Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To invite some children but not others to wedding?

112 replies

Toadstool101 · 31/05/2025 19:44

Inspired by other wedding posts on here today and having a panic.

We’re having a wedding of approx 100 guests and if we were to allow all children, there would be 36 (all below age 8) at a cost of £80 per child. I cannot fathom how we would provide entertainment for 36 children or maintain any sense of occasion different to a soft play. We have 10 children coming - our own, the children of family who have travelled from abroad, and bridesmaid’s children, who are good friends of our own children. There will also be about 4 babies under 1yo.

Are people going to come to the wedding and be potentially livid that we’ve cherry picked the children that could come? My fiancés cousin asked if their 3 children could come, and we politely explained that we’ve had to restrict due to the high numbers of children. But the threads today are making me worry that people on the day will judge harshly for this.

OP posts:
Penthrowingsurvivor · 31/05/2025 20:26

Why not sort the guest list before committing to a venue?

because most people do not plan their entire wedding around guest's children 😂

Dreamerinme · 31/05/2025 20:24

Cyclingforcake · 31/05/2025 19:51

I think wedding party children and non mobile babies only is fine. So give them all a role and say that to everyone that asks.

This.

How utterly rude and obnoxious for a guest to be ‘livid’ that their DC aren’t invited to a wedding. Don’t go if you are beyond offended - and remember that your DC are the centre of your world but they aren’t the centre of anyone elses.

Penthrowingsurvivor · 31/05/2025 20:24

Entitled parents will be pissed off.
On other threads, some entitled CF moaned that an unknown remote cousin or their neighbour wasn't invited 😂

Others will completely understand.

Please just spare them the patronising "no child so you have a nice night off". I have no problem with child-free, or limited child-only weddings. I arrange my childcare if I can. It pissed me off immensely when it's presented as doing ME a favour, it's not.

Toadstool101 · 31/05/2025 20:10

@AnneLovesGilbert but there’s literally no way on earth I would have ever invited 36 young children to our wedding? Even if a venue said they’d pay us £80 per child, we would have declined. It would be my idea of a bad day at a soft play, not a wedding. I’ve been dumbfounded reading threads today saying it’s unreasonable not to invite all children. Unless these people don’t know children.

Our children have only been invited to one wedding and we sorted childcare out. It’s not their idea of fun and it’s not my idea of fun. Obviously completely different if they’re close to the bride and groom.

OP posts:
toastofthetown · 31/05/2025 20:09

AnneLovesGilbert · 31/05/2025 20:04

I’ve been married twice and both times we worked out who we wanted to be there and then where it would be and how much it would cost and made tweaks as needed. You didn’t suddenly realise there were 36 kids related to the adult guests you were inviting. Why not sort the guest list before committing to a venue? It sounds extortionate if each child will cost £80 - how?! - so you could easily have accommodated everyone somewhere less extravagant. Prioritising a place over people seems odd and bound to lead to problems.

It’s not only cost. The OP clearly says that she doesn’t want the vibe of the 36 children either. A wedding where a third of the guests are children has a hugely different feel and the OP doesn’t want that. The OP worked out who she wanted to be there as well, and it wasn’t an entire primary school class.

DappledThings · 31/05/2025 20:07

Some people will be pissed off but also loads of people, if you invite all children, will choose not to bring them. So you can probably chance inviting all of them and giving people the option.

For our wedding we invited everyone with their children, was a horrible idea to me to exclude them. That was 11 children invited and only 5 came. Lots of people prefer to come just as adults.

whackamole666 · 31/05/2025 20:06

Your wedding, your guest list .... adults, children, dogs, whoever you want.

saraclara · 31/05/2025 20:04

Immediate family and wedding party only is a clear and reasonable boundary. People will whinge, but you simply say "we did a head count of potential child guests and it came to 36 which sadly we simply can't accommodate" ... and nothing else. Any more detail and you'll sound defensive and they'll try to suggest ways around it.

