Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

SATS cheating - by the Head!

561 replies

Dilemmaramma · 16/05/2025 21:16

In my DC’s final SATS exam yesterday, the headteacher was overseeing and they picked up DC’s paper, DURING the exam, flicked through it, then rubbed out one of the answers and told DC to try again. They also pointed out another wrong answer and indicated DC should re-do that question.

This is clear cut cheating, right?

YABU - don’t report it, the whole year group could get their SATS voided and they’ll be devastated
YANBU - this is appalling and the Head needs to be investigated

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
RumAndDietCoke · 17/05/2025 16:22

It’s disgraceful and I don’t agree with it but it’s not like it’s GCSEs (which most employers aren’t interested in anyway either)

Joyunlimited · 17/05/2025 16:22

Dilemmaramma · 17/05/2025 16:05

Yes, that’s fair. I mostly wanted to get my thoughts down. As it stands, I don’t think I can bring myself to report it to STA. And I agree that he wouldn’t be able to respond to the letter so probably pointless. Unless I take out the part re. action at the end and just log my opinion of what he’s done. It's not a comfortable position at all.

I can see the point that he won’t be able to admit his guilt, but I still think sending the rest of your letter without the requests at the end for a written response to various points is preferable to doing nothing. Even if you get no response at all, he'll know you know and it might make him less likely to cheat in the future.

IButtleSir · 17/05/2025 16:22

Apollo365 · 17/05/2025 10:50

There was teacher to four children this week at my DCs school. What I mean is it’s unlikely another teacher was not there to witness the cheating.

I'm sorry, I genuinely don't understand your first sentence.

sakuraspring · 17/05/2025 16:21

IButtleSir · 17/05/2025 16:19

I have worked at four schools. None of those schools have used any of these 'resources' except for the school's own governors, if they aren't at work in those days, which they often are.

We definitely had staggered testing. Dd was in the last group (all those with SEN or just non academic - DD is bright but with severe dyslexia) and they were given "revision " sessions whilst the other children were already in their SATS. The head was moving between the two groups.

IButtleSir · 17/05/2025 16:20

Joyunlimited · 17/05/2025 09:34

You do know you’re allowed to stagger the timing of the tests, as long as the children taking them later are kept separate from the others (e.g. sent to "help" in an infants class for an hour or so), don’t you?

You do know that in a school with 96 children taking the test, that would be a totally unnecessary logistical nightmare, don't you?

sakuraspring · 17/05/2025 16:20

butteredhorseradish · 17/05/2025 16:12

Just let it go.
It's ridiculous.
It will make the difference of one or two marks at most.

Then why did the head do it?! ridiculous to set such a bad example to children for the sake of one or two marks. And it says something damning about their character that means I would not want them to have such a responsible position.

IButtleSir · 17/05/2025 16:19

DidStart · 17/05/2025 10:10

Schools use

Staggered testing.

Governors.

Governors from local secondary school.

WRAC staff.

Even the WI and parish council.

I have worked at four schools. None of those schools have used any of these 'resources' except for the school's own governors, if they aren't at work in those days, which they often are.

noworklifebalance · 17/05/2025 16:17

butteredhorseradish · 17/05/2025 16:12

Just let it go.
It's ridiculous.
It will make the difference of one or two marks at most.

Conversely, the fact that it may only be one or two marks but the HT still felt the need to cheat shows how serious it is.

Dilemmaramma · 17/05/2025 16:14

MissJoGrant · 17/05/2025 16:10

Specifically, I would appreciate:
A response acknowledging the seriousness of this incident;
An outline of what steps the school will take to ensure full compliance with national test protocols in future;
A reassurance that this will not be repeated;

There's absolutely no way you'll get any of that as it would effectively be an admission of guilt.

Yes, I have reflected and realise this now. I could take that part out and simply state that I will not be taking this further as that would risk the whole year group having their tests voided, which would be grossly unfair as the children have done nothing wrong.

But maybe it’s pointless sending the letter at all, in that case.

i drafted it to get my thoughts in order. Everyone’s comments re the head not being able to respond are fair.

OP posts:
butteredhorseradish · 17/05/2025 16:12

Just let it go.
It's ridiculous.
It will make the difference of one or two marks at most.

MissJoGrant · 17/05/2025 16:10

Specifically, I would appreciate:
A response acknowledging the seriousness of this incident;
An outline of what steps the school will take to ensure full compliance with national test protocols in future;
A reassurance that this will not be repeated;

There's absolutely no way you'll get any of that as it would effectively be an admission of guilt.

Peachycat01 · 17/05/2025 16:09

I think report to STA or do nothing. If you send the letter in at all, the wheels must turn within school and it will be investigated.

