Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Vaccination against cervical cancer/HPV

344 replies

nooshoo · 19/05/2025 09:32

This vaccination protects against a sexually transmitted virus which can lead to cancer and other problems. Does anyone know why is it recommended as standard for children from 11 years, is it because there is perceived realistic risk of sexual contact occuring from this age?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
TrainGame · 19/05/2025 12:33

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 11:52

My child is severely disabled since having the vaccine on high rate for both components and needs a lot of care. Was fine before and developed severe Pots and ME immediately after. I don’t care about ‘what’s ifs’ and other scenarios about possible hpv related issues I care about making sure it doesn’t happen to my other children . My gp actually said to us that herd immunity is for families like us

I'm really sorry your poor child has experienced this. Was this Gardasil vaccine? There is a tiny fraction of children who do go on to get POTS. I worry so much about this, I don't want my children to be injured.

I had HPV in my 20s but I cleared it as it doesn't appear on any of my cervical smears. From my understanding they let you know if you have the high risk strains. It's not perfect but at least you know.

I am hesitant for both my children. Again I'm really so sorry for your child and your family that you experienced this. My DD has a number of autoimmune diseases and I'm hesitant, even though there is no researched connection.

Gwenhwyfar · 19/05/2025 12:30

"So recommending vacc for most children at 11 is still slightly odd."

How would you differentiate which children need it early and which don't?

MatildaMovesMountains · 19/05/2025 12:29

He'll be saying something different if he contracts penile warts 😅

Pebbles16 · 19/05/2025 12:29

nooshoo · 19/05/2025 10:28

Not right. If you think you are right, link a source.

@nooshoo https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b362bed915d3ed9062e5f/Green-Book-Chapter-28-v2_0.pdf

It is correct and we were vaccinated for this precise reason

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b362bed915d3ed9062e5f/Green-Book-Chapter-28-v2_0.pdf

Gwenhwyfar · 19/05/2025 12:29

TheSmallAssassin · 19/05/2025 12:16

I am old enough to have been vaccinated for rubella around that age and it was common knowledge that we girls were vaccinated against rubella so that we wouldn't catch it later while pregnant and risk our babies being born with sight or heart problems. I'd love to see your source disputing this.

Yes, definitely. I was given the rubella vaccine at 11 or 12 in case I passed it on to a future baby. Never had such a baby so was a waste on me.

cakewench · 19/05/2025 12:28

nooshoo · 19/05/2025 10:02

Okay, I will adapt my wording as a few posters are getting confused by it - 11 is seen as the age JUST BEFORE children are going to start being sexually active? Except stats shown above indicated that around 20 percent of 14 year olds are sexually active. So recommending vacc for most children at 11 is still slightly odd. Although there is a second jab given, presumably in fact more jabs are going to be needed throughout life, it isn't 2 jabs cover for life?

It isn't about the majority, which you sound obsessed with, it's about the outliers whom they'd like to be covered as well. Because yes, some children are sexually active around the age of 12, and they also deserve to be covered by this vaccine.

Whether or not we as parents approve of this has no bearing on the evidence that it is happening.

Gwenhwyfar · 19/05/2025 12:28

deflatedbirthday · 19/05/2025 09:34

The HPV vaccine is most effective before someone becomes sexually active and has not yet been exposed to HPV

Yes, but in some countries you can get it at any age, even though it hasn't really been tested for older women. My 50 year old friend was recommended to have it by her gynaecologist.

MatildaMovesMountains · 19/05/2025 12:26

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 12:14

No they said it was our choice completely that they understood our concerns and they always advise to vaccinate but to reassure us they mentioned about herd immunity.

Herd immunity doesn't apply - your daughters will most likely have sex with boys who haven't been vaccinated. Or older men who've slept with unvaccinated women. You have been badly advised.

YourSignalFadedIntoAnotherWorld · 19/05/2025 12:25

nooshoo · 19/05/2025 09:51

I had a bee in my bonnet about the post telling me I would already know the answer if I had googled! Not about the vaccine - it was a genuine question as to whether why the age had been set at 11.

I've just Googled - Why is the HPV vaccine given at 11? and it's all there. The reasons pp's have said and that the younger the nipper, the better they hold to vaccination so 11 has been decided as the best of all worlds.

Google is your friend.

Bunny44 · 19/05/2025 12:25

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 12:09

Approx 8% of cervical cancers are non hpv related and they now unfortunately go undetected till it’s harder to treat as smears only check for hpv they don’t look at the cells unless you’re hpv positive

Yes so they could revert to doing smear tests that don't look for HPV potentially. But the current type wouldn't be needed if everyone was vaccinated.

MatildaMovesMountains · 19/05/2025 12:24

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 12:13

They are both aware that they didn’t have the vaccine as it was done in school and they knew they were the only ones not having it so they are aware. They know what it’s for as well and read the info sent out. They also know it’s what their sister had done before falling ill and they know they are fully vaccinated for everything else and my ds actually said to me ‘I know for all our other vaccines you said it’s important so I trust you on this’

Better hope she doesn't get genital warts, which the HPV vaccine also protects against.

Emonade · 19/05/2025 12:21

nooshoo · 19/05/2025 09:52

Is it perceived that most children are sexually active from 11? Genuine question!

No of course not

CarefulN0w · 19/05/2025 12:20

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 12:10

I’m not a troll and my gp was the one who mentioned herd immunity to us to reassure us

I would be very sceptical of a GP who talks about herd immunity with regard to HPV. I would be concerned that, especially when discussing girls, they may hold misogynistic views.

The vaccination programme was started in 2008. Not everyone has had it below the age of 35, Most older people and some who were brought up in other countries won’t have had it. We are a long way from herd immunity.

