Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Who's read 'Age of Diagnosis' (overdiagnosis in Long Covid, ADHD, Lymes, autism, cancer screening)

437 replies

FrodoBiggins · 27/05/2025 23:42

Inspired by another thread, has anyone read/ listened to Suzanne O’Sullivan's new book Age of Diagnosis? I just finished it and found it so interesting. She's a high profile consultant neurologist.

Touches on Long Covid, Autism, ADHD, Lymes disease (all in terms of diagnostic debates) and also Huntingdons genetic testing and Cancer/ Alzheimers screening (along what benefits there are of knowing of a risk/ certainty of future illness, especially if there is no cure).

I'll quote from a review:

"in her outstanding new book O’Sullivan offers a third possibility; that variance in bodily and mental health is being unnecessarily medicalised and pathologised: “We are not getting sicker – we are attributing more to sickness.”
She describes a trinity of “overs”. Overdiagnosis, where a medical problem is treated when treatment might not be needed; overmedicalisation, where non-medical behaviours are turned into the business of doctors; and underlying both, overdetection: we are ever better at identifying signals of disease, sometimes earlier than necessary, when those indicators may not end up presaging the disease itself. Alongside balanced analysis of the epidemiological data on prostate and breast cancer, O’Sullivan examines the growth in behavioural conditions such as autism and ADHD. The tone is not sneering or dismissive, as debunkings of bad science so often can be. O’Sullivan is instead full of compassion, care and grace."

I believe it was also the Radio 4 Book of the Week. The full review quoted from above is here: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/mar/12/the-age-of-diagnosis-by-suzanne-osullivan-review-do-no-harm?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

Has anyone else read it? Thoughts?

The Age of Diagnosis by Suzanne O’Sullivan review – do no harm

A doctor’s brilliant study of the dangers of overdiagnosis, from ADHD to long Covid

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/mar/12/the-age-of-diagnosis-by-suzanne-osullivan-review-do-no-harm?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

OP posts:
faerietales · 28/05/2025 09:27

ThatDenimExpert · 28/05/2025 08:56

Life is very stressful, synthetic materials, and unnatural environments. So I can see how someone could be diagnosed with adhd or high functioning autism when their symptoms wouldn’t be there if they hadn’t had such a stressful life.

This implies that autism goes away when your environment changes - but it’s more the case that certain environments mean you don’t have to mask, and therefore you’re less likely to shut down or go into burnout.

Sensory overload is a huge thing for me so I’ve set up a business that minimises my triggers. I couldn’t do that in school or if I was forced to work in an office or a shop.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 09:26

OneBadKitty · 28/05/2025 09:22

I think there is definitely an over diagnosis of ADHD and Autism going on. I work in a primary school, and in the class of 30 I work in, the teacher and other staff are claiming that at least 10 of the children have some form of neurodiversity. There are 3 who definitely are ND in my view, however, the rest are questionable in my opinion- children are all different, having a little personality quirk, struggling to not shout out, liking learning facts, being a bit of a fidget, having a strong interest in something etc. do not automatically make you ND. Not being a perfect model pupil at age 7 does not equal ADHD.

“Not being a perfect model pupil at age 7 does not equal ADHD” and wouldn’t get you a diagnosis.

We’re talking about actual diagnosis .

RedBeech · 28/05/2025 09:25

ArtTheClownIsNotAMime · 27/05/2025 23:57

I haven't read it but will look for a copy, thanks OP. It's a topic that interests me, especially the overdiagnosis of autism and ADHD.

I am biased but I am SO sick of people trotting out 'over-diagnosis' of ADHD and autism.

There was no diagnosis of either condition, except at the absolute extreme end of the autistic specturm, for decades. So of course there will be a surge these days as a) children and teens get correctly diagnosed and b) adults who spent their lives struggling and wondering what was wrong with them finally discover why. That is three generations at least, catching up.