Dilemmaramma · 17/05/2025 16:05

Yes, that’s fair. I mostly wanted to get my thoughts down. As it stands, I don’t think I can bring myself to report it to STA. And I agree that he wouldn’t be able to respond to the letter so probably pointless. Unless I take out the part re. action at the end and just log my opinion of what he’s done. It's not a comfortable position at all.

OP posts:
noworklifebalance · 17/05/2025 16:01

Straightjacketsandroses · 17/05/2025 15:36

Also, I’m very much in the camp of stop being such a busybody. Imagine voiding the tests for an entire year group vs just letting this one go and accepting that sometimes, situations that are supposed to be rigorously overseen perhaps aren’t. I could understand if your child was placed at a disadvantage but I can’t fathom how anyone holds such rigid principles that they’re willing to cause chaos just to see them upheld

It’s not the OP that is causing this, it is the HT

neverbeenskiing · 17/05/2025 15:55

Dilemmaramma · 17/05/2025 15:15

I’m not enjoying the drama at all, ridiculous. The Governors would be obliged to report it to STA. I’m very conflicted about that - the tests would likely be voided for the whole year group. I want to give the head a chance to amend his conduct - I’m furious, yes, but I am not comfortable with ending someone’s career.

So you want him to admit wrongdoing, say he's sorry and promise not to do it again? You must realise that's not going to happen. He'll just deny it, he'd be mad to do anything else. Either report it properly or move on, this is not going to achieve anything.

Tripadvisor101 · 17/05/2025 15:40

Straightjacketsandroses · 17/05/2025 15:36

Also, I’m very much in the camp of stop being such a busybody. Imagine voiding the tests for an entire year group vs just letting this one go and accepting that sometimes, situations that are supposed to be rigorously overseen perhaps aren’t. I could understand if your child was placed at a disadvantage but I can’t fathom how anyone holds such rigid principles that they’re willing to cause chaos just to see them upheld

It's not a bad thing to have morals and principals.

Straightjacketsandroses · 17/05/2025 15:36

Also, I’m very much in the camp of stop being such a busybody. Imagine voiding the tests for an entire year group vs just letting this one go and accepting that sometimes, situations that are supposed to be rigorously overseen perhaps aren’t. I could understand if your child was placed at a disadvantage but I can’t fathom how anyone holds such rigid principles that they’re willing to cause chaos just to see them upheld

Straightjacketsandroses · 17/05/2025 15:30

RareGoalsVerge · 17/05/2025 14:27

Only if you consider the 50% of the population who fall below the average line to be "failures"

Well yes, since they haven’t achieved mastery of the foundational knowledge expected at the end of KS2 and going into key stage 3. ‘Failure’ is an ugly word - especially when talking about children, but roughly 70% of children will achieve this standard and the 30% who don’t will need heavy differentiation going forwards. So they haven’t ‘failed’ at anything other than meeting the standard, but that in itself will likely present them with difficulties over the next few years of their education

Peachycat01 · 17/05/2025 15:30

You don't report to the school - maladministration should be reported to the STA as they are responsible for investigating. Why would you report it to the person you are making the allegation against? If you want to report maladministration - report it and let it be investigated without intervening in the process yourself.

Tripadvisor101 · 17/05/2025 15:30

Your letter is extremely well written. However, the head will not be able to respond to your requests without admitting fault and they can't do that for fear of losing their job. You'd then have specific evidence which you could use so you put them in an awful position. I think you need to either have a verbal conversation or you need to officially report it as this in-between will be just as career ending as an official report.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 17/05/2025 15:26

Dilemmaramma · 17/05/2025 14:37

Have drafted a letter, at this stage just to help get it out of my head. I don’t know yet if I’ll send it. DH has pointed out the ‘casting a shadow’ paragraph is laying it on a bit thick, so if this does get sent, will edit that part!

I’m sure this will trigger the ‘shrug it off’ PPs, but interested in any constructive feedback re. whether this could do the job of getting the head to seriously reconsider their conduct in future…

“I am writing to formally raise a serious concern about an incident during my daughter’s recent SATs exams which I believe constitutes clear misconduct and a breach of national test administration rules.

My child reported that, during the test, you personally intervened by picking up her paper, rubbed out one of her answers, and told her to try again. You also drew her attention to another incorrect response, encouraging her to amend it, while the exam was still in progress.

Whatever the intention, this constitutes a clear breach of national test guidelines. The statutory guidance around permissible support is explicit: adults must not indicate whether an answer is right or wrong, and may not guide or prompt pupils towards correct responses. What took place is, by any fair reading, a case of inappropriate assistance.