AnneLovesGilbert · 31/05/2025 20:04

I’ve been married twice and both times we worked out who we wanted to be there and then where it would be and how much it would cost and made tweaks as needed. You didn’t suddenly realise there were 36 kids related to the adult guests you were inviting. Why not sort the guest list before committing to a venue? It sounds extortionate if each child will cost £80 - how?! - so you could easily have accommodated everyone somewhere less extravagant. Prioritising a place over people seems odd and bound to lead to problems.

SparkyBlue · 31/05/2025 20:03

I’d always assume the only children invited to a wedding are the children of close family and very close friends of the b&g. I’d never assume or expect my own DC to be invited.
I was at my cousins wedding recently and apart from her own DC and her sisters DC she had the DC of her closest friend who she has been best friends with since primary school and would have a close relationship with her friends children. I get on really well with this cousin but I never expected my DC to be invited and neither did anyone other guests at the wedding. I actually met one of my DCs teachers there (friend of the bride) and she was also saying she was enjoying her child free afternoon/evening out.

Octavia64 · 31/05/2025 20:00

It depends if you can give a solid reason.

so for example family children only or bf babies only or children only for people who have come from abroad etc.

TeenToTwenties · 31/05/2025 20:00

Our wedding was daytime only and most people were under 2hrs from home. We invited children we knew, but not those we didn't.

avidteadrinker · 31/05/2025 19:59

We did this for our wedding, had nephews, nieces and children of wedding party and not others. Did some people moan? Yes. did I care? Absolutely not!

MumChp · 31/05/2025 19:59

pinkyredrose · 31/05/2025 19:56

Why though? 36 kids at a wedding would be chaos!

True. But it is cherry picking.

AnneLovesGilbert · 31/05/2025 19:59

pinkyredrose · 31/05/2025 19:56

Why though? 36 kids at a wedding would be chaos!

She asked if people would be annoyed. They will. No one’s thinking about what the total number of kids will be. They care about their own families.

toastofthetown · 31/05/2025 19:58

I wouldn’t be offended at all. I’m going to a wedding later this year where my six month old isn’t invited, but if children of the wedding party or those who’d travelled long distances were there, I’d understand. I think the only thing you have to do is keep it equitable between groups of people.

CanOfMangoTango · 31/05/2025 19:57

Cyclingforcake · 31/05/2025 19:51

I think wedding party children and non mobile babies only is fine. So give them all a role and say that to everyone that asks.

Good idea. Is this possible to implement, OP?

pinkyredrose · 31/05/2025 19:56

MumChp · 31/05/2025 19:55

This.

Why though? 36 kids at a wedding would be chaos!

toomuchfaff · 31/05/2025 19:56

AnneLovesGilbert · 31/05/2025 19:47

Are people going to come to the wedding and be potentially livid that we’ve cherry picked the children that could come?

Yes.

But it doesn't matter... its your wedding. They got an invite, not a summons, they can choose to decline if they are that bothered.

Have the wedding you want, invite the kids you want, and if Sharon's 3 kids aren't invited then Sharon needs to accept that and either get a sitter to attend or not go.

HeddaGarbled · 31/05/2025 19:55

£80 for a child? Good grief! That’s an absolute rip-off.

Comedycook · 31/05/2025 19:55

My friend had family children at her wedding but didn't invite friends children. I think that is completely understandable.

MumChp · 31/05/2025 19:55

AnneLovesGilbert · 31/05/2025 19:47

Are people going to come to the wedding and be potentially livid that we’ve cherry picked the children that could come?

Yes.

This.

ColinCaterpillarsNo1Fan · 31/05/2025 19:54

Tell your cousin that you've had to restrict the kids attending due to cost to those from immediate family & party only. However, he is welcome to bring his children if he'd be willing to pay £80 per head.

Ydkiml · 31/05/2025 19:54

Let them be pissed off . Narrow minded selfish people usually are . Not your problem .

Grealish · 31/05/2025 19:54

I thought this was the norm?? We only had children we were close with at the wedding (nieces/nephews, my best friends children, DHs godchildren)

I definitely wouldn’t want 36 random kids at my wedding. I also love getting invited to kid free weddings - adore my kids but idk how I’d entertain them at someone they’ve met twices wedding ?

Swipe left for the next trending thread