Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Woman declared legally dead is being kept alive due to state’s abortion laws

236 replies

Youstolemygoddamnhouse · 17/05/2025 18:02

Anyone see this story?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/15/pregnant-georgia-woman-brain-dead-abortion-law

TLTR
US women is being kept alive on life support due to abortion laws. Woman was 9 weeks pregnant when she became brain dead. Family have no say in the matter and do not want this. The foetus if it survives may have life long health conditions and suffer from brain damage. Family are also having to pay for medical fees occurred and also for future birth fees.

I am being unreasonable to say WTF. Where is the outcry about this? This actually happened in an episode of The Handmaid’s tale.

YABU - this is the law, law needs to be upheld even after death
YANBU - WTF. Women are not safe even after death.

Pregnant US woman declared brain dead is being kept alive under state abortion law

Doctors are keeping Adriana Smith on life support months after medical emergency until baby is ready, family says

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/15/pregnant-georgia-woman-brain-dead-abortion-law

OP posts:
proximalhumerous · 17/05/2025 19:45

Would this technically even be an abortion?

One definition I found is "a medical intervention to end a pregnancy growing in the womb". In this case no medical intervention need take place.

Another definition is "a medical procedure to end a pregnancy". Surely turning off life support is not "a medical procedure"?

I'm not sure that a foetus which can't survive outside the womb is a baby any more than a trans woman is a woman...

Uberella · 17/05/2025 19:39

It’s extremely hard to keep a brain dead person alive;they need an enormous amount of medication and other extremely invasive interventions; for example they cannot maintain their own blood pressure etc

It’s highly likely she could die before she even gets to a viable gestation from complications like organ failure and the amount of pressure on her body could cause a miscarriage anyway.

Its completely undignified and cruel.

AthWat · 17/05/2025 19:38

ThejoyofNC · 17/05/2025 19:19

As I said, I'm 100% anti-abortion.

Also, what about a situation where a 13 year old is 100% going to die if she continues the pregnancy, but the baby has a 1% chance of survival. You are also, with your 100% anti abortion stance, against abortion in that case, so can you explain what happened in the 13 years of that girl's life that made her so much less valuable than a barely viable foetus?

TabbyBeast · 17/05/2025 19:33

I think some posters are, understandably, reacting to this story emotionally; imagining their living child if they themselves were in a coma / brain dead.

This is a baby who if survives will never have known it's mother's voice or smell. The bump will never have been gently rocked by their mother's motions. It's all a bit Frankenstein tbh. Can you image trying to replicate the blood gases and hormone processes that happens during pregnancy; that's just the processes I can think of in the human body as I'm not a Doctor .

My dear sister was in a coma, brain dead and it was clear that her body was trying to die despite being on life support. She was not in a Disney Sleeping Beauty state of stasis. If she was heavily pregnant, then we might have considered allowing the baby to to be born while on life support but if she was at an early stage of pregnancy, as much as it pains me to say, I would have wanted the baby to slip away with her.

I feel so much for the family and I hope whatever happens they find peace. It's a horrible, sad and upsetting situation to face and I hate the religious / anti abortion arseholes who will probably never have to face being in this situation.

Lovelysummerdays · 17/05/2025 19:30

Kreepture · 17/05/2025 19:23

almost worse is the only reason she IS brain dead is because of that pregnancy

She had horrific headaches and because of the heartbeat laws they wouldn't do lifesaving medical care, and a blood clot left her brain dead.

They killed her, then have left her dead body being kept artificially alive to incubate a baby.

It's beyond grotesque.

Edited

I don’t think that’s correct, she had headaches went to hospital they sent her away with medicine, didn’t do any tests/ scans.

Woke up her partner gasping for breath, he called 911. Ambulance to hospital, there they fix a ct scan and found blood clots, her mom is next of kin gave permission for surgery that wasn’t successful.

I think it’s common for A&E here too. I’ve been admitted to hospital a few days after attending A&E and being told nothing serious.

AthWat · 17/05/2025 19:30

ThejoyofNC · 17/05/2025 19:28

So do you only agree with the less than 1% of abortions where this is the case?

No, I am not the one with a 100% stance, you are. Can you answer my question first? Then I'll be happy to answer yours.

ThejoyofNC · 17/05/2025 19:28

AthWat · 17/05/2025 19:23

So if a 13 year old is raped by her father, she has to have the child, even if it's reported the following day? What makes you think this is the best way to handle the situation?

So do you only agree with the less than 1% of abortions where this is the case?

AthWat · 17/05/2025 19:25

Youstolemygoddamnhouse · 17/05/2025 19:22

But surely you have reasons behind it, reasons that have informed your decision. I can’t imagine having such a 100% stance on a subject without having a reasoning. I’m not bating you, I’m genuinely interested to know why

I don't think it's possible to have a 100% stance on that issue if you have ever tried to apply reason to it. However, the poster may prove me wrong.

Lovelysummerdays · 17/05/2025 19:24

BIossomtoes · 17/05/2025 19:12

They get sued I’m guessing. The US is absolutely barbaric these days. Land of the free my arse.

I think they can be made bankrupt. I suspect there will be some sort of payment plan and she was a nurse ( at the hospital she is in) so will have some insurance.

I do think there is a legal arguement that the medical care is not for Adriana, but for the fetus. A child / disabled under 18 yo can have their medical care covered under Medicaid. It feels like a natural extension so if life begins at fetal heart beat perhaps medical bills can start being attributed at that point too?

BIossomtoes · 17/05/2025 19:23

StScholastica · 17/05/2025 19:21

Just horrendous. That poor woman, there is no dignity at all for her.

At least she’s oblivious to it all. It’s the family I feel sorry for.

