Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

DD unwell, had to take a day off, works reaction..

379 replies

Raincloud997 · 02/06/2025 22:53

I am a single parent and have limited childcare. My DD is in reception and was unwell today so couldn't go back in to school today after the half term. I had to ring up. My manager sounded very annoyed on the phone and said they have other staff off too, said she is struggling for cover and that I really must try and make it in tomorrow and that someone else will have to look after my DD. She also sighed before putting down the phone. I don't have a lot of time off at all, this is the first time its happened and my contract states they allow for emergency parental leave but her reaction has got me worried and I don't think I have childcare for tomorrow if she is no better by morning. What would ou do?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
RealEagle · 03/06/2025 08:07

sciaticafanatica · 03/06/2025 07:18

Honestly just don’t give it a second thought.
your child is ill and you need to look after her.
it is not your responsibility that your employer does not have enough staff to cover.
its your managers.
she is paid to manage so let her sigh away

I agree with this

HelpMeGetThrough · 03/06/2025 08:06

Champagnetennis17 · 03/06/2025 06:58

I disagree, the manager needs sorting out or dismissing. She should definitely raise this as a complaint when she’s back at work as it is not on at all.

And as we all know, HR are there for the company not the employee and will side with the Manager.

No proof the Manager sighed, OPs word against the Manager.

It’ll ultimately do the OP no good in this situation.

Fleetheart · 03/06/2025 08:06

Stepfordian · 02/06/2025 23:22

Staff taking time off to look after small children is a cost of doing business, they should have a contingency so they can cope with staff having a couple of days off unexpectedly.

Absolutely this.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 03/06/2025 08:05

NotUsually · 03/06/2025 06:12

Oh dear. What an unsupportive response from your boss. No wonder it made you feel bad.
You sound like you can't find anyone else to look after your DD, and anyway why would you when your DD needs her mum when she is ill.
You have a dependent.
I hate the way so many work bosses trivialise and get irritated by parents needing time off work when their young children are ill. If you were in your 50s or 60s and called your boss to say you are a carer for your dependent and infirm husband who cannot look after himself, that he has other people to care for him whilst you are at work, but that he is ill so you need to stay at home to care for him, you would not have been met with this response from your boss.
If DD is still too unwell to go in to school today, phone up and say you're not coming in because she's ill. End of. Take it as parental leave or annual leave. You can't be sacked for this.
Don't send DD in before she's ready to go back. She is your priority here.
When you return to work, put in a formal complaint about the response from your boss. It was completely unprofessional.

Whilst I sympathise with the OP, and in her shoes would do as she did, the responses here are largely based on quicksand - there is a vast difference between sympathy and the law.

I hate the way so many work bosses trivialise and get irritated by parents needing time off work when their young children are ill.
They are employers. Their role is to employ people who come into work and work. Childcare needs, illness etc may be unavoidable, but that does not get the work done. Your priority as a parent may be your child. Their priority as an employer is the work being done.

If you were in your 50s or 60s and called your boss to say you are a carer for your dependent and infirm husband who cannot look after himself, that he has other people to care for him whilst you are at work, but that he is ill so you need to stay at home to care for him, you would not have been met with this response from your boss.
Of course you would. Why on earth would you think it makes a difference? If anything employers are often less sympathetic towards carers for adults.

Take it as parental leave or annual leave
You need to ask for annual leave in advance and you cannot take it if it is refused. Parental leave must be taken in full weeks, unpaid and must be applied for in advance. Emergency parental leave is time off to make arrangements for your child's care, such as taking them to the doctor or making other care arrangements. It is not for childcare.

You can't be sacked for this.
Of course you can. It is unlikely if you have more than two years employment, and probably unlikely if you have less than two years and do not have a poor attendance record, but it is irresponsible to state that someone cannot be dismissed. Especially with less than two years employment it is relatively easy to dismiss somebody.

It is all very well saying an employer is unsupportive, being unreasonable etc. It is all very well saying to prioritise the child. Those are all opinions. They might be the majority opinions. But they are not the law. The manager was wrong to show her frustration about the circumstances, but she has, on technical grounds, done nothing wrong.

