Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

15 Billion for UK nuclear warhead programme

110 replies

Howhighcanitbe · 02/06/2025 07:03

Just seen this and feel it’s absolutely obscene. What a huge waste of money. Starmer apparently wants to build more nuclear submarines too. I understand that defence spending is necessary but this seems far too much in the wrong areas? Surely it would be better to focus on other weaknesses as I assume cyber attacks would be more damaging and more likely than conventional?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
5
izthiszeend · 03/06/2025 09:35

deusexmacintosh · 02/06/2025 18:57

Just send an army of covert snipers into Moscow. Take out Putin, take out his cronies, declare martial law, murder anyone with pro Putin/anti West sentiments and install a Western puppet government to run the place. Problem solved, in 30-50 years you'll have a fully-functioning democracy on the same level as any other european country. We should've done it long ago. The Russian elite could never be trusted at any time in history, and certainly not now. Wipe 'em all out.

I find your suggestions quite hopeful! Thanks!
Your ideas match Russia’s actions perfectly. They felt threatened by the proximity of nato military bases and, failing to resolve it by diplomacy, went for a regime change.
You think the same way, so you must be in a position to understand and find a way to peace.

WaryCrow · 03/06/2025 08:15

The Guardian said that a lot of money is being invested in drones too, I didn’t see that on the BBC.

TracyBeakerSoYeah · 03/06/2025 02:46

Sometimes I feel like we're living at the start of the 20th century re: the naval arms race

As pps have said wars are caused by business men propping up deluded dictators.

Perhaps we should make it clear that if anyone dares to drop a tactical nuclear weapon then we'll set the whole lot off & cause the end of civilisation.

savory · 02/06/2025 22:35

FOJN · 02/06/2025 22:31

Starmer concentrated on the job creation aspect in his speech about the nuclear subs so I think you are correct.

We do need to improve our defence capabilities but 12 nuclear subs which will each take 18 months to build doesn't seem like an urgent measure when our government seems convinced we'll be at war with Russia in a couple of years.

Edited

An MP on Nick Ferrari said he belived that and stopped the fat old Brexit fecker in his tracks. So the rich will be sacrificing their ill gotten wealth first, willingly and with good grace whilst AI does a jobs holocaust, right ? For King and country - slumlords unite. The grooming and the gaslighting has begun.

FOJN · 02/06/2025 22:31

PhilippaGeorgiou · 02/06/2025 08:06

If the UK were to be attacked, I very much doubt it would be the kind of attack that this sort of spending will stop. This is, in my opinion, less about being prepared for war and more about generating a "war economy". It has long been known that wat and it's associated trappings produce strong economies - but only temporarily. As Tony Benn once said “If we can find the money to kill people, we can find the money to help people.” So why are we finding money to kill people in a war when we can't find the money to help people?

Starmer concentrated on the job creation aspect in his speech about the nuclear subs so I think you are correct.

We do need to improve our defence capabilities but 12 nuclear subs which will each take 18 months to build doesn't seem like an urgent measure when our government seems convinced we'll be at war with Russia in a couple of years.

WaryCrow · 02/06/2025 22:26

‘If you want peace prepare for war’, especially when you have a hostile neighbour.

Might have been a good idea to not declare a Cold War on your own people too. Don’t think the baby boomer landlords will be defending the country.

Britain’s always had a navy so I suppose submarines are a place to start. If we had more faith in our country, if it had not declared a Cold War on everyone who doesn’t have an inheritance or the right family background (unless they’re foreigners in which case just lots and lots of money and who cares how it was obtained), perhaps we could have trained people to defend our country too, like the Finns. Who have a rather larger potential army than we do. Thankfully, while Russia is being aggressive again.

SummerEve · 02/06/2025 21:53

PhilippaGeorgiou · 02/06/2025 21:40

Perhaps based on your reply? And of course it is gossip - everyone knows everything about what countries say to each other. That is why the conversations are top secret. About as reliable as whatever Williams third cousins best friend said about Meghan as reported by GB News. After all, it was hardly a "quiet warning" if everyone knows about it, was it?

Whatever you say.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 02/06/2025 21:40

SummerEve · 02/06/2025 21:30

It’s not gossip. Nor am I paranoid, and I have no idea why you would insinuate that.

