Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

MIL guilt tripping me for divorcing husband when he might lose his job

186 replies

Chambers9 · 23/05/2025 22:50

I told my husband earlier this week that I want a divorce. Background, he told me out of the blue that he faces yet another disciplinary at work and given he was issued a final warning last year, it’s likely he will be dismissed.

I gave him an ultimatum at that time that if he did anything like that again to risk his job, I’d leave him. He works in an industry where you have to give references and disclose any dismissals if applying for a new role so he would never find new work.

He works for a big local employer for which I have friends who work in other departments. He lied to me about the reason for the final warning and I found out weeks later (from a friend) the real reason. It was humiliating for me as it was due to a remark he made to a female colleague on a night out. I was very close to walking away then.

This latest incident relates to inappropriate comments he has made (again when drunk!) on the team WhatsApp group. I cannot believe he has been so stupid.

He has obviously told his mum as I’ve had a barrage of messages tonight - I’m overreacting and heartless for kicking a man when he’s down, I should be fighting his corner, his workplace are pandering to the ‘modern worker’ whatever the hell that means.

I’m standing firm and want out.

OP posts:
MissScarletInTheBallroom · 24/05/2025 08:35

Chambers9 · 24/05/2025 08:22

The final warning was due to telling a female colleague on a team night out that he’d never worked with someone so ‘fuckable’ and that she was wasted in their line of work (charming, I know).

The latest incident - obviously I’ve only got his word for it, and he has lied before. But he tells me he is being 100% truthful.

There was a few of them messaging in the team WA group during/after a football match last weekend (he was watching in a pub with mates so drink involved again). One of them supports a team who lost. DH directed a message at him which was a version of ‘just get your DP to suck you off to cheer you up’.

He says the colleague he directed it at laughed it off and wasn’t offended. But he forgets he said this in a group with all of his colleagues, including females, and was notified of complaints and a disciplinary procedure earlier in the week.

He thinks he can argue his case about the latest incident as the collleague wasn’t offended but I don’t care either way - he has risked his employment and the roof over our head and he knew my position on this.

What he is failing to understand here is that even if the person he was speaking to wasn't offended, the women he works with do not want to have to deal with comments like that in their workplace. And the team WhatsApp group is an extension of their workplace.

If there are no consequences for his behaviour, the message these women will get is that the business is completely OK with him talking about women like that, and that if they are uncomfortable with it they need to go and work somewhere else that has a more respectful culture.

It's going to be far easier for the business to replace one wanker man (especially one who is already on a final warning and can be fired pretty easily by this point) than to replace half the team after they resign in disgust. And that's assuming that they don't resign and bring claims for constructive dismissal, citing the misogynistic and sexually predatory culture in the workplace, perpetuated by one or two male staff members, which management failed to deal with.

It's clear from your posts that his employers do not want him anymore, he's more trouble to them than he is worth, and because they have been following the correct disciplinary procedures after his previous behaviour and he's had plenty of warnings, if he gets fired this time he will not have a legal leg to stand on.

As for your MIL, "stand by your man" is all very well when your man is not at fault, or even if he's made one silly mistake. But this isn't one mistake, this is a pattern of behaviour which isn't going to change. Your self respect would have to be in the toilet for you to remain married to a man with so little respect for women, let alone have to shoulder the financial consequences of him repeatedly getting fired and finding it harder and harder to get and keep employment.

DrummingMousWife · 24/05/2025 08:34

Mil is freaking out she is going to be stuck with him!

Sapana · 24/05/2025 08:32

ItsMutinyontheBunty · 23/05/2025 22:59

In retrospect, the flaw in the plan was saying you’d leave if it happened again..because it was very likely to happen again and at that point he’d get sacked, so you’re not just ending it but ending it when he’s about to lose his job. But no, you aren’t unreasonable to want to end this. He sounds awful. He’s made bad choices and will have to live with the consequences.

It's not a flaw in the plan, it's a boundary. If that means she's leaving as he has lost himself his job that's not her fucking problem.

ExercicenformedeZ · 24/05/2025 08:31

Good for you. Sounds as if dear Mother is the reason why he is so entitled. Behind (almost) every nightmare man, there is a pandering, enabling mother. Ditch the dead wood and make sure that he doesn't drag you down financially.

CapitalAtRisk · 24/05/2025 08:31

Sounds like you're better off without both of them, OP!

GoodCharl · 24/05/2025 08:29

He sounds like a liability. You are definitely making the right decision. Ignore his mummy. Shes probably scared that hes going to turn up on her doorstep shortly!

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:28

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:22

Then the applicable diagnosis affording protection under the Equality Act wouldn’t be alcohol related - it would be whatever mental health condition is diagnosed, providing it meets the definition of disability under the Act. And if it doesn’t cause a problem unless he drinks, then it doesn’t meet the definition of long term and significantly impacting normal daily activity. So still not a disability.

