Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cousin-in-law’s Wedding Restrictions on spouses.

591 replies

Notmotherofflowergirls · 29/05/2025 11:19

Mother-in-law’s nephew is getting married but I am not invited and neither are any other partners of cousins . I am upset as unfashionable as this is on mumsnet, I love a wedding.

Husband’s brothers-in-law are thrilled that they don’t have to be dragged to an in-law wedding. I would refer to it as a family wedding.

The Groom wrote a letter to all of his 11 first cousins explaining his reasons. I think it’s great that he has included his cousins. It will be nice for them.

I am upset but unreasonable to be so. I am not being singled out.

Now here is my AIBU at last! I was going to stay in the hotel, a really nice one with a spa, I know another cousin’s husband was going too as well to play golf there.

Cousin has now written to everyone again saying that they understand that some spouses are going to the ceremony (I was most definitely NOT going to do this) and taking advantage of the venue’s amenities. He has said that he just wanted to say that a bar was reserved just for this invited guests the night before , this hadn’t occurred to me. There will be no further capacity for the evening (I did think, hope, that they might invite me in for a dance (I have NEVER mentioned this to anyone)and he was hoping guests would all have breakfast together.

What does everyone think? Fair enough for the wedding but all the other restrictions????

OP posts:
blubberyboo · 29/05/2025 16:13

RisingSunn · 29/05/2025 15:59

Exactly this - and its not as if the spa etc are included in the price.
The whole thing sounds so awkward. OP will be having breakfast alone too - so I just don't see the point.

Plenty of women use spa facilities on their own eg when hubby is off playing golf.
There is no obligation for her DH to attend the family breakfast. He might feel like having a lie in and shagging his very relaxed wife in a room he has paid for.

The cousin can rightfully ask for spouses not to attend the wedding parts but he cannot mandate all the invited guests to be at every part.

Even if he did attend the breakfast OP can order breakfast in bed via room service.

I don't see the issue

Notonthestairs · 29/05/2025 16:13

In theory it sounds fine to accompany your husband & busy yourself.
I suspect the reality is that you’ll be bumping into weddings guests in corridors and lifts and asked why you aren’t in attendance.

An evening sat on your own, either in the restaurant or the room is perfectly fine but I think by that point I’d feel a bit bored and want a bit of company. I suppose you could go for dinner with the golf spouse.

Overall I think I’d let my husband get on with it and do something else over the weekend.

ColinCaterpillarsNo1Fan · 29/05/2025 16:13

I don't know why you couldn't have described the groom as your dh's cousin instead of your miles nephew which is a bit long winded.

Riaanna · 29/05/2025 16:13

nomas · 29/05/2025 15:47

Not that small when all the 11+ cousins are invited.

But smaller than if 11 cousins plus 11 partners are coming.

Catandsquirrel · 29/05/2025 16:12

I don't think you need to be put off going (to the hotel, not the wedding). It's a big hotel and you were planning a spa day, relaxing walk and dinner. Especially if it's some distance away. Why waste the cost of the bed and transport if you can have a nice day yourself somewhere new?

I imagine the groom has been receiving requests for exceptions to be made for this and that cousin and has had to send a blanket communication.

I think 11 cousins is a lot to squeeze into the wedding and he's had to be firm. I don't think you need to feel banished from the whole village. Just exercise discretion. Go down separately, and do your own thing all day so it's not a thing that you're chatting lots to people on the day and the couple have well meaning comments to field about not inviting you. Maybe have a quick chat then next day if you see anyone.

Acknowledge the groom's message if so, let him know you may be at the hotel for a separate solo break but won't be joining the wedding and wish them.well. I think that's fine. You're not pressing your nose against the window or being off, it's not a very close relative, you're just taking the opportunity for a nice trip.

I get what you meant about having a dance if they opened the doors later but not expecting it.

Teenybub · 29/05/2025 16:12

CowboyFromHell · 29/05/2025 16:07

Your mother in law’s nephew is getting married, and you’re annoyed you’re not invited? I’m struggling to even remember the names of my mother in law’s nephews!