I was diagnosed with ADHD at 59. That was six decades of being screamed at for being forgetful by teachers and parents. Missing an A level because I forgot what day the exam was on, so getting a D when I was predicted an A. Losing friends, boyfriends and offending family because I forgot meet ups and birthdays, of being incapable of holding down a steady job. Getting into trouble on the underground because I forgot to renew my weekly pass. of Locking myself out of the house about three times a week. Spending at least an hour every day frantically looking for keys/phone/handbag/travel pass. Not understanding when people said in exasperation: just find a place to keep them and always put them there, because if I could remember to do that when I walked through the door, then there wouldn't be an issue in the first place. Having a chaotic, confused approach to cleaning and tidying, unable to keep on top of the laundry, missing dental and doctors' appointments. Double and sometimes triple booking clients when I first became self employed, and having to cancel at last minute. Getting truly depressed that I knew I was clever and talented in my field but simply couldn't manage the ordinary day to day stuff that went alongside it. Doing jobs sometimes for very long hours, worth a lot of money and not being paid for them because I forgot the final stage of submitting an invoice.

I could go on and on and on. I have had friends smirk and roll their eyes when i say I have been diagnosed. But since taking ADHD medication, I don't forget things. The constant noise in my head (a combination of very aggressive, negative self-talk combined with a weird noise which is like listening to people talking loudly while a television blares, through the walls of a cheap hotel) is gone. The food noise is gone.

DS was diagnosed with autism aged 12. It transformed his life. His brilliant school offered oustanding support, helping him socialise, so for the first time he started to make lasting friendships. All teachers were informed, so they knew to use very direct language (e.g. he used to get in trouble for not doing homework because teachers would say 'Finish that off in your own time or before next class.' He needed to hear: 'Your homework is to finish...' otherwise he had no idea it was homework. We helped him get super-organised. He is now thriving. he went from bottom sets to top sets, from profoundly lonely and low to surrounded by friends, from zero interest in hobbies to getting really good at something he loves, from zero confidence to a real knack of acing job interviews.

DH has not been diagnosed, but after sitting in on DS's lengthy assessment, he realised his answers, which he thought were normal, tallied with DS's. It has saved our marriage. I now understand him far better.

I see my niece suffer so badly, underachieving, deeply distressed and chaotic. It is like watching my own life all over again. But my sister doesn't believe in ADHD. I know Ritalin would transform her life.

It is so easy for people who don't suffer one of these below the radar illnesses like ME, CFS, mild autism, ADHD to sweepingly criticise over-diagnosis. Yes, the world is full of very different types of people. But we are not allowed to be different. There is an expected norm. That people don't forget appointments, do have the energy to keep on top of housework, or to do a 9-5 job every day.

It can't work both ways. It's not okay to say: stop seeking diagnosis. You are within the realms of normal but simply failing at being normal, which is what so many of us spent our lives battling with.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 09:25

TheAgileGoldPoet · 28/05/2025 09:21

Our overdiagnosis epidemic - New Statesman

https://nypost.com/2023/04/24/doctor-who-broadened-autism-spectrum-sorry-for-over-diagnosis/

In answer to your question, A LOT of people want a diagnosis of ND. I used to diagnose adult ADHD as part of an NHS clinic which did great, multi-disciplinary assessments and because of the information required and the screening process before assessment, we diagnosed over the overwhelming majority of the people we saw.

And although with all psychiatric and ND assessments, there are personal biases and blind-spots in we may have got some wrong, I think we mostly got it right but the people who didn't receive a diagnosis were often very invested in the diagnosis and very upset to not be given one. I can think of only one person I saw who seemed relieved. Many people were upset, some were angry and some were threatening.

And quite often, the people who hadn't been diagnosed went to a private Psychiatrist to get a diagnosis thinking that would get them back into the NHS system. And quite often, someone had already got a private diagnosis to 'jump the NHS queue' into treatment by the NHS and were pissed off when the diagnosis was not upheld. Many were upheld though.

After the Panorama programme a few years ago expressing concern about private ADHD diagnosis, a world-expert in adult ADHD who championed the diagnosis and the provision of adult ADHD services in the UK, Professor Marios Adamou OBE said that in his NHS clinic, 50% of the private diagnosis assessments reviewed by the clinic, would not have recieved a diagnosis in his NHS adult ADHD clinic.

That documentary has since been scrutinised and criticised for poor journalism.

It is hard and very expensive ( if private)to get an autism diagnosis. ADHD diagnosis is expensive as is subsequent titration and funding of meds

You would only want either on your medical records for very good reasons.

