KC but when I was googling my pup’s ancestors from his KC certificate, many of them are working labs and several had ‘FT CH’ before their name (which I had to google) so am I right in thinking the KC also has field trials for working dogs too?

Yes, they do. But you can only run a KC registered pedigree dog in a KC trial - there is no crossbreed registry for that.

If a dog becomes a FTCh and also a ShCh, it's what's called a dual champion. Very few of those crop up these days, and never in the spaniels and retrievers as the field lines do not win in the show ring.

CoubousAndTourmalet · 11/06/2025 21:37

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 21:33

You know what I meant. Dogs as they are now. The weird over-bred inbred manipulated for specific traits dogs.

I don't really think you know anything about dogs at all.

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 21:33

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 20:52

Humans created dogs 😂😂😂😂😂

You know what I meant. Dogs as they are now. The weird over-bred inbred manipulated for specific traits dogs.

vodkaredbullgirl · 11/06/2025 21:26

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 19:23

The farmed animals we have today are not a natural species. They have been interfered with to the Nth degree so they plump up fast, and die young. I am sure they'd rather not be bred only to be slaughtered. They'd have no consciousness about preserving their family lineage, would they. So what's the big deal if the cows and sheep who are bred to be slaughtered die out as a species? I'd happily save some safe areas for cows and sheep and pigs to have freedom, sure.

We can indeed all be vegan in this country, if we wanted to. Stop being so defeatist. We can build walled greenhouses and gardens, it's totally possible. We can encourage those with gardens and allotments to grow more vegetables, we can create community gardens to grow vegetables, this is happening in certain areas, and can be expanded upon.

I have been vegan for a very long time, and the change in the last 25 years has been amazing. I have no doubt it will continue along this trajectory, just wish some people weren't so stubborn about the change.

That figures, should have know you were a vegan.

fiveIsNewOne · 11/06/2025 21:19

Many dog owners don't like animals in general. They just like their dog as a part of themselves.

How many of them let them chase or scare wildlife, annoy other dogs or cats, all those interactions when their dog them is the only animal which matters.

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 21:12

EdithStourton · 11/06/2025 19:46

To drag this thread away from the vegans...

I have mixed feelings about the Kennel Club (and Crufts).

When you judge a dog in the show ring, aside from it being temperamentally stable enough to cope being in the ring, not bite the judge etc, you're not seeing anything about its mind. You're not seeing its working ability. You're not seeing how drivey it is, how good it is at working the wind, or working stock, whether it really would bring down a wolf, whether it's hardy enough to handle the weather that would be thrown at it, whether its coat would shrug off the rain, whether its conformation is robust enough to do a day's work. Nothing about trainable it is.

I don't know when there was last a dual champion cocker or Labrador: springer, cocker and labs have split into very different show and working types. I own a hunt-point-retrieve breed, and I know several dogs who both work and do well in shows, but even in those breeds a split is developing - some lines are losing their working ability, because if you don't breed for the working traits you will slowly lose them, and if you select against them (because a less driven dog is much easier to keep and handle) you will lose them even faster.

So, to that extent, the KC and Crufts destroy working breeds. And they also encourage - via what is rewarded in the show ring - the deformity of some breeds: the too-long dachshunds prone to back issues, the saggy-eyed bloodhounds that wouldn't last 5 minutes in the field, the brachy dogs that can barely breathe.

On the other hand, the KC maintains a registry, so you can know, if you're looking to breed a litter, that this stud dog is too closely related for comfort and that stud dog is far enough away. You can look at generations of health test results. All of that is valuable.

I'd love the registry system with the health test information without a show ring rewarding only looks.

This is really interesting.
Please correct me if I am wrong, I don’t know too much about the KC but when I was googling my pup’s ancestors from his KC certificate, many of them are working labs and several had ‘FT CH’ before their name (which I had to google) so am I right in thinking the KC also has field trials for working dogs too?

Twiglets1 · 11/06/2025 20:57

Stellaris22 · 11/06/2025 08:43

I agree. I was in the vets the other day and there was a French Bulldog, it’s inability to breathe was distressing to hear.

I have a colleague who recently bought a cockapoo and talks about it constantly. Real dog lovers wouldn’t go anywhere near these breeds.

I always feel sorry for indoor cats as well, what a dull life they have.

I always feel sorry for indoor cats too.

At the very least people shouldn’t get a cat unless they are willing to pay for a Catio or other outside enclosure if they feel their road is too busy to be safe (but also, don’t get a cat if you live on a busy road).

