Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Who's read 'Age of Diagnosis' (overdiagnosis in Long Covid, ADHD, Lymes, autism, cancer screening)

437 replies

FrodoBiggins · 27/05/2025 23:42

Inspired by another thread, has anyone read/ listened to Suzanne O’Sullivan's new book Age of Diagnosis? I just finished it and found it so interesting. She's a high profile consultant neurologist.

Touches on Long Covid, Autism, ADHD, Lymes disease (all in terms of diagnostic debates) and also Huntingdons genetic testing and Cancer/ Alzheimers screening (along what benefits there are of knowing of a risk/ certainty of future illness, especially if there is no cure).

I'll quote from a review:

"in her outstanding new book O’Sullivan offers a third possibility; that variance in bodily and mental health is being unnecessarily medicalised and pathologised: “We are not getting sicker – we are attributing more to sickness.”
She describes a trinity of “overs”. Overdiagnosis, where a medical problem is treated when treatment might not be needed; overmedicalisation, where non-medical behaviours are turned into the business of doctors; and underlying both, overdetection: we are ever better at identifying signals of disease, sometimes earlier than necessary, when those indicators may not end up presaging the disease itself. Alongside balanced analysis of the epidemiological data on prostate and breast cancer, O’Sullivan examines the growth in behavioural conditions such as autism and ADHD. The tone is not sneering or dismissive, as debunkings of bad science so often can be. O’Sullivan is instead full of compassion, care and grace."

I believe it was also the Radio 4 Book of the Week. The full review quoted from above is here: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/mar/12/the-age-of-diagnosis-by-suzanne-osullivan-review-do-no-harm?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

Has anyone else read it? Thoughts?

The Age of Diagnosis by Suzanne O’Sullivan review – do no harm

A doctor’s brilliant study of the dangers of overdiagnosis, from ADHD to long Covid

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/mar/12/the-age-of-diagnosis-by-suzanne-osullivan-review-do-no-harm?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

OP posts:
Toootss · 28/05/2025 10:27

If you are adult being diagnosed surely you will have decades of problems which you can recount to the psychiatrist.

Toootss · 28/05/2025 10:23

I am disappointed that checking for a diagnosis of adhd or autism with prisoners doesn’t seem to get mentioned.

If you fail at school I’m not sure how people are supposed to make a living these days.

If you have a low dopamine level due to ADHD you are more likely to drink, smoke, take risks, gamble, take drugs -to think that medication for a few hundred £ a year could fix some of the problems which have prisoners in jail and costing £40,000 a year. But no one seems to be following this up.

Riaanna · 28/05/2025 10:22

The term over diagnosis is absurd. What are we suggesting people are being diagnosed who don’t have the condition they’re diagnosed with? Or that people should live with it and not be diagnosed? I wish this debate would stop.

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:21

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:18

Never said they don't struggle.

Perhaps different diagnosis is required. Autism with ......

The problem I've encountered when with individuals who have severe and massive life changing symptoms, and I mean severe is that everyone knows someone with less impacting Autism. Try a tablet, try headphones (not tolerated by some individuals due to profound sensory overload) even if on many children, it works for them and they are autistic...that lumping of all people diagnosed into the same incorrect assumption

I actually agree that we need something to replace the old diagnosis of Asperger’s.

IMO the main problem with diverse conditions like autism is what you’re highlighting in your answers - that it’s too easy to dismiss those with less obvious outward struggles and so they get ignored or brushed off as rude, ignorant, weird and annoying.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:21

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:18

Never said they don't struggle.

Perhaps different diagnosis is required. Autism with ......

The problem I've encountered when with individuals who have severe and massive life changing symptoms, and I mean severe is that everyone knows someone with less impacting Autism. Try a tablet, try headphones (not tolerated by some individuals due to profound sensory overload) even if on many children, it works for them and they are autistic...that lumping of all people diagnosed into the same incorrect assumption

🤣hysterical. Stereotypical ignorance .If only headphones and a magic tablet was the answer for the huge struggles my dc have.

BlueTitFly · 28/05/2025 10:20

@L00pl00p

Yes. Because I have fought to have his speech targeted (rather than turn taking stereotypes associated with ASD) and this is now happening. I realised his EHCP was not stating provision correctly, so I basically rewrote it myself. I insisted on the ADOS screening. I’ve researched DLD.
The result is far better provision for DS and the threat of exclusion is no longer there.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:19

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:12

Nope. Worked with many individuals with autism which ranged from smaller impact on their day to day life to profound impact on their day to day life. A massive difference.

Edited

Working with people autism doesn’t mean you’re not ignorant. I’ve met many people working with those who have autism who are extremely ignorant ,hence the rolling out of NHS training.

My dc’s autism has a profound impact on their lives involving multiple services, hospital stays and MDT teams- they don’t present in the way you dictate autism should though. Thankfully the professionals in their MDT teams are far more knowledgeable than you.

