Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Loud DC and unhappy neighbour. Would you move?

992 replies

YourMintReader · 15/05/2025 19:40

I moved in 6 weeks ago. Within a week, the neighbour had complained about noise levels from 4.30am in the morning. First with a note through the door, the second time I got a phone call from Housing Association. Quickly resolved when I explained why.

Understandable, but there’s nothing I can do. This is from loud shouting and vocal stims.

She has now complained to the Housing Association that I am letting my son play out for hours on end, screaming. And has added he screams foul language. Quickly proven otherwise by me by emailing over countless documents that mention he doesn’t speak a word.

He does scream, happy and sad screams and different times. But I am absolutely not allowing him out ‘all day’

He goes to school 8am to 4pm return.

His weekend schedule is 4/4.30am - Awake. Downstairs around 5.30am latest. We might leave the house for about 9am. Possibly 2 hours of respite carers out the house for a couple of hours with them.

He would spend about 2 or 3 hours max a day in the garden. Inside no later than 6pm.

My neighbour has also got 2 children, 12 and 15. I have never heard from them but they’re older.

It’s a really small new build development and I think I and one other house are the only housing association tenants.

Would you look to move? I would be against it but cannot see a solution if it doesn’t stop. I can’t feel so worried in my own home.

Bloody awkward as there just isn’t many houses so you can’t blend in at all

OP posts:
YourMintReader · 16/05/2025 16:58

flapjackfairy · 16/05/2025 16:19

@YourMintReader
Would it be possible to.have a downstairs bedroom added. That is what we did for our autistic child who.is also v noisy at times. Because it is not attached on the party wall it doesn't impact on us or the neighbours . It has been a lifesaver.
If you could get a disabled facilities grant to do that you.could leave him to it until it is a decent hour.prividing he has a safespace bed or similar and cannot escape of course. And invest in some sleepsuits ( Seen in or Rackettys etc ) that do up the back.and can be made escape proof then you.will not have to.worry about smearing.
And you can.put in a cctv link.or camera to.monitor if required. .This is the only workable solution I think.

This is a great point and an example of why I come back to the thread - sometimes you find good suggestions amongst a lot of foolishness.

I am going to add this to what I’m being up with the OT on Monday. It would be such a game changer if it could work… For everyone!

OP posts:
IButtleSir · 16/05/2025 16:48

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 14:55

Children do grow tbf 😂

They eventually become adults!

Children with profound learning disabilities become adults with profound learning disabilities, so I'm not sure your point is relevant here.

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 16:38

TheHerboriste · 16/05/2025 16:34

Exactly. It is the people causing the disruption who need to exert themselves to ameliorate it, not the innocent victims.

You’re both referring to or agreeing to the idea that a disabled child is a “huge problem,” and suggesting that those who live near them are “victims.”

Imagine saying you’re being victimised by someone’s disability. It’d be funny if it wasn’t so awful.

TheHerboriste · 16/05/2025 16:34

thecatneuterer · 16/05/2025 16:04

You are massively missing the point. The needs of the people whose lives are being made miserable by a random family they have nothing to do with are of course going to be prioritised. They are the ones who should not have to move (how could they sell anyway with such neighbour issues) or anything else, because none of this is any to do with them. This huge problem has just turned up on their doorstep.

Edited

Exactly. It is the people causing the disruption who need to exert themselves to ameliorate it, not the innocent victims.

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 16:24

ThatDaringEagle · 16/05/2025 16:09

"...For our benefit. I wouldn’t move him for someone else’s benefit...."

Jeez. What if it was your family that was unavoidably waking the neighbours every day at 4.30am & making their lives & new house hellish?

Would you move then??

For their benefit 🙄🙄🙄

P.s. you should get over your snobbery chip too, this is just a simple & very basic quality of life issue....

If what you’re asking me is if I’d put my family through our second move this year because someone thought it would help them - no. No I wouldn’t.

Whether it’s convenient for people or not, there are more pressures involved in moving a disabled child, and the only reason I’d do it is if the house didn’t meet his needs.

PS: I don’t have a snobbery chip. I both own property and pay tax, I just wouldn’t bring it up unless I was using it to make a point, which other posters clearly were. That point was a superiority point.

flapjackfairy · 16/05/2025 16:19

@YourMintReader
Would it be possible to.have a downstairs bedroom added. That is what we did for our autistic child who.is also v noisy at times. Because it is not attached on the party wall it doesn't impact on us or the neighbours . It has been a lifesaver.
If you could get a disabled facilities grant to do that you.could leave him to it until it is a decent hour.prividing he has a safespace bed or similar and cannot escape of course. And invest in some sleepsuits ( Seen in or Rackettys etc ) that do up the back.and can be made escape proof then you.will not have to.worry about smearing.
And you can.put in a cctv link.or camera to.monitor if required. .This is the only workable solution I think.

rainbowsandraspberrygin · 16/05/2025 16:18

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 16/05/2025 11:45

Because the OP has already stated that taking him downstairs will create more noise and activity and violence.

