Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Clarks WTAF?

211 replies

Bananararity · 17/05/2025 16:20

90% of my work shores are from Clarks and have been for years. I get this is a collaboration but honestly? Or am I really out of touch and this is what I need to be wearing.

Absolutely love the shade of blue though.

www.clarks.com/en-gb/Martine-Rose-Heel-Womens/26183327-p

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
chipsewfast · 28/05/2025 16:53

Hideous

Idisagreewithu · 28/05/2025 09:44

You are really out of touch and this is what you need to be wearing. You may have personal preferences, but you should try and suppress these.

shadypines · 26/05/2025 16:23

The shoes aren't the only thing that's 'distressed', I'm distressed just looking at them.

thestudio · 26/05/2025 15:34

So interesting @CertainUncertain (and I very much enjoyed hearing about your much more glamorous life. I socialise in those areas too but my milieu is more openings = free wine Grin).

I tend to think of those low kitten heels or the cut-out-bits ones as flat-ish rather than properly heely and the same goes for heeled loafers (which I secretly like and had in the 90s in fact. I wore them with slim ankle skimmers and a Helmut Lang crombie...)

I haven't noticed anyone other than Shoreditch hen-night stumblers in proper heels for ages but I will keep my eyes peeled.

I hope it's a permanent change. I do get costume dressing - putting on an alter ego kind of thing - but women being pressurised to wear as a matter of course body-deforming footwear in which they can't run feels barbaric to me, and on an exact par with more obviously oppressive forms of mandated women's dress globally.

RabbitsRock · 26/05/2025 12:22

£250!!!!

5foot5 · 26/05/2025 09:39

Sapana · 26/05/2025 08:18

That's what ethically made shoes cost. Fine if you can't afford it, but don't glorify that.

Where does it say anything about them being ethically made, whatever that means? Certainly at the time I posted (more than a week ago!) there had been no discussion about how they were made.

Anyway it's not a question of being able to afford that much for shoes. I could if I placed that much value on shoes, which generally I don't. I can just about see me spending that much on a pair of hiking boots, but hard to imagine anything else being worth that much.

But fair point, if shoes are your thing and you get pleasure from collecting unusual ones then it may be worth it to you. I don't find them all that interesting and I must have conventional tastes as these shoes look ugly and badly made to my untutored eyes.

Sapana · 26/05/2025 08:18

5foot5 · 17/05/2025 16:33

I have never paid that much for a pair of shoes in my life. And these are just awful!

That's what ethically made shoes cost. Fine if you can't afford it, but don't glorify that.

Coffeekisses · 26/05/2025 08:10

I think they’re stunning. Sorry OP but YANBU - they’re still selling their more traditional shoes at the usual prices, you’re not being denied anything!

Wallichiana · 26/05/2025 07:58

BIossomtoes · 17/05/2025 18:13

I’m hiding with you because I like them too. 😱

can I squeeze in too?

love

sorry mumsnet

DuckbilledSplatterPuff · 25/05/2025 23:56

Bananararity · 17/05/2025 16:55

I’m actually angered by them. If they were the usual court shoe they do in that colour with a heel I’d have bought them - probably two of them. But they’ve taken something that usually sells and made it look as though it’s been jammed in a door. Any they trebled the price.

Who is the target market here?

They look like a Fashion Task from The Apprentice

CertainUncertain · 25/05/2025 10:54

thestudio · 24/05/2025 19:31

Yes, this is fair enough - I think the majority of UK heel wearers are definitely not haute fashion or haute bourgeoisie, but there is a level of luxe fashion which has never let heels go (and which to me feels more commerce/Kardashian adjacent than art form).

In London I primarily see wealthy heels on minimalist beige-and-butterscotch wide-trouser lunching types with excellent highlights, gentle tans and very understated work (still have laugh lines). Alternatively, on gallerinas (and their Zara wannabes) - these are more high-fashion, but it's a particular moneyed West London Euro look, rather than CSM students or the man-repelling fashionista subset?

I find all this coding so interesting. Your view might be different and I'm interested to hear it.

It's hard to break it down, I think. I know what you mean about the commerce-adjacent, I see that type a lot when I'm in Mayfair or Chelsea, sometimes Marylebone. I was a a work event last week, a variety of ages, city-adjacent, and it was like a kitten heel showroom, python prints in excess (quite like some of them), plenty of block heeled mary janes (an abomination, imo), some heeled loafers (yuk) and a variety of point-toed flats.