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 28/05/2025 09:22

The book sounds interesting. I'm a teacher and every training session I've had on SEND in the last few years has pointed out that many the strategies for making lessons more accessible for ND pupils almost always actually benefit all pupils, which is a good point. The same could be said about changing fundamental aspects of our school system.

I agree in principle with a lot of what has been said about our school system being unfit for purpose and over-focussed on exams. In many countries they don't have high-stakes exams until the age we do A Levels. However, I think people over-estimate how flexible it is possible for individual schools to be in terms of offering different pathways and options, due to staffing and timetable issues.

The thing I've noticed being pathologised is anxiety (and I say that as someone who has suffered it). Kids are learning that being anxious about something means that they 'have anxiety'.

OneBadKitty · 28/05/2025 09:22

I think there is definitely an over diagnosis of ADHD and Autism going on. I work in a primary school, and in the class of 30 I work in, the teacher and other staff are claiming that at least 10 of the children have some form of neurodiversity. There are 3 who definitely are ND in my view, however, the rest are questionable in my opinion- children are all different, having a little personality quirk, struggling to not shout out, liking learning facts, being a bit of a fidget, having a strong interest in something etc. do not automatically make you ND. Not being a perfect model pupil at age 7 does not equal ADHD.

mugglewump · 28/05/2025 09:21

I've not read the book, but I am skeptical. Claims of over-diagnosis of ND conditions smacks of the far right (eg Farage's claims). The increases in diagnosis, IMO, is the growing acceptability of being neurodivergent and the comfort people can get from a diagnosis so that they are no longer worrying about what's wrong with them and having to mask all day long, which is exhausting.

Since learning to recognise traits in undiagnosed children, I have become a much better teacher because I know which behaviours to ignore and how to steer children back on to the right path when they are exhibiting ND behaviours not conducive to the learning in the classroom. When you hear older people (Gen X or Boomer) say I hated school, I didn't get on at school etc, a lot of this is because their ND was not recognised and instead they were punished for behaviours they either could not help, or didn't not understand why they were not acceptable. I've heard that 1 in 100 children are ND, but I would say there are at least one in every classroom so these conditions are still being uderdiagnosed.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 09:21

I’m staggered somebody could be so arrogant as to lecture to cancer, ND, Lyme, Covid…consultants and specialists.

She apparently thinks she has equivalent knowledge in all. 🤣

TheAgileGoldPoet · 28/05/2025 09:21

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 08:39

Care to link?

This really is ridiculous. It is under diagnosed.Minor traits don’t get you a diagnosis. It’s very hard to get a diagnosis. The waiting lists are massive and it’s very expensive. Who would want ND on their medical records by choice?

Our overdiagnosis epidemic - New Statesman

https://nypost.com/2023/04/24/doctor-who-broadened-autism-spectrum-sorry-for-over-diagnosis/

In answer to your question, A LOT of people want a diagnosis of ND. I used to diagnose adult ADHD as part of an NHS clinic which did great, multi-disciplinary assessments and because of the information required and the screening process before assessment, we diagnosed over the overwhelming majority of the people we saw.

And although with all psychiatric and ND assessments, there are personal biases and blind-spots in we may have got some wrong, I think we mostly got it right but the people who didn't receive a diagnosis were often very invested in the diagnosis and very upset to not be given one. I can think of only one person I saw who seemed relieved. Many people were upset, some were angry and some were threatening.

And quite often, the people who hadn't been diagnosed went to a private Psychiatrist to get a diagnosis thinking that would get them back into the NHS system. And quite often, someone had already got a private diagnosis to 'jump the NHS queue' into treatment by the NHS and were pissed off when the diagnosis was not upheld. Many were upheld though.

After the Panorama programme a few years ago expressing concern about private ADHD diagnosis, a world-expert in adult ADHD who championed the diagnosis and the provision of adult ADHD services in the UK, Professor Marios Adamou OBE said that in his NHS clinic, 50% of the private diagnosis assessments reviewed by the clinic, would not have recieved a diagnosis in his NHS adult ADHD clinic.

Our overdiagnosis epidemic

How a marked rise in the treatment of certain conditions – physical and mental – is harming, not protecting, public health.

https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/books/book-of-the-day/2025/03/our-overdiagnosis-epidemic

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 09:19

BlueTitFly · 28/05/2025 09:09

@L00pl00p

Oh I think it could be very common with an under resourced NHS, lack of paediatricians, people being taken into the job with little experience, high turnover (DS has now seen 3 different paediatricians as 2 have left and been replaced), high demand, cost cutting, I’m 100% sure the reason to take DS off the screening list was to save money.