The fact they are referred to as MILs nephews rather than DHs cousin highlights to me they are a distant relative in terms of closeness. Why would anyone want to go to something where they aren’t wanted. I wonder if OPs DH is feeling embarrassed.

CantStopMoving · 29/05/2025 16:12

Darkmudder · 29/05/2025 16:10

This is why they needed to write a letter - for people like you - pushing boundaries.

Your agenda despite your protestations once called out are clear.

You said you were "upset"

You titled the thread "restrictions on spouses"

The B&G have spent, time and their money to make choices and preferences for their once in a lifetime wedding.

These are their 'choices' not 'restrictions on spouses - no need for you to be 'upset'.

You are just embarassing yourself. Just accept how they wish to spend their money.

The B&G are not paying for the accommodation nor the breakfast and potentially not even paying for the drinks the night before.

cardibach · 29/05/2025 16:12

MyLimeGuide · 29/05/2025 16:10

Yes!!! If you can't afford it you dont do it!!!

You don’t get married at all because you can’t invite everyone whose wedding you’ve attended?
MN is insane sometimes.

RandomMess · 29/05/2025 16:12

I think it’s perfectly reasonable for you to use the hotel room, non-wedding facilities. Your DH doesn’t have to attend the breakfast the following day or drink in the bar the night before.

It would have been lovely for you to enjoy some couple time before and after the wedding itself.

cardibach · 29/05/2025 16:10

Teenybub · 29/05/2025 16:08

Or really shitty to the couple getting married. Seems childish to try detract from the day of people that don’t even want you there.

Who says they don’t want them there? They might be gutted that finances prevent it.

MyLimeGuide · 29/05/2025 16:10

cardibach · 29/05/2025 15:55

It’s a weird way to decide the guest list for your wedding in my opinion. What about friends who you are really close to who aren’t married yet? Do they just get shoved off the list for someone who invited you to their wedding years ago?
Plus what if you can’t afford that? Do you invite nobody and not get married?

Yes!!! If you can't afford it you dont do it!!!

Darkmudder · 29/05/2025 16:10

This is why they needed to write a letter - for people like you - pushing boundaries.

Your agenda despite your protestations once called out are clear.

You said you were "upset"

You titled the thread "restrictions on spouses"

The B&G have spent, time and their money to make choices and preferences for their once in a lifetime wedding.

These are their 'choices' not 'restrictions on spouses - no need for you to be 'upset'.

You are just embarassing yourself. Just accept how they wish to spend their money.

CantStopMoving · 29/05/2025 16:08

NoSoupForU · 29/05/2025 16:06

If I were going to a wedding and staying over that my husband was not attending I'd find it really odd if he wanted to tag along and hang around the hotel.

really? I have done it loads over the years and he once stayed with me at a conference I went to. We both just enjoyed the pool and just sat and read books and just enjoyed the break. Don’t get why that is weird.

Riaanna · 29/05/2025 16:08

nomas · 29/05/2025 15:46

Then have a small wedding. It's rude to leave out OP when she invited them to her wedding and they have seen her hundreds of times since. She isn't stranger they barely meet.

They are literally having a smaller wedding hence the OP isn’t invited 😂

Teenybub · 29/05/2025 16:08

GarlicPile · 29/05/2025 15:29

I've read your posts, @Notmotherofflowergirls, not all the replies.

Have you talked to the other cousins? You mentioned one non-invitee wanted to use the golf course; are there others? If some of them were thinking along similar lines, you might end up forming a little posse of 'non-invited non-wedding guests' and make arrangements for your group to have drinks, dinner, breakfast and so forth together.

Could be fun 😎

Edited

Or really shitty to the couple getting married. Seems childish to try detract from the day of people that don’t even want you there.

blubberyboo · 29/05/2025 16:08

You are perfectly entitled to go to anything not being paid for by the bride and groom.

Your DH is paying for the room and you will be using other facilities. You should absolutely stay away from any part of the wedding such as predrinks.