DrBlackbird · 28/05/2025 10:18

SomethingInnocuousForNow · 28/05/2025 09:37

I listened to her on the Dr Chattergee podcast recently and honestly felt a bit sick the way she described knowing (as a medical professional) that someone had a medical condition but thinking she should not impart that knowledge to the patient themselves. It was like a God complex and if a patient had come to her feeling something was wrong, would be medical gaslighting.

Unfortunately not surprising and, in my opinion, not unique for her specialty.

many neurologists are expert diagnosticians up to and within the boundaries of their specialist knowledge. Even then, of all the organs, we know the absolute least about the human brain. Amazing as to what is now possible, but still limitations on what can be known and limitations on diagnostic abilities.

It is disturbing when claims and assertions are confidently made about neurological conditions without acknowledging the possibility of error, let alone making commentary on conditions outside medical expertise. Feels like this doctor has made overgeneralisations about ‘psychosomatic’ (or unexplained) illnesses her thing and is running with it in a Julia Hartley Brewer kind of manner.

At best, an inadvertent consequence of her books is encouraging or feeding into a narrative that doctors are never wrong, that there’s no possibility of being un/misinformed, as they are all knowing omniscient beings. At worst, it’s arrogance and contributing to the potential for some medical professionals to further stigmatise patients who are left undiagnosed at the current boundaries of medical knowledge. Medical history ought to be a humbling reminder.

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:18

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:14

Of course there’s a difference but that doesn’t mean the people who don’t appear to struggle as much are any less autistic 🙄

Never said they don't struggle.

Perhaps different diagnosis is required. Autism with ......

The problem I've encountered when with individuals who have severe and massive life changing symptoms, and I mean severe is that everyone knows someone with less impacting Autism. Try a tablet, try headphones (not tolerated by some individuals due to profound sensory overload) even if on many children, it works for them and they are autistic...that lumping of all people diagnosed into the same incorrect assumption

BlueTitFly · 28/05/2025 10:17

@L00pl00p

Ok, just to point out that I am discussing this with you. I’m not stating things to you such as ‘you make zero sense’. A good discussion is about respecting differing points of view.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:16

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:14

When people deny what is provable.

Just because they didn't get an hour diagnosis doesn't mean it's made up.

You were referring to autism. You can’t get an autism diagnosis in an hour with just a tick box form.

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:14

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:12

Nope. Worked with many individuals with autism which ranged from smaller impact on their day to day life to profound impact on their day to day life. A massive difference.

Edited

Of course there’s a difference but that doesn’t mean the people who don’t appear to struggle as much are any less autistic 🙄

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:14

TheAgileGoldPoet · 28/05/2025 10:11

I think they were talking about adult ADHD, which is 100% being diagnosed in an hour by numerous private clinics.

Here's just one from a quick Google search, there are many others.

https://www.berkeleypsychiatrists.co.uk/lp/adhd-assessment#book

Adult ADHD assessment - 60-90 minutes.
Virtual - £745, in-person £1,045.

"The assessment typically takes 60 minutes"

So, really not hard and really not that expensive despite what other posters may claim.

When people deny what is provable.

Just because they didn't get an hour diagnosis doesn't mean it's made up.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:14

BlueTitFly · 28/05/2025 10:08

@L00pl00p

I truly don’t think mine was an anomaly or isolated incident.

NHS waiting lists are extremely stretched and I had to wait nearly two years for the ADOS screening.
I firmly believe that - in order to reduce demand - there had been a decision (and I believe this decision was made as a group practice for the area) to remove children from the list who they felt they could diagnose without the need for an ADOS screening.
And this would have happened has I not insisted on the screening.
If you look at DLD v ASD - there is much discussion that the ‘fashion’ for ASD has led to DLD being overlooked : whereas DLD is actually more commonplace than ASD. Yet you rarely hear of DLD.

I think part of the issue is that the ASD spectrum is so broad, and - I think - subjective - that a teacher or teaching assistant can make assumptions about a child.

An unqualified TA does the majority of DS’s interventions. If she is specifically targeting DS’s speech, this will have better outcomes than anything more generalised and associated with a ‘stereotype’ of ASD.

A TA would only be targeting his speech. IEP targets are specific and if a speech therapist is involved they’d be following their advice. How would you change speech difficulties to a stereotype of autism? That makes zero sense.

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:13

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:10

Wipe their own bottoms, dress themselves, massive life changing ocd behaviour meaning they cannot hold down any job, aggressive, non verbal, needing 3 to 1 support, very complex and life changing is different from many late diagnosed adults!

You’re conveniently ignoring the fact that autism often goes hand in hand with severe learning disabilities - many of the people you describe who need constant care and who can’t function without medication and support have other conditions as well as their autism.

It’s interesting that you display quite a few autistic traits yourself in your responses.

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:13

TheAgileGoldPoet · 28/05/2025 10:11

I think they were talking about adult ADHD, which is 100% being diagnosed in an hour by numerous private clinics.