AlteredStater · 19/05/2025 12:18

TheSmallAssassin · 19/05/2025 12:16

I am old enough to have been vaccinated for rubella around that age and it was common knowledge that we girls were vaccinated against rubella so that we wouldn't catch it later while pregnant and risk our babies being born with sight or heart problems. I'd love to see your source disputing this.

Yes! Yes we were vaccinated against it to protect against catching it during pregnancy (or indeed, passing the virus to a pregnant woman).

BlueOysterCultGroupie · 19/05/2025 12:17

Here it is given in year 8 and the second dose in year 9 so the majority of children are 12 or 13 for dose 1 and 13 or 14 for the 2nd.

AlteredStater · 19/05/2025 12:16

Caligirl80 · 19/05/2025 11:33

Unclear why you are mentioning the Rubella vaccine - aka German Measles? Or the vaccination timelines used in 1971? Rubella is a totally different virus (RuV) to the HPV virus. And the vaccination protocols these days are very very different to those used in 1971.

Perhaps I should have quoted the post talking about Rubella and ages children were given this, but there was a conversation about it a page or so ago. The posts are moving pretty fast here!

TheSmallAssassin · 19/05/2025 12:16

nooshoo · 19/05/2025 10:28

Not right. If you think you are right, link a source.

I am old enough to have been vaccinated for rubella around that age and it was common knowledge that we girls were vaccinated against rubella so that we wouldn't catch it later while pregnant and risk our babies being born with sight or heart problems. I'd love to see your source disputing this.

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 12:14

50Pennies · 19/05/2025 12:13

I doubt your GP advocated for your child not being vaccinated so that you can benefit from others vaccinating their children. They may have mentioned it but not promoted not vaccinating.

Your attitude is selfish and uninformed.

No they said it was our choice completely that they understood our concerns and they always advise to vaccinate but to reassure us they mentioned about herd immunity.

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 12:13

Caligirl80 · 19/05/2025 12:10

Well, the fact you said that "you will" means that you actually haven't yet done so. Meaning they aren't aware of either the risks to themselves, or the risk they may post to others. Given this virus can be passed just by kissing someone else that's pretty negligent on your part. Also the only way to make them as them "as safe as they can be" is to give them the vaccine. You haven't done that. It appears you also haven't fully informed them of the risks, and their own right to get the vaccine if they want to - whether you consent or not. Maybe you should do some research into what happens when people get cervical; head/neck/throat; vaginal/vulval; penile; anal cancers and also make sure you know your kids see that research too so they are aware of what they are in danger of getting because they haven't been vaccinated. Louis Theroux did a documentary about end of life care involving a person who was suffering from anal cancer in Los Angeles a while ago: it was absolutely awful what that poor man was going through. If I could prevent my child from suffering that fait I absolutely would in a heartbeat.

They are both aware that they didn’t have the vaccine as it was done in school and they knew they were the only ones not having it so they are aware. They know what it’s for as well and read the info sent out. They also know it’s what their sister had done before falling ill and they know they are fully vaccinated for everything else and my ds actually said to me ‘I know for all our other vaccines you said it’s important so I trust you on this’

50Pennies · 19/05/2025 12:13

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 12:10

I’m not a troll and my gp was the one who mentioned herd immunity to us to reassure us

I doubt your GP advocated for your child not being vaccinated so that you can benefit from others vaccinating their children. They may have mentioned it but not promoted not vaccinating.

Your attitude is selfish and uninformed.

UpsideDownChairs · 19/05/2025 12:12

nooshoo · 19/05/2025 09:49

So the age of 11 has been perceived to be the age when children might start to be sexually active, in the majority, is that right?

No.. the age of 11 has been perceived to be before the vast majority of children would be sexually active, since that's when the vaccine needs to be administered.

If they waited until they were expected to start being sexually active, then those children at the lower end of average age of first activity would already have become active, and the vaccine might be too late for them.

CarefulN0w · 19/05/2025 12:12

From the Greenbook. Which has several pages of references that the expert committee considered.

license
Cervarix® Gardasil® and Gardasil®9 are licensed for individuals from nine years old. Vaccination of girls and boys aged 9 to 11 years is not covered by the national HPV vaccination programme.

Schedule
Adolescents aged from 11 years and adults aged less than 25 years HPV vaccination is routinely recommended for all girls and boys from 11 years of age with vaccination offered in school year 8 in England and Wales, S1 in Scotland, and school year 9 in Northern Ireland.

Funnyduck60 · 19/05/2025 12:12

I paid £450 for my son to be vaccinated as he missed the rollout due to his age si be grateful instead of questioning government policy.

Caligirl80 · 19/05/2025 12:10

Notanideafornow · 19/05/2025 11:59

Of course I will make them fully aware that they aren’t vaccinated and to be as safe as they can be .

Well, the fact you said that "you will" means that you actually haven't yet done so. Meaning they aren't aware of either the risks to themselves, or the risk they may post to others. Given this virus can be passed just by kissing someone else that's pretty negligent on your part. Also the only way to make them as them "as safe as they can be" is to give them the vaccine. You haven't done that. It appears you also haven't fully informed them of the risks, and their own right to get the vaccine if they want to - whether you consent or not. Maybe you should do some research into what happens when people get cervical; head/neck/throat; vaginal/vulval; penile; anal cancers and also make sure you know your kids see that research too so they are aware of what they are in danger of getting because they haven't been vaccinated. Louis Theroux did a documentary about end of life care involving a person who was suffering from anal cancer in Los Angeles a while ago: it was absolutely awful what that poor man was going through. If I could prevent my child from suffering that fait I absolutely would in a heartbeat.

Swipe left for the next trending thread