The cousin seems happy to communicate so your DH could write him a note to this effect. Ie c
"I'm paying for a room and my wife will accompany me to make use of this facility, and a romantic weekend away for us, but will use other hotel facilities whilst wedding activities are happening. She is quite comfortable doing so"

You of course can go eat breakfast or use hotel bar like any other member of the public, just not as part of the group. Wipe all notions of being asked to dance tho.

The cousin has no reason to be embarrassed

CowboyFromHell · 29/05/2025 16:07

Your mother in law’s nephew is getting married, and you’re annoyed you’re not invited? I’m struggling to even remember the names of my mother in law’s nephews!

Riaanna · 29/05/2025 16:07

GarlicPile · 29/05/2025 15:37

A flatmate and I did it a few times 😂 We were young, hard-up and on a mission to scrounge good food and drinks in as many ways as possible. Had some nice times dancing at various receptions with various people. One rather intimidating mother of the bride challenged me. I told her she was right, I wasn't invited, and it was a marvellous wedding; the canapes were the best I'd seen (well, they were pretty good). She turned out to be a proper charmer and introduced me to everyone as the wedding crasher 😍

So total strangers? Not quite the same.

ARichtGoodDram · 29/05/2025 16:07

BangersAndGnash · 29/05/2025 15:57

I am betting that one of the cousins (maybe more) has a spouse who is likely to get drunk and disorderly at the wedding, crash the bar the night before and drink the tab dry, and may have shagged the best man / head bridesmaid or caused some other havoc.

And they have dealt with it by keeping all the spouses at bay.

I see no reason for you not to stay in a hotel room paid for by you and your DH, and to stay well away from the wedding activities as you describe.

Just get on with your walk to the village etc. It’s fine!

Either that or the bride has loads of cousins and the numbers would be too massive.

We had cousins, but no spouses at our wedding. I only have 5 cousins and I knew only 1 of them would travel anyway and they were single so made no difference.

My FIL was one of 15 and MIL one of 9 so DH has nigh on 60 cousins 😂😂 No spouses of cousins is totally the norm in his family (as is inviting some cousins and not others sometimes)

NoSoupForU · 29/05/2025 16:06

If I were going to a wedding and staying over that my husband was not attending I'd find it really odd if he wanted to tag along and hang around the hotel.

Strawberriesforever · 29/05/2025 16:05

It’s not personal OP.
Either the problem is they have catered for a specific number of people and extras at the bar/breakfast will throw off the quantities, or the venue has restrictions on numbers, probably due to fire regulations, and the couple risk issues with the venue if extra people turn up. To mitigate these problems, there may well be a guest list and a hotel staff member at the door - in which case the groom is just trying to avoid embarrassment for everyone if cousins’ partners try to get in.

MyLimeGuide · 29/05/2025 16:05

Shellianotwheels · 29/05/2025 11:32

Cringe. Why on earth are you even going to the hotel? You’re not invited and it’s rude to just show up. You’re embarrassing yourself and your husband.

This.

Shellianotwheels · 29/05/2025 16:05

Op @Notmotherofflowergirls can you show us the letter or write up what was said, the exact words used. It will help everyone make up their mind if it was it a friendly heads up about private areas only for guests or a very entitled letter demanding you don’t use the hotel services.

Bloodtuch · 29/05/2025 16:03

Shellianotwheels · 29/05/2025 16:02

Did you read what op said? The letter was a heads up saying the bar was only for the invited guests, which would have been an area that was private and probably reserved. What’s the issue with that? The wedding breakfast probably was also in a reserved private area, so again if you’re not invited you don’t attend. Why don’t know what the letter said, maybe op should show us

A wedding breakfast isn't breakfast the day after the wedding.

Shellianotwheels · 29/05/2025 16:02

Sunholidays · 29/05/2025 15:54

The OP is questioning the letter she has received reminding them that only their guests are to enjoy the hotel amenities during the wedding. A very awkward letter IMO.

Did you read what op said? The letter was a heads up saying the bar was only for the invited guests, which would have been an area that was private and probably reserved. What’s the issue with that? The wedding breakfast probably was also in a reserved private area, so again if you’re not invited you don’t attend. Why don’t know what the letter said, maybe op should show us