Perhaps based on your reply? And of course it is gossip - everyone knows everything about what countries say to each other. That is why the conversations are top secret. About as reliable as whatever Williams third cousins best friend said about Meghan as reported by GB News. After all, it was hardly a "quiet warning" if everyone knows about it, was it?

SummerEve · 02/06/2025 21:30

PhilippaGeorgiou · 02/06/2025 21:12

I have no idea what is interesting about that. Your paranoia perhaps? But "well documented" unevidenced gossip isn't fact.

It’s not gossip. Nor am I paranoid, and I have no idea why you would insinuate that.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 02/06/2025 21:12

SummerEve · 02/06/2025 17:00

It has been well documented that Putin has been quietly warned several times, by the US and China, that nuclear escalation would be a serious mistake. Interesting that you use the styling “the Ukraine” as well.

I have no idea what is interesting about that. Your paranoia perhaps? But "well documented" unevidenced gossip isn't fact.

Budget37477483 · 02/06/2025 20:21

savory · 02/06/2025 20:18

Because they are addicted to power and probably see themslves as gods in human form who have to always win whatever the cause.It's even worse now cos the tech bros were the unloved and unloveable ones at Uni and now are the richest and most powerful men in the world. It's always men isn't it.

It is! I wonder whether it’s a disconnect from giving life. Women give life. The greatest power. Men are part of this process obviously but a lot less connected. I wonder if it’s whether they see their greatest power as taking away life. How ‘easy’. They should challenge themselves more.

savory · 02/06/2025 20:18

Budget37477483 · 02/06/2025 20:10

This is what blows my mind. Surely these rich and powerful men could just go on a perpetual holiday cruising round in a mega yacht drinking, skiing, golfing, swimming, doing whatever they want. Why cause all this misery when they too are just going to get stuck in an underground bunker.

Because they are addicted to power and probably see themslves as gods in human form who have to always win whatever the cause.It's even worse now cos the tech bros were the unloved and unloveable ones at Uni and now are the richest and most powerful men in the world. It's always men isn't it.

Budget37477483 · 02/06/2025 20:10

savory · 02/06/2025 19:32

Each world war gets much worse than the last one. If we ever get in one we can wave goodbye to the society that most of us know and love. And what will the mostly young men be fighting for - affordable housing, free university education pensions, secure employment, a functioning NHS and modern infrastructure - the things they are denied ?

This is what blows my mind. Surely these rich and powerful men could just go on a perpetual holiday cruising round in a mega yacht drinking, skiing, golfing, swimming, doing whatever they want. Why cause all this misery when they too are just going to get stuck in an underground bunker.

fixingmylife · 02/06/2025 20:06

savory · 02/06/2025 20:04

I loved The Day Today back in the day. It’s always worth remembering how France and later the US pushed back against Vietnam’s efforts for self-determination and to expel foreign invaders. By the end of the Vietnam War, about 3.5 million people in Southeast Asia had died. In Algeria, France’s war for independence killed around 1 million people. Yet, these facts are rarely discussed.

Yes, I loved it too. I know this is very silly, but if you think about it, all this is spending money on methods to kill people... It actually sounds ridiculous but..... It might have been early 2000s. It was very funny and in some way, ahead of it's time.

savory · 02/06/2025 20:04

fixingmylife · 02/06/2025 19:57

This thread made me think of this very amusing "Easter Egg" hidden on the DVD of The Day to Day back in the late 1990s.... Enjoy.

I loved The Day Today back in the day. It’s always worth remembering how France and later the US pushed back against Vietnam’s efforts for self-determination and to expel foreign invaders. By the end of the Vietnam War, about 3.5 million people in Southeast Asia had died. In Algeria, France’s war for independence killed around 1 million people. Yet, these facts are rarely discussed.

fixingmylife · 02/06/2025 19:57

This thread made me think of this very amusing "Easter Egg" hidden on the DVD of The Day to Day back in the late 1990s.... Enjoy.

EasternStandard · 02/06/2025 19:34

WithManyTot · 02/06/2025 19:24

Yep that's right, defence spending 2.5% GDP, maybe getting up to 3%, Health and Welfare spending about 20% of GDP, but hey why let the facts etc...

True, we are a bit ill and old. I liked the imagery anyway.

savory · 02/06/2025 19:32

dizzydizzydizzy · 02/06/2025 19:27

I thiink last time we were in this much risk was the 1930s. The world seems like a very unsafe place these days.

