Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel it’s a motherhood penalty… AIBU?

433 replies

Yudl · 13/05/2025 15:31

Recently got a new job in which they offered 95k. Unfortunately they would not be flexible on hours despite the fact that in my current role I work after collecting dd. Instead they said they would pay me until 3:30 which means my pay is effectively cut to under 75k (and only a small pay rise from where I am). I feel annoyed as I can do the hours they need but do need to do a pick up in between. We are expected to work some evenings anyway.

AIBU to feel miffed about this? DH is sadly no longer around to help

OP posts:
Zone2NorthLondon · 14/05/2025 19:17

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 18:56

Not if your working flexibly and make up the time later. Is going for coffee talking to others cheating the employer. Lots of people being over dramatic.

This is NOT about flexible authorised working, it’s in response to the suggestion to deceive employer and do school run. A fuck it and just quietly do your own thing suggestion made by @Moveoverdarlin

FlyMeSomewhere · 14/05/2025 19:07

There is a health and safety implication when someone wants to mind a child and work at the same time. I've seen it in places I've worked where someone has asked to homework more so they can avoid childcare and it is frowned upon! Supposing you are on a teams meeting or wrapped up in work and your child burns themselves on something, falls down the stairs, cuts themselves etc etc! The company will not want to be the reason you were not watching your child for obvious reasons!

Also when they give out salaries of that magnitude, they usually expect a high level of stress, long hours worked and high level of concentration for that kind of money, not somebody wanting an easy part time school hours job.

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 18:57

FlyMeSomewhere · 14/05/2025 18:46

To all those saying to cheat the WFH system, it's the most selfish thing you can do! Because if you get caught and your employer decides to do away with homeworking because of your behaviour, you ruin it for everyone and you'll be the most hated person in your company because you've stolen hours of their home life and slashed their salaries to pay for fuel costs 5 days a week again! Good luck going to a workplace everyday where you are despised by everyone!

That is a silly scenario that is never going to happen

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 18:56

Zone2NorthLondon · 14/05/2025 18:52

If one cheats the employer and is doing school run in work time its unauthorised absence and payment for work not undertaken. Your employer can initiate disciplinary action.

It causes reputational damage when recruiting other parents, they’ll have an institutional memory of the decept
Employer could withdraw WFH for everyone as a repercussion. Adversely affect many people

in summary, it’s a dick thing to do

Not if your working flexibly and make up the time later. Is going for coffee talking to others cheating the employer. Lots of people being over dramatic.

ForPlumReader · 14/05/2025 18:52

I don't earn anything like £75 never mind £95 but I managed to pay for after-school so I can work my hours???

Zone2NorthLondon · 14/05/2025 18:52

If one cheats the employer and is doing school run in work time its unauthorised absence and payment for work not undertaken. Your employer can initiate disciplinary action.

It causes reputational damage when recruiting other parents, they’ll have an institutional memory of the decept
Employer could withdraw WFH for everyone as a repercussion. Adversely affect many people

in summary, it’s a dick thing to do

FlyMeSomewhere · 14/05/2025 18:46

Moveoverdarlin · 13/05/2025 15:39

I’d be inclined to go back and say ‘It’s sorted. I’ll work full time for 95k thanks v much.’ And I’d just carry on nipping out and picking her up, or do afterschool club a few days, a playdate here and there and just make it work.

Like others have said it depends on how old she is. Tricky to WFH with her there if she’s 4, anything 7 and over should be much easier.

Edited

To all those saying to cheat the WFH system, it's the most selfish thing you can do! Because if you get caught and your employer decides to do away with homeworking because of your behaviour, you ruin it for everyone and you'll be the most hated person in your company because you've stolen hours of their home life and slashed their salaries to pay for fuel costs 5 days a week again! Good luck going to a workplace everyday where you are despised by everyone!

LimitedBrightSpots · 14/05/2025 18:40

FlyMeSomewhere · 14/05/2025 18:37

It's not just women that make the decision whether to have a child or not! Men are involved massively in deciding whether to have a kid or not! Couples are not as forced by societal expectations anymore to have kids! Both parties make these decisions, women cannot self impregnate!

