Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Mayflower primary school - nappy changing facilities for school aged children

461 replies

2011j · 15/05/2025 14:23

AIBU to think this shouldn't be necessary?

Not including those with sen, children should be potty trained before starting school - AIBU?

OP posts:
BreakfastClubBlues · 15/05/2025 20:53

Ladamesansmerci · 15/05/2025 19:54

This isn't about SEN kids, diagnosed or otherwise. Obviously those situations are different.

The vast majority of NT children are capable of being potty trained. You can teach bloody babies to wee in a potty very young! The only reason these kids aren't potty trained is because parents CBA and it's become normalised.

Teachers shouldn't be having to change nappies for 5 year olds with no additional needs.

It is about SEND kids though.

When I started teaching 15 years ago you may have had the odd reception child starting in nappies (very rare!) generally dry after a month or two.

Now there are children in nappies in every year group from nursery to upper Juniors- so that is why schools now need changing facilities.

There are more typical children starting nursery in nappies, but that is likely because children start at 2 now so it's more 'normal' and accepted.

daffodil2025 · 15/05/2025 20:53

I think that if Terry towelling nappies were the only option then most (but not all) children would be completely potty trained by aged 2.5. Nappies are cheap and convenient, not to mention absolutely awful for the environment.

Strawberryorangejuice · 15/05/2025 20:43

Mymanyellow · 15/05/2025 18:00

80%! That can’t be right surely.

Yes, it is and I know that sounds mad! It is a small class of around 15.

labtest57 · 15/05/2025 20:32

EffortlesslyInelegant · 15/05/2025 14:26

It might help if you disclose your interest in this? Are you having to change nappies? Clear up mess?

What would it help? Would your answer change if you knew why the OP was asking?

Difficile · 15/05/2025 20:20

katmarie · 15/05/2025 15:57

I don't think there is any one reason for it all, but a lot of contributing factors.

My DD is in reception year now, she was born a couple of months before we went into lockdown due to covid. Her school cohort has more children that started school (in reception year) in nappies than they've ever had before according to their reeption class teacher. The teacher puts it down to a lot of social failures during and after lockdown, where health visitors effectively abandoned families, social groups for parents and babies weren't able to meet, and parents weren't able to access wider family support. Add to that as others have noted, the increase in numbers of children with additional needs attending mainstream schools, and the eyewatering cost of childcare meaning that a lot of children are not going to nursery at all, where they might get nudged into potty training. As I said, lots of contributing factors.

Absolutely agree. We tried to potty train our girl at 2.5 and she absolutely wasn't having it. She couldn't tell us she needed a wee, nor did she notice, or care, if she wet herself.

She went into Preschool at 3 and immediately said she wanted to be a big girl and go to the toilet like the other kids. She was 3y 2m when she started Preschool and 3y 3m when she was fully potty trained.

If she hadn't been going to Preschool I'm certain she'd have been closer to 4 before we even attempted it as she just wasn't ready to do it on her own. We tried to read books, we tried to talk to her, we tried rewards charts, everything, but there weren't any groups, there weren't visits from the Health Visitor, she was our first baby and we had no idea what to do.

She's still in nappies at bedtime and there's no sign that's changing any time soon but we'll just keep going.

Kirbert2 · 15/05/2025 20:14

OneTaupeTraybake · 15/05/2025 20:08

It will make the parents toilet train them quite quickly if they were made to come in.
They set their kids up for this not the poor teachers.

pp is talking about my child who is bowel incontinent and no amount of toilet training will change that..

suburburban · 15/05/2025 20:12

Wouldn’t you be embarrassed to send your dc in pull-ups if they were not SN

i remember making sure my ds was toilet

trained to go to playgroup at 2.5 as they wouldn’t have taken him

OneTaupeTraybake · 15/05/2025 20:08

DontCallMeKidDontCallMeBaby · 15/05/2025 18:06

I’m sorry, are you genuinely proposing that if this were your child, you would be happy for them to sit in their own waste until you arrived to change them??

It will make the parents toilet train them quite quickly if they were made to come in.
They set their kids up for this not the poor teachers.