Edited

What if the problem is that he drinks too much every day due to MH & can’t stop ?

PhilippaGeorgiou · 24/05/2025 08:27

Hulabalu · 23/05/2025 22:54

YANBU, but if he has alcohol problem then company should offer support as this is a disability

No it isn't. It is possible that substantial and long-term physical or mental impairment from using drugs or alcohol may be classed as a disability. Being an idiot who can't hold their drink isn't. Harassing others isn't.

Bunnycat101 · 24/05/2025 08:27

Oh OP I’m sorry- those messages are bloody awful and I can’t believe he’s digging in that he’s fine on this because the colleague wasn’t offended. He’s been so stupid and also disrespectful to you.

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:26

Chambers9 · 24/05/2025 08:22

The final warning was due to telling a female colleague on a team night out that he’d never worked with someone so ‘fuckable’ and that she was wasted in their line of work (charming, I know).

The latest incident - obviously I’ve only got his word for it, and he has lied before. But he tells me he is being 100% truthful.

There was a few of them messaging in the team WA group during/after a football match last weekend (he was watching in a pub with mates so drink involved again). One of them supports a team who lost. DH directed a message at him which was a version of ‘just get your DP to suck you off to cheer you up’.

He says the colleague he directed it at laughed it off and wasn’t offended. But he forgets he said this in a group with all of his colleagues, including females, and was notified of complaints and a disciplinary procedure earlier in the week.

He thinks he can argue his case about the latest incident as the collleague wasn’t offended but I don’t care either way - he has risked his employment and the roof over our head and he knew my position on this.

i think you’re wise to be getting out OP. Sounds like you’ve put up with so much shit in the past. The fact that he’s focused on ‘arguing his case’ rather than learning the lesson says it all.

2ndbestslayer · 24/05/2025 08:26

He won't be able to 'argue his case'. He should look at the guidance on harassment on Acas.

Even if the comments weren't directed at the women in the chat, it creates a 'degrading environment' for them to work in.

Chambers9 · 24/05/2025 08:25

Velmy · 24/05/2025 04:27

Is it the nature of the messages/comments that have made you want to leave him OP, or his lying about it the first time? Or the issue of putting your security at risk?

Did he go straight to a final warning after the first incident you mentioned, or is this an ongoing thing that's built up?

As for MIL, I'm sure she's been lied to just like you were. She'll have been told it's all a bit of banter and that the world's gone mad/you can't say anything these days. Either that or she knows the truth and doesn't care.

Either way, it's unlikely you'll be able to make her see the light...if you're dead set on cutting ties with him, I wouldn't give her a second though. Just block and get on with doing what you have to do.

It’s a combination - I was disgusted by the comment which led to the final warning, and lies from him. That this also put our security at risk was what led to me issuing the ultimatum. There had been a couple of separate issues prior to this which probably got me to that position.

OP posts:
ThatsNotMyTeen · 24/05/2025 08:23

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:17

No one can know someone else’s mind. Maybe he is struggling with MH? If he continues to drink knowing it negatively affects his behaviour & can lose his career (not just his job) then that’s extreme problem. I’d guess undiagnosed MH issues like many men do who don’t seek help.
Not thar OP should put up with it. I don’t blame her for wanting divorce.
But an employer should consider that men’s MH issues often undiagnosed.

Employers can’t be expected to know or believe that someone might have a MH issue unless they actually have some information that this may be the case. They aren’t mind readers.

Or maybe they have taken it into account, which is why they gave him a warning last time instead of dismissing him then

Even if someone does have a disability it isn’t carte Blanche to get away with serious workplace misconduct

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 24/05/2025 08:23

Chambers9 · 23/05/2025 23:00

I’ve no idea if he has been truthful or not, I imagine he has told half the story or not even that like he did with me. I’m half tempted to tell her myself!

Tell her in glorious technicolour.

If it makes her shut up and leave you alone, great.

If it doesn't, tell her it's not your fault that he wasn't raised to respect women but it is your duty to show your children (if you have them) that this stuff isn't acceptable.

Thegreatescape12345 · 24/05/2025 08:22

Chambers9 · 23/05/2025 23:00

I’ve no idea if he has been truthful or not, I imagine he has told half the story or not even that like he did with me. I’m half tempted to tell her myself!

Do it!!

Chambers9 · 24/05/2025 08:22

JIMER202 · 24/05/2025 03:26

Do you know what he has said OP? To the work colleague and group chat I mean….im imagining they must be horrific if they are a sackable offense? All I can think of are pervy comments and inappropriate language and it would creep me out too.