Recent studies suggest men want children more than women do. Fatherhood is in many ways a much more attractive prospect than motherhood. Being in a relationship is also disproportionately beneficial for men.

The future is many women choosing to remain single and child-free and many men involuntarily missing out on fatherhood.

FlyMeSomewhere · 14/05/2025 18:37

LimitedBrightSpots · 14/05/2025 09:00

The way the birth rate is going, looking after children will be a generational problem that will end with the next generation.

OP, you'll get a lot of people saying "you chose to have children" and all that guff.

It's hardly unsurprising that women are increasingly choosing not to have children. And many of the same people who go on about "small state", "personal responsibility" and all that are now becoming quite upset about this. Certainly, everyone will be when income tax goes up to deal with the economic consequences of a declining birth rate.

It's not just women that make the decision whether to have a child or not! Men are involved massively in deciding whether to have a kid or not! Couples are not as forced by societal expectations anymore to have kids! Both parties make these decisions, women cannot self impregnate!

Verydemure · 14/05/2025 18:23

TaupePanda · 13/05/2025 19:35

Goodness, it beggars belief that other mums are so against a single mother earning great money (which I am sure they'll work hard for) and still wanting to pick their kids up. That is good money but post tax is about £5,500 a month take home which in many parts of the country won't exactly see you tripping over in cash. 2x parents on £33000 a year - not massive salaries - would take home around the same. Not an option for a single parent though, who is fulfilling the role of both parents at the same time without any respite.

I agree it is a penalty - whether you view it as a motherhood one or a single parent one. Flexibility is offered by many companies - could you offer to formalise it? Core hours and out of hours targets for example? I work in the evenings to make up extra hours - unless you have to be permanently on the end of the phone what difference does it make!

It’s not a penalty and the issue is very easily solved by the OP paying peanuts for after school club, or getting a childminder for a couple of hours after school.

This is such a non- problem.

plenty of parents on less than 95k make it work

Askingforafriendtoday · 14/05/2025 18:07

JoyousEagle · 13/05/2025 15:33

How old is your DD? I don’t think they’re unreasonable to say you can’t work while looking after a child at home. I think it’s more that you’ve been lucky with your current role.

ETA: at that salary, can’t she go into an after school club?

Edited

This

category12 · 14/05/2025 17:49

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 14:25

There is also the school holidays and inservice and sick days to think about. It’s pretty hard being a single parent if you don’t have any help!

With that salary, she can afford childcare.

PurpleChrayn · 14/05/2025 17:00

That’s a fucking huge salary. You’ll survive.

Zone2NorthLondon · 14/05/2025 16:57

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 14:25

There is also the school holidays and inservice and sick days to think about. It’s pretty hard being a single parent if you don’t have any help!

And? 92k wage will buy adequate childcare
this isn’t a minimum wage scenario struggling to pay for childcare
By taking a job you job you anticipate you need adequate childcare and you pay and plan accordingly
Millions of parents manage this and let’s face it 92k is enough monies to cover costs. All this oh what to do handwringing- throw some money and buy childcare , this is not insurmountable

TheHerboriste · 14/05/2025 16:57

Icecreammaninavan · 14/05/2025 16:22

That’s not the problem of the other employees and team mates. There’s nothing that pisses people off more than the unequal distribution of the workload, particularly when people are using the old ‘childcare’ excuse.

Exactly.

Not our problem. It’s something people beed to think about and problem-solve before producing offspring.

Icecreammaninavan · 14/05/2025 16:22

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 14:25

There is also the school holidays and inservice and sick days to think about. It’s pretty hard being a single parent if you don’t have any help!

That’s not the problem of the other employees and team mates. There’s nothing that pisses people off more than the unequal distribution of the workload, particularly when people are using the old ‘childcare’ excuse.

faerietales · 14/05/2025 14:31

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 14:25

There is also the school holidays and inservice and sick days to think about. It’s pretty hard being a single parent if you don’t have any help!

I don't think anyone is saying it's not hard, just that being a parent is a choice and other people shouldn't be expected to pick up the slack.

