Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To resent the U-turn on winter fuel allowance?

461 replies

BlueEyedStarling · 02/06/2025 20:51

Perhaps I'm existing in a bubble, but all of the pensioners I know, are pretty well off, or comfortable, at least. I live and have older family in the South East, but my dad and his elderly partner, live in the North. Literally, all of them say they dont need the WFA, but happily accept it regardless and shouted from the rooftops when it was taken away from them. Just how long can the working age population keep paying for this increasing, triple-lock section of society who are, as a whole, the wealthiest amongst us? Personally, we fell through the gaps of being able to receive any child benefit (only just!), but have always been willing to accept that we didn't need it and therefore shouldn't have it. Is it that our middle-aged generation just dont shout as loudly about things that affect us? I do want to add that I am very aware that there are many pensioners who should be in receipt of the WFA and that the cut off was too low. Also, that our pensioners fair pretty badly in comparison to much of Europe. It seems criminal that it can't be means tested to benefit those who really do need it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Sofiewoo · 15/06/2025 16:14

Boomer55 · 15/06/2025 15:55

Some of us in social housing did work all of our working lives. 🙄🤷‍♀️ And are still paying tax, full rent and not claiming any top up benefits.

Edited

You aren’t paying full rent in social housing though, nor can you say you don’t claim any benefits.

Slatterndisgrace · 15/06/2025 16:12

Kendodd · 15/06/2025 15:02

I don't know any pensioners who struggle. I know plenty of (now) pensioners who lived on state benefits, in council housing ,their whole life, with little bits of work thrown in. They're now on all the pensioner benefits and feel loaded in comparison to when they were younger or working and are better off than the, working or not working, younger neighbours.

I’m just wondering why you know so many pensioners like this and none at all who struggle.

Boomer55 · 15/06/2025 15:55

Kendodd · 15/06/2025 15:02

I don't know any pensioners who struggle. I know plenty of (now) pensioners who lived on state benefits, in council housing ,their whole life, with little bits of work thrown in. They're now on all the pensioner benefits and feel loaded in comparison to when they were younger or working and are better off than the, working or not working, younger neighbours.

Some of us in social housing did work all of our working lives. 🙄🤷‍♀️ And are still paying tax, full rent and not claiming any top up benefits.

Iwantmyoldnameback · 15/06/2025 15:54

I wonder if the pensioners on Mumsnet are outliers when it comes to voting. Higher intelligence maybe. ;)

TheignT · 15/06/2025 15:46

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 14:52

So do I but we’re in a minority.

I do, DH does, my sibling and their partner does. We are all in our 70s, two almost 80s.

Kendodd · 15/06/2025 15:02

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 02/06/2025 20:58

I'd say you're in a rare position to not know any pensioners who aren't struggling financially.

Means testing benefits costs money in adminstration. If the amount saved by means-testing is less than the administration cost then it makes sense not to means-test.

I don't know any pensioners who struggle. I know plenty of (now) pensioners who lived on state benefits, in council housing ,their whole life, with little bits of work thrown in. They're now on all the pensioner benefits and feel loaded in comparison to when they were younger or working and are better off than the, working or not working, younger neighbours.

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 14:52

Letskeepcalm · 15/06/2025 13:21

I do

So do I but we’re in a minority.

Letskeepcalm · 15/06/2025 13:21

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 09:22

Pensioners don’t vote Labour so what did they have to lose?

I do

Dangermoo · 15/06/2025 13:14

mum2jakie · 15/06/2025 10:07

My MIL moaned when she lost her WFA. She is now moaning that she is getting it back "because Starmer looks weak." She didn't even bother to vote last election- because the Reform candidate she planned to vote for got removed at the last minute. No use Labour bribing her for votes.

I like the sound of your MIL.

Iwantmyoldnameback · 15/06/2025 13:11

I'm a pensioner and I don't need the WFA. But the cut off was ridiculously low before and is just as ridiculously high now..
I do vote labour but agree a lot of pensioners don't, many are the new middle class as they see themselves after buying their council houses.

I cringe every time I see the latest stupid suggestions like no tax or council tax for anyone over SPA, all this will be comfortably paid for by stopping the boats and deporting all those in hostels. (I refuse to say hotels because that no longer describes these buildings). Its depressing it really is.. I'm fast becoming the most unpopular pensioner on facebook.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 15/06/2025 11:28

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 09:49

I wasn’t speaking for all pensioners but as a generation we lean right. I’ve voted Labour all my adult life since the early 1970s but I’m now in a minority in my age group.

For the over 50s the proportion voting Labour decreases more steeply with 34% of 50-59s backing Labour, 28% of 60-69s and just 20% of those 70 or older.

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49978-how-britain-voted-in-the-2024-general-election

Edited

I don't disagree with the analysis, but statistics are also not accurate reflections on why things happen.

You could, for example, point out that the more working class the person, the more likely they are to die younger. That is also a fact. So the better off (more likely to lean right than left) will live longer on average. You would also need to take into account that many people of my generation (I am 67) did not vote Labour at the last general election (I didn't - the first time in my life I haven't) because Labour is right of us! I and many people I know could see what Starmer and his ilk were going to bring with them and simply could not support it because we are far to the left of Labour now. Around where I live Reform swept the local elections not due only to their level of support but due to the fact that Labour voters were so disillusioned they simply didn't vote, but interestingly our local "no-hoper" leftie, who usually gets maybe 50 votes, actually beat some of the Labour candidates.