ExpressCheckout · 15/05/2025 19:58

bathroomadviceneeded · 15/05/2025 19:29

In France and Belgium, kids can start free, public pre-school at age 2.5 as long as they are potty trained. If it becomes apparent that the kid isn't potty trained within the first week or so of arriving, they will send them home and say 'come back when he's potty trained.' As a result, every kid (excluding SEN of course) is potty trained by age 2.5-3 because parents don't want to pay 900+ euros per month anymore for creche! They are really strict about it, which many anglophone parents find shocking.

I'm not sure that you're allowed to do that in the UK, Australia, or USA.

^ This is excellent, but too much like common sense for the UK's politicians. Unfortunately we have a spineless generation of politicians who really cannot be bothered to address issues such as this.

HaudYerWheeshtYaWeeBellend · 15/05/2025 19:55

Local authorities systematically and deliberately use the legal process as a means to delay and obstruct complying with their legal duties.

It's a chicken/egg problem and in the middle of this is a vulnerable child who is being failed due to a multitude of factors.

Parents fighting the system and systems unable to cope with the challenges of lack of funding/resources/provisions.

Parents even with ongoing tribunal appeals, the outcome heavily relies on co-operation from the local authority, which they might be legally required to do, but they do not because of lack of accountability.

The system needs a complete overhaul and for the councils to be held accountable, currently as it stands we are accepting councils to be unlawfully failing children!

Additionally it’s so easy to lay blame at the parents, when the likely factor is there is a underlying reason as to why children are not reaching their milestones however if for example a child does have a parent that is failing to aid their child to reach milestones, isn’t helping the child!

Likely the child is being failed further by adults point scoring blame and not understanding that at the CORE of all this, is a vulnerable child.

Ladamesansmerci · 15/05/2025 19:54

This isn't about SEN kids, diagnosed or otherwise. Obviously those situations are different.

The vast majority of NT children are capable of being potty trained. You can teach bloody babies to wee in a potty very young! The only reason these kids aren't potty trained is because parents CBA and it's become normalised.

Teachers shouldn't be having to change nappies for 5 year olds with no additional needs.

Kirbert2 · 15/05/2025 19:53

suburburban · 15/05/2025 19:23

Perhaps it would incentivise the dc to not soil themselves in the first place.

I know it isn’t pleasant but they do need to be toilet trained unless SN

Edited

pp was referring to my son who is disabled and is bowel incontinent.

Kirbert2 · 15/05/2025 19:49

suburburban · 15/05/2025 19:19

I feel sorry for the teacher tbh

Is your ds in mainstream in that case?

He is. He wouldn't get into a special school because the education wouldn't be appropriate for him as he has no learning disabilities and is capable of accessing a mainstream education.

OneAmusedShark · 15/05/2025 19:48

Come to think of it, I remember teachers actually telling children off for having accidents sometimes. “You should have gone to the toilet earlier!” etc. That didn’t stop the accidents happening though…

FancyCatSlave · 15/05/2025 19:43

It’s the curse of disposable nappies and lazy parenting basically.

For every genuine medical or SEN case there’s 9 badly parented children. Same ones that can’t sit at a table and use cutlery either.

OneAmusedShark · 15/05/2025 19:42

I do get the impression that this is used as something of a stick to beat parents with.

Every child is different.

DD has autism and has sensory issues.

She is still in DryNites at night but potty trained during the day at the normal age of 2 because she likes routines, and we did regular sitting on the potty with a book as part of a routine.

She still takes a book into the loo with her every time, though! 😂

As I’ve said before, when I was in Infants at Primary School (nearly 40 years ago, before Pull-Ups were invented, I’m sure) there were a few children who wet themselves nearly every day and had to be sent home in their PE kit with a plastic bag with their wet clothes in.

Nowadays they would probably be the children who are sent in in nappies.

I’m sure there were more “special schools” around in those days too.

I’m not sure it’s all parental laziness.