I don't know if you've ever had one of those mornings where you're so tired you find it really difficult to come around, but when you're consistently getting poor sleep it is like that every day. You physically can not force yourself into action. You aren't alert. You can't risk assess properly. You can't take your loud, energetic, boisterous child into a space where there are more risks to himself and others when you are chronically sleep deprived and your every single waking moment you're in fight or flight mode because you've got to always be ready to anticipate unpredictable behaviour.

I do feel sorry for the neighbours because it is clearly impacting them too but taking him downstairs is not a solution.

Going downstairs is a signal that the day is starting, and that means it's OK to start spinning and flapping and put the tv on and jump on sofas or go in the garden and play with toys that can be loud or hard that make noises when dropped or thrown, or go to the shops, and so many other things that cause noise, and when you can't go in the garden like you want to because its 4:30 in the morning, or you can't play with your toy that repeats loud repetitive sentences because it's 4:30 in the morning, or you can't have the tv on at the volume you want it because it's 4:30 in the morning or you can't go to the shop because it's closed because it's 4:30 in the morning then as a high needs autistic person with little to no concept of time that can be extremely upsetting and aggravating and you might just feel like the only thing you can do is yell and shout and throw things and hit and kick and bite and I can't see the NDN being happy if the walls were shaking with things hitting it or the screams were louder, or the OP raises her voice, or doors started being slammed, or things got broken either.

I've said in another post I don't think the NDN was wrong to complain, sometimes it's needed but she was wrong to create complete fabrications. It's disgusting, ableist, combative and ridiculous. There's no reason the neighbour couldn't have just talked to OP to try and find a solution. Maybe both houses need soundproofing. Maybe the neighbour doesn't understand the property layout constraints, so hasn't considered that she can also move furniture, maybe she hasn't tried earplugs out of sheer stubbornness and just wants to kick an isolated, depleted mum while she's already down because she's a bully and that's why she won't cooperate.

You’ve expressed this so well. Thank you

ThatDaringEagle · 16/05/2025 16:09

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:46

I’m not going to list the ways it’s difficult to move house with a disabled child, or taking autism into account. Whether you rent or own, it’s a different challenge.

We moved in February, and genuinely I wouldn’t consider it again unless completely necessary. For our benefit. I wouldn’t move him for someone else’s benefit.

The rent/buy debate is all the same as the people going on about tax earlier. It’s snobbery.

“You rent, I own, I’m more important.”
“My taxes pay for those who don’t work.”

Transparent snobbery, nothing more and nothing less.

"...For our benefit. I wouldn’t move him for someone else’s benefit...."

Jeez. What if it was your family that was unavoidably waking the neighbours every day at 4.30am & making their lives & new house hellish?

Would you move then??

For their benefit 🙄🙄🙄

P.s. you should get over your snobbery chip too, this is just a simple & very basic quality of life issue....

UndermyShoeJoe · 16/05/2025 16:04

Thing is everyone should be able to sleep during normal sleeping hours. Even the op.

Ops child ok though no fault of her own is stopping people sleeping op, ops neighbours some of which are children.

But nobody should expect to have to put up with being woken daily from their neighbours regardless of the reason.

Sleep deprivation is a form of torture as has been mentioned.

A colicky baby is also still different in that you know the baby will grow out of it and again often the parent will take the baby to a different room.

Both op and ops neighbour need to keep on at the council. Because the house just isn’t suitable. Doesn’t need to be a detached just a Semi with double bedroom on the external wall. His only going to get bigger and stronger and as such louder.

thecatneuterer · 16/05/2025 16:04

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:46

I’m not going to list the ways it’s difficult to move house with a disabled child, or taking autism into account. Whether you rent or own, it’s a different challenge.

We moved in February, and genuinely I wouldn’t consider it again unless completely necessary. For our benefit. I wouldn’t move him for someone else’s benefit.

The rent/buy debate is all the same as the people going on about tax earlier. It’s snobbery.

“You rent, I own, I’m more important.”
“My taxes pay for those who don’t work.”

Transparent snobbery, nothing more and nothing less.

You are massively missing the point. The needs of the people whose lives are being made miserable by a random family they have nothing to do with are of course going to be prioritised. They are the ones who should not have to move (how could they sell anyway with such neighbour issues) or anything else, because none of this is any to do with them. This huge problem has just turned up on their doorstep.

Words · 16/05/2025 15:58

@TheHerboriste . I agree with every post you have made.

I am child free as I know beyond question I could not deal with a profoundly disabled child. I chose not to risk that eventuality.

