Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not paying for garden work

808 replies

gardendramas5 · 16/05/2025 09:24

I’m pretty sure I’m not being unreasonable but I just want to see what other people think.

I purchased my house December last year. It was empty for at least 2 years (ex rental)

The previous owners kept the front and back garden tidy whilst it was on the market, no idea if it was them that did the work or if they paid someone. Both gardens are quite large. I started doing all of this myself when I took ownership.

Anyway, I’ve been away for the last week with family and came home on Wednesday to freshly cut grass, weeds pulled etc. I asked my neighbours if they had seen anyone but they were at work. It turns out that the previous owners hired a company to do the work and hadn’t notified them that they’d sold the house last year. I only found this out yesterday as the gardener turned up with the invoice. I explained I wasn’t aware of this arrangement and that he would have to invoice the previous owners for the work (I was polite and apologised for the inconvenience but made it clear I hadn’t asked for this work to be done and wasn’t prepared to pay for it either)

He knocked on again this morning and explained that he’d spoken to them yesterday and that they agreed to pay half (because it was their error) but that I should pay the rest because I’m the one benefiting from the work. I told him no sorry I’m not paying and he needs to take it up with them.

I do feel bad for the gardener, but it’s their fault. I didn't ask for this. They were awkward during the conveyancing process too so this doesn’t surprise me. AIBU?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Inertia · 28/05/2025 09:03

Wonder what the OP decided to do in the end?

Endorewitch · 27/05/2025 18:46

It is definitely legally the responsibility of previous owners. If it was a big company who did the work,I would have no hesitation in refusing to pay. If it was a self employed gardener I would pay half. Not fair on him to lose out.

ellyeth · 26/05/2025 21:30

Even though you benefitted, I don't believed you should be expected to pay half. The previous owners have a cheek suggesting that you should. It was their arrangement and they should be responsible for paying all the money to the gardener. I think he should have insisted that they pay as they didn't have the courtesy to cancel the arrangement. I think the fact that it has been put to you that you pay half would be the thing that would annoy me the most. If it were me, I might have considered paying half as a good will gesture but it should be your choice and not the other parties'.

AthWat · 22/05/2025 21:13

Pomonafluff · 22/05/2025 20:17

Not engineered, more taken advantage of, possibly even subconscious resentment.
No need to be crass .

Oh there's every need. What are you doing now, trawling through 3 day old posts?

Pomonafluff · 22/05/2025 20:17

AthWat · 19/05/2025 20:09

What do you think? You think she has somehow engineered a situation where she's being asked to pay half of a bill the old owners owe because she resents them over the conveyancing?

Whatever you're taking, stop taking it.

Not engineered, more taken advantage of, possibly even subconscious resentment.
No need to be crass .

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 22/05/2025 07:46

Muckybib · 21/05/2025 21:05

All.im saying is that's what I'd do. This is subjective so let people have an opinion that's different to yours. You wouldn't pay and that's fine.

Fair enough, but you didn't say it was pretty small fry to you.

Apologies if I misconstrued your meaning, but it sounded to me like you were calling it an insignificant sum of money for anybody.

MintChocCat · 22/05/2025 07:45

purpleme12 · 22/05/2025 07:44

I know, so many people seem to love to argue on here. I don't get it, personally

It’s weird isn’t it, arguing with a stranger over the internet 😳

purpleme12 · 22/05/2025 07:44

MintChocCat · 22/05/2025 07:38

I can’t think of anything worse than bickering on an online forum - I would simply disengage!

I know, so many people seem to love to argue on here. I don't get it, personally

Kissedbyfire1 · 22/05/2025 07:43

BeJollyEagle · 22/05/2025 07:00

You must have had terribly legal advice to have lost this case. What were the reasons you lost as you’ve wouldn't have had a legal contract with however did the work?

The reason given was that the work had been done so had to be paid for, and the person doing it had no reason to think that the instructions came from someone with no authority to order it. Our only recourse would have been to take action against that person to recover the cost. Given that the amount owing was only £200-300 it wasn’t worth spending many hundreds more to do that.

MintChocCat · 22/05/2025 07:38

purpleme12 · 22/05/2025 07:17

Often happens on here, I think it's so strange though!

