Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Professional Ex vs SAHM

162 replies

TheFirstSeaMonster · 28/05/2025 21:22

Ex wants 50/50 custody which is fine although with his working pattern it’s more likely to be 60/40. 2 children. I am a SAHM and I’ll be returning to work in the autumn.

Ex has been very calm (too calm!) since I ended our marriage. He wasn’t happy that I’ll be classed as the primary carer and I’ll be getting UC but I would end up in poverty without it and I am the primary carer. Ex husband earns £47000 per year - I’m getting UC plus carers allowance for one child. He keeps saying “as long as we don’t screw each other over” everything will be ok.

He thinks he won’t have to pay CM as we will be 50/50. He wants to keep our child’s mobility car and pay me a part of his mobility payment(not all) and I would get the carers (high rate) DLA.
He seems to think he won’t pay me anything? He feels like he’s been screwed over already as he won’t be on the UC claim anymore and isn’t classed as the primary carer.
Seeking advice please. I want us to remain friendly and civil but I also don’t want to be “screwed over” nor do I want to leave ex broke…

on the CM calculator I am entitled to something (£450 per month)

How does 50/50 custody work if one parent earns a decent wage and the other is a carer?

Sorry not AIBU but seeking advice thanks

OP posts:
ButItWasNotYourFaultButMine · 29/05/2025 16:03

TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 13:57

Update - thanks for all your advice. I’ll definitely seek legal advice about this. Ex continues to say that we should sort everything out between ourselves. He is now saying he wants to go for primary carer and UC for our teenager. He is talking about picking up our children at 8.30pm from mine for the extra overnights. He is also stating over and over - “ you won’t go after me for child maintenance will you?” “Promise me you won’t go after me for CM” He already pays for a child he’s never met (now a teenager) he’s basically saying that he already pays for one child, he can’t afford to pay for any more etc.

And the truth comes out ... This is why he wants the car. He was planning to go for primary carer all along, even though that is clearly you, and will screw you over at every turn.

Get a lawyer. Spend the money. Get a lawyer. Don't give up your primary carer status and either learn to drive or sell the car.

File for CMS and get every penny your child, HIS CHILD, is entitled to to have a decent life on. He shouldn't have had children if he didn't want to pay for them. Arsehole!

InterIgnis · 29/05/2025 15:54

TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 15:50

No, that’s way too late, especially for our youngest. He’s now talking about his mother offering to sit with our oldest in Ex house until ex comes home at 8.30 which is obviously good to know it’s an option but if I’m sitting in my house down the road why would I not be with my child? Plus that seems like a sneaky way of doing many more overnights without the childcare.

Because it would be his time with them, and as their father it would be up to him to organize childcare, even if you would be willing to have them.

A father requesting 50/50 is likely to get it, so be prepared for that.

TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 15:50

TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 15:42

He’s talking about applying for primary carer for our teenager and claiming the UC on top of his wages.

No, that’s way too late, especially for our youngest. He’s now talking about his mother offering to sit with our oldest in Ex house until ex comes home at 8.30 which is obviously good to know it’s an option but if I’m sitting in my house down the road why would I not be with my child? Plus that seems like a sneaky way of doing many more overnights without the childcare.

OP posts:
InterIgnis · 29/05/2025 15:45

Snoken · 29/05/2025 14:31

If there is a difference in income you will receive cms even when it's 50/50 care. It sounds like OP will be entitled to some.

That would only apply if OP’s husband earned in excess of £156,000 gross.

Barrenfieldoffucks · 29/05/2025 15:43

Please tell me you're not agreeing to an 830 pick up? You'll end up unable to work but not receiving CM, while he is unaffected.

You need a solicitor and to go through the CSA. Stop talking to h, you can see how unreasonable he is.

TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 15:42

He’s talking about applying for primary carer for our teenager and claiming the UC on top of his wages.

OP posts:
TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 15:41

x2boys · 29/05/2025 14:16

Are you ignoring the fact he has them 50% of the time?

So realistically after much talking it is likely he will have our youngest for 2 or 3 nights per week and our teenager will go between houses 50/50.

