Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Gender ideology is toxic and creates divisions

207 replies

reprobatiusmumius · 21/05/2025 11:59

I know I’m wading into a toxic debate here. But AIBU to find the gender ideology debate just so poisonous?

I have non binary identifying autistic teenager. I love and accept her but I refuse to get drawn into pronouns and calling her by a name she’s made up herself.

Why? It’s disrespectful to me, frankly. I conceived, birthed, nurtured and named her. I do not wish to capitulate to an ideology I disagree with, and so? My stance is, you do you with your friends. I am going to do me with you. That means I call her by her birth name and I’m not going to force grandma to say they / them which is grammatically incorrect. This is my stance.

It feels like a reasonable truce, having navigated years of chest flatteners, drawings with breast scars and other horrors, when all I want for her is for her to be happy in herself. In her current body. Surely, that’s not an unreasonable stance? And yet, I have been called out for bigotry, transphobia and told that if she walks out on me and never speaks to me again, that’s all I deserve. Not by her, I may add, although she tends to refuse my clothing suggestions- it’s fine- I give her money and she can wear what she wants (except clothes, like binders, that can physically harm her)

I’m sorry, but how have we got to a stage where parental norms, wishes and expectations are so decried, twisted and frowned upon that this debate has become “if you don’t agree then your child should disown you”? Seriously, I’ve got to the point where I’m so angry by the gremlins who have hog hold of her and convinced her something untrue that I feel like I want to go full Trump and refuse to engage in this debate at all, just ban it outright.

This is a debate where there is no allowance for nuance, questioning, watching and waiting and just accepting a rebellion (because that’s what I see this as!). I thank god they have banned surgical interventions on under 18s because the online trolls who push this agenda want to turn kids against loving and cautious parents who just WANT THEIR KIDS TO BE HAPPY as they are!

Sorry, I’m so angry- have just been outright banned by an Autistic with ADHD sub on Reddit for stating the same, and told my daughter should disown me. How did this become so toxic and how is any of this good for families?

The online pushers want more angry converts to their nasty little cult and it’s made me so angry. How dare they poison my sweet little girl and make out that I, her mother, am the problem, because I have an opinion that differs from hers. It’s hideous and I’ve had enough of the insidious compulsion to agree entirely or say nothing.

Gender ideology is toxic and creates divisions
Gender ideology is toxic and creates divisions
OP posts:
Slightyamusedandsilly · 21/05/2025 20:22

Ddakji · 21/05/2025 20:00

Of course it’s coerced. Female victims of rape have been told to refer to their male attackers using “their preferred pronouns” in court. That’s perjury, and yet that’s happened as a court order. Forcing a rape victim to deny the evidence of their own eyes.

Thats what you’re supporting. Which is of course up to you, you can support whatever evil you choose.

We're talking about a person and their child. The one they gave birth to, and love.

Alternatively, as a PP considered, we could be talking about someone walking around, wanting to be addressed as Elvis.

Wowwee1234 · 21/05/2025 20:07

Thank you

elderl · 21/05/2025 20:07

Slightyamusedandsilly · 21/05/2025 19:47

If anyone wants to think they're Elvis, they can. Regardless of what you think of them. None of us get to dictate other people's self belief. It's called autonomy. We all have it.

Yes, you can think you're Elvis (or the Akond of Swat, or Queen of Sheba). You can believe you're cool, or that what you say makes sense.

What you can't do is be Elvis, or the Akond or Queen. Or anything else other than who and what you are. Believe what you like - it won't make it true.

If wishes were horses ... But they're not.

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 20:03

Wowwee1234 · 21/05/2025 19:44

I don't think you are wrong, but my child has cut out everyone - everyone - in his life. The only real disagreement we have ever had is around gender ideaology. We never even argued, I just explained my views. So be careful.

Youngsters really do see any questioning as akin to racism and as toxic. If I could take everything back and hold my tounge, I would.

I am so sorry to hear that. My heart goes out to you.

The unfiltered, hive-minded rage on both "sides" of this mess has gotten totally out of hand. Families should not be torn apart.

I hope your child finds a way back to you.

Ddakji · 21/05/2025 20:00

Slightyamusedandsilly · 21/05/2025 19:51

A bit like wicked, cool, the dogs bollocks. Contronyms exist.

It's not coerced. It's just speech you disagree with. Dyke, queer, homo have been reclaimed in order to defuse the power. That was much more successful than fighting back against the terms.

