Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

BBC news using the phrase "broken home"

315 replies

IsitaHatOrACat · 14/05/2025 04:35

Really? Really? Whilst I'm not overly interested to know about this man's drug fuelled years, the description of him coming from a "broken home" has infuriated me.
As a single parent to a 15 year old, I can confirm that there us nothing whatsoever "broken" about our home or small family.
I really thought we had moved on from this type of shaming of single parent families
Seriously BBC, do better.

BBC News - Heavy hangs the crown - sadness at Wiggins' troubles
www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/articles/c23mv42m2lmo

OP posts:
Feetinthegrass · 15/05/2025 07:52

Renabrook · 15/05/2025 06:37

Ok so I will ask people 2 questions

  1. thinking back of all your relationships that are no longer there, how many can you think back and say absolutely there was not one hint of something wrong the person absolutely changed overnight and was 100% a different person? there was no sign at all in any of the relationships you ignored, or they ignored about you? it does work both ways
  1. with all the people in trouble with the police or schools what is their background? if you sat down and wrote a chart what would the chart show?

With respect, you clearly know next to nothing about domestic violence. I work in the field, have devoted myself to my work for the best part of three decades, what I can tell you is this:

  1. Many abusers will master operating with a mask, a version of themselves, and are able to function very well for years until the back breaking exhaustion of parenthood, and then the abuse becomes apparent, it tends to happen gradually over a period of time. We call it the boiling frog technique.

  2. Many women grow up in dysfunctional homes, and simply do not recognise a red flag or a ‘hint’ as you put it of the danger they are in. It is their ‘normal’ and would take years of therapy to unpick. Do you think they or the government have the resources to help them with this? No, and no.

  3. Even the most stable of relationships with no re flags whatsoever can be seriously derailed by mental illness, bereavement and life trauma.

  4. Due to the way our society is organised a woman is immensely vulnerable once pregnant, more so with multiple children. More often and not she does not have a community to turn to, and it’s only when things have deteriorated to the point of police and court intervention will support or protection be offered. Once you are in this situation it can be very hard to leave, psychologically impaired with limited means and options it is an incredibly daunting task.

  5. A lack of a criminal record or an outstanding school record is not an indication of character, only the means to avoid legal action and an expensive education. There is no class divide with dv, despite popular opinion, it can literally happen to anyone.

Assuming that poor outcomes can only happen with red flags is misguided, and quite frankly offensive.

We can never know ‘all parts’ of a person, there is always an element of uncertainty in any relationship. Whilst we can take precautions, there is no sure fire way of avoiding domestic violence, serious dishonesty and other abuse. You can only equip people with the tools to deal with it if it should happen to them. It is essential that posts like this take extreme care not to blame the victim. The real issue always lies with the perpetrators of such crimes.

Your focus should be on what we are doing as a society to address the perpetrators, not the victims.

CremeBruhlee · 15/05/2025 07:43

Escapingagain · 14/05/2025 18:08

When I was growing up single mums often had very little contact/support or none from their children’s fathers. I’m guessing that was a broken home. Now it seems that many parents separate and successfully coparent. Often meaning a better calmer lifestyle for those involved. As long as separated parents try to navigate changes it can work. A few people I know are happily married a few unhappily I know which step I would choose if unhappy.

Successfully for them I’m afraid. As long as no violence or emotional abuse many many children don’t experience the issues of their parents when married. A breakup is a massive negative event to them. You are talking about the parents here. Ask the children….

Renabrook · 15/05/2025 06:37

Ok so I will ask people 2 questions

  1. thinking back of all your relationships that are no longer there, how many can you think back and say absolutely there was not one hint of something wrong the person absolutely changed overnight and was 100% a different person? there was no sign at all in any of the relationships you ignored, or they ignored about you? it does work both ways
  1. with all the people in trouble with the police or schools what is their background? if you sat down and wrote a chart what would the chart show?
Renabrook · 15/05/2025 06:33

Feetinthegrass · 14/05/2025 10:21

Strangely enough men don’t tend to come with warning stickers on their heads saying serial adulterer or violent when stressed!