Here's just one from a quick Google search, there are many others.

https://www.berkeleypsychiatrists.co.uk/lp/adhd-assessment#book

Adult ADHD assessment - 60-90 minutes.
Virtual - £745, in-person £1,045.

"The assessment typically takes 60 minutes"

So, really not hard and really not that expensive despite what other posters may claim.

Indeed.

Just because people here say it doesn't happen doesn't make that statement true!

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:12

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:10

All you’re doing is proving that you have absolutely no idea about autism or how the autistic brain works.

Nope. Worked with many individuals with autism which ranged from smaller impact on their day to day life to profound impact on their day to day life. A massive difference.

TheAgileGoldPoet · 28/05/2025 10:11

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:03

There isn’t. You have just spouted complete rubbish. Clinics can not spout out an autism diagnosis in an hour with just a tick box form. There’s not a large number of adult diagnosis. Previously autism diagnoses (like adhd)was heavily genderised which left women and girls undiagnosed. Now we have better knowledge and diagnostics those lost women and girls want their diagnoses. Don’t really get what you prefer,your ignorance is palpable.

I think they were talking about adult ADHD, which is 100% being diagnosed in an hour by numerous private clinics.

Here's just one from a quick Google search, there are many others.

https://www.berkeleypsychiatrists.co.uk/lp/adhd-assessment#book

Adult ADHD assessment - 60-90 minutes.
Virtual - £745, in-person £1,045.

"The assessment typically takes 60 minutes"

So, really not hard and really not that expensive despite what other posters may claim.

Adult ADHD Assessments Tailored for You

https://www.berkeleypsychiatrists.co.uk/lp/adhd-assessment#book

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:11

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:10

All you’re doing is proving that you have absolutely no idea about autism or how the autistic brain works.

This!

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:10

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:07

Let's also include narcissistic people then. Where does it end. I don't care if everyone says they are autistic just don't pretend they speak for individuals that are massively impacted by their severe symptoms.

All you’re doing is proving that you have absolutely no idea about autism or how the autistic brain works.

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:10

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:07

Your preferences don’t thankfully over ride the highly qualified professionals within my dc’s MDT teams either. They have profound and life changing challenges even though they have been able to live alone and hold down jobs at times. Looking after themselves is subjective. Thank goodness there are better informed professionals.

Wipe their own bottoms, dress themselves, massive life changing ocd behaviour meaning they cannot hold down any job, aggressive, non verbal, needing 3 to 1 support, very complex and life changing is different from many late diagnosed adults!

faerietales · 28/05/2025 10:09

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:04

He's claiming he's the same as the person who needs 24/7 care and lacking any independence skills.

Perhaps high functioning and low functioning or Asperghers should be used?

Yes - and another trait of autism is black and white thinking, so he sees an autism diagnosis as being an autism diagnosis no matter the impact.

Many people with autism who require constant care also have other conditions as well.

BlueTitFly · 28/05/2025 10:08

@L00pl00p

I truly don’t think mine was an anomaly or isolated incident.

NHS waiting lists are extremely stretched and I had to wait nearly two years for the ADOS screening.
I firmly believe that - in order to reduce demand - there had been a decision (and I believe this decision was made as a group practice for the area) to remove children from the list who they felt they could diagnose without the need for an ADOS screening.
And this would have happened has I not insisted on the screening.
If you look at DLD v ASD - there is much discussion that the ‘fashion’ for ASD has led to DLD being overlooked : whereas DLD is actually more commonplace than ASD. Yet you rarely hear of DLD.

I think part of the issue is that the ASD spectrum is so broad, and - I think - subjective - that a teacher or teaching assistant can make assumptions about a child.

An unqualified TA does the majority of DS’s interventions. If she is specifically targeting DS’s speech, this will have better outcomes than anything more generalised and associated with a ‘stereotype’ of ASD.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:08

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 10:07

Let's also include narcissistic people then. Where does it end. I don't care if everyone says they are autistic just don't pretend they speak for individuals that are massively impacted by their severe symptoms.

You are though🤣You seem to think your picture of autism trumps the autism experienced by my massively impacted children.

L00pl00p · 28/05/2025 10:07

Namechangedformyanswer · 28/05/2025 09:55

Yep, the adult diagnosis is banged out by private clinics in an.hour after completing tick.box forms. There's a large number of adult diagnosis now. I prefer a spectrum, at least the people that struggle day to day and cannot look after themselves don't get lumped in with the look at me I'm autistic adult private clinic diagnosis. Having worked with adults with PROFOUND and LIFE CHANGING challenges, that cannot look after themselves, even do self care, cannot live alone, never have relationships or work it's completely different.

Edited

Your preferences don’t thankfully over ride the highly qualified professionals within my dc’s MDT teams either. They have profound and life changing challenges even though they have been able to live alone and hold down jobs at times. Looking after themselves is subjective. Thank goodness there are better informed professionals.