Voting patterns and decisions are far more complex than just generational breakdowns. It isn't an easy stat to pull up, but what would be more interesting would be to see where former Labour voters are casting their votes, if they are doing so. More and more what I am hearing is people simply stopping voting because they cannot find anyone to believe any more.

mum2jakie · 15/06/2025 10:07

My MIL moaned when she lost her WFA. She is now moaning that she is getting it back "because Starmer looks weak." She didn't even bother to vote last election- because the Reform candidate she planned to vote for got removed at the last minute. No use Labour bribing her for votes.

Slatterndisgrace · 15/06/2025 09:51

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 09:49

I wasn’t speaking for all pensioners but as a generation we lean right. I’ve voted Labour all my adult life since the early 1970s but I’m now in a minority in my age group.

For the over 50s the proportion voting Labour decreases more steeply with 34% of 50-59s backing Labour, 28% of 60-69s and just 20% of those 70 or older.

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49978-how-britain-voted-in-the-2024-general-election

Edited

Are there facts to back this up though?

edit as I see you’ve edited.

thanks for the link.

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 09:49

I wasn’t speaking for all pensioners but as a generation we lean right. I’ve voted Labour all my adult life since the early 1970s but I’m now in a minority in my age group.

For the over 50s the proportion voting Labour decreases more steeply with 34% of 50-59s backing Labour, 28% of 60-69s and just 20% of those 70 or older.

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49978-how-britain-voted-in-the-2024-general-election

Slatterndisgrace · 15/06/2025 09:33

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 09:22

Pensioners don’t vote Labour so what did they have to lose?

That’s a generalisation, you can’t possibly speak for all pensioners!

BIossomtoes · 15/06/2025 09:22

SarfLondonLad · 15/06/2025 08:53

It was a mind numbingly stupid idea that cost Labour political capital that it could ill-afford.

Pissing off the one cohort in the electorate who can always be relied upon to vote made no sense.

Pensioners don’t vote Labour so what did they have to lose?

SarfLondonLad · 15/06/2025 08:53

It was a mind numbingly stupid idea that cost Labour political capital that it could ill-afford.

Pissing off the one cohort in the electorate who can always be relied upon to vote made no sense.

Letskeepcalm · 15/06/2025 08:46

Pensioner here 🙋‍♀️
I am on the new state pension, £921 per month. I have a small work pension £450 after tax. My husband also has the new state pension, plus a decent work pension. We will now qualify for the WFP. We DO NOT NEED it.
Most of the pensioners I know DO NOT NEED it. Im sick of hearing pensioners say, well I've paid into the system I should benefit. They should get their state pension, agreed. But top ups ? FGS, stop being greedy! There's more important things to give the money to.

BTW, I agree that poorer pensioners should have help. But 35k is way too high.

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 13/06/2025 12:16

BlueEyedStarling · 02/06/2025 20:51

Perhaps I'm existing in a bubble, but all of the pensioners I know, are pretty well off, or comfortable, at least. I live and have older family in the South East, but my dad and his elderly partner, live in the North. Literally, all of them say they dont need the WFA, but happily accept it regardless and shouted from the rooftops when it was taken away from them. Just how long can the working age population keep paying for this increasing, triple-lock section of society who are, as a whole, the wealthiest amongst us? Personally, we fell through the gaps of being able to receive any child benefit (only just!), but have always been willing to accept that we didn't need it and therefore shouldn't have it. Is it that our middle-aged generation just dont shout as loudly about things that affect us? I do want to add that I am very aware that there are many pensioners who should be in receipt of the WFA and that the cut off was too low. Also, that our pensioners fair pretty badly in comparison to much of Europe. It seems criminal that it can't be means tested to benefit those who really do need it.

Yes, but Rachel has fixed the foundations remember!

Lurker85 · 13/06/2025 12:16

Regardless of anything eise, if he thinks your reduced maternity pay doesn’t mean he should pay more temporarily then your increased salary shouldn’t mean you pay more long term either. He can’t have it both ways. Either the one receiving less money pays less or they don’t. It can’t apply to you and not him. So I think when you’re back to work you should make him increase his contributions to 50% - by his own logic! If you manage to stomache him until then that is 😂

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 13/06/2025 12:10

TBH I don’t know anyone who actually needs it - dh and I don’t - but nor do I know anyone who was complaining about it being stopped. Consensus was, presumably, well, fair enough.

3awesomestars · 13/06/2025 11:57

Yes, you are living in a bubble.

Slatterndisgrace · 13/06/2025 11:53

LlynTegid · 02/06/2025 21:28

Whilst agreeing that there are pensioners who live comfortably and have a good income, I think some partial U turn would be reasonable. I also think that the energy companies should be charging less for everyone.

That would be the most sensible and logical solution for everyone.

This though, it pits people against each other. People are hating on the disabled, others are hating on the pensioners. This divide and conquer tactic has worked for decades, they won’t change their agenda now.

4pmwinetimebebeh · 13/06/2025 11:51

I agree OP its ludicrous. It's also convenient how this benefit can be worked out for each member of the household whereas with child benefit that is of course impossible and so families just over the threshold lose out.

CaptBirdsEar · 11/06/2025 15:46

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 11/06/2025 08:34

Yeah and we paid them too so CsptBirdsEar could go to school, hospital, catch a bus etc.

No one is disputing that

Swipe left for the next trending thread