I know I would never, ever cope as a single parent and it's one of the reasons I have never wanted children.

Sheldonsheher · 14/05/2025 14:25

There is also the school holidays and inservice and sick days to think about. It’s pretty hard being a single parent if you don’t have any help!

BoudiccaRuled · 14/05/2025 13:10

This is not a motherhood penalty.
Find a childminder or use after-school like everyone else.

Hoohaz · 14/05/2025 12:51

This seems like a very solvable problem. After school club, nanny, childminder, friends/family. What on earth do you think the rest of us do?

WineIsMyMainVice · 14/05/2025 12:51

Moveoverdarlin · 13/05/2025 15:39

I’d be inclined to go back and say ‘It’s sorted. I’ll work full time for 95k thanks v much.’ And I’d just carry on nipping out and picking her up, or do afterschool club a few days, a playdate here and there and just make it work.

Like others have said it depends on how old she is. Tricky to WFH with her there if she’s 4, anything 7 and over should be much easier.

Edited

And this is the exact reason employers are calling people back into the office! You would specifically deceive your employer as to your whereabouts would you? What would you do if you are in a meeting and it’s pick up time? Lie again? It’s people who do this that spoil WFH for all.

PurpleThistle7 · 14/05/2025 12:48

No this is fine. Either your child is too young to be left to their own devices while you're working and you are expecting to be paid while providing childcare, or your child is old enough to consider either them walking themselves home or paying for after school club. I make nowhere near that salary (like miles away from it) and have paid for after school care for my children for 11 years now so I can't see how this would be impossible. Or take the win and work school hours. Sounds like a genuinely wonderful place to work if they are willing to flex around your home life like this.

cramptramp · 14/05/2025 12:47

Pay a childminder. On that salary you can afford it. Your childcare issues are not the concern of an employer.

Grammarnut · 14/05/2025 12:45

gattocattivo · 14/05/2025 08:59

I agree.

and I’ve never understood this idea that people (which usually means mums!) should be paid to stop working and be at home. I mean, being a SAHP is a perfectly valid choice, if you (or your partner) fund it.

A lot of this comes down to the partnerships that we choose. Dh and decided from the get go that we wanted things on as equal footing as possible. We both worked and both took equal responsibility for housework, nursery drops etc. And this was 30 years ago.

the OP is earning decent money. She has the choice to either accept the flexibility offered by her employer to not work core hours but to stop at 3:30 and collect her child from school, which would mean earning about 75k. Or she can work the full core hours and earn 95k, using some of that extra money to pay for a childminder or other form of care for the pick up and after school hours. Like millions of other people do (on lower incomes too!)
it’s really not a bad choice she has there and it’s a bit pathetic to see a woman in the 21st century whining that they want to do school pick up every day while still retaining the same salary as if they worked the full core hours

I agree re OP. But it is not just mothers who have extra responsibilities. Many people are carers. It is a true though that the burden of care rests on women. Despite my utopia costing it would be the true cost of running an economy. At the moment 50% of the population are giving free labour to keep the economy going so that companies can make ever greater profits. What I meant when I suggested my utopia (but utopia is not what I mean - utopias e.g. Moore's and Plato's tend to be tyrranies) is that employers and government pay for the unpaid work women do which makes the economy work. Or we could all just stop doing it and see how that pans out.

Ddakji · 14/05/2025 12:35

gattocattivo · 14/05/2025 12:32

Women don’t have to juggle it all. Men have just as much right to request flexible working. Women can transfer some of their mat leave to their partner. And of course many couples continue to work equal hours after having kids and it’s up them whether they also share house and child responsibilities equally too.

the reality is that some women don’t want to share things equally. If one partner is going to stop work or go part time, they want it to be them. You see it frequently on Mumsnet…. Women who choose to reduce their hours while their partner remains a full time earner.

there Is nothing wrong with couples dividing up home and earning workload whatever way works best for them, but it’s disingenuous to either juggle it all, or to intentionally step back and let your career take the back seat, and then complain about it.

Well, it’s all irrelevant if you’re a single parent whose partner has buggered off!