Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to stop my partner from forcing our daughter into more sports?

293 replies

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 15:13

In my family we have a rule that our kids need to do an athletic activity outside of school. Just one, to keep them active and healthy.

My DH is very athletic, and enjoys a wide range of sports, which is a hobby that he shares with our son. My daughter on the other hand, only enjoys playing tennis, but would much rather be reading or drawing.

The problem is that DH wants our daughter to stop doing the activities she loves and replace them with more sports, something she doesn't want to do.

I don't want to force my daughter into playing additional sports she doesn't want to do, and so I put my foot down, saying no, but my DH keeps insisting.

Am I being unreasonable though?

OP posts:
JustSawJohnny · 18/05/2025 18:02

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 18/05/2025 17:59

I grew up in the countryside- there's plenty of opportunity for walking or cycling.

Depends where you live. The lanes around our village are treacherous and have no paving. No way would I let mine roam around on those.

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 18/05/2025 18:00

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:56

What I said was, that my DH would want her, instead of reading all Saturday afternoon to play another sport instead. Not that every hobby needs to be taken or replaced with sports.

Your husband is an ignorant prat then.

JustSawJohnny · 18/05/2025 18:00

He needs to understand that it can be really harmful when parents demand their kids fit into the box they expect them to.

It's perfectly fine for DD to not be sporty. She is already doing one sport, that's fine. If she has no health or fitness issues then there is absolutely no reason to push her into more.

If he wants her to do more activities outside of school then offer her more academic or arty clubs/classes.

Does he have a tendency to see his way as the best way?

Bumdrops · 18/05/2025 17:59

I think OP is struggling,
the DH is highly unreasonable about rules regarding sports, and OP can see that his behaviour crosses the line and is here to have that validated -
what has happened is it’s been highlighted just how much the OP colludes with these unreasonable family expectation around sport.
In suspect these parents are caught in the trap of their children needing to showcase to others that they are doing well in school, sports etc..
it must be about showcasing / performative parenting because no reasonable adult would truly believe that this child needs more sport in their lives than they are already doing !!!!
I wonder if the parents are doing two sports or more on top of everything ?????????

performative / showcase parents - UGH

YearlySubscriptionRenewal · 18/05/2025 17:59

ObelixtheGaul · 18/05/2025 17:05

But is it really either slobbing about in front of the TV all day or doing an organised sport?

I know times have changed a lot, but it does make me sad to think that kids now need to consciously do something 'organised' to keep fit.
To be reliant on teams and clubs at 10, as opposed to simply 'playing out'.

Threads like this make me misty-eyed and feeling very grateful for the days when we were turfed out of the front door in the morning. Only the very posh kids did 'organised' sport. Most of us just played out. The hours I spent on my bike, on roller skates, doing handstands and cartwheels down the rec.

Oh, I know it's not possible now, but it is such a shame we have to shoehorn forced activity into our kid's lives like this at this age.

is it really though?

You have happy memories of your own childhood, who is to say today's kids won't have same happy memories? Let's not forget, it's yesterday's kids "being turfed out" who are today's parents bringing them to various places.

For people like you, who enjoyed their time, how many posters remembering they were bored to death on Sundays and hated weekends as a child.

It is that difficult to believe that children in organised sports shine, and they love being supported by their parents and being part of clubs with their mates?
It never stops them from doing independent activities as soon as they are old enough.

"organised" sport doesn't mean rigid boring torture. It's a mix of learning skills and rule, practicing and having fun. You just have to see kids laughing and having fun with their friends, and it's a good start in life.

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 18/05/2025 17:59

Almostwelsh · 18/05/2025 17:51

If you live rurally it is very possible to have nowhere safe to walk that isn't a car drive away. Roads don't have pavements and farmers fields are private land.

I grew up in the countryside- there's plenty of opportunity for walking or cycling.

WeHaveTheRabbit · 18/05/2025 17:57

aylis · 18/05/2025 17:50

I live in a city and if I lived in most other parts of the area I'm in, it would be difficult for me to allow my daughter outside unsupervised as it's mostly flats, parked cars and a few corner shops. In one area there is a large park but too large for a 10 year old to be at on her own. I'm lucky where I am because there are a lot of kids and an area fairly near that she has been going to with minimal supervision from 5 and now goes unsupervised (although checked) - but that just wouldn't be possible in most other streets in this area. I totally agree that it benefits children but sometimes it's just really not advisable.

