Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if people were actually healthier when everyone smoked

370 replies

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:11

(I have never smoked and used to hate going to bars etc that stank of smoke so this is a very against my own interests question but)

Smoking makes people thinner (it just does)

Cigarettes can be good for people with anxiety

Smoking is a social activity and social connection is good for health

Should we try and get a tiny bit more going?

(Not me I still don't want my hair to smell)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
WiddlinDiddlin · 30/05/2025 03:45

Ahh.. a fat hate thread disguised as a pro-smoking thread.

Dying of emphysema and cancer being cheaper and less offensive than fatties waddling around everywhere I guess?

Look up 'causation vs correlation' - there are many many more factors at play in the issues you mention than merely smoking vs not smoking.

If you're certain that correlation = causation, then try these for size:

'Children drink much more water through the day now than they did 40 years ago - SEN is much more frequently DX now than 40 years ago. Therefore drinking more water causes SEN'.

'Dog attacks have risen dramatically following the legalisation of gay marriage - therefore gay marriage causes dog attacks'.

Are you starting to see how ridiculous this is?

XWKD · 30/05/2025 03:31

Are smokers nowadays thinner than non-smokers? Diet was completely different in the past.

Fruhstuck · 30/05/2025 03:22

ShotIndustry · 30/05/2025 02:35

I assume that you just want people to agree with you that smoking is s? I can't think of any other reason that somebody would ask what is barely a question. Smoking cigarettes is mediaeval, it is literally only because all the damage is hidden on the inside that people do it at all and for so long. Then again maybe you do smoke and it's the lack of oxygen to your brain that's made you ask such a dumb f question? Who knows, can't believe I've logged into mum's net just to answer you. 😞

I'm gone back to YouTube because I'm dying to know what an AIBU is!?!! Is it like a WAIFU? I'm out of here. And if I catch you smoking I'm going to make you eat the whole pack (!)

AIBU means "Am I being unreasonable?"

pollyglot · 30/05/2025 03:21

DM was an obese smoker with chronic anxiety who lived to be 96. DH, in the 60s-70s smoked, as a young sailor in the Royal Navy, as it was encouraged. He stopped in 2005, but has terrible COPD which I fear will carry him off well before his time. His DSis died at 66 of lung cancer, smoking to the end. DH coughs just like my DGF who was gassed on the Somme - it's a terrible affliction.

Fruhstuck · 30/05/2025 03:20

Sure. And perhaps we should go back to sending children to work up chimneys, in factories and down mines, because that stopped them becoming obese.

And it’s a well-known fact that people were much healthier during and immediately after WW2, so let’s start another world war and then continue with rationing for years afterwards.

ShotIndustry · 30/05/2025 02:35

I assume that you just want people to agree with you that smoking is s? I can't think of any other reason that somebody would ask what is barely a question. Smoking cigarettes is mediaeval, it is literally only because all the damage is hidden on the inside that people do it at all and for so long. Then again maybe you do smoke and it's the lack of oxygen to your brain that's made you ask such a dumb f question? Who knows, can't believe I've logged into mum's net just to answer you. 😞

I'm gone back to YouTube because I'm dying to know what an AIBU is!?!! Is it like a WAIFU? I'm out of here. And if I catch you smoking I'm going to make you eat the whole pack (!)

HornungTheHelpful · 30/05/2025 02:29

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:15

I think maybe you're dismissing too quickly the fact that hardly anyone was obese when smoking was commonplace and nobody was long term unemployed with anxiety when smoking was commonplace

I guess I forget that people rarely think about health and just believe what they are expected to believe (understandably survival attitude)

I have on occasion wondered this myself.

But I also think that “wellness” makes people less healthy so will probably be dismissed as an idiot too.

I’ve never smoked btw

Imisscoffee2021 · 30/05/2025 02:23

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:15

I think maybe you're dismissing too quickly the fact that hardly anyone was obese when smoking was commonplace and nobody was long term unemployed with anxiety when smoking was commonplace

I guess I forget that people rarely think about health and just believe what they are expected to believe (understandably survival attitude)

I grew up in the 90s next to an area of high long term unemployment where people almost expected not to work when out of school, and everyone smoked. Even if they couldn't afford other things they had ciggies. They weren't fat but they weren't healthy by a long shot, and yeah they chatted and socialised but it wasn't and isn't exactly an aspirational area or place people really want to live.

Don't think your argument stacks up, sometimes the cure is worse than the disease and this is a good example.

ToWhitToWhoo · 30/05/2025 02:03

No. In 1970, average life expectancy in the UK was 75 for women and 68.7 for men. In 1980, average life expectancy was 76.8 for women and 70.7 for men. Nowadays, it's 83 for women and 79 for men. There are many reasons for the increased life expectancy, but the decline in smoking is certainly one of them.