Of course it’s coerced. Female victims of rape have been told to refer to their male attackers using “their preferred pronouns” in court. That’s perjury, and yet that’s happened as a court order. Forcing a rape victim to deny the evidence of their own eyes.

Thats what you’re supporting. Which is of course up to you, you can support whatever evil you choose.

Lmnop22 · 21/05/2025 19:56

bumblingbovine49 · 21/05/2025 19:07

Don't be so bloody ridiculous. They can't change their name by deed poll until they are an adult. I imagine the op will change the way they deal with this if their child is still doing this as an adult.

For now, this TEENAGER is experimenting with their identity as teenagers often do . Their parents job is not to unconditionally support and affirm every experiment . It is to give them a loving space to experiment without necessarily affirming everything they try and actively discouraging things that the parent thinks are harmful.
Not every experiment a teenager tries is good for them and parents are not obliged to say they are

Not sure why you feel so personally offended by my point of view that you feel the need to resort to insults.

I also never advocated just blindly accepting anything one’s child tells them they are. I advocate a supportive approach to exploring together the root of the feelings, the reason for them, the legitimacy of them and the appropriate (both age appropriate and proportionate) response.

I think that invalidating their beliefs and their current perception of their identity just pushes them away, means they won’t listen even when you’re telling them valuable and helpful things and changes the narrative to arguing over pronouns and names rather than a collaborative approach to reaching the best outcome for the mental health, welfare and happiness of the child at the centre of all this!

Supporting someone does not necessarily mean agreeing with them

TheKeatingFive · 21/05/2025 19:55

Wowwee1234 · 21/05/2025 19:44

I don't think you are wrong, but my child has cut out everyone - everyone - in his life. The only real disagreement we have ever had is around gender ideaology. We never even argued, I just explained my views. So be careful.

Youngsters really do see any questioning as akin to racism and as toxic. If I could take everything back and hold my tounge, I would.

It's really scary, isn't it, that this conversation has become so charged.

TheKeatingFive · 21/05/2025 19:54

Slightyamusedandsilly · 21/05/2025 19:47

If anyone wants to think they're Elvis, they can. Regardless of what you think of them. None of us get to dictate other people's self belief. It's called autonomy. We all have it.

He can think that, sure.

But aren't under any obligation to affirm he's right

Slightyamusedandsilly · 21/05/2025 19:51

Ddakji · 21/05/2025 17:29

Of course. But as language is a shared, collective endeavour it requires the consent of the majority to change, which is why language evolution is so slow.

What the gender cult has done to language isn’t evolution. It’s imposed against the will of the majority. It’s coerced speech. It’s not new or additional words, it’s making words mean their exact opposite, to distort and deceive.

A bit like wicked, cool, the dogs bollocks. Contronyms exist.

It's not coerced. It's just speech you disagree with. Dyke, queer, homo have been reclaimed in order to defuse the power. That was much more successful than fighting back against the terms.

Slightyamusedandsilly · 21/05/2025 19:47

elderl · 21/05/2025 18:20

"We all decide who we are ..." Really?

"There's a guy works down the chip shop swears he's Elvis."

You think he's Elvis? No you don't. Not really.

(People peddle such absurd nonsense about identity and such these days.)

If anyone wants to think they're Elvis, they can. Regardless of what you think of them. None of us get to dictate other people's self belief. It's called autonomy. We all have it.

Wowwee1234 · 21/05/2025 19:44

I don't think you are wrong, but my child has cut out everyone - everyone - in his life. The only real disagreement we have ever had is around gender ideaology. We never even argued, I just explained my views. So be careful.

Youngsters really do see any questioning as akin to racism and as toxic. If I could take everything back and hold my tounge, I would.

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 19:35

drspouse · 21/05/2025 19:28

No, I'm suggesting you are a child because adults don't think children should choose people's names.

How old is this child?

Edit - The one called Grin. Not me. Grin

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 21/05/2025 19:32

drspouse · 21/05/2025 19:28

No, I'm suggesting you are a child because adults don't think children should choose people's names.

If you look at the National Records list, you could easily make a cogent argument that there are plenty of adults who shouldn't be naming children either.

drspouse · 21/05/2025 19:28

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 19:00

You are suggesting I am a child because I disagree with you?

No, I'm suggesting you are a child because adults don't think children should choose people's names.

bumblingbovine49 · 21/05/2025 19:07

Lmnop22 · 21/05/2025 13:42

It’s not an ideology it’s their identity.