I've also, over the past few weeks, been to dinner near Broadway Market twice and dinner in Clapton once, to an art opening at a friend's studio in Bethnal Green, a cocktail bar in Dalston and a gig in Hackney, so have seen a variety of footwear in the cooler haunts. Lots of trainers, but also lots of Chloe-type platforms (lots of them) and a big variety of heeled and wedged mules - particularly ones with the sides of the wedge sort of scooped out, like these

https://www.mytheresa.com/gb/en/women/dries-van-noten-snake-effect-leather-
mules-beige-p01014762?rrec=true

https://lemondeberyl.com/products/micro-wedge-mule-black-naplack-leather?pr_prod_strat=e5_desc&pr_rec_id=0dea0b31e&pr_rec_pid=8199588053169&pr_ref_pid=8199587627185&pr_seq=uniform

And my sister and my DD, both of whom tend to be up on trends are wanting heeled thong sandals for summer - they look like torture devices to me🤗

@Blossomtoes Alas, I think the creatives and the achingly hip have been banished further afield to make way for the tourists, bankers and hen parties. I went through Shoreditch and Hoxton last night (in a taxi) and the streets were thronged with heels heels heels and inflatable penii.

www.mytheresa.com

https://www.mytheresa.com/gb/en/women/dries-van-noten-snake-effect-leather-mules-beige-p01014762?rrec=true

Winterjoy · 24/05/2025 22:01

Tooty78 · 17/05/2025 18:16

I bought two pair of black slim heel court shoes one velvet type and the other silk, back in 1992 in the sale for £7 each.

I still wear them occasionally mainly, at the social dances at the dance studio we go to. 33 years later they are still like new, I have had them heeled, but that's all.
This is what Clarks meant to me, well made footwear made to last.

Unfortunately selling two pairs of shoes per customer every 30 years doesn't keep a business going anymore. An explosion in the volume of accessible vendors (globalism/online shopping) means a smaller share of customers, so retailers have to stock low quality fast fashion to keep repeat custom up.

BIossomtoes · 24/05/2025 20:12

CertainUncertain · 24/05/2025 19:00

I live in London and I see them all the time. Maybe not point toe stilettos for the most part, although I've seen some lately, but block heels, platforms, I'm seeing loads. And have a look at mytheresa and net-a-porter, they're styling lots of outfits with heels again.

And you can argue that they're not the peak of street style, but I highly doubt the average mumsnetter announcing they're out is really out ahead of them on trends.

Depends where they hang out - Hoxton, Spitalfields, etc - achingly fashionable and barely a heel to be seen.

thestudio · 24/05/2025 19:31

CertainUncertain · 24/05/2025 19:00

I live in London and I see them all the time. Maybe not point toe stilettos for the most part, although I've seen some lately, but block heels, platforms, I'm seeing loads. And have a look at mytheresa and net-a-porter, they're styling lots of outfits with heels again.

And you can argue that they're not the peak of street style, but I highly doubt the average mumsnetter announcing they're out is really out ahead of them on trends.

Yes, this is fair enough - I think the majority of UK heel wearers are definitely not haute fashion or haute bourgeoisie, but there is a level of luxe fashion which has never let heels go (and which to me feels more commerce/Kardashian adjacent than art form).

In London I primarily see wealthy heels on minimalist beige-and-butterscotch wide-trouser lunching types with excellent highlights, gentle tans and very understated work (still have laugh lines). Alternatively, on gallerinas (and their Zara wannabes) - these are more high-fashion, but it's a particular moneyed West London Euro look, rather than CSM students or the man-repelling fashionista subset?

I find all this coding so interesting. Your view might be different and I'm interested to hear it.

CertainUncertain · 24/05/2025 19:00

thestudio · 24/05/2025 18:22

I agree it's become a bit of a ... class marker <runs>

I live in London and I see them all the time. Maybe not point toe stilettos for the most part, although I've seen some lately, but block heels, platforms, I'm seeing loads. And have a look at mytheresa and net-a-porter, they're styling lots of outfits with heels again.