You need a lot of evidence to get an autism diagnosis and the wait lists are insane. One crappy paed who has since left doesn’t infer there is mass over diagnosis when the data doesn’t match that either.

PawsAndTails · 28/05/2025 09:12

WitheringHighs · 28/05/2025 09:04

Such a useful viewpoint. I have witnessed a person who was capable of a PhD (started, but didn't finish) regress to inability to leave the house, entirely dependent on a caregiver and almost non-verbal s a result of 'possible autism'. Not even fully diagnosed. True iatrogenic harm.

And I've seen someone go from dropping out of university three times, to being diagnosed with ADHD, which enabled them to not only graduate but get to a PhD.

DrBlackbird · 28/05/2025 09:11

I remember listening to this woman be interviewed on R4 for her book "It’s All In Your Head" and recounting patient stories. Her faux ‘compassion’ was risible and, to me, her smug arrogance came through loud and clear.

On an individual level, I felt sorry for those who had her as their neurologist. More widely, it was depressing at the thought of the damage this book would do as other doctors read it and began to discount their patient’s symptoms as psychosomatic even more.

If only someone would write a book on the number of people harmed by having their unexplainable symptoms dismissed or minimised by patronising doctors.

And now she’s at it again with this new book. Yes, there are dangers from pathologising and over prescription but in my opinion this book, like the others, grotesquely overstates medical knowledge in understanding human illness and the human body.

BlueTitFly · 28/05/2025 09:09

@L00pl00p

Oh I think it could be very common with an under resourced NHS, lack of paediatricians, people being taken into the job with little experience, high turnover (DS has now seen 3 different paediatricians as 2 have left and been replaced), high demand, cost cutting, I’m 100% sure the reason to take DS off the screening list was to save money.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 09:06

WitheringHighs · 28/05/2025 09:01

One of her important points is that IF diagnosis and the resultant help was beneficial, then it wouldn't be overdiagnosis. But there isn't evidence that this is the case. There hasn't been a correspondent improvement in outcomes (including adjustments for exams). And yes, there will of course be anecdotes about people who feel individually helped but high level data suggests otherwise.

But there is plenty of evidence which she has chosen to ignore. She clearly has had zero interaction with all the professionals working In the sectors I listed below. Are you seriously saying the only benefits to ND diagnosis is extra time in exams? The ignorance is just laughable.

Jujujudo · 28/05/2025 09:05

HerNeighbourTotoro · 28/05/2025 09:02

Totally not interested. The moment I hear about 'overdiagnosing' I know it's ableist bullshit of someone who has not lived with special needs and tries to jusfity not diagnosing (because it's cheaper not to AND you dont need to provide support for people since they dont have a diagnosis). But I bet many people will read it and use arguments to dismiss SEN needs of other people because 'a neurologist' wrote it. It fits within your narrative OP- but that does not make it accurate.
I once med a pediatrician who told me allergies (my DD had a severe dairy allergy) are a made up thing, and I would not exactly quote the man as an authority, and yet he was a doctor.
There are multiple reasons why there are more diagnoses now than in the past and awareness is a big part of it, and the fact many much older people get diagnosed later in life with traits that were present their whole lives.
The end.

Urgh that old chestnut. Totally with you. My son has Coeliac and everyone has an opinion on that… I even had a family member tell me that nobody had it in their day eye roll til eye drops out

WitheringHighs · 28/05/2025 09:04

GarlicPile · 28/05/2025 08:44

For all those saying it’s society’s “fault” for not being accommodating enough, how would you have it change to accommodate absolutely everyone? I’m genuinely interested

@Sammii82 - Society's getting less flexible, I believe. We increasingly need to classify everything in tightly-defined categories. It's probably not coincidental that this is how computers need data to be organised: 'fuzzy logic' is a popular concept that literally can't be performed by machines; they can only emulate it by processing very many tight definitions and collating the result into something that looks like comprehension.