Edited

Yes but the stickers are there if people look harder enough and and not blinded by a bit of attention and ''he loves me" how much is actually not there and how much is ignored?

Pickledpoppetpickle · 15/05/2025 05:54

TheHerboriste · 14/05/2025 23:17

The signs are always there.

You know nothing at all. They’re really not,

Pickledpoppetpickle · 15/05/2025 05:52

Neurodiversitydoctor · 14/05/2025 05:35

But statistically being brought up in a,single parent house hold is a huge risk factor for all sorts of things. The evidence is in to try to argue otherwise is disingenuous.

It is equally disingenuous to suggest all single parents are unable to protect and support their children, provide for them, bring them up appropriately. And there is sod all broken about my family. We could have had a different life if their dad had provided financial support but my hard work gave them plenty. I have 3 incredible young adults in nd out my house, girlfriends, a lot of laughter. I am sure there is an existing negative impact on them as a result of their father’s actions but we could never be described as broken.

Sunnysideup32 · 15/05/2025 05:12

SandyY2K · 15/05/2025 03:32

Common... that's obviously not what is being said. I think you know that.

Although, an orphaned child will have different emotions as a result of their situation.

It isn't a broken home though.

And it isn't a 'broken home' if children are raised in a single parent household, if those children are raised with stability and love.

A broken home to me is one where children are raised in a dsyfunctional family unit. Often times that dysfunctional unit consists of both parents who raise their children in a difficult atmosphere, because there's abuse, infidelity, arguments etc etc going on.

SandyY2K · 15/05/2025 03:32

Sunnysideup32 · 14/05/2025 22:35

So are you saying that a child who is orphaned as a baby and raised by their grandparents, for instance, is being bought up in a 'broken home' because their mum and dad aren't around?

Common... that's obviously not what is being said. I think you know that.

Although, an orphaned child will have different emotions as a result of their situation.

It isn't a broken home though.

Sunnysideup32 · 14/05/2025 23:57

TheHerboriste · 14/05/2025 23:17

The signs are always there.

FFS are you for real?
Of course the signs aren't always there!!!
I'm actually wondering if you're being deliberately goady or are just incredibly naïve with a twist of thinking you know better than anyone else. You know nothing. Period.

Hwi · 14/05/2025 23:53

JHound · 14/05/2025 16:29

It’s a way of trying to shame women into remaining in mediocre marriages.

”Think of the children” is always aimed at the person leaving….never aimed at the behaviour causing them to leave.

Odd that.

Mediocre marriages are exactly what people should be aiming for - if it works out to be mediocre, which means 'not shit' - this is great! What do you think, that there are great marriages all over the place? Come bloody on!

TheHerboriste · 14/05/2025 23:17

Sunnysideup32 · 14/05/2025 22:51

Just when I thought I'd read the most stupid comment I've previously replied to, along comes yours!
You are clearly very clueless that women (and men) can be in what they believe to be loving relationships, even for a number of years, then abuse starts when children come along.
As you like to state 'facts', then my comment is a FACT, so wind your neck in and stop coming across as such a know it all.
It isn't the result of 'poor choices' in so many cases. Think logically about it, do you really think that people would stay with and go on to have children with partners if they believed they were potential abusers or cheaters?

Seriously.

The signs are always there.

Sunnysideup32 · 14/05/2025 22:51

TheHerboriste · 14/05/2025 10:11

If people would be more discriminating in their choice of mate, the kids wouldn’t be relieved when Daddy moves out. That’s failure on an epic level. Broken homes aren’t inevitable, they are the result of very poor choices.

Just when I thought I'd read the most stupid comment I've previously replied to, along comes yours!
You are clearly very clueless that women (and men) can be in what they believe to be loving relationships, even for a number of years, then abuse starts when children come along.
As you like to state 'facts', then my comment is a FACT, so wind your neck in and stop coming across as such a know it all.
It isn't the result of 'poor choices' in so many cases. Think logically about it, do you really think that people would stay with and go on to have children with partners if they believed they were potential abusers or cheaters?

Seriously.