His mother can fuck off with her misogynistic drivel. If my son was fired for being a creep at work I’d wonder where the fuck I went wrong!

The final warning was due to telling a female colleague on a team night out that he’d never worked with someone so ‘fuckable’ and that she was wasted in their line of work (charming, I know).

The latest incident - obviously I’ve only got his word for it, and he has lied before. But he tells me he is being 100% truthful.

There was a few of them messaging in the team WA group during/after a football match last weekend (he was watching in a pub with mates so drink involved again). One of them supports a team who lost. DH directed a message at him which was a version of ‘just get your DP to suck you off to cheer you up’.

He says the colleague he directed it at laughed it off and wasn’t offended. But he forgets he said this in a group with all of his colleagues, including females, and was notified of complaints and a disciplinary procedure earlier in the week.

He thinks he can argue his case about the latest incident as the collleague wasn’t offended but I don’t care either way - he has risked his employment and the roof over our head and he knew my position on this.

OP posts:
Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:22

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 07:50

He could be undiagnosed, men are known not to seek help for MH problems, but drink to feel better. some people behave out of character when drinking.

Then the applicable diagnosis affording protection under the Equality Act wouldn’t be alcohol related - it would be whatever mental health condition is diagnosed, providing it meets the definition of disability under the Act. And if it doesn’t cause a problem unless he drinks, then it doesn’t meet the definition of long term and significantly impacting normal daily activity. So still not a disability.

2ndbestslayer · 24/05/2025 08:20

His mum's response just confirms you're doing the right thing op. He has been brought up to take no accountability for his actions and he is being supported to continue to take no accountability. Its questionable whether he'll ever change with his mum telling him that he's done nothing wrong.

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:17

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:07

But to be considered a disability and afford him protected characteristics the alcohol consumption would have to have caused an actual physical or mental health condition which meets the definition of disability. Simply being under the influence of alcohol is not a disability.

No one can know someone else’s mind. Maybe he is struggling with MH? If he continues to drink knowing it negatively affects his behaviour & can lose his career (not just his job) then that’s extreme problem. I’d guess undiagnosed MH issues like many men do who don’t seek help.
Not thar OP should put up with it. I don’t blame her for wanting divorce.
But an employer should consider that men’s MH issues often undiagnosed.

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:12

ThatsNotMyTeen · 24/05/2025 08:11

What on earth are you on about?

MS is one of the few conditions (alongside cancer and HIV infection) expressly listed in the Equality Act as a disability from the point of diagnosis

Alcohol and drug addiction are expressly excluded

Yep, this.

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:12

Hulabalu · 24/05/2025 08:08

No I think OP has had enough and needs to do what is right for herself. I am just saying OPs husband could be undiagnosed. I am actually just thinking more generally about men who don’t seek help for MH. That if someone drinks knowing they behave out of character then they are being self destructive.

It’s happened on more than one occasion, so l don’t think it can be described as out of character.

ThatsNotMyTeen · 24/05/2025 08:11

HelenaWaiting · 24/05/2025 00:02

MS isn't classified as a disability under the Equality Act. Or cerebral palsy. In fact it doesn't give a list of conditions that are "classified" as disabilities at all. It simply states that a disability is "a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on a person's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities". So alcohol addiction could be considered a disability.

What on earth are you on about?

MS is one of the few conditions (alongside cancer and HIV infection) expressly listed in the Equality Act as a disability from the point of diagnosis

Alcohol and drug addiction are expressly excluded

Rosscameasdoody · 24/05/2025 08:10

thepariscrimefiles · 24/05/2025 08:02

So what are you actually saying? That OP's DH's employer was wrong to dismiss him or that OP is wrong to divorce him (or possibly both)?

OP's DH could take this to a tribunal but as addiction to alcohol or poor behaviour when drunk aren't protected characteristics under the Equality Act, it is unlikely that he will have a case, particularly as this is his second offence, both of which relate to his sexual harassment of female colleagues.

This. They’d laugh him out of a tribunal. Getting pissed at office parties and sexually harassing female colleagues isn’t a disability !!

thepariscrimefiles · 24/05/2025 08:09

ThatsNotMyTeen · 24/05/2025 08:06

AI v the equality act 😂

AI said that OP's DH is mummy's special little soldier and everyone is being mean to him and it's not fair.

Bunnycat101 · 24/05/2025 08:08

Oh god it’s really not that hard to refrain from drinking at work if you’re prone to being a twat when drunk. I’ve had this before in a work setting- person was actually good at their job but was a walking employment tribunal when they’d had a drink. That individual had lots of warnings and stuck to not drinking for a bit… until they did at a work event and had two formal complaints made against them. It was final straw and they had to be dismissed but it was so frustrating.