If they wanted to change their name by deedpoll then they could so the name you gave them is not sacrosanct.

If you genuinely believe they’ve been indoctrinated into an ideology and that by accepting their identity you’re “drinking the kool-aid” have you considered that those in power are hoping to isolate people from their families and the best way to beat them is to show unwavering and unconditional support for your child no matter what?

Don't be so bloody ridiculous. They can't change their name by deed poll until they are an adult. I imagine the op will change the way they deal with this if their child is still doing this as an adult.

For now, this TEENAGER is experimenting with their identity as teenagers often do . Their parents job is not to unconditionally support and affirm every experiment . It is to give them a loving space to experiment without necessarily affirming everything they try and actively discouraging things that the parent thinks are harmful.
Not every experiment a teenager tries is good for them and parents are not obliged to say they are

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 21/05/2025 19:03

reprobatiusmumius · 21/05/2025 18:52

Yes it was- I don’t really like what you are insinuating. And as I said before I was permanently banned from the community.

you seem to suggest I am somehow at fault here. Reddit mods are well known for being power hungry dictators with no regard for free expression.

That's the thing though - Reddit mods are under no obligation to permit what you consider "free expression".

Every reddit sub I've been on has it's list of house "rules" down the right hand side. Fail to follow them, there are inevitably consequences, often permanent consequences.

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 19:00

drspouse · 21/05/2025 18:52

If a parent called their child Grin they'd be laughed out of town.
Or are you ok with babies being called Spider Man because the preschooler named him?

Children aren't sensible enough to name themselves or other family members. Children aren't sensible enough to do a lot of things. Though maybe you disagree because you are a child and want to be allowed to name your new sibling?

You are suggesting I am a child because I disagree with you?

reprobatiusmumius · 21/05/2025 18:52

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 17:39

Is that the only message you sent?

Freedom of speech is not about 3 day bans from Reddit, which is a privately owned site. If that were the case, people would be suing them, Mumsnet, Twitter, etc, daily.

Yes it was- I don’t really like what you are insinuating. And as I said before I was permanently banned from the community.

you seem to suggest I am somehow at fault here. Reddit mods are well known for being power hungry dictators with no regard for free expression.

OP posts:
drspouse · 21/05/2025 18:52

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 17:51

Why? There are children called things like Olive and Miles.

Grin is pretty inoffensive IMO.

If a parent called their child Grin they'd be laughed out of town.
Or are you ok with babies being called Spider Man because the preschooler named him?

Children aren't sensible enough to name themselves or other family members. Children aren't sensible enough to do a lot of things. Though maybe you disagree because you are a child and want to be allowed to name your new sibling?

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 21/05/2025 18:51

Gender ideology is utterly toxic and destructive. It needs to be done away with.

elderl · 21/05/2025 18:20

Slightyamusedandsilly · 21/05/2025 14:29

We all decide who we are though. And we do get to dictate who we are as individual. We don't get to tell others who they are.

A total lack of empathy with your own child is risking losing that child once they're of age.

"We all decide who we are ..." Really?

"There's a guy works down the chip shop swears he's Elvis."

You think he's Elvis? No you don't. Not really.

(People peddle such absurd nonsense about identity and such these days.)

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 17:51

drspouse · 21/05/2025 17:45

I would be ok with my teens choosing a nickname from their own name, middle name etc. But Jolyon Maugham's daughter has called herself Grin. That's just ridiculous.

Why? There are children called things like Olive and Miles.

Grin is pretty inoffensive IMO.

drspouse · 21/05/2025 17:45

I would be ok with my teens choosing a nickname from their own name, middle name etc. But Jolyon Maugham's daughter has called herself Grin. That's just ridiculous.

user2848502016 · 21/05/2025 17:40

I agree with you about everything except the name - it’s the same as her wanting a particular nickname used instead of her full name so I don’t think there’s any harm in that. I wouldn’t allow changing it legally or anything, just use it for now.
I hope your daughter comes to accept herself for who she is as she grows up.

TicklishReader · 21/05/2025 17:39

reprobatiusmumius · 21/05/2025 17:29

Yes, I said I hadn’t done anything that I should be banned for and then they closed my account for three days. Sorry, but that’s an insidious assault on free speech.

Is that the only message you sent?

Freedom of speech is not about 3 day bans from Reddit, which is a privately owned site. If that were the case, people would be suing them, Mumsnet, Twitter, etc, daily.