I think it’s a combination of:

  • Larger nappies and pull-ups being available and used by parents of children who would have simply wet themselves every day before;
  • More inclusion of SEN kids in mainstream education;
  • A small proportion of parents who don’t bother/ want to wait until the child is ready;
  • More absorbent nappies that make it harder for a child to know when they are wet.

No easy answers, I’m sure, but I don’t think it’s any one factor.

Cuwins · 15/05/2025 19:42

Also one thing I thought of was when I started school it was the term (e.g Easter/Christmas not just summer) before you were 5- that’s giving some children another 7 months to pick up things like toilet training. That’s a lot of time in the life of a 4 year old.

Cuwins · 15/05/2025 19:40

MissTRENDING · 15/05/2025 19:32

Women on minimum wage, most likely.

Once children are 5 years and older, surely they're able to take off their own pull up and put a new one on, unless they have a severe disability? Do parents provide these pull ups or do schools pay for them?

That wasn’t what I was responding to. Just the idea it wasn’t in their job description- I think you will find it often is.

Italiandreams · 15/05/2025 19:34

The problem is at 2/3 is quite tricky to tell if a child has SEND. My youngest has been really tricky to train, we have tried relentlessly, he does have SEND but still no diagnosis, although we are in the process. But the only reason for that is because I am pretty clued up on child development and SEND otherwise he could easily start school with no identified needs.

MissTRENDING · 15/05/2025 19:32

Cuwins · 15/05/2025 19:19

Sorry but the job description of a TA will
likely include meeting hygiene needs as needed. Mostly it won’t be teachers changing them but support staff.

Women on minimum wage, most likely.

Once children are 5 years and older, surely they're able to take off their own pull up and put a new one on, unless they have a severe disability? Do parents provide these pull ups or do schools pay for them?

bathroomadviceneeded · 15/05/2025 19:29

In France and Belgium, kids can start free, public pre-school at age 2.5 as long as they are potty trained. If it becomes apparent that the kid isn't potty trained within the first week or so of arriving, they will send them home and say 'come back when he's potty trained.' As a result, every kid (excluding SEN of course) is potty trained by age 2.5-3 because parents don't want to pay 900+ euros per month anymore for creche! They are really strict about it, which many anglophone parents find shocking.

I'm not sure that you're allowed to do that in the UK, Australia, or USA.

suburburban · 15/05/2025 19:23

DontCallMeKidDontCallMeBaby · 15/05/2025 18:06

I’m sorry, are you genuinely proposing that if this were your child, you would be happy for them to sit in their own waste until you arrived to change them??

Perhaps it would incentivise the dc to not soil themselves in the first place.

I know it isn’t pleasant but they do need to be toilet trained unless SN

Cuwins · 15/05/2025 19:19

ThejoyofNC · 15/05/2025 17:47

It's a genuine question. Of course he needs an education. But I honestly think this is too far outside of the job description. I'm not sure what the solution would be, but the current one seems very unfair to me.

Sorry but the job description of a TA will
likely include meeting hygiene needs as needed. Mostly it won’t be teachers changing them but support staff.

EverythingElseIsTaken · 15/05/2025 19:19

Onceuponatimethen · 15/05/2025 18:52

@EverythingElseIsTaken you don’t know they have no SEN though? All that can be known of Reception kids is no dx. Who knows which ones will later be diagnosed. Mine wasn’t diagnosed until age 10.

Well they generally seem to make it to year six with no indication of SEN….

In fact one of last years Y6 leavers got a scholarship to a prestigious school due to her academic ability… she came to us in nappies and unable to even recognise her written name. It’s not all down to us as a school though… the other parent took over sole care and it was like she was a different child…..

suburburban · 15/05/2025 19:19

Kirbert2 · 15/05/2025 18:13

My son needs changing multiple times in a school day. It would be unrealistic for parents to drop out of work potentially multiple times a day and would just plunge parents with disabled children into poverty.

Not to mention how inappropriate it would be to leave a child in their own waste for however long it would take the parent to get there. Disabled children deserve dignity.

I do think that teachers and assistants need to accept that it is now part of the job and I believe that most do.

Edited

I feel sorry for the teacher tbh

Is your ds in mainstream in that case?