Ddakji · 03/06/2025 07:53

GRex · 02/06/2025 23:04

It is normal to be expected to try to find some other childcare for run of the mill illnesses. Can your ex do a day? Do you have the funds to book a babysitting service like Koru / sitters / etc? Or is there any work you could do from home to be useful while not fully present? You can use the emergency parental leave, but trying to minimise how much time you take is a fair expectation from employers.

I wouldn't read too much into her sighing, she told you that a bunch of people are off, she's having a really shitty day with a lot to sort out. Don't take her stress reaction personally unless she actually creates an issue when you return to work.

No it isn’t. It’s normal that a parent looks after a child who isn’t in school due to illness.

She sounds a poor manager if she’s sighing down the phone like that.

travelallthetime · 03/06/2025 07:51

this is the reason I’m so glad I’m self employed now.
Back in the day my youngest was in hospital with breathing difficulties (severe chest infection), my manager suggested my husband stay with him while I came to work. It was literally the first day he was in hospital and actually, we were BOTH there with him. He was in a week overall and then still very poorly for another week and yet on day 2 in hospital I dragged myself into work as they were absolute dicks about it. My husband’s work were fantastic and told him to take as long as he needed, paid, and sent us a get well soon card for my son

Dontlletmedownbruce · 03/06/2025 07:50

I remember a manager asking 'can't your mum take him?', no sorry she is dead.. 'can't your MIL take him', no sorry she is seriously mentally ill. (No mention of course of 2 grandfathers). I wasnt single mum but DH worked away for a few months. OP You don't get a choice in this right now so there is nothing you can do. It's so so difficult and unfair when people with support are seen as more reliable than those who are doing all the work all the time. Yes it's hard being a manager but that's their problem not yours.

yakkity · 03/06/2025 07:49

NotUsually · 03/06/2025 06:44

I do.
I think it might highlight that her manager isn't managing well.

You think being a manager means all human emotional and behaviours are automatically suppressed? A manager like anyone has stressful off days and sighing is a very normal human response and one that is forgivable. Shouting, name calling and threats are not.

Koalafan · 03/06/2025 07:48

NotUsually · 03/06/2025 06:42

No.
You are completely and utterly wrong.
And I am a senior manager.

Yes, because all managers are the same and all companies are the same.

Studdedbag · 03/06/2025 07:47

GRex · 03/06/2025 07:43

"Example
If your child falls ill you could take time off to go to the doctor and make care arrangements. Your employer may then ask you to take annual leave or parental leave if you want to look after your child for longer."

You're entirely missing this point about making arrangements for some reason. You are supposed to try to make care arrangements, that may include negotiating paid or unpaid leave with your employer but the employer does get to discuss how that works (bound by their own HR policies for fairness).

Im not missing it, but op hasn't said they don't want to take any other sort of leave so presumably wouldnt have an issue.

feelingbleh · 03/06/2025 07:44

I had a manager like this anytime you where doing anything for her like covering a shift last minute you where an absolute gem best employee ever then the second you needed anything the huffing and puffing and hanging up on you started and you where the worst person in the world. I'm glad I left the manager I have now is amazing

GRex · 03/06/2025 07:43

Studdedbag · 03/06/2025 07:31

Well it says quite clearly here that theres no set amount of time as it depends on the circumstances:

www.gov.uk/time-off-for-dependants

"Example
If your child falls ill you could take time off to go to the doctor and make care arrangements. Your employer may then ask you to take annual leave or parental leave if you want to look after your child for longer."

You're entirely missing this point about making arrangements for some reason. You are supposed to try to make care arrangements, that may include negotiating paid or unpaid leave with your employer but the employer does get to discuss how that works (bound by their own HR policies for fairness).

Unpaid parental leave

Employer and employee guide to unpaid parental leave - eligibility, how much leave can be taken and notice periods, postponing leave

https://www.gov.uk/parental-leave

MrsTWH · 03/06/2025 07:40

Obviously your sick child comes first, and the manager should not have behaved like that. It sounds like you rarely have time off, so I wouldn’t give it another thought OP.