Kreepture · 17/05/2025 19:23

almost worse is the only reason she IS brain dead is because of that pregnancy

She had horrific headaches and because of the heartbeat laws they wouldn't do lifesaving medical care, and a blood clot left her brain dead.

They killed her, then have left her dead body being kept artificially alive to incubate a baby.

It's beyond grotesque.

AthWat · 17/05/2025 19:23

ThejoyofNC · 17/05/2025 19:19

As I said, I'm 100% anti-abortion.

So if a 13 year old is raped by her father, she has to have the child, even if it's reported the following day? What makes you think this is the best way to handle the situation?

Babyboomtastic · 17/05/2025 19:23

diabeticdd · 17/05/2025 19:08

This is what I didn’t understand, is it possible to keep a woman ‘alive’ this long and the foetus can be totally healthy ? Are they saying they baby may have issues because that’s common or is it due to the specifics surrounding the condition that made the mother so unwell. It’s not very clear but maybe it’s designed to be vague ? It seems absurd that the family could be liable for the costs of life support ??!

Yeah, if it's.

I'd the baby wasn't injured by whatever happened to mum, then providing the hospital manage to lay the woman attacks, in most cases the baby is fine.

They're was a case in the Czech republic of a woman kept alive for about 5m so her baby could survive. Baby was perfectly healthy.

But it's also not easy to keep a woman with no brain activity stable, so not all make it.

I think it's an amazing thing to be able to do where we know mum would have wanted it and the family are in favour. The issues here are that the family are against it, it was very early on in pregnancy, that the baby is so poorly it might not survive or be proudly disabled and that the family will be lumbered with the bill.

CrystalMighty · 17/05/2025 19:22

If the foetus is a life then the family should be able to take out life insurance

What a bloody excellent point @Snorlaxo

TheBlueUniform · 17/05/2025 19:22

Absolutely fucking bonkers. This is the negative part of religion and its influence in society. It’s not on

Youstolemygoddamnhouse · 17/05/2025 19:22

ThejoyofNC · 17/05/2025 19:19

As I said, I'm 100% anti-abortion.

But surely you have reasons behind it, reasons that have informed your decision. I can’t imagine having such a 100% stance on a subject without having a reasoning. I’m not bating you, I’m genuinely interested to know why

OP posts:
StScholastica · 17/05/2025 19:21

Just horrendous. That poor woman, there is no dignity at all for her.

Toddlerteaplease · 17/05/2025 19:21

BlueyNeedsToFuckOff · 17/05/2025 18:24

Even if someone is anti-abortion, how are they defining this as an abortion? It’s not as though the objective of removing treatment is to end the pregnancy - it’s to allow this poor woman’s body to die as she has long gone from it. Yes, it’s sad that her unborn child will also die - but if the medical expertise wasn’t there to keep bodies going artificially then she and her child would have died naturally months ago.

That says it better than I did. And I’m anti abortion. But this is just not acceptable.

JustMyView13 · 17/05/2025 19:20

And this is a looking glass into our future if we continue to vote for Reform. Anyone who is a woman, or cares about a woman, should wake up and smell the coffee. Nige thinks the sun shines out of Donny T’s arse. The UK would be following suit under a Reform government.

Youstolemygoddamnhouse · 17/05/2025 19:19

diabeticdd · 17/05/2025 19:08

This is what I didn’t understand, is it possible to keep a woman ‘alive’ this long and the foetus can be totally healthy ? Are they saying they baby may have issues because that’s common or is it due to the specifics surrounding the condition that made the mother so unwell. It’s not very clear but maybe it’s designed to be vague ? It seems absurd that the family could be liable for the costs of life support ??!

I would say they are being deliberately vague on the things you have mentioned. Anyone who was wanting to investigate would have to look at similar cases and compare but then things like new technology could affect results. The whole case is absurd.

OP posts:
ThejoyofNC · 17/05/2025 19:19

Youstolemygoddamnhouse · 17/05/2025 19:13

Yes, it’s the machines that are keeping her alive and are the only reason she is alive right now.

Side note, with you saying you’re 100% anti abortion. What about women who have been brutally raped or gotten pregnant due to incest. What are your thoughts on those women who choose to have abortions?

As I said, I'm 100% anti-abortion.

Toddlerteaplease · 17/05/2025 19:18

I don’t understand why this would class as an abortion. The poor woman is dead. And as a result the baby will die as well. That’s different from electively choosing an abortion.

Lamelie · 17/05/2025 19:18

Tutorpuzzle · 17/05/2025 18:56

With absolutely respect (honestly, I’m not being snarky) being ‘anti-abortion’, however ‘weakly’ is too simplistic.

If you mean you are anti the provision of safe and legal abortion procedures the only alternative will be those of the back street variety (for those who can’t afford to travel). God knows how many women in the US have risked this recently. Because abortions ain’t going to stop happening, however illegal they’re made.

You’re right. And any political movement which is pro death penalty isn’t acting in good faith. It’s not about the sanctity of life. Hopefully cases like this will lead to more humane laws.

Youstolemygoddamnhouse · 17/05/2025 19:13

ThejoyofNC · 17/05/2025 19:09

I am 100% anti-abortion.

However I cannot see how allowing the woman to die could have been considered an abortion. Are the machines what's keeping her "alive' right now?

I think if everyone involved was in support of this and knew that it's what the woman would have wanted then saving her baby would be miraculous. But that's not the case.

Yes, it’s the machines that are keeping her alive and are the only reason she is alive right now.

Side note, with you saying you’re 100% anti abortion. What about women who have been brutally raped or gotten pregnant due to incest. What are your thoughts on those women who choose to have abortions?

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 17/05/2025 19:12

JHound · 17/05/2025 18:25

What happens if the family refuses to pay the medical costs?

They get sued I’m guessing. The US is absolutely barbaric these days. Land of the free my arse.