Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Fecking sports day

240 replies

HippyKayYay · 03/06/2025 15:11

DD is in yr 7 and I've just found out they still have sports day - in secondary. DD is unsporty, uncoordinated and uncompetitive. She hates it. I hated it. I still hate it. It's miserable for her. She tries her best and is very supportive of her mates. But it still makes her feel shit about herself and has done every year that she's had to do it. Despite all our positive reinforcement and conversations about taking part, blah di blah di blah... And I thought we were finally done with it (for her) when she left primary last year. But no...

She is active, gets movement and exercise in ways she enjoys, btw. So it's not about that. But it really hacks me off. No one is making kids do maths or art or science competitively and in public. So why is it ok to make them do this for sport?

Btw - I have a younger DC who is super sporty and fast. But they also hate sports day (finds it really stressful and gets very nervous).

Why do schools do this? Why is it ok to do this for sport but not other subjects? It's just bloody mean to unsporty/ uncoordinated kids...

OP posts:
UniReunion · 07/06/2025 07:15

So is the difficulty that an activity at school is compulsory, or coming last?

SouthLondonMum22 · 07/06/2025 07:11

UniReunion · 07/06/2025 07:07

That sounds like a “Yes, all people coming last are humiliating, can they not see themselves? Obviously it is a value I instill in my children.”

I am also of the opinion that any parent whining on the internet about sports day that has not contacted the school with a proposal of how to do it in a way your would be happy with needs to take a look at themselves.

No it doesn't. It sounds exactly as I said it, that there is a difference between forcing someone to do it and making the decision to do it yourself.

UniReunion · 07/06/2025 07:07

SouthLondonMum22 · 06/06/2025 23:45

No one is forced to do a park run or any other beginners class for sport. That's the main difference.

It's voluntary and competitive races etc during sports day should also be voluntary.

That sounds like a “Yes, all people coming last are humiliating, can they not see themselves? Obviously it is a value I instill in my children.”

I am also of the opinion that any parent whining on the internet about sports day that has not contacted the school with a proposal of how to do it in a way your would be happy with needs to take a look at themselves.

SouthLondonMum22 · 06/06/2025 23:45

UniReunion · 06/06/2025 17:48

Do you think that people who come last are a humiliation who should stop embarrassing themselves. Let’s say at park run? Or any other beginners class for sport?

You are using the word humiliating but are you projecting?
Is it really a humiliation, or just a disappointment.

No one is forced to do a park run or any other beginners class for sport. That's the main difference.

It's voluntary and competitive races etc during sports day should also be voluntary.

RomanCavalryChoir · 06/06/2025 18:48

JenniferBooth · 06/06/2025 16:36

If an employer did what some of these PE teachers did they would find themselves hauled before a tribunal.

Yep!

UniReunion · 06/06/2025 17:48

HippyKayYay · 05/06/2025 16:38

Agreed. I mean, if they marked the exams/ tests in front of the whole school and all the parents, then yes it would be comparable.

I do know the ones who are musical, because they choose to participate in the music evenings. I have no idea who isn't musical. The equivalent would be making every kid perform in the concert, even if they couldn't play/ were tone deaf.

I also have absolutely no idea who struggles with maths/art/whatever in DDs school. They don't publicise the results of their maths, etc, tests. I have no idea who is in what set other than DDs. They also don't publicise the individual GCSE/ A-level results.

So these comparisons don't hold up.

I have nothing against competition. I have nothing against learning through failure. This is not about protecting DD from that kind of stuff. I have nothing against sports day in principle. I do have an issue with the compulsory participation in sports day and the public humiliation that ensues for kids who are always the slowest/ poorly coordinated.

Do you think that people who come last are a humiliation who should stop embarrassing themselves. Let’s say at park run? Or any other beginners class for sport?

You are using the word humiliating but are you projecting?
Is it really a humiliation, or just a disappointment.

ByCyanMoose · 06/06/2025 17:09

UniReunion · 05/06/2025 20:17

I would love to hear your teachers and class mates recollection of those times.

It is fascinating that you still have a chip on your shoulder about having to do something at school you weren’t good at, blaming everyone else, and have a total of zero insight into your own selfish motivations and behaviour.

Yes, I doubt that her teachers and classmates ever got over her refusal to participate in sports day. On a more serious note, I hope I am never as angry about anything as you are about this.