Edit: just as an example, on Friday evening I was driving through a specific part of the area near me and there was a bunch of young teens hanging around a bus stop. Great that they were out, but I know they were at the bus stop because there's nowhere else for them to go. It's actually something I raised with the council as they refuse to out benches at any areas where kids might congregate - there's really no real outdoor provision for kids once they're spending less time on playparks even in the very small, basic ones you sometimes get on estates.

Edited

Yes, I completely agree that there are some situations where it can be genuinely dangerous for children to go out on their own. But I do think that many parents with the best of intentions have chosen to limit their children's independence in ways that are unhealthy. Childhood has changed drastically in recent decades and not for the better.

ETA: I missed your edit but I also agree about the lack of places for young people to go in some areas. That is definitely an issue of concern.

Tiswa · 18/05/2025 17:57

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:45

@Tiswa She loves dancing but is self - conscious about doing it in a club or as a group activity. She reads, draws, does other crafty things, is bilingual and plays chess, but not in a club, just at home.

@MissScarletInTheBallroom Yes, but it's not really her thing.

Ok so if she is self conscious about it focus on that see where you can go is there a dance type she wants to try?
or some other form of musical theatre to build her confidence

team sports and activities can be great for building up confidence and fitness but can also be awful if it isn’t your thing

and it sounds as if it isn’t her thing so focus on building up her confidence in things that are her thing and she needs help finding that

Your DH needs to parent the child you have not the one you wanted or yourself

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:56

aylis · 18/05/2025 17:35

But you did say that, explicitly. If it's not what you meant then fair enough but that is what you said.

What I said was, that my DH would want her, instead of reading all Saturday afternoon to play another sport instead. Not that every hobby needs to be taken or replaced with sports.

OP posts:
Newusername1234567 · 18/05/2025 17:56

Gosh people have a go at you for no reason…

you are right. She is already participating in one activity she likes (btw 4 days at her age seems a lot😳). There is no need to add another one if she doesnt want to. For what? 4 days 1.5 hrs every time is awful lot but i guess if she really likes it it’s probably fine.

Angrygirl · 18/05/2025 17:55

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 16:36

No, neither of us would stop her from doing another club, no matter what it was.
Our rule is to do one sport or physical activity, this can be after school club or just an activity with nothing to do with the school. It could be running, or cycling, or anything they wanted to do.

But realistically where would she find time to do another activity if she’s doing tennis FOUR nights a week?

Even if she did it every free night it would still be less time than she does tennis.

As soon as she starts secondary school this already isn’t sustainable.

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 18/05/2025 17:53

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:38

Good grief! 😬
I've said countless times now, that she WANTS, LIKES AND ENJOYS playing tennis. Are you being deliberately obtuse?

Edited

Does she? Or is it the least worst option, given that you gave her no choice about not doing sport.

Comtesse · 18/05/2025 17:53

6 hours of tennis a week is LOADS. Your DH is an arse and unreasonable if he thinks she should be doing more. Reading for pleasure is very important in the long run too.

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:52

WeHaveTheRabbit · 18/05/2025 17:41

I disagree with this post. Children absolutely can and should spend time outside independently at the age of 10. Parents are doing their children no favours at all with excessive supervision and too many organised activities.

They do spend time outside independently, just not anything that would constitute In my opinion as physical activity, for instance walking a couple of minutes to a friend's house. The local park is around 30 minutes away by car, there's a couple of close corner shops nearby.

so I'll ask again, where are they supposed to walk? Just randomly up and down streets?

OP posts:
Megifer · 18/05/2025 17:51

Can I just say op that your command of English is excellent, it's actually really surprising you got of/have mixed up.

That sounds like I'm being snarky but I've genuinely never come across anyone with near perfect command of English get of/have wrong! I know that sounds patronising too btw 😔

Almostwelsh · 18/05/2025 17:51

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 18/05/2025 17:42

Where on earth do you live that they can't walk somewhere?

You're very rigid about sport. I'm not sure why you're sorry for me because I hate sport. I find all of them boring and pointless.