KnitFastDieWarm · 30/05/2025 01:50

@Fragmentedbrain I don’t think you’re going far enough tbh. Never mind smoking, how about crystal meth? Great for weight loss, would certainly pep up productivity at work, and would save on dentistry once no one had any teeth left. Foolproof.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 30/05/2025 01:46

It's easy to mock, but I think the OP might be onto something here.

The trouble is, there were quite a few changes made around the same time smoking levels started to drop - and we can't be certain which was responsible for the changing obesity rates. So we need to think bigger.

I propose we also bring back leaded petrol, asbestos, London smogs, unregulated gin distillers, cars without seatbelts, bread rationing, and mixing alum and plaster of paris into flour, just to be on the safe side.

And TB. There's nothing like a TB epidemic for bringing obesity rates right down.

theyoungishman · 30/05/2025 01:28

Assuming by your post that you're under 10 years old- maybe do some research before posting such garbage 🤗

ThatDaringEagle · 30/05/2025 01:04

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:20

Healthy life expectancy is still well below 72

So why bother with an extra 9 years in nappies

Cos those nappies may prevent vou talking sh1te!!

Smoking is disastrous for people's health on an individual & societal level. Wrt all your stupid posts about people being less obese in previous decades & you glibly attributing this to smoking more in those decades:
firstly, correlation is not causation, I.e. IF people are heavier (or more obese) now that's much more likely to be because of less exercise & manual work, changes in diet (processes foods & sugar) & lifestyle, and certainly not due to cancer & heart disease inducing smoking.

If you seriously believe all the nonsense you're proposing here, I probably need to smoke some of what you're smoking, cos it must be great to escape reality like that!?

MyDelma · 30/05/2025 01:00

I was born in the late 1850s and everyone I knew was fat.

samarrange · 30/05/2025 00:59

AInightingale · 30/05/2025 00:53

What? Maybe you are being tongue in cheek but they certainly did get cancer. I believe it was called 'wolf' on old records.

I was indeed being tongue in cheek. But I would still stand by "hardly anyone" getting cancer back then, if we allow "hardly anyone" to mean 2 or 3%, because cancer is a disease of ageing. Life back then really was nasty, brutish, and short. People are only available to die of cancer when they haven't already died of septic wounds, or the kinds of infectious diseases that are readily preventable with basic hygiene and vaccines.

BooneyBeautiful · 30/05/2025 00:56

Nominative · 29/05/2025 23:04

I think maybe you're dismissing too quickly the fact that hardly anyone was obese when smoking was commonplace

Simply not true.

I was born in the late 1950s and grew up in a small village where we all pretty much knew each other. There was probably no more than three women in the village who could be considered obese and they were only about a size 18 in today's sizes.

AInightingale · 30/05/2025 00:53

samarrange · 30/05/2025 00:52

Back in medieval times almost nobody got cancer or heart disease, and there were no ultra-processed foods. So clearly everyone must have been much healthier then.

(Joking aside, has anyone else noticed that OP's argument is precisely the one used by anti-vaxxers, as in "Yes but who ever actually gets polio?")

Edited

What? Maybe you are being tongue in cheek but they certainly did get cancer. I believe it was called 'wolf' on old records.

samarrange · 30/05/2025 00:52

Back in medieval times almost nobody got cancer or heart disease, and there were no ultra-processed foods. So clearly everyone must have been much healthier then.

(Joking aside, has anyone else noticed that OP's argument is precisely the one used by anti-vaxxers, as in "Yes but who ever actually gets polio?")

AInightingale · 30/05/2025 00:50

Do you have anxiety about dementia OP?
Having watched my octogenarian mother and uncle succumb to this vile condition, and my other uncle die of emphysema (and booze) in his mid 70s, I can see why many people might think that way. But unfortunately, cancer is also a long-drawn out death.

PluckyBamboo · 30/05/2025 00:47

You're probably correct as a large % of smokers would be dead and not be worrying about their weight or anxiety. 🙄

CookingFatCat · 30/05/2025 00:45

I miss the mindfulness of smoking, just five minutes, lunchtime going for walk at work, something about it makes me wistful.
But the cost, smell, bad breath and health worries. No thanks.

SnowFrogJelly · 30/05/2025 00:45

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:19

In the 70s about 3/4 of men smokes (look it up)

They're certainly not all dead now

In the 70s my mum and dad smoked and they both died of cancer

wind your neck in OP

Less people being overweight and suffering from anxiety wasn’t just down to smoking

AnnaL94 · 30/05/2025 00:44

Should we try and get a tiny bit more going?

No.

To get people healthier we need to stop eating ultra processed foods, takeaways. Walk more. Less screen time, more time in nature. Wearing SPF. Drinking more water. Healthy work life balance. Less binge drinking. More human interaction.

Shellianotwheels · 30/05/2025 00:39

BooneyBeautiful · 30/05/2025 00:17

Very few people were obese in the 70s. You only have to look at photos and film footage from that era to see it.

So yes, we still had fat people then.

Whattodo1610 · 30/05/2025 00:39

Wtaf is going on with mn these days?? Bloody fruit loops everywhere!!