JenniferBooth · 06/06/2025 16:36

RomanCavalryChoir · 05/06/2025 17:53

Yes, the oh nooo what about the workplace posts are heroically stupid. The two are not remotely equivalent.

If an employer did what some of these PE teachers did they would find themselves hauled before a tribunal.

HippyKayYay · 05/06/2025 20:37

gannett · 05/06/2025 18:24

The other reason sports day and exams aren't comparable is that exams are the culmination of everything the kids have been learning over the course of the term/year.

Whereas the only kids who get taught how to do sport and get better at sport are the ones with a natural affinity and who are good enough to be on school teams. The rest, especially the ones who are bad at it, just get chucked out on to a pitch to hoof around randomly.

I did hockey and netball with the other nerdy duds and was not once taught a single thing about tactics. They made us do cross-country without teaching us about pacing or breathing technique. There was never any question of preparing us for sports day, so all the kids who were bad at sport were thoroughly ill-equipped to perform. Which adds to the humiliation aspect - it's not just that you can't do it well, but you have no idea how to do it well.

So true. I remember this big time with tennis - just given balls and racquets with no teaching at all. DD says it’s the same with the sports they ‘learn’ - no actual instruction on the game play or techniques, etc. although I am taking that with a pinch of salt! I’m sure they must teach them something??

OP posts:
Catwoman8 · 05/06/2025 20:27

Sports days are not nonsense, however at secondary school particpation should be optional. I'm surprised it isn't..

UniReunion · 05/06/2025 20:17

gannett · 05/06/2025 12:23

Not just sports day but everything about school sports is only geared to the kids who have a natural affinity for specific, limited team sports. Absolutely nothing about school sports helps kids without that natural affinity to get better at sports or learn to love sports in general.

I was unsporty in school and I thought I hated sports - I did hate hockey, netball and being yelled at to go faster/try harder by teachers I hated and my jolly hockey sticks peers. I also didn't give a shit so I'd go out of my way to make zero effort on sports day - walking the 100m, ducking under the high jump - and they soon learned not to make me do anything. I think on one cross-country I took a book, walked round a few corners, sat behind a tree and read it for a couple of hours, then walked back.

Fast forward to my adult life and on any given day I'm doing a home workout, playing a tennis match or running 20km. Oddly enough it turns out that I can be motivated to do sport and exercise when I'm not being yelled at by people who have no real interest in helping me get better!

I would love to hear your teachers and class mates recollection of those times.

It is fascinating that you still have a chip on your shoulder about having to do something at school you weren’t good at, blaming everyone else, and have a total of zero insight into your own selfish motivations and behaviour.

SwingTheMonkey · 05/06/2025 19:22

ByCyanMoose · 05/06/2025 15:47

The notion that individual pupil exams taken in class are as competitive and public as athletic competitions, done outside in front of all other pupils and their families, is absurd on its face.

It really is. My eldest is in year 10 and has just taken exams. He’s got no idea what any of the other kids got and isn’t interested. There’s no competition against any of the other pupils - just a desire to do as well he can. Unless exam results are read out to an assembled audience of parents and fellow pupils, it’s like comparing apples and oranges.

gannett · 05/06/2025 18:24

HippyKayYay · 05/06/2025 16:38

Agreed. I mean, if they marked the exams/ tests in front of the whole school and all the parents, then yes it would be comparable.

I do know the ones who are musical, because they choose to participate in the music evenings. I have no idea who isn't musical. The equivalent would be making every kid perform in the concert, even if they couldn't play/ were tone deaf.

I also have absolutely no idea who struggles with maths/art/whatever in DDs school. They don't publicise the results of their maths, etc, tests. I have no idea who is in what set other than DDs. They also don't publicise the individual GCSE/ A-level results.

So these comparisons don't hold up.

I have nothing against competition. I have nothing against learning through failure. This is not about protecting DD from that kind of stuff. I have nothing against sports day in principle. I do have an issue with the compulsory participation in sports day and the public humiliation that ensues for kids who are always the slowest/ poorly coordinated.

The other reason sports day and exams aren't comparable is that exams are the culmination of everything the kids have been learning over the course of the term/year.