Fuzzy logic is, however, what human minds do incredibly well: we are flexible, capable of observing patterns and updating our observations on the fly, naturally aware of grey areas and highly adaptive. Creative, adaptive, fuzzy behaviours are anathema to data processing, so they are being defined and filtered. Hence the need for increasingly detailed descriptions and classifications of more and more aspects of human life.

I'm neither a medic nor overly interested in the matter of medicalisation, but can offer concrete examples from my own experience.

I'm 70. I have several diagnosed chronic conditions, one of which is ME-CFS. That's a diagnosis of exclusion and, since it has no known cure (or even cause), is a proper dustbin. In the 1980s I called it 'yuppie flu' and said it was an imaginary illness. Everybody did. All of my symptoms were attributed to depression for about 15 years, which led me to do ever more exercise. I pushed myself until I was developing all sorts of strange symptoms, passing out in the gym - and was given stronger antidepressants, with encouragement to keep up the exercise. Because fitness fights fatigue, right? Half of ME-CFS sufferers are eventually diagnosed by psychiatrists, as I was.

I'm still on the pills (being permanently ill and exhausted is depressing!) but the point of my 'journey' is that the need to apply a diagnosis led directly to behaviour that worsened the condition. In earlier times - up to and including my own childhood - this condition was known by vague names such as nervous exhaustion. Treatment, for those who could afford it, was a long stay at a country retreat, where gentle walks and mineral baths soothed the tired 'nerves' while regular meals and plenty of rest fortified the body. This kind of fuzzy thinking would've benefited me no end, quite possibly preventing the decline that has left me seriously disabled.

My brother and I are certain that we have dyspraxia and ADHD. Neither of us will seek diagnosis because it won't make any difference at our age. We can clearly see how we fit into these 'boxes' - failed schooling when we'd been pegged as shoo-ins for Oxbridge; endless weird travelling experiences because we couldn't figure out what to do with ourselves; the kind of erratic timekeeping that makes Mumsnetters spew hatred; so much more!

One might wonder how either of us managed to have the very successful careers we achieved, given our chaotic natures. Easy: we did jobs that needed creative, agile problem-solvers working in intense bursts with down time in between. All of our employers accepted our 'quirks' as part of the package. I never even got a warning about my abysmal timekeeping ... until the late '90s, when both my brother and I found ourselves colliding with rigid systems that had no space for mavericks. (My last boss actually called me a maverick. He meant it as an insult.)

With rigid systems and their rigid rules excluding everyone but the totally predictable, spaces are being provided via reasonable adjustment. I'd need a diagnosis in order to get the flexibility on punctuality and time off to rest. This would then label me 'dysfunctional' and would cause expectations of failure in areas where, perhaps, I may actually excel.

Thinking about our older relatives, we can see some who'd now be labelled autistic with their extreme social quirks, their extensively catalogued collections and their obsessive special interests. One of our uncles was always starting strange new projects, launching himself up & down difficult mountains on a whim, and loved staying up all night for a lively debate. ADHD, probably. None of these people needed diagnoses because they lived in a society that accommodated people's quirks, allowed them to play to their strengths.

Sorry this has turned out so long. I feel quite frustrated by this aspect of the 21st century, and am saddened that the concept of people simply being themselves is getting lost as we progressively comply with the requirement to define and classify ourselves.

Such a useful viewpoint. I have witnessed a person who was capable of a PhD (started, but didn't finish) regress to inability to leave the house, entirely dependent on a caregiver and almost non-verbal s a result of 'possible autism'. Not even fully diagnosed. True iatrogenic harm.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 09:03

She’s not an expert on cancer either. I know who I’d rather take advice from as regards cancer risk and it’s not a neurologist with a book to sell.

How dare somebody with zero ND experience lecture to those who have and particularly to a group( women and girls) who have been subjected to gendered diagnosis with the result they’ve sat hidden and lost for years. The arrogance of it.

HerNeighbourTotoro · 28/05/2025 09:02

Totally not interested. The moment I hear about 'overdiagnosing' I know it's ableist bullshit of someone who has not lived with special needs and tries to jusfity not diagnosing (because it's cheaper not to AND you dont need to provide support for people since they dont have a diagnosis). But I bet many people will read it and use arguments to dismiss SEN needs of other people because 'a neurologist' wrote it. It fits within your narrative OP- but that does not make it accurate.
I once med a pediatrician who told me allergies (my DD had a severe dairy allergy) are a made up thing, and I would not exactly quote the man as an authority, and yet he was a doctor.
There are multiple reasons why there are more diagnoses now than in the past and awareness is a big part of it, and the fact many much older people get diagnosed later in life with traits that were present their whole lives.
The end.

