Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not paying for garden work

808 replies

gardendramas5 · 16/05/2025 09:24

I’m pretty sure I’m not being unreasonable but I just want to see what other people think.

I purchased my house December last year. It was empty for at least 2 years (ex rental)

The previous owners kept the front and back garden tidy whilst it was on the market, no idea if it was them that did the work or if they paid someone. Both gardens are quite large. I started doing all of this myself when I took ownership.

Anyway, I’ve been away for the last week with family and came home on Wednesday to freshly cut grass, weeds pulled etc. I asked my neighbours if they had seen anyone but they were at work. It turns out that the previous owners hired a company to do the work and hadn’t notified them that they’d sold the house last year. I only found this out yesterday as the gardener turned up with the invoice. I explained I wasn’t aware of this arrangement and that he would have to invoice the previous owners for the work (I was polite and apologised for the inconvenience but made it clear I hadn’t asked for this work to be done and wasn’t prepared to pay for it either)

He knocked on again this morning and explained that he’d spoken to them yesterday and that they agreed to pay half (because it was their error) but that I should pay the rest because I’m the one benefiting from the work. I told him no sorry I’m not paying and he needs to take it up with them.

I do feel bad for the gardener, but it’s their fault. I didn't ask for this. They were awkward during the conveyancing process too so this doesn’t surprise me. AIBU?

OP posts:
AthWat · 16/05/2025 16:29

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:27

I know perfectly well how contacts work. How can a house give consideration to form a contact? The previous home owners ended the contract but didn't tell the gardener. My point about OP being lucky is that they could have refused to pay. They are correct in that she has benefitted from the service. It's unfair that the OP didn't enter into a contract.

How can they end the contract without telling the other party in the contract??

They couldn't (reasonably) have refused to pay! They are legally liable!

What on earth do you mean "it's unfair the OP didn't enter into a contract"? Unfair to whom?

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:27

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:22

As a pp has pointed out to you, the contract is with the home owner, not the property. It doesn’t cease to be a thing because the owner has sold. That isn’t how a contract works!

I know perfectly well how contacts work. How can a house give consideration to form a contact? The previous home owners ended the contract but didn't tell the gardener. My point about OP being lucky is that they could have refused to pay. They are correct in that she has benefitted from the service. It's unfair that the OP didn't enter into a contract.

AthWat · 16/05/2025 16:25

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:20

That's where we differ. They no longer have a contract with the gardener.

Opinions are divided on the subject. You on one side, everyone else and the law of the land on the other.

AthWat · 16/05/2025 16:24

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:19

It was an error in not cancelling him. They may have even presumed new owner would keep him on. They were wrong on both counts. However, the work cannot be undone and to suggest pursuing a small claims action is ridiculous. I would enjoy a fresh looking garden and pay half for the gardener's sake. Is this really worth the hassle or would you prefer digging your heels in for the sake of it?

There's no "digging your heels in" to say no to people who ask you for money for nothing. The OP should just say to the gardener this is nothing to do with me, take it up with the people who contracted you; don't come back to me because they won't fulfil their legal obligations. If he wants to go to small claims against them, he can. It's nothing to do with the OP.
Your suggestion is that the OP should pay for the sake of the previous owners who are not owning their error, because apparently "the poor gardener" is too stupid or weak to push them to pay what they owe, but fine with hassling the OP.

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:22

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:20

That's where we differ. They no longer have a contract with the gardener.

As a pp has pointed out to you, the contract is with the home owner, not the property. It doesn’t cease to be a thing because the owner has sold. That isn’t how a contract works!

Alwayswonderedwhy · 16/05/2025 16:22

I can't believe he just turned up after all this time without contacting the previous owners. How would he know they even wanted him back?

I it was me and I was happy with the work and the cost was reasonable I'd probably pay but you definitely shouldn't feel any obligation to.

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:21

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:20

I would 100% refuse to pay for a job I didn’t want and didn’t ask for.

That's your choice.

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:20

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:19

It was an error in not cancelling him. They may have even presumed new owner would keep him on. They were wrong on both counts. However, the work cannot be undone and to suggest pursuing a small claims action is ridiculous. I would enjoy a fresh looking garden and pay half for the gardener's sake. Is this really worth the hassle or would you prefer digging your heels in for the sake of it?

I would 100% refuse to pay for a job I didn’t want and didn’t ask for.

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:20

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:18

They are absolutely not within their rights 😂

That's where we differ. They no longer have a contract with the gardener.

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:19

AthWat · 16/05/2025 16:15

The previous owners are the one who contracted him to come in May and forgot to tell him not to. Why do you think they shouldn't pay? If he takes them to court for the whole amount, he will certainly win.