OP posts:
TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 15:36

So it’s now a case of trying to figure out what happens with the mobility car and carers element of UC

OP posts:
TheFirstSeaMonster · 29/05/2025 15:35

x2boys · 29/05/2025 14:07

It's 50/50
Nobody seems to be asking if the Op is sharing the DLA as it's also supposed to benefit the child 100% of the child

Just had another conversation and after looking at ex H rota the custody arrangement is likely to be 60/40 or 2-3 nights per week at his.

OP posts:
HopscotchBanana · 29/05/2025 15:32

nomas · 29/05/2025 14:09

Do not agree to this!

8.30pm is too late, he is trying to game the system.

And please apply for CM.

OP have you been living under a rock? Seriously. How many threads are there where the dickhead father wants the kids ten minutes before bedtime, then returns them in the morning because CMS only care about where the child spends the night. Are you suggesting you've never seen any of these?

He's got to turn into a prize prick unless you let him screw you over. So ask yourself . Are you going to be financially abused so he can live pretty at your expense, or are you going to do 99% of the parenting from now on because he only wants the kids (at night) to stop a CMS claim, not because he wants to see them, and when you don't let him do that, it's of no use to him to see them at all. Wake up.

Workinginthelivingroom · 29/05/2025 15:28

You need to stand your ground, claim CMS and tell him to go through court for 50/50 as it's very clear he isn't going to be stepping up and caring for your disabled DC. I'd imagine if your recieve carers allowance and DLA then your DC isn’t going to manage regular breakfast club, after school club and holiday club. So ask him in court to evidence how he is going to provide care on his days. Get proof of how much you expect care to cost, as hiring a carer for a disabled DC often costs in excess of £100 p/h and clearly he doesn't earn enough to afford that.

MyCyanReader · 29/05/2025 15:21

TheFirstSeaMonster · 28/05/2025 21:22

Ex wants 50/50 custody which is fine although with his working pattern it’s more likely to be 60/40. 2 children. I am a SAHM and I’ll be returning to work in the autumn.

Ex has been very calm (too calm!) since I ended our marriage. He wasn’t happy that I’ll be classed as the primary carer and I’ll be getting UC but I would end up in poverty without it and I am the primary carer. Ex husband earns £47000 per year - I’m getting UC plus carers allowance for one child. He keeps saying “as long as we don’t screw each other over” everything will be ok.

He thinks he won’t have to pay CM as we will be 50/50. He wants to keep our child’s mobility car and pay me a part of his mobility payment(not all) and I would get the carers (high rate) DLA.
He seems to think he won’t pay me anything? He feels like he’s been screwed over already as he won’t be on the UC claim anymore and isn’t classed as the primary carer.
Seeking advice please. I want us to remain friendly and civil but I also don’t want to be “screwed over” nor do I want to leave ex broke…

on the CM calculator I am entitled to something (£450 per month)

How does 50/50 custody work if one parent earns a decent wage and the other is a carer?

Sorry not AIBU but seeking advice thanks

To me it seems like he wants the 50/50 custody and primary carer of the disabled child so that he can keep the car as that's his method of transport to get to work.

I assume he doesn't have another car?

If he's not the primary carer, then as you don't drive, you would be far better off getting the mobility payment so you can pay for taxis/buses etc... and clearly this would impact him and not you.

If he wants to do 50/50, then he can't just collect them at 8.30pm unless that's ok with you. His 24 hours for that day would then need to be until 8.30pm the next day.

I think I'd be contemplating legal advice, but also putting forward your own proposal of what you feel is fair. e.g. he keeps the mobility car but pays you £300 a month.

Snorlaxo · 29/05/2025 15:12

If ex had a week off he would help to transport our son to respite or any hospital appointments etc.

He might do that now but I wouldn’t be so confident that he’d take time off to help your child. Divorced men often prioritise their own needs like seeing their new woman over their kids as they see it as the mum’s problem.

Snorlaxo · 29/05/2025 15:10

If you do agree to 50/50 then make sure he pays you money for feeding dc and any other costs on “his nights” like dc’s bus fare from school to your home. Can teen travel from school to his house on their own? He can’t have 50/50 without changing his working hours or buying in help. Most men decide that paying CM is better because it’s less money and less hassle (no booking childcare on school holidays, taking day off if child is ill etc)

beesandstrawberries · 29/05/2025 14:55

TheFirstSeaMonster · 28/05/2025 22:06

I don’t drive and ex would be using the car to get to work, I would pay for taxis and busses for our son. If ex had a week off he would help to transport our son to respite or any hospital appointments etc. It’s a complicated one.