Whereas the only kids who get taught how to do sport and get better at sport are the ones with a natural affinity and who are good enough to be on school teams. The rest, especially the ones who are bad at it, just get chucked out on to a pitch to hoof around randomly.

I did hockey and netball with the other nerdy duds and was not once taught a single thing about tactics. They made us do cross-country without teaching us about pacing or breathing technique. There was never any question of preparing us for sports day, so all the kids who were bad at sport were thoroughly ill-equipped to perform. Which adds to the humiliation aspect - it's not just that you can't do it well, but you have no idea how to do it well.

RomanCavalryChoir · 05/06/2025 17:53

HippyKayYay · 04/06/2025 13:42

If workplaces were holding competitions to which they invite the employees families and the whole company to spectate and then give prizes to the 'winners' then yeah, I'd probably take a duvet day too.

But obvs they're not. Because enforced public competition at school isn't equivalent to coping in the workplace. And as many, many responses to this thread indicate being made to do it doesn't instil resilience or grit or any of that total bullshit. It just makes those who always come last (and it is always the same ones) feel crap about themselves (physically) and hate organised sport.

Yes, the oh nooo what about the workplace posts are heroically stupid. The two are not remotely equivalent.

HippyKayYay · 05/06/2025 16:38

ByCyanMoose · 05/06/2025 15:47

The notion that individual pupil exams taken in class are as competitive and public as athletic competitions, done outside in front of all other pupils and their families, is absurd on its face.

Agreed. I mean, if they marked the exams/ tests in front of the whole school and all the parents, then yes it would be comparable.

I do know the ones who are musical, because they choose to participate in the music evenings. I have no idea who isn't musical. The equivalent would be making every kid perform in the concert, even if they couldn't play/ were tone deaf.

I also have absolutely no idea who struggles with maths/art/whatever in DDs school. They don't publicise the results of their maths, etc, tests. I have no idea who is in what set other than DDs. They also don't publicise the individual GCSE/ A-level results.

So these comparisons don't hold up.

I have nothing against competition. I have nothing against learning through failure. This is not about protecting DD from that kind of stuff. I have nothing against sports day in principle. I do have an issue with the compulsory participation in sports day and the public humiliation that ensues for kids who are always the slowest/ poorly coordinated.

OP posts:
HippyKayYay · 05/06/2025 16:30

QuickPeachPoet · 05/06/2025 14:13

All this 'the sporty kids are celebrated but the arty/maths/whatever else ones aren't... THAT IS LIFE. When a team wins the premier league, it's all over the news. When the Wimbledon final is on, it's got prime coverage. The Olympics? enough said. Does the world chess championships, impressive art exhibitions, maths competitions, spelling bees, and cultural stuff get the same attention? NO THEY DON'T. And those involved in them put up with it. So yes, this is a day for the sporty kids. Will the non sporty ones get the same attention for the things they are good at? Probably not. But that is life.

people compete in Wimbledon, etc, out of choice. And I should have thought that if they're at that level, they're, relatively, one of the best in the world. Not at all comparable to compulsory sports day participation for the non-sporty.

OP posts:
ByCyanMoose · 05/06/2025 15:47

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 05/06/2025 12:10

I agree with this! And much more pressure on them.

The notion that individual pupil exams taken in class are as competitive and public as athletic competitions, done outside in front of all other pupils and their families, is absurd on its face.

ByCyanMoose · 05/06/2025 15:44

QuickPeachPoet · 05/06/2025 14:13

All this 'the sporty kids are celebrated but the arty/maths/whatever else ones aren't... THAT IS LIFE. When a team wins the premier league, it's all over the news. When the Wimbledon final is on, it's got prime coverage. The Olympics? enough said. Does the world chess championships, impressive art exhibitions, maths competitions, spelling bees, and cultural stuff get the same attention? NO THEY DON'T. And those involved in them put up with it. So yes, this is a day for the sporty kids. Will the non sporty ones get the same attention for the things they are good at? Probably not. But that is life.

None of which constitutes even the remotest argument for forcing non-sporty kids to participate in sports day against their will. If your kids want to, good for them. Of course, then your kids would only get to be compared with others who are actually skilled enough to compete with them. Rather than getting to pump up their self-esteem by destroying the nerds.