WhereIsMyJumper · 11/06/2025 20:52

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 19:00

I don't think we should breed any animals. I think we should let nature take care of itself. Dogs are an unnatural species, created by humans, and I believe we should absolutely stop breeding them. Technology is here and will take over for the drug-sniffers, the seeing-eye dogs etc. For the dogs that re already here, I don't see the difference in feeding them to obligate carnivores like lions, who are going to be eating other poor animals like goats and sheep - why not dogs?! Food for thought, eh!

Humans created dogs 😂😂😂😂😂

redboxer321 · 11/06/2025 20:51

I think animal lover is the wrong term. Animal respecter might be better.

ChiliFiend · 11/06/2025 20:50

Of course dog lovers aren't animal lovers. The vast majority of them eat them. Call yourself a dog lover or a cat lover, but you're not an animal lover if you eat them...

redboxer321 · 11/06/2025 20:47

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 20:31

I hear ya!

However ...

I still maintain that taking a dog from a no kill shelter just perpetuates dog ownership and the cycle of death at slaughterhouses. If people stopped taking them on (I despise the term adopted), they would have to rethink their model. I do think taking on dogs from shelters is merely prolonging the inevitable. I am sure you are attached to the dog you have, which colours your view. But from my perspective, your dog is no more deserving of life than the x number of farmed animals killed to keep it alive.

And not aimed at you in particular, but all dog owners. Dog ownership (and pets, really) are detrimental to the ecosystem. They are against the natural order of things. They are bad for the planet. We talk about being ecologically responsible in this thread, people talk about being agains aviation and importation, but dogs and cats cause a LOT of harm. People need to think beyond the ball of fluffy snuggles in front of them, and really think outside the mainstream narrative.

Anyway. Back to the main OP! If people must have dogs I do at least wish they'd stop proclaiming to be animal lovers.

Sadly, I can't disagree with much of that. Wish I could but I can't. And you're right, my dog is by far them most important relationship in my life. I took her on to help her but for my benefit too. Hmm, more thinking required!

I was thinking about her diet too and domesticated dogs' diets in general. One poster upthread I think said that 6million animals are slaughtered in the UK in order to feed pets (I might not have remembered that right). I'm uncomfortable with that but I also don't know if it's accurate and I'm not sure there is a way to find out with any certainty. What I would say though is that some dogs actually eat very little meat. Take a can of Pedigree Chum. It's a shit food but it sells so dogs are being fed it but it contains (difficult to work out to be honest) about 10% Meat and Animal Derivatives. Much of it is cereal but that comes at a cost to living creatures too. Harvey Weinstein has just come on TV - perhaps I could feed her him!

Edited to say: I don't have kids so I am doing well for the planet there!

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 20:38

I do think that 'in the grand scheme of things' this chat forum DOES matter

Well, I'll have to disagree with that. It may change the mind of a few people, but humans are selfish, always have been, always will be. Even if we all become vegan, we will still be selfish as a species. That's how we've progressed - it's our survival instincts.

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 20:36

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 20:28

It's true though. We're all sat here on devices, most likely made by slave labour in some factory somewhere, powered by batteries that destroy the planet, debating on an online forum about something that, really, in the grand scheme of things, doesn't matter in the slightest.

Most people will also have children, drive cars and do multiple things a day that are purely for their own benefit or enjoyment. There is not a single person on this planet who isn't selfish, with the exception of very small children.

Edited

These are good points well made. Fair enough. I do have children (only two). I do obviously have a phone, because we simply can't manage in this country without one. Mine is four years old, and I only replace them when they are on their last legs. My laptop is pre-loved (not especially an eco choice, but a financial one, but still, I do try to use pre-loved where possible). I also have a car but will give it up the second I possibly can, because I am sick of driving (think it's a menopause thing!) and the cost is pissing me off. Literally can't get my children where they need to go in time without it though. But yes - point taken.

I do think that 'in the grand scheme of things' this chat forum DOES matter though, and changes are made. People have changed my mind on some things due to this forum. And I remember posting about veganism on here over 15 years ago when I was pregnant with my first child, and was universally shut down. Now we have a whole vegan section - its own board, no less! So change does happen, and discussions do help. I wouldn't waste my time otherwise.

CoubousAndTourmalet · 11/06/2025 20:31

MuskIsACnt · 11/06/2025 20:23

I’m not vegan…mostly I just think dog ownership is dumb and selfish. And I’m capable of using Google to understand facts

Edited

Why is it "dumb"?
I get that you consider it selfish, and I do agree that many dog owners are selfish. They don't consider that their dog would rather be running around the fields, being a dog, than trailing around a shopping centre or sitting in a coffee shop.
But why dumb exactly?

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 20:31

redboxer321 · 11/06/2025 20:10

Yes, I read about Bramble. It's very interesting. Still not convinced but maybe I'll try with the next dog. Don't know.