WitheringHighs · 28/05/2025 09:01

Jujujudo · 28/05/2025 08:52

Gosh, emotional moment reading this. I’m the same age and I suffer from ADHD and mania, always have from a young age. Of course in the 70’s and 80’s I was called disruptive, fidgety, chatterbox, easily distracted, naughty, silly, etc etc.
I never managed with Maths and really really couldn’t get my body still enough to sit through an exam.
My whole life went a different way as a direct result of not being diagnosed or even aware that what was going on with me was an actual neurological problem rather than just a fidgety, talkative little girl.
I honestly believe that if I’d have been born 20 years later I would have succeeded and been able to achieve my dreams as child. But because I failed everything and everyone (I was an endless disappointment to my parents, they thought I had so much potential but was deliberately destroying my chances eye roll).. I never really did much with my life.
Since being properly diagnosed (in my 40’s) it’s devastating to me how easy it would have been all those years ago to help that irritating little girl to sit still, focus and achieve what she was capable of achieving.

One of her important points is that IF diagnosis and the resultant help was beneficial, then it wouldn't be overdiagnosis. But there isn't evidence that this is the case. There hasn't been a correspondent improvement in outcomes (including adjustments for exams). And yes, there will of course be anecdotes about people who feel individually helped but high level data suggests otherwise.

GoodGodGaribaldi · 28/05/2025 09:01

Have only skimmed the review as am dashing off to work but what I skimmed was abysmal - ill-informed and lazy old tropes (no ADHD in my day etc).

Also: “O’Sullivan examines the growth in behavioural conditions such as autism and ADHD.” 🙄 Autism and ADHD are NOT behavioural conditions. Christ, do journalists not actually do any research anymore?

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 08:59

SENNeeds2 · 28/05/2025 08:57

a neurologist can not diagnose or treat adhd - only a psychiatrist can - and adhd meds don't work if you don't have adhd - so I am wondering why someone who can't legally diagnose or treat adhd patients has weight to her opinion. if nd's showed up on neurolgist scans it would make life easier ... maybe she could stay on her side of the fence and research into that if she has interest in the subject.

This!

YellowOrangePink · 28/05/2025 08:58

SisterMargaretta · 28/05/2025 01:53

Why are people who are unaffected by these conditions concerned about "overdiagnosis" of them?

Unless you are Margaret Thatcher who believes there's no such thing as society, then I imagine people are concerned because it affects everyone

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 08:58

SomethingInnocuousForNow · 28/05/2025 08:55

Aside from the fact that I'm not convinced there is an 'overdiagnosis problem'... I see it from two sides. As a mother to two children with what would have been termed 'severe' autism (so very high support needs), I do have to admit there is a small (horrible) part of me that gets pissed off when the children of friends get a diagnosis, DLA etc and their children are fully speaking, using toilet, academically able, have some friends etc.

That said, another part of me is grateful that my children's difficulties were immediately 'obvious'. There was very little insinuation that our parenting was to blame like there is with lower support needs children. The reality of scaling back assessment/ diagnosis of the low support needs children however would just make things even more unequal for poorer demographics of neurodivergent people. All middle class people with a spare £1500 will continue to seek private assessment (which isn't going anywhere) and poor neurodivergent children really struggling in mainstream schools will continue to be seen as 'naughty not needy'.

It’s more like £3k and I don’t think many middle class parents have that spare either.

SENNeeds2 · 28/05/2025 08:57

a neurologist can not diagnose or treat adhd - only a psychiatrist can - and adhd meds don't work if you don't have adhd - so I am wondering why someone who can't legally diagnose or treat adhd patients has weight to her opinion. if nd's showed up on neurolgist scans it would make life easier ... maybe she could stay on her side of the fence and research into that if she has interest in the subject.

ThatDenimExpert · 28/05/2025 08:56

Life is very stressful, synthetic materials, and unnatural environments. So I can see how someone could be diagnosed with adhd or high functioning autism when their symptoms wouldn’t be there if they hadn’t had such a stressful life.