SouthLondonMum22 · 05/06/2025 15:39

QuickPeachPoet · 05/06/2025 14:13

All this 'the sporty kids are celebrated but the arty/maths/whatever else ones aren't... THAT IS LIFE. When a team wins the premier league, it's all over the news. When the Wimbledon final is on, it's got prime coverage. The Olympics? enough said. Does the world chess championships, impressive art exhibitions, maths competitions, spelling bees, and cultural stuff get the same attention? NO THEY DON'T. And those involved in them put up with it. So yes, this is a day for the sporty kids. Will the non sporty ones get the same attention for the things they are good at? Probably not. But that is life.

If it's a day for the sporty kids, the non sporty kids can have a day off then.

QuickPeachPoet · 05/06/2025 14:13

All this 'the sporty kids are celebrated but the arty/maths/whatever else ones aren't... THAT IS LIFE. When a team wins the premier league, it's all over the news. When the Wimbledon final is on, it's got prime coverage. The Olympics? enough said. Does the world chess championships, impressive art exhibitions, maths competitions, spelling bees, and cultural stuff get the same attention? NO THEY DON'T. And those involved in them put up with it. So yes, this is a day for the sporty kids. Will the non sporty ones get the same attention for the things they are good at? Probably not. But that is life.

Renabrook · 05/06/2025 12:30

So would there be people lining up to watch teams to compete in who can do long division the fastest? I presume they have competitions with sports is for the physical aspect and that would be hard to do stuck sat in a classroom at a desk where mental activity can be done solo?

gannett · 05/06/2025 12:23

SouthLondonMum22 · 04/06/2025 23:22

How is it sabotaging it when it isn't stopping those who want to from taking part?

Sports day is what often leads to unsporty kids thinking that sport just isn't for them due to how the day can make unsporty kids feel. I know I didn't realise that actually, I do enjoy some sport, until many years after my school sports days. Sports day made me loathe sports.

It would be so easy to make it more inclusive and make the competitive sports optional.

Not just sports day but everything about school sports is only geared to the kids who have a natural affinity for specific, limited team sports. Absolutely nothing about school sports helps kids without that natural affinity to get better at sports or learn to love sports in general.

I was unsporty in school and I thought I hated sports - I did hate hockey, netball and being yelled at to go faster/try harder by teachers I hated and my jolly hockey sticks peers. I also didn't give a shit so I'd go out of my way to make zero effort on sports day - walking the 100m, ducking under the high jump - and they soon learned not to make me do anything. I think on one cross-country I took a book, walked round a few corners, sat behind a tree and read it for a couple of hours, then walked back.

Fast forward to my adult life and on any given day I'm doing a home workout, playing a tennis match or running 20km. Oddly enough it turns out that I can be motivated to do sport and exercise when I'm not being yelled at by people who have no real interest in helping me get better!

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 05/06/2025 12:10

KoiTetra · 05/06/2025 12:06

"no one is making kids do maths or art or science competitively and in public"

Well I would argue exams are competitive and public so yes, yes they are.

I agree with this! And much more pressure on them.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 05/06/2025 12:09

DD’s secondary school do it for years 7-10 but there’s no audience of parents, just the kids.

Also I think you have to sign up for events you want to do, so not compulsory to do anything (I think!)

Our secondary school one was similar - you made a team in your form group with people doing the events they wanted to do.

KoiTetra · 05/06/2025 12:06

HippyKayYay · 03/06/2025 15:11

DD is in yr 7 and I've just found out they still have sports day - in secondary. DD is unsporty, uncoordinated and uncompetitive. She hates it. I hated it. I still hate it. It's miserable for her. She tries her best and is very supportive of her mates. But it still makes her feel shit about herself and has done every year that she's had to do it. Despite all our positive reinforcement and conversations about taking part, blah di blah di blah... And I thought we were finally done with it (for her) when she left primary last year. But no...

She is active, gets movement and exercise in ways she enjoys, btw. So it's not about that. But it really hacks me off. No one is making kids do maths or art or science competitively and in public. So why is it ok to make them do this for sport?

Btw - I have a younger DC who is super sporty and fast. But they also hate sports day (finds it really stressful and gets very nervous).

Why do schools do this? Why is it ok to do this for sport but not other subjects? It's just bloody mean to unsporty/ uncoordinated kids...

"no one is making kids do maths or art or science competitively and in public"

Well I would argue exams are competitive and public so yes, yes they are.