Sunnysideup32 · 14/05/2025 22:35

Hwi · 14/05/2025 09:15

It is a broken home - a child wants a mum and a dad. I know it must be upsetting, but it is just stating facts.

So are you saying that a child who is orphaned as a baby and raised by their grandparents, for instance, is being bought up in a 'broken home' because their mum and dad aren't around?

Sunnysideup32 · 14/05/2025 22:07

FortyElephants · 14/05/2025 08:17

What, any mother and father? Or the ideal ones?
This is just such nonsense, truly

I've replied to Chiseltips post too, but I couldn't quote her comment after I'd written my response. I've never heard such a ridiculous comment

Sunnysideup32 · 14/05/2025 22:05

Chiseltip

Your last sentence has really pissed me off! WTAF

My kids have been bought up just by me, they've always known how much they're loved, I've sat with them through any issues, such as boyfriend/girlfriend troubles, you name it.
I've spent time with them always, I've helped them with their homework, I've been there consistently for them when they've been ill or literally whenever they've needed me, and I'll ALWAYS be there for my kids until my last breath, so how bloody dare you write such bollocks that a 'single parent's efforts will never be as good as a mother and father raising a child together'

My kids have turned into well adjusted and happy adults, who are both thriving in their lives, read my first post at the start. They haven't been 'short changed' as you imply, just because they've been bought up by a single parent, many kids are raised in two parent households, and many of those kids are unhappy and uncared for.

DysmalRadius · 14/05/2025 19:38

crackofdoom · 14/05/2025 09:36

I've seen a lot of women on MN over the years who have been reluctant to leave a clearly abusive DP because they "don't want their kids to come from a broken home." It's a highly stigmatising phrase that does real harm, IMO.

I think that's a bit simplistic - it's not necessarily the term itself or even the stigma that people are worried about in those threads so much as the reality: that their kids will spend most of their time without one or other parent, that their lives will be turned upside down, that either parent might meet someone else that their children might not like, and all the myriad things that will be more difficult for their children if their parents split.

In many ways I think the external stigma is overstated - not many people really give a shit what other people are doing with their families, but anyone considering leaving a marriage should seriously consider the fact that choosing to end a relationship will almost certainly have some detrimental effects on their children which (depending on the circumstances) may or may not turn out to outweigh the benefits.

theresbeautyinwindysun · 14/05/2025 19:07

IsitaHatOrACat · 14/05/2025 18:21

Really? Language and societal attitudes change over time though. Why should we keep up?

Is a single parent family antisocial and undesirable? I'm not sure I understand what you mean?

Full agreement

ButteredRadish · 14/05/2025 18:24

There are far more broken families where they’re all still together yet abusive & violent! Like the home I was raised in. Both my parents remained married (47 years when my DF died) but my DF was a violent functioning alcoholic. That was a broken home. No divorce in sight

IsitaHatOrACat · 14/05/2025 18:21

TheHerboriste · 14/05/2025 18:14

Normalizing and sanitizing undesirable and antisocial situations with “neutral” language isn’t productive.

Really? Language and societal attitudes change over time though. Why should we keep up?

Is a single parent family antisocial and undesirable? I'm not sure I understand what you mean?

OP posts:
ButteredRadish · 14/05/2025 18:20

Localised · 14/05/2025 10:40

Oh the last one always makes me laugh as if the small amount of benefits and child maintenance he refuses to pay makes up for not being able to work a full-time job because your stuck doing all the childcare after he's fucked off or decided to only have the children when convenient for him (random times) even a minimum wage job would pay infinitely more than most of these dead beats "maintenance" 😂

Men with nothing paranoid about gold diggers. Many such cases haha

Exactly!

TheHerboriste · 14/05/2025 18:14

IsitaHatOrACat · 14/05/2025 17:33

Absolutely, but language is powerful and important. We can agree with the above but use a neutral term instead of described a home or family as "broken".

Would you be happy for your home or family to be described as such?

Offense is personal and it's not a bad thing.

Normalizing and sanitizing undesirable and antisocial situations with “neutral” language isn’t productive.