On the flip side though, at what point does it become unsustainable/unacceptable or a matter of whether an employee is actually capable of doing their job? I consider myself an empathetic and supportive manager but I have an employee who, this year since January, is on 40% attendance as either she or her children are sick pretty much every other week. She simply isn’t here to do her job and I have to cover both roles pretty much all the time. Should my very small company continue to suck it up? It is frustrating!

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 03/06/2025 07:34

Isittimeformynapyet · 02/06/2025 23:05

Let's hope she was just expressing her frustration and anxiety. Not very professional though and would make you feel bad.

I was a manager for a short while - I hated it! People would call in sick at 7am every day and I'd have to wake people up on their days off and beg them to come in. If 3 people called in sick it was really hard not to express frustration to the third, even though I knew it was not their fault and they were perfectly entitled to do so. I was a shit manager!

Don't fret too much OP - she'll get over it.

Where on earth did you work that people were sick every day??

Studdedbag · 03/06/2025 07:31

GRex · 03/06/2025 07:28

I've stated her statutory rights, because some on here mistake their own business's child friendly policies for law and risk misdirecting OP. Please do check what I've said against gov.uk, solicitor sites etc, "make other childcare arrangements" features throughout.

It's tricky, of course. Many of us have a DH, either or both can work from home, have friends or family who might step in, and we have known childcare / a cleaner / someone who can be asked to help; that's how we get on. The problem OP has is that her child has reached school age without her having any childcare options lined up apart from school. What do I suggest? Well, I already did suggest options. I've said she can try to arrange parental leave or annual leave, and named 4 specific sites as options who will care for sick kids. I literally can't be any more specific than naming some same-day national childcare services who come out in this scenario.

Well it says quite clearly here that theres no set amount of time as it depends on the circumstances:

www.gov.uk/time-off-for-dependants

GRex · 03/06/2025 07:28

Studdedbag · 03/06/2025 07:01

The statutory right to unpaid time off for dependants is only ever intended to be for a few hours or a day. The time period is explicitly to allow other arrangements to be put in place

What do you suggest people like OP do?

I've stated her statutory rights, because some on here mistake their own business's child friendly policies for law and risk misdirecting OP. Please do check what I've said against gov.uk, solicitor sites etc, "make other childcare arrangements" features throughout.

It's tricky, of course. Many of us have a DH, either or both can work from home, have friends or family who might step in, and we have known childcare / a cleaner / someone who can be asked to help; that's how we get on. The problem OP has is that her child has reached school age without her having any childcare options lined up apart from school. What do I suggest? Well, I already did suggest options. I've said she can try to arrange parental leave or annual leave, and named 4 specific sites as options who will care for sick kids. I literally can't be any more specific than naming some same-day national childcare services who come out in this scenario.

LethargeMarg · 03/06/2025 07:22

u Used to absolutely dread having to ring in when my kids were younger and unwell. Kids need to be in their own home if ill and you will need to take time off. Most jobs have a limited amount of paid carers leave. If your boss is tricky check if they have this snd if not all you can do is offer to take it as annual or unpaid leave
on the other side of the coin there are some people who don’t realise paid carers leave is limited- my husband is a deputy head and they are having to remind staff of this as they have a nightmare trying to staff with teachers taking a lot of parental leave (eg both parents being home with an ill child) but they accept if your child is ill a parent needs to take time off
I think all employers probably are fed up when staff ring up to say they can’t come in but most just cover it up on the call
itvis just one of those things - try not to stress to much

sciaticafanatica · 03/06/2025 07:18

Honestly just don’t give it a second thought.
your child is ill and you need to look after her.
it is not your responsibility that your employer does not have enough staff to cover.
its your managers.
she is paid to manage so let her sigh away

pelargoniums · 03/06/2025 07:16

@Wherehavetheyallgone How would employers know it was day two? Surely once one person had got caught out, everyone would sensibly not mention a Wednesday evening sickness and call in Thursday saying “Yup, day one”.