I do not intend my next comment as a gotcha to all those shouting about disabilism, but I have various diagnosed disabilities including autism . So I am far from unsympathetic. Up to a point.

I was driven out of my home and my health has suffered massively. I have a right to feel bitter.

Bustabloodvessel · 16/05/2025 15:55

I really feel for your neighbour, she’s entitled to peace especially at 4:30 in the morning, to suggest it’s just tough on the neighbour is ridiculous she wax there first. Unfortunately I knew of a similar situation & enough complaints were made to the HA, council, police & SS thatHA moved the disruptive family out. You’re going to have to find a way of managing it.

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:47

Mrsttcno1 · 16/05/2025 15:44

Then you would fully understand the attitude of everybody else prioritising the people inside their own houses and ensuring they did everything they could to have you moved, or make sure you wanted to move, if you were inconveniencing them. Because just like you, they want to do the best for the people in their own house, just like the neighbours do here :)

Oh I understand it, but I personally wouldn’t buckle to it.

If we moved out of the way every time the kid did something society doesn’t approve of, I’d have to make him live in the shed.

What OP actually needs to do is let it be water off a ducks back.

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:46

Mrsttcno1 · 16/05/2025 15:42

It makes an absolutely massive difference. We saved for a long time and went without to buy our home, we pay a lot of money for it and this is our space which we have worked very hard for, the bare minimum is being able to sleep in your own home.

Having bought our home also means we can’t easily, quickly or cheaply move. To sell our house, depending on where we are at in a mortgage deal at the time, we’d need to pay an estate agent, put it up for sale, book viewings, we’d then have to pay for searches, surveys on the new property, potentially on a couple of properties if the first showed issues, we’d have a % to pay to the lender for moving if within a fixed deal, we’d have to pay solicitors fees, stamp duty, as well as then the costs of moving in general. Add to that the fact the house would be incredibly difficult to sell now with the noise complaints and trying to find a buyer who doesn’t mind a 04:30 start every day.

I don’t doubt that parents of disabled children have less time to themselves, but that’s not the fault or problem of the neighbour who just wants to be able to get a full nights sleep in their own home.

I’m not going to list the ways it’s difficult to move house with a disabled child, or taking autism into account. Whether you rent or own, it’s a different challenge.

We moved in February, and genuinely I wouldn’t consider it again unless completely necessary. For our benefit. I wouldn’t move him for someone else’s benefit.

The rent/buy debate is all the same as the people going on about tax earlier. It’s snobbery.

“You rent, I own, I’m more important.”
“My taxes pay for those who don’t work.”

Transparent snobbery, nothing more and nothing less.

Mrsttcno1 · 16/05/2025 15:44

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:37

Our neighbours aren’t complaining, but thank you for your concern.

Would I put myself or a disabled child in an unsuitable space for anyone’s benefit outside of this house? No. Take that how you will to be honest!

Then you would fully understand the attitude of everybody else prioritising the people inside their own houses and ensuring they did everything they could to have you moved, or make sure you wanted to move, if you were inconveniencing them. Because just like you, they want to do the best for the people in their own house, just like the neighbours do here :)

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:42

TheHerboriste · 16/05/2025 15:40

But that's not the neighbour's responsibility.

Everyone knows when they choose to procreate that there is a chance their child will have serious illness or disability. That's just an unfortunate fact. To some people, clearly it is worth the risk. I'm sure it's difficult if the abstract risk becomes concrete reality.

That doesn't mean that unrelated people who happen to live nearby need to have their lives completely upturned, too.

Okay.

But in the absence of the detached property, which OP has said isn’t available- what would you like her to do?

Your disabled community doesn’t exist yet either.

Someone, will “have” to be this child’s neighbour. Someone will live “nearby.” Personally I think it would be great if those people are understanding, but since they’re not in this case - it’s actually quite difficult to do anything about it.

I don’t believe the housing association do houses in the middle of nowhere.

Mrsttcno1 · 16/05/2025 15:42

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:35

I’m not sure having bought your space makes it anymore or less annoying when you can’t sleep in it. Not really sure why it needs saying.

I would go so far to say that the parents of disabled children have significantly less space and time for themselves than those without. That’s not an especially bold statement, it’s just an unfortunate fact.

It makes an absolutely massive difference. We saved for a long time and went without to buy our home, we pay a lot of money for it and this is our space which we have worked very hard for, the bare minimum is being able to sleep in your own home.

Having bought our home also means we can’t easily, quickly or cheaply move. To sell our house, depending on where we are at in a mortgage deal at the time, we’d need to pay an estate agent, put it up for sale, book viewings, we’d then have to pay for searches, surveys on the new property, potentially on a couple of properties if the first showed issues, we’d have a % to pay to the lender for moving if within a fixed deal, we’d have to pay solicitors fees, stamp duty, as well as then the costs of moving in general. Add to that the fact the house would be incredibly difficult to sell now with the noise complaints and trying to find a buyer who doesn’t mind a 04:30 start every day.