It was an error in not cancelling him. They may have even presumed new owner would keep him on. They were wrong on both counts. However, the work cannot be undone and to suggest pursuing a small claims action is ridiculous. I would enjoy a fresh looking garden and pay half for the gardener's sake. Is this really worth the hassle or would you prefer digging your heels in for the sake of it?

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:18

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:13

Mistakes happen when you move house. You may inevitably forget to notify somebody/cancel everything. They no longer are responsible for the property, so are well within their rights to say hard luck. Is that the right thjng to do? No, so they have compromised with paying half for a service they havent benefitted from. So yes, the OP is lucky.

They are absolutely not within their rights 😂

AthWat · 16/05/2025 16:18

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:13

Mistakes happen when you move house. You may inevitably forget to notify somebody/cancel everything. They no longer are responsible for the property, so are well within their rights to say hard luck. Is that the right thjng to do? No, so they have compromised with paying half for a service they havent benefitted from. So yes, the OP is lucky.

They are not remotely within their rights to say hard luck. The gardener didn't make a contract with the house, he made it with them; whether they are currently responsible for the property is utterly immaterial. Legally they are 100% responsible for the contract with the gardener.

AthWat · 16/05/2025 16:15

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:03

He has done the work now and no doubt it looks better so you should pay half. I think you're lucky previous owners have offered half. Poor bugger just wants to be paid.

The previous owners are the one who contracted him to come in May and forgot to tell him not to. Why do you think they shouldn't pay? If he takes them to court for the whole amount, he will certainly win.

sidebirds · 16/05/2025 16:14

The gardener is being unreasonable! Immensely cheeky to come a second time in an attempt to chisel you out of money you don't owe. Awkward situation. Well done for standing your ground ✊🏾

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:13

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:10

Lucky? It was entirely their fault he did the work which op didn’t want done.

Mistakes happen when you move house. You may inevitably forget to notify somebody/cancel everything. They no longer are responsible for the property, so are well within their rights to say hard luck. Is that the right thjng to do? No, so they have compromised with paying half for a service they havent benefitted from. So yes, the OP is lucky.

GabriellaMontez · 16/05/2025 16:13

I'd advise him to chase the previous owners via small claims for the rest of the work.

I wonder if he genuinely hadn't realised or, thought he'd lean on you to continue his contract by just doing the job.

SwingTheMonkey · 16/05/2025 16:10

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:03

He has done the work now and no doubt it looks better so you should pay half. I think you're lucky previous owners have offered half. Poor bugger just wants to be paid.

Lucky? It was entirely their fault he did the work which op didn’t want done.

ButterCrackers · 16/05/2025 16:05

Catchewer · 16/05/2025 16:00

He was hired by the previous owners. The house has been empty for 2 years. He stopped work over the winter. He should check, especially in view of the circumstances, in the spring whether his clients still need him.

He’s been hired. If you work do you check that your employer still needs you or do you go to work? The gardener’s employer should have said that the gardener was no longer needed. He’s probably reserved calendar space that he could have filled.

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:04

He wasn't trespassing if he thought his invite was still open.

Dangermoo · 16/05/2025 16:03

He has done the work now and no doubt it looks better so you should pay half. I think you're lucky previous owners have offered half. Poor bugger just wants to be paid.

Catchewer · 16/05/2025 16:00

ButterCrackers · 16/05/2025 15:58

He's been hired so he’s done the work.

He was hired by the previous owners. The house has been empty for 2 years. He stopped work over the winter. He should check, especially in view of the circumstances, in the spring whether his clients still need him.

ButterCrackers · 16/05/2025 15:58

Catchewer · 16/05/2025 15:52

It is the gardeners fault though .. who comes to work after being off for 5 months or more, and doesn’t check if their clients still need their services??

He's been hired so he’s done the work.

Pompompurin1 · 16/05/2025 15:56

If I could afford it, I would probably pay half as a gesture of Goodwill but make it clear that no more work was to take place without prior arrangement with me. It’s just one of those things.

LadeOde · 16/05/2025 15:56

This can't possibly be the first time the gardeners have come since December, though. Most gardeners resume work to prepare for spring around Feb/March, so whats been going on since then? also @op said the grass was freshly cut AND weeded so she can't be doing that much of a stellar job! c'mon @op just pay him half and stop the service.

Catchewer · 16/05/2025 15:52

UpUpUpU · 16/05/2025 15:48

How much are we talking for half the bill?

I would pay half (I am an avid gardener and like to do my own so would be annoyed) but it's not the gardeners fault.

It is the gardeners fault though .. who comes to work after being off for 5 months or more, and doesn’t check if their clients still need their services??

Swipe left for the next trending thread