Re But it also may as well not be anyone...

If you adopt from a no-kill shelter, there is someone feeding them. I figure it may as well be me.

I think although not totally, we largely agree, and that's a refreshing change for me on MN 😀

I hear ya!

However ...

I still maintain that taking a dog from a no kill shelter just perpetuates dog ownership and the cycle of death at slaughterhouses. If people stopped taking them on (I despise the term adopted), they would have to rethink their model. I do think taking on dogs from shelters is merely prolonging the inevitable. I am sure you are attached to the dog you have, which colours your view. But from my perspective, your dog is no more deserving of life than the x number of farmed animals killed to keep it alive.

And not aimed at you in particular, but all dog owners. Dog ownership (and pets, really) are detrimental to the ecosystem. They are against the natural order of things. They are bad for the planet. We talk about being ecologically responsible in this thread, people talk about being agains aviation and importation, but dogs and cats cause a LOT of harm. People need to think beyond the ball of fluffy snuggles in front of them, and really think outside the mainstream narrative.

Anyway. Back to the main OP! If people must have dogs I do at least wish they'd stop proclaiming to be animal lovers.

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 20:28

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 20:26

What a sad position to take.

It's true though. We're all sat here on devices, most likely made by slave labour in some factory somewhere, powered by batteries that destroy the planet, debating on an online forum about something that, really, in the grand scheme of things, doesn't matter in the slightest.

Most people will also have children, drive cars and do multiple things a day that are purely for their own benefit or enjoyment. There is not a single person on this planet who isn't selfish, with the exception of very small children.

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 20:26

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 20:24

All humans are selfish.

What a sad position to take.

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 20:24

MuskIsACnt · 11/06/2025 20:23

I’m not vegan…mostly I just think dog ownership is dumb and selfish. And I’m capable of using Google to understand facts

Edited

All humans are selfish.

MuskIsACnt · 11/06/2025 20:23

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 19:59

FWIW, it's attitudes like this that give vegans a bad reputation. I'm sure you don't care, but I thought I'd put it out there.

I’m not vegan…mostly I just think dog ownership is dumb and selfish. And I’m capable of using Google to understand facts

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 20:20

henlake7 · 11/06/2025 20:14

True. I'm sure my lot don't look great on walks. I'm usually dragging the 17 yr old (who has walked that slow since she was a puppy and makes me pull her up hills!).
Then the 16 yr old is blind and has dementia so walks into things, stumbles, etc.
I'm sure they look rough to other people but they are both happy girls.

Also all my dogs were fed vegan food (like me!) for about 8 yrs, they were perfectly happy and healthy. I only recently went back to meat as their appetites had reduced and they needed more incentive.

I have a friend whose dogs are similar - they look doddery and confused on walks but they're healthy, regularly see the vet and are absolutely fine - just old.

henlake7 · 11/06/2025 20:14

True. I'm sure my lot don't look great on walks. I'm usually dragging the 17 yr old (who has walked that slow since she was a puppy and makes me pull her up hills!).
Then the 16 yr old is blind and has dementia so walks into things, stumbles, etc.
I'm sure they look rough to other people but they are both happy girls.

Also all my dogs were fed vegan food (like me!) for about 8 yrs, they were perfectly happy and healthy. I only recently went back to meat as their appetites had reduced and they needed more incentive.

redboxer321 · 11/06/2025 20:10

SharpestBulb · 11/06/2025 19:46

But it also may as well not be anyone, and the dog fed to the lion instead of breeding a sheep to be fed to the lion.

https://wildearth.com/blogs/the-wild-times/bramble-the-vegan-border-collie?srsltid=AfmBOoqG0aUn8rH-d-yU_gFXMhZANx-THt-SDDt9b8p1PYf-bWJTmGDq

Dogs thrive on a plant-based diet.

Yes, I read about Bramble. It's very interesting. Still not convinced but maybe I'll try with the next dog. Don't know.

Re But it also may as well not be anyone...

If you adopt from a no-kill shelter, there is someone feeding them. I figure it may as well be me.

I think although not totally, we largely agree, and that's a refreshing change for me on MN 😀

tumblingdowntherabbithole · 11/06/2025 20:07

redboxer321 · 11/06/2025 20:05

@tumblingdowntherabbithole I don't know if you are not reading my posts or if you're not understanding them but it's one of the two.

Probably not understanding (that's the autism for you).

Didn't you say earlier in the thread that you'd spoken to people about their dogs on walks before?

EDIT: you said you'd risk offending someone if you thought their dog was in pain.

If you spoke to me about my dog being in pain based on a snapshot of him limping, I would genuinely probably cry. Because it implies that I'm both stupid and uncaring, neither of which would be true.