I can’t think of anything worse than bickering on an online forum - I would simply disengage!

purpleme12 · 22/05/2025 07:17

MintChocCat · 22/05/2025 06:51

I can’t believe how long this thread has gone on for - and now it appears people are just arguing with one another.

Often happens on here, I think it's so strange though!

AthWat · 22/05/2025 07:15

Pomonafluff · 22/05/2025 06:12

No. I was replying to you.

You're just trying to waste people's time and giggling to yourself now, aren't you. Do you honestly think this is some knid of achievement?

BeJollyEagle · 22/05/2025 07:00

Kissedbyfire1 · 16/05/2025 10:03

Years ago we found ourselves in a very similar situation. Someone ordered a service to be carried out on an item of property that we owned- we knew nothing about it until we got the bill. We refused to pay, the service provider took us to small claims and we lost. We had to pay.

You must have had terribly legal advice to have lost this case. What were the reasons you lost as you’ve wouldn't have had a legal contract with however did the work?

MintChocCat · 22/05/2025 06:51

I can’t believe how long this thread has gone on for - and now it appears people are just arguing with one another.

Pomonafluff · 22/05/2025 06:12

AthWat · 21/05/2025 22:39

You weren't replying to me. You were apparently replying to someone who suggested suing for damages. Confusing, isn't it.

No. I was replying to you.

AthWat · 21/05/2025 22:39

Pomonafluff · 21/05/2025 22:26

Why , can't you remember your own post ?

You weren't replying to me. You were apparently replying to someone who suggested suing for damages. Confusing, isn't it.

Pomonafluff · 21/05/2025 22:26

AthWat · 21/05/2025 22:17

Perhaps it would have helped if you'd quoted the post you were replying to, then.

Why , can't you remember your own post ?

AthWat · 21/05/2025 22:17

Pomonafluff · 21/05/2025 19:50

No, I don't think that and that's not what I stated.

Perhaps it would have helped if you'd quoted the post you were replying to, then.

Muckybib · 21/05/2025 21:05

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 21/05/2025 15:16

It might be pretty small fry to you, but it's inevitably going to be a fair chunk of money - which could indeed make a very significant difference to many people.

We don't know the actual cost this time, but I'd bet it's likely to be a minimum of £2-300 in total - and probably more than that. It's not going to be a fiver, is it?

All.im saying is that's what I'd do. This is subjective so let people have an opinion that's different to yours. You wouldn't pay and that's fine.

Muckybib · 21/05/2025 21:05

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 21/05/2025 15:16

It might be pretty small fry to you, but it's inevitably going to be a fair chunk of money - which could indeed make a very significant difference to many people.

We don't know the actual cost this time, but I'd bet it's likely to be a minimum of £2-300 in total - and probably more than that. It's not going to be a fiver, is it?

All.im saying is that's what I'd do. This is subjective so let people have an opinion that's different to yours. You wouldn't pay and that's fine.

Pomonafluff · 21/05/2025 20:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SwingTheMonkey · 21/05/2025 20:28

Pomonafluff · 21/05/2025 19:52

I was reacting to you being unreasonable and shitty. Please don't say I'm misogynistic. Please stop.

No part of what I said to you was unreasonable and shitty. I pointed out that the pp was right when she said you’d not read the op correctly. You’re over sensitive.

godmum56 · 21/05/2025 20:10

Muckybib · 21/05/2025 15:07

Of course she doesn't have to pay and I agree she shouldn't have to pay BUT, personally I would pay but that's just me. I'd feel sorry for the gardener losing out and you would have had half price gardening. But ike i said that's just me and what would make me feel comfortable and how id see the situation. It's all pretty small fry in the grander scheme of things. Did she mention the cost? We've probably destroyed a couple of gardens with the energy input of this ridiculously long thread!

coming round to ninja clean your windows too!

Pomonafluff · 21/05/2025 19:52

SwingTheMonkey · 21/05/2025 16:42

Describing women as ‘hysterical and catty’ is incredibly misogynistic. Please stop.

I was reacting to you being unreasonable and shitty. Please don't say I'm misogynistic. Please stop.

Pomonafluff · 21/05/2025 19:50

AthWat · 19/05/2025 20:10

You think if the gardener went to court to get the previous owner to pay money he was contractually owed he'd be laughed at? What are you talking about?

No, I don't think that and that's not what I stated.