If you live rurally it is very possible to have nowhere safe to walk that isn't a car drive away. Roads don't have pavements and farmers fields are private land.

aylis · 18/05/2025 17:50

WeHaveTheRabbit · 18/05/2025 17:41

I disagree with this post. Children absolutely can and should spend time outside independently at the age of 10. Parents are doing their children no favours at all with excessive supervision and too many organised activities.

I live in a city and if I lived in most other parts of the area I'm in, it would be difficult for me to allow my daughter outside unsupervised as it's mostly flats, parked cars and a few corner shops. In one area there is a large park but too large for a 10 year old to be at on her own. I'm lucky where I am because there are a lot of kids and an area fairly near that she has been going to with minimal supervision from 5 and now goes unsupervised (although checked) - but that just wouldn't be possible in most other streets in this area. I totally agree that it benefits children but sometimes it's just really not advisable.

Edit: just as an example, on Friday evening I was driving through a specific part of the area near me and there was a bunch of young teens hanging around a bus stop. Great that they were out, but I know they were at the bus stop because there's nowhere else for them to go. It's actually something I raised with the council as they refuse to out benches at any areas where kids might congregate - there's really no real outdoor provision for kids once they're spending less time on playparks even in the very small, basic ones you sometimes get on estates.

Taytayslayslay · 18/05/2025 17:48

I have resentment towards my mum for so many things(we are no contact) but one thing I always hated was, I was very into music and arts and she forced me to attend Karate instead.

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:45

@Tiswa She loves dancing but is self - conscious about doing it in a club or as a group activity. She reads, draws, does other crafty things, is bilingual and plays chess, but not in a club, just at home.

@MissScarletInTheBallroom Yes, but it's not really her thing.

OP posts:
Agapornis · 18/05/2025 17:43

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 16:57

She tried Judo with her brother but hated it. We haven't tried any other type of martial arts though.

I think I should also say (Not specifically at you @YearlySubscriptionRenewal but for everyone) that if she ever decides that she wants to do something else aside from tennis or instead of tennis, then she absolutely can.

Agree with @YearlySubscriptionRenewal that martial arts are worth another go. If she doesn't like the improvisation, groundfighting or intimacy (😅) of judo, she might enjoy the choreography of traditional Japanese jujitsu (not BJJ, which is like judo groundfighting), aikido, karate, taekwondo, or tai chi (in rough order of reduced contact/breakfalls). Try a few clubs and instructors, they vary hugely in quality. I nearly have a brown belt in one of them and like the choreo compared to judo.

She could also try yoga. But above all, don't force her because your DH insists.

ObstreperousCushion · 18/05/2025 17:42

@YearlySubscriptionRenewal That is not what I said. Or even implied. I didn’t mention academia at all. And I think its great that coaches give up their time for to coach kids.

What I have observed is that some people can be very invested in team sport, to the extent that they see reading, dance, craft etc as much less valuable. I was asking if the OPs DH was one of those people, as it will help to understand why he’s being so insistent on their DD doing more sport.

80smonster · 18/05/2025 17:42

Erm, are both children quite academic too? I’d have thought at that age one would be prioritising tuition for core subjects, rather than sporting? Or is this with good reason, i.e aiming for a sports scholarship for private school fee discount?

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 18/05/2025 17:42

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:35

Sorry you feel that way.

Unfortunately, children can't just go out, for any length of time on their own anymore. We live roughly 10 minutes from school, and they walk to and from school every week. Where are they supposed to walk?

Where on earth do you live that they can't walk somewhere?

You're very rigid about sport. I'm not sure why you're sorry for me because I hate sport. I find all of them boring and pointless.

WeHaveTheRabbit · 18/05/2025 17:41

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:35

Sorry you feel that way.

Unfortunately, children can't just go out, for any length of time on their own anymore. We live roughly 10 minutes from school, and they walk to and from school every week. Where are they supposed to walk?

I disagree with this post. Children absolutely can and should spend time outside independently at the age of 10. Parents are doing their children no favours at all with excessive supervision and too many organised activities.

YearlySubscriptionRenewal · 18/05/2025 17:40

Opalskies · 18/05/2025 17:38

Good grief! 😬
I've said countless times now, that she WANTS, LIKES AND ENJOYS playing tennis. Are you being deliberately obtuse?

Edited

I would say yes, they are obtuse.

When posters start to pretend it's a negative to have active kids, let alone be active themselves, it's more about them than anyone else.

Swipe left for the next trending thread