And you can argue that they're not the peak of street style, but I highly doubt the average mumsnetter announcing they're out is really out ahead of them on trends.

thestudio · 24/05/2025 18:22

BIossomtoes · 24/05/2025 16:56

Depends. Where I live it’s very rare to see anyone in heels and I never see anyone wearing them in London either.

I agree it's become a bit of a ... class marker <runs>

BIossomtoes · 24/05/2025 16:56

CertainUncertain · 24/05/2025 15:58

I see this trotted out on mumsnet constantly and it's just... really not true.

Depends. Where I live it’s very rare to see anyone in heels and I never see anyone wearing them in London either.

CertainUncertain · 24/05/2025 15:58

malificent7 · 23/05/2025 05:25

Noone wears heels any more surely? Very dated.

I see this trotted out on mumsnet constantly and it's just... really not true.

HomericEpithet · 24/05/2025 15:44

thestudio · 24/05/2025 15:32

Fair enough, I used the expression 'class marker' yesterday on a thread and assumed I'd annoyed you.

And arf, no - even though I do like a bit of deconstruction, all heels make me think of little piggy trotters and/or how women are literally hobbled by the patriarchy 😁

Ah, now I get what you meant. No, I didn't see the other thread. This was an instance of entirely coincidental vocabulary overlap!

Agreed about the hobbling. And to add insult to injury, women have to pay to be hobbled, but that's another rant.

thestudio · 24/05/2025 15:32

HomericEpithet · 24/05/2025 15:18

How have I quoted you from another thread? You posted on this one, three posts before my reply to you?

It's the shoes, isn't it? You've bought a pair, and the heels are so high that you're at too high an altitude to remember where you've posted. Does MN have a mountain smiley?

Fair enough, I used the expression 'class marker' yesterday on a thread and assumed I'd annoyed you.

And arf, no - even though I do like a bit of deconstruction, all heels make me think of little piggy trotters and/or how women are literally hobbled by the patriarchy 😁

Anyotherdude · 24/05/2025 15:23

I would argue that they are actually dangerous with the extra length of sole at the front (E.g. when ascending stairs) - based on my experience of one pair of extra-pointy cowboy boots and a nasty fall…

HomericEpithet · 24/05/2025 15:18

thestudio · 24/05/2025 14:51

No that's precisely not what I'm talking about - as I said, 'don't like it, don't buy it.' It's the outrage that this shoe exists at all that I think is very parochial, as if the designer has personally insulted the poster.

There is room for edgy/high-fashion/conceptual and there is room for mainstream. To care enough to publicly mock or be outraged by either is odd.
My own style has historically tended towards the former (not now, cba); I find most middle-of-the-road fashion aesthetically and sometimes ideologically displeasing, and often wince internally. I wouldn't do so out loud because I know it would make me sound like a cunt without convincing anyone to care more about design principles.

Also, bit weird to quote me from another thread on an entirely different issue but ... flattered, I guess?

How have I quoted you from another thread? You posted on this one, three posts before my reply to you?

It's the shoes, isn't it? You've bought a pair, and the heels are so high that you're at too high an altitude to remember where you've posted. Does MN have a mountain smiley?

BIossomtoes · 24/05/2025 15:11

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 24/05/2025 12:51

Yeah. The daft shit belongs on the catwalk.
The high street is for normal stuff.

Some of us don’t want “normal stuff” - whatever that is.

thestudio · 24/05/2025 14:53

Having said that, I have just put UPVC windows designed by people without eyes as my number one on the 'I would never buy a house with...' thread 😂

thestudio · 24/05/2025 14:51

HomericEpithet · 24/05/2025 14:22

You mean that disdain for concept footwear is a class marker for practical people who spend too much time on their feet to risk prioritising style over function? Grin

Yeah, probably true. Private podiatry costs a fair whack and an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

No that's precisely not what I'm talking about - as I said, 'don't like it, don't buy it.' It's the outrage that this shoe exists at all that I think is very parochial, as if the designer has personally insulted the poster.

There is room for edgy/high-fashion/conceptual and there is room for mainstream. To care enough to publicly mock or be outraged by either is odd.
My own style has historically tended towards the former (not now, cba); I find most middle-of-the-road fashion aesthetically and sometimes ideologically displeasing, and often wince internally. I wouldn't do so out loud because I know it would make me sound like a cunt without convincing anyone to care more about design principles.

Also, bit weird to quote me from another thread on an entirely different issue but ... flattered, I guess?