Each world war gets much worse than the last one. If we ever get in one we can wave goodbye to the society that most of us know and love. And what will the mostly young men be fighting for - affordable housing, free university education pensions, secure employment, a functioning NHS and modern infrastructure - the things they are denied ?

dizzydizzydizzy · 02/06/2025 19:27

I thiink last time we were in this much risk was the 1930s. The world seems like a very unsafe place these days.

WithManyTot · 02/06/2025 19:24

EasternStandard · 02/06/2025 18:00

I saw this on another thread and it is still relevant 80 years later. It’s a good cartoon.

I think Starmer is trying to get a lift from putting out headlines. But it likely won’t help much.

Yep that's right, defence spending 2.5% GDP, maybe getting up to 3%, Health and Welfare spending about 20% of GDP, but hey why let the facts etc...

LavenderBlue19 · 02/06/2025 19:18

It's not a typical Labour priority, which suggests to me that it's absolutely necessary. My assumption is that there is a very real threat - especially now we can no longer rely on the US military to support us.

There's been all sorts of funny stuff going on in the last few years. Russian submarines and jets frequently take liberties with our sea and air borders. Undersea cables are being cut, the Heathrow fire, the power cuts in Spain, plus however much else we don't know about because it's kept quiet.

And it will create jobs. I would much prefer there were no nuclear weapons at all, but sadly they exist and we are lucky to have quite a lot of them as a deterrent. Also Germany are doing the same thing. It's clearly being seen as a major priority by those in power.

ThatDenimExpert · 02/06/2025 19:15

If the UK is cyber attacked will they shut off electricity to homes that have smart meters .. my meter is no longer working and they’re insisting on replacing it with a smart one

EasternStandard · 02/06/2025 19:14

savory · 02/06/2025 19:08

These would effectively be a suicide squad, with virtually no chance of survival. And if the operation fails and is traced back to us then what? Likely, Putin and his inner circle retreat to a doomsday bunker and launch a hypersonic conventional missile at a legitimate UK military target, possibly killing hundreds.

At the same time, cyber attacks cripple parts of our infrastructure - banking systems, power grids, communications. Cables might be cut. Putin declares that revenge has been taken and claims he’s prepared to leave it at that.

So what next?

Maybe not then

savory · 02/06/2025 19:08

deusexmacintosh · 02/06/2025 18:57

Just send an army of covert snipers into Moscow. Take out Putin, take out his cronies, declare martial law, murder anyone with pro Putin/anti West sentiments and install a Western puppet government to run the place. Problem solved, in 30-50 years you'll have a fully-functioning democracy on the same level as any other european country. We should've done it long ago. The Russian elite could never be trusted at any time in history, and certainly not now. Wipe 'em all out.

These would effectively be a suicide squad, with virtually no chance of survival. And if the operation fails and is traced back to us then what? Likely, Putin and his inner circle retreat to a doomsday bunker and launch a hypersonic conventional missile at a legitimate UK military target, possibly killing hundreds.

At the same time, cyber attacks cripple parts of our infrastructure - banking systems, power grids, communications. Cables might be cut. Putin declares that revenge has been taken and claims he’s prepared to leave it at that.

So what next?

deusexmacintosh · 02/06/2025 18:57

Whatafustercluck · 02/06/2025 09:31

I understand that defence spending is necessary but this seems far too much in the wrong areas?

Trump has said that unless Europeans step up their own defences, he won't be committing US troops to our defence, so 'far too much' is a moot point when the future of NATO is at stake. Trump thought we weren't spending enough (and in truth, we probably weren't) and that's the main driver - NATO's future.

Also, as a pp said, all the mood music from various countries' intelligence services is that Russia is upping its military power and making hundreds and hundred of additional tanks, as well as infringing air and sea space - clearly Putin's ambitions go way beyond Ukraine. It's why Poland spends 5% of its GDP on defence.

It's actually quite frightening to know that we're being put on a war footing. But at least we may be better prepared for whatever happens.

Just send an army of covert snipers into Moscow. Take out Putin, take out his cronies, declare martial law, murder anyone with pro Putin/anti West sentiments and install a Western puppet government to run the place. Problem solved, in 30-50 years you'll have a fully-functioning democracy on the same level as any other european country. We should've done it long ago. The Russian elite could never be trusted at any time in history, and certainly not now. Wipe 'em all out.

Swipe left for the next trending thread