While I recognise that schools are under enormous pressure to demonstrate progress and deliver strong results, such pressures cannot justify actions that amount to cheating. I am extremely concerned by what this models to the children. If a child were to receive help from a peer during an exam, they would rightly face consequences. When a figure of moral and academic authority appears to break the rules, it risks teaching young people that cheating is acceptable. This is damaging and confusing, especially at an age when children are developing a strong sense of fairness and integrity. It risks normalising cheating, diminishing trust, and confusing their understanding of right and wrong.

This incident has cast a shadow over the final weeks of my daughter’s primary school experience. What should have been a proud moment — the culmination of her own hard work — is now clouded by doubt. She will be left questioning the authenticity of her results, and the experience has been embarrassing and upsetting, particularly given that it took place in full view of her peers. The emotional impact of this cannot be underestimated.

The wider implications are just as troubling. This kind of interference doesn’t just affect individual test outcomes—it can follow children for years. Inflated results lead to inflated secondary targets, which can result in students constantly falling short of unrealistic benchmarks. If children are assigned artificially high GCSE targets based on inflated SATs results, they may struggle unnecessarily, lose confidence, and spend years under the shadow of unrealistic expectations. Secondary teachers, in turn, are unfairly judged for failing to meet targets that were never reflective of genuine ability in the first place.

I also note that this kind of incident rarely occurs in isolation. If this has happened to my child, it is highly likely it has happened to others.

I recognise the intense pressure primary schools face, particularly around performance metrics. I want to be clear that I have no desire to see careers harmed or individuals publicly criticised. I appreciate how hard staff work to give our children the best education possible. However, I do feel that this situation demands accountability and reassurance.

I would like to know what steps you will take to ensure that assessment protocols are upheld in future and that the integrity of school-led testing remains beyond reproach.

Specifically, I would appreciate:
A response acknowledging the seriousness of this incident;
An outline of what steps the school will take to ensure full compliance with national test protocols in future;
A reassurance that this will not be repeated;
Any reflections you can offer on how the school will rebuild trust with this cohort of pupils and parents.

I hope you understand that I write this with a genuine interest in the wellbeing of the school community, the integrity of the education system, and the moral development of our children.

I would welcome a written response and am available for a meeting if you consider it helpful.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.”

The Head will interpret that as blackmail. They won't grovel for forgiveness, they won't engage in any communication with you - at best, they'll disappear on sick leave and nobody will know why. Even sending it to the Chair of Governors/Trustees/Members doesn't guarantee it being acknowledged or acted upon.

Like SATs themselves, do it properly or not at all - and not at all isn't a viable course to take if you do value integrity. Report and it'll be investigated.

sakuraspring · 17/05/2025 15:24

Joyunlimited · 17/05/2025 15:15

On the contrary, I think the OP is trying to be magnanimous to someone who has perhaps been a good headteacher apart from this incident, and is trying to prevent any bad publicity or career-damaging reports.

Agreed.
I feel same as op about my children's head teacher cheating. There's part of me that would love to have a quiet word with her and see if that can shake her into behaving decently

The reality is though that cheats dont have a moral compass. Consequences are the only thing that would work. I reported last time and I am going to report again this time. Then, once my daughter has left the school, I shall write a letter to the chair of governors.

Joyunlimited · 17/05/2025 15:15

neverbeenskiing · 17/05/2025 15:05

Why on earth would you take it upon yourself to contact the HT about this directly?

You say you're furious that you've been "put in this position". But the link to report maladministration has been posted several times on this thread, and pp have also advised you that you can report to the Chair of Govenors.
The fact that you've ignored these suggestions in favour of confronting the HT yourself suggests that a part of you is enjoying the drama of it all.

On the contrary, I think the OP is trying to be magnanimous to someone who has perhaps been a good headteacher apart from this incident, and is trying to prevent any bad publicity or career-damaging reports.

Dilemmaramma · 17/05/2025 15:15

neverbeenskiing · 17/05/2025 15:05

Why on earth would you take it upon yourself to contact the HT about this directly?

You say you're furious that you've been "put in this position". But the link to report maladministration has been posted several times on this thread, and pp have also advised you that you can report to the Chair of Govenors.
The fact that you've ignored these suggestions in favour of confronting the HT yourself suggests that a part of you is enjoying the drama of it all.

I’m not enjoying the drama at all, ridiculous. The Governors would be obliged to report it to STA. I’m very conflicted about that - the tests would likely be voided for the whole year group. I want to give the head a chance to amend his conduct - I’m furious, yes, but I am not comfortable with ending someone’s career.

OP posts:
Joyunlimited · 17/05/2025 15:12

Azdcgbjml · 17/05/2025 14:49

Yes, in this case it just happened to be a cohort of children that really struggled.

Then their previous assessments, at the end of Reception and at KS1, would have shown that, and the school would not have been penalised unless they still didn’t make the amount of progress expected. Even then, there must (as you say) have been other major factors.