OP, your manager is a bad manager: she’s getting paid the manager salary to keep that sigh away from you and to be the one who figures out the plan when multiple members of staff are off. There are workplaces who are more understanding of child illnesses - I’ve had two children at home with successive illnesses for two weeks, full flex to work around them being there and to pick up my work (task-based not time-based) where and when I can. Even when that’s not been possible, there’s been understanding.

inamarina · 03/06/2025 07:14

GRex · 03/06/2025 06:48

The statutory right to unpaid time off for dependants is only ever intended to be for a few hours or a day. The time period is explicitly to allow other arrangements to be put in place. After that, the employee is supposed to make arrangements. Parental leave (there are total limits on this of 18 weeks up to age 18, so it won't cover every single childhood illness) or annual leave are options she can discuss, but the manager in this case indicated aren't ideal.

You can think it's lovely to be home with your child, but when someone commits to a job they need to be aware of statutory rights. Most people split any time off between parents, ask grandparents to help, have known childcare step in etc. OP was clear she didn't have a support network, so that's why she would need "an unknown babysitter"; over time she'll have to come up with something and then the person becomes "known". A friend of mine was in this position with a young baby; it wasn't her fault she didn't have anyone, but that's why she then had to fall back on paid childcare. It's a reason why sites like Childcare, Armyofnannies, Koru, Sitters etc all exist.

How will the stranger become “known”, how like is it that they’d always be available whenever the child is sick?
Most likely it would be a different babysitter each time.

MoominUnderWater · 03/06/2025 07:12

Managers like this are why people end up fibbing and pretending it’s them that’s sick rather than their kid. 🤷‍♀️.

Goingawayistricky · 03/06/2025 07:10

Its easier to get someone in to cover work then someone to cover a sick child. Literally what supply agencies are for.

Don’t worry Op. Take the time off and ge confident in your choice. Any complaints and you can raise the unprofessional comments and sighing.

BobbleHatsRule · 03/06/2025 07:10
  1. Babysitter suggestions are daft.
  2. Manager was probably very stressed. Its all very well criticising but we don't know how critical her staffing was (NICU? No staff today....yes she'd be very stressed)
  3. Go to HR if you wish to ramp up the situation and cause everyone a lot more stress.

HR policies are meant for an ivory tower of lots of staff and understanding. Your manager is human. Workers who take unplanned leave are difficult to manage if your workplace is very dependent and staffing is very tight. Many places are like this. However you are entitled to time off, you need time off so don't feel guilty and know it is just an unfortunate set of circumstances. I hope your child is better soon.

Jellycatspyjamas · 03/06/2025 07:10

annual leave are options she can discuss, but the manager in this case indicated aren't ideal.

Having a sick child isn’t ideal either, but such is life. Some people really don’t have swathes of people able to look after their sick child - you could give me a week to find someone and I still wouldn’t be able to conjure up someone prepared and able to look after my child if they were sick. Thankfully my employer understands this.

Pandasandelephants · 03/06/2025 07:08

GRex · 03/06/2025 06:48

The statutory right to unpaid time off for dependants is only ever intended to be for a few hours or a day. The time period is explicitly to allow other arrangements to be put in place. After that, the employee is supposed to make arrangements. Parental leave (there are total limits on this of 18 weeks up to age 18, so it won't cover every single childhood illness) or annual leave are options she can discuss, but the manager in this case indicated aren't ideal.

You can think it's lovely to be home with your child, but when someone commits to a job they need to be aware of statutory rights. Most people split any time off between parents, ask grandparents to help, have known childcare step in etc. OP was clear she didn't have a support network, so that's why she would need "an unknown babysitter"; over time she'll have to come up with something and then the person becomes "known". A friend of mine was in this position with a young baby; it wasn't her fault she didn't have anyone, but that's why she then had to fall back on paid childcare. It's a reason why sites like Childcare, Armyofnannies, Koru, Sitters etc all exist.

I hope you are not a manager with all those ill informed nonsense you are coming out with. Legally, one is allowed 'reasonable' time off. People can are what reasonable is but it's not a few hours. Nice you mention statutory rights. These also extend to the employee! Just saying ;-)

Swipe left for the next trending thread