Escapingagain · 14/05/2025 18:08

When I was growing up single mums often had very little contact/support or none from their children’s fathers. I’m guessing that was a broken home. Now it seems that many parents separate and successfully coparent. Often meaning a better calmer lifestyle for those involved. As long as separated parents try to navigate changes it can work. A few people I know are happily married a few unhappily I know which step I would choose if unhappy.

SandyY2K · 14/05/2025 17:53

JHound · 14/05/2025 17:31

Separation and breakdown are completely different.

Breakdown is inherently negative as a description. To separate is not. My parents separated when I was young but my broken home was the years they were together. Not when they parted.

I did not suggest men don’t leave but it is far more frequently women who make that decision and far more frequently women who are shamed for doing so (“single mother” and “single father” are both viewed differently.)

I do agree OP should try to reframe how she sees this. That society views separating parents negatively is a societal problem. OP should not make it hers. Whenever people suggest I am from a broken home I respond “yes I was. Then luckily my parents separated and it was fixed again.”

Edited

It's about the family unit no longer being together though. The parents separated, leading to a breakdown in their relationship, creating a broken family unit.

Anything else is just creating fog.

My brother is divorced, so his kids (now adults) are from a broken home. That's a fact. They have always had both parents in their lives. They weren't abandoned.

He has a good relationship with all of them, but they've shared some challenges with my kids, which are as a direct result of the divorce and breakdown.

The original family unit is no longer together..it's broken down.

Life happens. People split up. It has some pros and cons and we just need to accept that is the case.

Women often stay for financial reasons, as well as not wanting to share custody of the kids.

Society are not making women stay. It may be the people close to the woman, who she listens to.. but society at large will not make a woman stay, if she's has the support of family and others who care about her.

IsitaHatOrACat · 14/05/2025 17:33

SandyY2K · 14/05/2025 17:26

Men often leave marriages too. Nobody should be shamed into staying in a marriage where they're unhappy.

A lot of terms used van be considered outdated, but it is what it is. Taking offence over this particular article, is more a personal trigger.

Separation of the family unit, is essentially a breakdown...hence the use of the word broken. That doesn't mean for one minute, that the parents splitting up is a bad thing.

In many cases, it's necessary for the safety of the kids and/or the parent.
We do need to recognise, that 2 things can be true.

Someone can come from a broken home AND the separation of the parents was the RIGHT THING to happen.

They are not mutually exclusive.

Some kids benefit from their parents being separated or divorced.

Some kids have negative outcomes as a result of the split.

It doesn't mean that kids with parents that stay together do not also have negative outcomes...many do, for different reasons.

Absolutely, but language is powerful and important. We can agree with the above but use a neutral term instead of described a home or family as "broken".

Would you be happy for your home or family to be described as such?

Offense is personal and it's not a bad thing.

OP posts:
JHound · 14/05/2025 17:31

SandyY2K · 14/05/2025 17:26

Men often leave marriages too. Nobody should be shamed into staying in a marriage where they're unhappy.

A lot of terms used van be considered outdated, but it is what it is. Taking offence over this particular article, is more a personal trigger.

Separation of the family unit, is essentially a breakdown...hence the use of the word broken. That doesn't mean for one minute, that the parents splitting up is a bad thing.

In many cases, it's necessary for the safety of the kids and/or the parent.
We do need to recognise, that 2 things can be true.

Someone can come from a broken home AND the separation of the parents was the RIGHT THING to happen.

They are not mutually exclusive.

Some kids benefit from their parents being separated or divorced.

Some kids have negative outcomes as a result of the split.

It doesn't mean that kids with parents that stay together do not also have negative outcomes...many do, for different reasons.

Separation and breakdown are completely different.

Breakdown is inherently negative as a description. To separate is not. My parents separated when I was young but my broken home was the years they were together. Not when they parted.

I did not suggest men don’t leave but it is far more frequently women who make that decision and far more frequently women who are shamed for doing so (“single mother” and “single father” are both viewed differently.)

I do agree OP should try to reframe how she sees this. That society views separating parents negatively is a societal problem. OP should not make it hers. Whenever people suggest I am from a broken home I respond “yes I was. Then luckily my parents separated and it was fixed again.”

Swipe left for the next trending thread