If he will be using the car when the child is not in his care or he’s not doing activities for the disabled child - ie picking up child’s shopping as opposed to going to work and using it for his own personal reasons. He will be committing benefit fraud. It would be different if that was the households car and the parent had the child 100% of the time, but that is not the case so

jeaux90 · 29/05/2025 14:51

OP this is why you need a solicitor. You will need to get a CAO in place so he can’t mess you about with nonsense like picking kids up at 8.30pm.

SomethingInnocuousForNow · 29/05/2025 14:45

What will your salary be OP?

SomethingInnocuousForNow · 29/05/2025 14:44

x2boys · 29/05/2025 14:16

Are you ignoring the fact he has them 50% of the time?

No, because although he's said he wants them 50% of the time, the reality is he can't have the younger disabled child that much. He seems to want to have his cake (no CM and extra UC) and eat it (not actually provide 50:50).

I believe upthread he was suggesting really silly arrangements not in best interests of children like picking them up at 8.30pm so he could say he'd had them for the evening / night.

I am concerned that he's not going to step up for the disabled child and is wishfully thinking this won't affect his work at all.

He's also just not the 'primary carer' in any way.

Mrsttcno1 · 29/05/2025 14:44

I think you are on shakey ground to be honest and the best way to move forward is for both of you to accept that you’re not functioning as a family unit now, you’re going to be two households and just try and figure out what works best for everyone.

£47k isn’t a high earner, 50/50 you’re getting £0, the calculator is notoriously inaccurate for 50/50.

The car- technically yes he could keep it and use it for work, if he can’t go to work he can’t pay for anything for your kids, but how would that impact you/DC? I’d work out how often currently the car is used/needed for DC, appointments, food shops, prescriptions, school etc, work out what impact that’s going to have and then you can see whether you’d be better off letting the car stay or giving it back and using the money for taxi’s instead.

If you’re claiming the DLA, and you want to be petty about transferring money for the car, you should also be transferring him money from that because that money is for the child 100% of the time- you do not have the child 100% of the time.

Snorlaxo · 29/05/2025 14:43

He is trying to con you.
50/50 means he needs to do whole days so if Monday is an inset day then he needs to take the time off or organise childcare for the younger child (who I assume is the one with SN) He can’t pick up the kids after work and drop off in the morning. That’s technically how CMS works (overnights) but isn’t in the spirit of things. He can’t have every weekend to make up his time either. Start with every other weekend (so you can both chill with the kids on their days off school) and remind him that there’s 13 weeks of school holidays and he’s responsible for whole days not just nights. He does school run and pick ups, takes to activities and clubs, takes the day off when they are sick…

If he does 50/50 then technically you’re supposed to claim child benefit for one child each. Make sure he does a true 50%

Rainbowpony6 · 29/05/2025 14:33

You have a disabled child
50/50 care is not in your child's best interests
You need to end the lease on the car and gave the money to pay for taxis
You are the carer of your child ,your DC needs to be in one place with you the majority of the time ,not chopping and changing houses causing confusion

Snoken · 29/05/2025 14:32

RandomMess · 29/05/2025 14:27

Pick them up at 8.30pm 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 nope they are his responsibility from the end of school until he takes them back to school the next day as you will be working/studying/having a life!!

And yes, this! He can't just have them for the hours they sleep and then dump them with you again so that he doesn't have to do any actual caring. 24 hour period should count as a day.

Rainbowpony6 · 29/05/2025 14:31

TheFirstSeaMonster · 28/05/2025 22:06

I don’t drive and ex would be using the car to get to work, I would pay for taxis and busses for our son. If ex had a week off he would help to transport our son to respite or any hospital appointments etc. It’s a complicated one.

That is absolutely not what the car is for
It totally is not to get your DH to work
That is taking advantage of the system

Snoken · 29/05/2025 14:31

x2boys · 29/05/2025 14:16

Are you ignoring the fact he has them 50% of the time?

If there is a difference in income you will receive cms even when it's 50/50 care. It sounds like OP will be entitled to some.

RandomMess · 29/05/2025 14:27

Pick them up at 8.30pm 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 nope they are his responsibility from the end of school until he takes them back to school the next day as you will be working/studying/having a life!!