I don’t doubt that parents of disabled children have less time to themselves, but that’s not the fault or problem of the neighbour who just wants to be able to get a full nights sleep in their own home.

TheHerboriste · 16/05/2025 15:40

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:35

I’m not sure having bought your space makes it anymore or less annoying when you can’t sleep in it. Not really sure why it needs saying.

I would go so far to say that the parents of disabled children have significantly less space and time for themselves than those without. That’s not an especially bold statement, it’s just an unfortunate fact.

But that's not the neighbour's responsibility.

Everyone knows when they choose to procreate that there is a chance their child will have serious illness or disability. That's just an unfortunate fact. To some people, clearly it is worth the risk. I'm sure it's difficult if the abstract risk becomes concrete reality.

That doesn't mean that unrelated people who happen to live nearby need to have their lives completely upturned, too.

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:37

WWW3434 · 16/05/2025 15:28

Even if it meant your neighbour and their kids had a better night's sleep??

Wow.

Our neighbours aren’t complaining, but thank you for your concern.

Would I put myself or a disabled child in an unsuitable space for anyone’s benefit outside of this house? No. Take that how you will to be honest!

Words · 16/05/2025 15:35

@Placeholder123 Flowers

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:35

Mrsttcno1 · 16/05/2025 15:23

Interesting that you feel so strongly about your own peace & space, what about the neighbours who have bought this home for themselves and cannot even get a full night sleep, through no fault of their own and with no control? The neighbours are not in the wrong here.

I’m not sure having bought your space makes it anymore or less annoying when you can’t sleep in it. Not really sure why it needs saying.

I would go so far to say that the parents of disabled children have significantly less space and time for themselves than those without. That’s not an especially bold statement, it’s just an unfortunate fact.

WWW3434 · 16/05/2025 15:28

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:13

There’s already quite a lot of “getting on with it.”

I can’t speak for OP but I personally view our space as ours, and would really struggle to give it up as we have so little left for ourselves.

At the end of a long day, with 3hrs sleep, your bedroom and it’s environment is very important to you.

Even if it meant your neighbour and their kids had a better night's sleep??

Wow.

TheHerboriste · 16/05/2025 15:28

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 13:56

I don’t know whether you realise how critical of the disabled your tone sounds.

However - my first priority is the child that lives in this house and what happens in these 4 walls. Show me someone who doesn’t prioritise their own family.

I personally think that society would be a far more pleasant place if it didn’t want to send disabled children to some sort of commune for the vulnerable, and were accepting of their needs. If at 4am the thought was about how he can’t help it, and it must be tough for the mum.

Like I said, that’s the more pleasant approach IMO. Far more pleasant than wanting to send him away somewhere.

I would never tolerate or accept noise at 4am every single day. Regardless of whether the source was a child, elephant, someone learning to play the saxaphone, religious chanting, motorcycles revving or whatever.

It's not "critical of the disabled" to want a decent night's sleep and quiet enjoyment of one's home.

A residential commune for families with specific accommodations for people who cannot control their noise, need safe rooms to avoid injury, need space for respite carers to sleep, large gardens, etc. would be a lot more humane and productive than expecting random members of the community, who live nearby with party walls through sheer luck (or unluck) of the draw, to have their lives and health disrupted for years on end.

I would be happy for my taxes to fund such programs and facilities.

Mrsttcno1 · 16/05/2025 15:23

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:13

There’s already quite a lot of “getting on with it.”

I can’t speak for OP but I personally view our space as ours, and would really struggle to give it up as we have so little left for ourselves.

At the end of a long day, with 3hrs sleep, your bedroom and it’s environment is very important to you.

Interesting that you feel so strongly about your own peace & space, what about the neighbours who have bought this home for themselves and cannot even get a full night sleep, through no fault of their own and with no control? The neighbours are not in the wrong here.

SleeplessInWherever · 16/05/2025 15:23

TheHerboriste · 16/05/2025 15:17

But why??

The neighbour didn't sign up for this. They are living near a loud family by sheer happenstance. Because they randomly purchased property adjacent. Why should they revolve their lives around this family's needs and noise??

The default norm is "quiet enjoyment of one's home." The person(s) disrupting that peace are the ones in the wrong. Regardless of the source of the noise or the reason for it; that's irrelevant. And especially during hours that are customarily reserved for sleeping.

I'm sure it's challenging to have a child with these conditions. Many of us chose to not have children because we didn't want to risk such a situation. To have it forced upon one anyway is untenable.

The thing is - it isn’t irrelevant.

Disabled children aren’t in the wrong for being disabled, and their parents aren’t in the wrong for having them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread