Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think car ownership is out of control in the UK

657 replies

JacquesHarlow · 02/06/2025 13:27

I fully expect to get a vast majority of "YABU" comments, but here goes:

Firstly, before I get flamed - I am a woman, a car owner, and yes I have a driveway now (though didn't before). I am a car enthusiast in terms of the enjoyment I've got from driving and I don't have an issue with "cars" per se.

What I have an issue with is how ridiculous Britain's councils and governments are on car ownership. How cheap car ownership is. How anyone can distort the living environment around them with their choices.

Have you driven down a suburban street lately, or even an urban one?

Small and narrow Victorian streets with lines of cars packed on either side, and only room for one vehicle to drive down it. Why so many cars? The houses have been there for 150 years. Why now?

And because so many people (often fellow women, annoyingly) don't ever like reversing, you find yourself caught in the middle, having to reverse right back to the end of the street to start again.

School runs are chaos - so many cars, parking up in illegal or careless ways, purely to save a short distance walking.

And the size of cars! Absurdly large vehicles which then take up more road space on the kerbside. Yeah it is "legal" but in a decade where theoretically we want to get better as a country environmentally, most people do not give two fucks as long as their precious DCs are "safe" (you're just as safe in a NCAP 5* rated Yaris as you are in a Merc GLS, but try telling that to people where I live).

So this is the madness of today:

Cars are SO much bigger. And thanks to PCP they're cheaper - and this is why I see so many cars where I live ,and up north when I visit, and everywhere else. The PCP monthlies thing keys right into the British obsession of wanting to look and feel wealthy. Years ago a Golf or an Audi A3 would be considered posh for a family. But why would I buy a Golf when my monthly payments could get me into something BIGGER!

The one thing that isn't bigger, is the United Kingdom. I've seen councils in London paint "parking lines" half on the pavement so that people can park up on either side to let cars past. I've seen people in these Discoveries and Defenders mount kerbs at drop off time without a thought or care for who might be behind them or even aware of this being an issue.

And you can have 1 household in a street of 20 houses own 5 cars. You do the maths as to how much of the available parking is then taken away.

Why are people so aggressive and discourteous in their car ownership? What are we going to do about this?

Some of us remember 20 or 30 years ago when you could drive to another street and not have to face a x5 barrelling towards you, parked cars either side? With a tiny woman peering over the steering wheel refusing to reverse back into the space immediately behind her? But powering through so that you, in your little hatchback, have to reverse 10 car lengths to accommodate her ego and lack of driving skill?

Our city and town streets are not made for X5s, Discoveries, Range Rover Sports, and god knows what else, to be parked along the kerbside blocking out the light into tiny terraced houses.

How do we put a stop to this? I love the Japanese principle in certain cities where you have to name a parking space you own or have access to before you buy a car. Could this work here?

AIBU? How will we ever wean ourselves off this 'bigger is better, and every member of my family must have a car' mentality?

OP posts:
JacquesHarlow · 03/06/2025 09:57

brunettemic · 03/06/2025 09:53

Men refusing to reverse (which I agree a minority of them can be arseholes about) and women not wanting to isn’t the same. I agree with OP that a lot more women panic about things like that, most of my female friends can’t parallel park and I’ve been sat in a car with them panicking as they have to reverse. I’ve had to swap seats with one friend a couple of times as she couldn’t do it and even had to park her car.

Thank you for sharing @brunettemic - this is exactly the kind of thing I was referring to.

And sadly I too have had similar. I have seen colleagues and friends sit for ages in a kind of "standoff" because they patently cannot reverse, and go into a kind of fugue state or panic if the road conditions asks it of them.

We just can't have a situation long term in the UK where people aren't willing to reverse their (much bigger than before) cars.

I have had to reverse 10, 15 cars length, along a busy packed street, while someone who could have reversed two car lengths into a large space, refused to. I have places to get to, I can't just sit there and be "assertive" in these cases.

What fascinates me is how it is amazing what people will endure, just so that they don't have to reverse. To do a basic fundamental part of the "life skill" they boast to everyone they have.

OP posts:
brunettemic · 03/06/2025 09:53

WomensSports · 02/06/2025 13:36

And because so many people (often fellow women, annoyingly) don't ever like reversing
Nah you lost me here. "I'm a woman. Let's do womanly stuff as women with our ladybrains" nah thanks. I find plenty of aggressive males who refuse to reverse even when I have right of way, it's not a uniquely female problem.
Also you're not right about the cost of cars, either. They're more expensive than they've ever been. Look up prices from the 1990s or 2000s before the scrappage scheme if you want proof.

Edited

Men refusing to reverse (which I agree a minority of them can be arseholes about) and women not wanting to isn’t the same. I agree with OP that a lot more women panic about things like that, most of my female friends can’t parallel park and I’ve been sat in a car with them panicking as they have to reverse. I’ve had to swap seats with one friend a couple of times as she couldn’t do it and even had to park her car.

Badbadbunny · 03/06/2025 09:49

Personally, I think the bigger problems is works vans. So many self employed tradesmen who have transit or long wheel based vans or small pick up trucks PLUS a car for the wife AND a car for them when they're not working. So at least 3 vehicles. Then often a car or two for their adult children still living at home. In the streets I know with severe parking problems, it's tradesmen vans that cause the most trouble, as they are longer and wider than normal cars, and are the ones partly blocking pavements, parking between drives taking up all the available space where 2 "normal" cars could have parked, etc.

If anything, I think vans, pick up trucks, camper vans, etc should be the vehicles who need permits for parking in residential areas. Cars aren't really the problem.

GasPanic · 03/06/2025 09:48

Alexandra2001 · 03/06/2025 08:59

Why do we allow this??

..because life in almost all of the UK without a car is miserable, employment, shopping, leisure... all pretty much impossible without a car.

Buses take forever, as they have to make many stops and how would most people do the shopping carrying all those bags around.... trains far too expensive and who wants to pay the taxes to give European levels of fares...

People seem to hate anyone who cycles on the road, so we have ruled out that option all by ourselves......

Now there is an argument on controlling the size of cars but we have decided to go down the EV route and they, due to their batteries/range tend to be bigger & heavier, smaller EVs have a poor range.

Then there is migration, those 1m people per year, now 500k, who have been coming here to work study, bringing in dependents too, also need to get around... but we voted for this....

Edited

EVs tend to be heavier but not bigger (larger dimensions) than ICEs.

Within 10 years or so the mass will probably reduce due to solid state batteries as well.

Dangermoo · 03/06/2025 09:46

As the OP isn't answering questions, may I suggest she writes a thesis on this passionate subject of hers. Surely that would be way more fruitful than telling other people how many cars and what type they 'should be allowed' to own. This is all very controlling.

UpsideDownChairs · 03/06/2025 09:43

20 years ago i remember visiting my friend who lived on a victorian terrace street and having to drive my peugeot 106 down between 2 rows of parked cars, and having whoever was coming the other way often not wanting to reverse.

20 years ago my neighbour used to park his work van in front of my house, and the people opposite had their work van and a caravan and reversing out of my drive was tricky but doable.

40 years ago it was pretty similar an my nan's - we always had to park quite a long way away at Christmas.

Driving down to my parents it's still the same - most houses have a drive, but there's cars on the road (half on the pavement) too - always have been, similar numbers.

I don't think it's changed that much TBH.. Perhaps more kids staying at home for longer so more adults in a house, but I think you're harking back to a golden age that didn't exist.

Actually, it is true that cars are wider now than ever. But given I always lived places where people had a family car and a work van, I guess I don't notice that as much, since big vehicles were always around

Rocksintheriver · 03/06/2025 09:39

JacquesHarlow · 02/06/2025 14:09

None of that is ridiculous per se, @Butterflyfern

What is ridiculous is that people who haven't made those lifestyle choices, are forced to suffer the lifestyle choices of those who have, and who then litter streets with cars so that the street becomes practically undriveable with nowhere for visitors to park.

Until you've lived in it or visited one, you just won't get it.

OP why are you not getting public transport to visit your friends? You’re contributing to the very problem you’re complaining about by taking your car.

very convenient that you haven’t answered this question.

Dangermoo · 03/06/2025 09:21

Elbowpatch · 03/06/2025 09:07

It’s a vicious circle. When the time comes to change my saloon car, it will probably be replaced by a big wheeled 4x4 because of the terrible state of the roads in my locality. Bad enough to break a wheel on my car, not just a tyre.

I'm the same, living rurally. The roads are atrocious with their potholes. I will drive a big fuck off car if it stops me getting forced into a hedge, hard gravel etc by bigger vehicles.

Elbowpatch · 03/06/2025 09:07

Fiver555 · 03/06/2025 07:17

I was sitting in the inevitable traffic queue at Stonehenge the other day, next to a massive SUV which was almost the same size and height as the minibus in front of it. I was actually quite shocked. It's obvious why the potholes in our roads are so bad if everybody's basically driving lorries....

It’s a vicious circle. When the time comes to change my saloon car, it will probably be replaced by a big wheeled 4x4 because of the terrible state of the roads in my locality. Bad enough to break a wheel on my car, not just a tyre.

MikeRafone · 03/06/2025 09:03

not just over 3 miles?

MikeRafone · 03/06/2025 09:02

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 03/06/2025 08:44

Surely it depends on the journey. As I said upthread my journey to work was 15-20 minutes by car, over an hour by public transport. There were two ways I could have walked or cycled it, one was along an unlit towpath and one on an unlit winding road with no paths. Walking or cycling either route would have taken much longer than driving and didn't feel safe so why would I? (This journey was slightly longer than 3 miles but the principle is the same)

surely a 15-20 minute journey by car would be 7 miles or more - as speed limits are 20/30mph in most areas of suburbs

Alexandra2001 · 03/06/2025 08:59

JacquesHarlow · 03/06/2025 07:52

My mother is disabled, @Toastandbutterand . Has been for twenty five years.

What has disability got to do with anything here?

A disabled person living on the terraced street I lived on, and owning a car, doesn’t bother me.

a disabled person owning 5 cars including large SUVs, and parking them all along a terraced street, would bother me.

My issue is how we allow one household to own any number of cars despite the Victorian infrastructure on the kerbside. There isn’t room for 2 tonne SUVs on most of our streets. There isn’t the capacity for one family to take up 25% of the parking in one road.

why do we allow this?

and why do we allow specious arguments like yours, where you pull the disability card on me to try and discredit my perfectly credible argument?

Why do we allow this??

..because life in almost all of the UK without a car is miserable, employment, shopping, leisure... all pretty much impossible without a car.

Buses take forever, as they have to make many stops and how would most people do the shopping carrying all those bags around.... trains far too expensive and who wants to pay the taxes to give European levels of fares...

People seem to hate anyone who cycles on the road, so we have ruled out that option all by ourselves......

Now there is an argument on controlling the size of cars but we have decided to go down the EV route and they, due to their batteries/range tend to be bigger & heavier, smaller EVs have a poor range.

Then there is migration, those 1m people per year, now 500k, who have been coming here to work study, bringing in dependents too, also need to get around... but we voted for this....

Sortumn · 03/06/2025 08:47

We have 3 between 2 and the reason we have 3 between 2 is that the computer on our nice newish (we never buy brand new) eco friendly car failed and it's now an expensive heap of metal that we're still paying for.
Its replacement is an old diesel that has no computer stuff to fail.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 03/06/2025 08:44

MikeRafone · 03/06/2025 08:37

why does it have to be all or nothing? Why can't it be that trips under 3 miles are done by other means - which would take 50% of traffic of the road - as 50% of trips completed are under 3 miles

but keep a car for longer journeys

Surely it depends on the journey. As I said upthread my journey to work was 15-20 minutes by car, over an hour by public transport. There were two ways I could have walked or cycled it, one was along an unlit towpath and one on an unlit winding road with no paths. Walking or cycling either route would have taken much longer than driving and didn't feel safe so why would I? (This journey was slightly longer than 3 miles but the principle is the same)

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 03/06/2025 08:39

crackofdoom · 02/06/2025 20:23

See, I just don't get this. Driving is stressful, you're always "on", it's often mega crowded and you're sitting in traffic, and then there's the stress of finding somewhere to park when you get there.

If the journey can be done by public transport I find it a massive relief. Time to go on my phone, read, watch the world go by...and when you get there you just walk off.

I find public transport more stressful. I can't bear being crammed in anywhere and get panicky with crowds of people. I would never, ever work anywhere that involved using the tube as I find that worst of all.

MikeRafone · 03/06/2025 08:37

WinSomeandLoseSome · 02/06/2025 23:49

If you feel so strongly OP why don’t you lead by example and give up your car?

why does it have to be all or nothing? Why can't it be that trips under 3 miles are done by other means - which would take 50% of traffic of the road - as 50% of trips completed are under 3 miles

but keep a car for longer journeys

ImFckingMattDamon · 03/06/2025 08:32

Public transport in my area makes having a car a necessity for me. I start work at 7am and the first bus I could catch (about 10 minutes walk from my house) is at 6.37 and takes 58 minutes to get to the town i work in, plus another 10 minutes on top of that to walk from the bus station to work! There are no trains, and a taxi would be about £30 minimum. The journey by car at that time in the morning, on empty roads takes 20 minutes door to door and actually works out cheaper than the bus fare!

scalt · 03/06/2025 08:18

It's obvious why the potholes in our roads are so bad if everybody's basically driving lorries.... As well as those heavy electric cars we are being "nudged" into using.

I will not buy the anti-car arguments until politicians give up their cars, and until public transport becomes much cheaper and more convenient. If I have to travel somewhere, often the decision is along the lines of: train £60 and takes longer, car less than £25. Tough decision, innit?

I would, however, support car-sharing being made more convenient. Such schemes exist in large cities, but not in small towns. I live in a small town just outside a large city, and this makes public transport much more expensive and inconvenient. If I moved to just inside the city, I would be paying about ten times as much for where I live. Once you have bought a car, and paid the many costs such as insurance, tax and repairs, public transport can then feel like an expensive (and slow) luxury. So the anti-car voices need to sort this out, instead of trying to price motorists off the road.

Toastandbutterand · 03/06/2025 08:14

The consultant for my disability is based at a hospital 32 miles away from my house.

I don't drive, due to my disability. Sure, it takes 2 hrs each way on public transport. I manage though. I manage to travel around for work on public transport. For most journeys it's possible.

The only time I've ever needed a car was taking my kids home from hospital after they were born, and I got a taxi for that.

Toastandbutterand · 03/06/2025 08:02

JacquesHarlow · 03/06/2025 07:52

My mother is disabled, @Toastandbutterand . Has been for twenty five years.

What has disability got to do with anything here?

A disabled person living on the terraced street I lived on, and owning a car, doesn’t bother me.

a disabled person owning 5 cars including large SUVs, and parking them all along a terraced street, would bother me.

My issue is how we allow one household to own any number of cars despite the Victorian infrastructure on the kerbside. There isn’t room for 2 tonne SUVs on most of our streets. There isn’t the capacity for one family to take up 25% of the parking in one road.

why do we allow this?

and why do we allow specious arguments like yours, where you pull the disability card on me to try and discredit my perfectly credible argument?

It's not your argument I was addressing, sorry!

It's the people that NEED cars, and have so many arguments for why they need them. The same people that say disabled people should just be more resilient and try harder.

I think a one car per household rule is a pretty good idea tbh. It would solve a lot of problems. More space on the roads, encouraging public transport use and car sharing. Less pollution. More exercise from walking short journeys. Lots of other good outcomes I'm sure.

Dangermoo · 03/06/2025 08:01

JacquesHarlow · 03/06/2025 07:52

My mother is disabled, @Toastandbutterand . Has been for twenty five years.

What has disability got to do with anything here?

A disabled person living on the terraced street I lived on, and owning a car, doesn’t bother me.

a disabled person owning 5 cars including large SUVs, and parking them all along a terraced street, would bother me.

My issue is how we allow one household to own any number of cars despite the Victorian infrastructure on the kerbside. There isn’t room for 2 tonne SUVs on most of our streets. There isn’t the capacity for one family to take up 25% of the parking in one road.

why do we allow this?

and why do we allow specious arguments like yours, where you pull the disability card on me to try and discredit my perfectly credible argument?

Did you answer my question on those who drive large vehicles under the mobility scheme?

Sorry, meant motorbility.

FlightCommanderPRJohnson · 03/06/2025 07:59

I think there should be increases in car tax the more cars you have registered to a single address, to discourage multi-car households.

JacquesHarlow · 03/06/2025 07:52

Toastandbutterand · 02/06/2025 23:17

I'm going to link this thread next time someone says disabled people need to be more resilient and shouldnt get benefits.

It's bloody hilarious.

My mother is disabled, @Toastandbutterand . Has been for twenty five years.

What has disability got to do with anything here?

A disabled person living on the terraced street I lived on, and owning a car, doesn’t bother me.

a disabled person owning 5 cars including large SUVs, and parking them all along a terraced street, would bother me.

My issue is how we allow one household to own any number of cars despite the Victorian infrastructure on the kerbside. There isn’t room for 2 tonne SUVs on most of our streets. There isn’t the capacity for one family to take up 25% of the parking in one road.

why do we allow this?

and why do we allow specious arguments like yours, where you pull the disability card on me to try and discredit my perfectly credible argument?

OP posts:
Fiver555 · 03/06/2025 07:17

I was sitting in the inevitable traffic queue at Stonehenge the other day, next to a massive SUV which was almost the same size and height as the minibus in front of it. I was actually quite shocked. It's obvious why the potholes in our roads are so bad if everybody's basically driving lorries....

Bebee1 · 03/06/2025 07:12

ByBlueMoose · 02/06/2025 14:02

But public transport provision would improve if more people used it instead of using a car to get everywhere.

I’ll just get on the invisible bus shall I?

People don’t use it because it isn’t frequent enough so they can’t get where they need to be.
The network also isn’t extensive enough.

I don’t want to have to get to an appointment 1 hour 45 before I need to, which is what I would have had to do the other day (small town near three major towns).