Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

5 year old in the ladies. Is it okay?

434 replies

LoveFridaynight · 13/05/2025 08:52

At what age would people feel uncomfortable to have a child of the opposite sex in the "wrong" toilet?
I was told off yesterday for taking my nearly 5 year old son in to the ladies. A woman in there said he should use the men's. No-one has ever said anything like this to me before. I could understand if he was a teenager or something but a young child?
Really? On his own? At 5? Not that he could anyway as he's autistic and not toilet trained so I needed to change his nappy.
I thought afterwards I should have used the disabled toilet but I try to avoid that incase someone who can only use the disabled toilet comes along. I think I will just do this in future though.
But regardless of disability I don't think children under the age of 9 should be in the toilet on their own.
What are your thoughts on the age a child should be using the "right" toilet?

OP posts:
samks · 13/05/2025 10:19

No way would I let my 5 year old son go into men’s loos on his own. My 8 year old son has started to, although I’m still a bit hesitant depending where we are - but he got uncomfortable going into the ladies so that’s fine.

My husband used to go into ladies loos when the kids were babies to change them if that’s where the change facilities were and he was on his own. He always used to shout in first and tell people what he was doing and no one ever had an issue with it.

Franpie · 13/05/2025 10:19

I wouldn’t bat an eyelid if a primary school aged boy was in the ladies with his mum.

Tbh, I wouldn’t care if a teenage boy was in the ladies with his mum. I would assume that he had additional needs that were none of my business.

Gundogday · 13/05/2025 10:17

Five is fine.

Topohthemornin · 13/05/2025 10:16

PoppyFleur · 13/05/2025 09:11

I don’t judge by age, I judge by need. There was a teenage boy with profound needs in the ladies toilets with his mum the other day, I had no problems at all with this. The disabled loo was busy, the boy needed the loo and was a vulnerable child being aided by his mum. Parents with children who have special needs have enough daily challenges, I hope to never be the type of person that forgets my humanity.

You are then ignoring the needs of that teenage boy….disabled and learning disabled children ,(depending on their particular conditions ) can also go through puberty, develop secondary sexual characteristics, can have sexual desires and needs , it is wrong to infantilise a disabled teenager and we must also respect THEIR privacy hence why we have disabled / accessible facilities .

Alondra · 13/05/2025 10:13

There is no way in hell I would let a 5 y.o. go to a men's toilet on his own a nd I certainly won't go to a men's toilet accompanying him. She was beyond ridiculous. What a twat!

If your child is autistic, you can use a disabled toilet. If there isn't one available, stick to women's. If another idiot questions you again, tell her to complain to management.

Seriously.....

maryberryslayers · 13/05/2025 10:10

purpleme12 · 13/05/2025 09:01

I would think 5 years old is ok
Does he look older than he is maybe?

My mate's just turned 13 year old boy still goes in the lad women's changing rooms at swimming (in his own cubicle) as he doesn't feel comfortable in the men's on his own yet. He's (high functioning) autistic -if that makes any difference - but I often think about discussions on here about it

What about the naked women and girls he sees on the way to the cubicle, who don't want a teenage boy viewing them, does their comfort not matter to your friend?

Any child over the age of 8 needs to use the facilities for their own sex. If they aren't able because of physical or neurological disabilities, they should use the disabled facilities with their parent, even if it means waiting. That's what they are provided for.

No one is an exception to the rule, it's not about the child/teen, it's about the privacy of those who the facility is intended for.

A 5 year old is clearly fine, at 6 I'm starting to prepare ds to use toilets alone, he'll come in with me but I won't assist in any way so he gets used to locking/opening cubicles, using soap pumps/ automatic taps etc.

LadyButtonofButtonHouse · 13/05/2025 10:06

The woman's a moron! I would have told her so as well, but I am at the age now where I don't care 🤣

Namerequired · 13/05/2025 10:06

Butchyrestingface · 13/05/2025 09:47

There’s no way I’m sending him into the men’s alone.

I wasn't suggesting you send him into the men's alone.

I was pondering why there are boys being brought into the women's toilets, including by men (yes, it does happen), but women never accompany their boys into the men's toilets, a facility they will, presumably, ultimately be one day using.

I personally would not have objected to a five year old in the women's presence but on this thread, you see a plethora of views about what is an acceptable age to stop bringing boys into women's facilities - from 8 right through to secondary school.

Do you have any thoughts on what age you'll be sending him into the men's alone?

Sorry I know you didn’t. The first part was in regards to your post, the 2nd wasn’t.

I don’t know what age tbh, I know we are getting to it. He is becoming more reluctant to come into the ladies now so sometimes we use the disabled toilet. I don’t like doing that though, especially if there’s only one. I will judge it as I need to I suppose. He’s vulnerable though and the thought of sending him alone makes me feel ill.

Women use cubicles and are rarely if ever showing any nudity. In the men’s with urinals it’s not as discreet. And yes they are gross according to my oh and my son still wouldn’t stand to go so my oh doesn’t even like taking him into them.

I have saw men standing outside the ladies and sending daughters in, but never in with them. I don’t have daughters so I don’t know what we would have done tbh. It probably is more difficult in those circumstances. But then women don’t (as a general rule) pose as much risk to children as men do.

Butchyrestingface · 13/05/2025 10:04

SapphireSeptember · 13/05/2025 10:01

@Butchyrestingface Seems a lot of people are slow on the uptake this morning. Grin

Very, VERY.

As I say though, lesson learned. I will litter any such posts with a litany of Easter Wink in future. Or maybe just avoid wholesale. In the words of Lex Luther, you gave them eyes, Lord. But they do not see.

cramptramp · 13/05/2025 10:02

Of course it’s okay. Tell anyone who says otherwise to shush.

SueSuddio · 13/05/2025 10:02

The guidance is under 8s isn't it. So that woman was

a) completely wrong
b) never had kids / or didn't have a boy
c) giving a completely OTT reaction to an innocent & harmless 5 year old child

If someone had said this to me, I'd come straight back at them with the guidance, it's always in my mind when I take my 5 year old into the ladies loos.

Butchyrestingface · 13/05/2025 10:02

Noononoo · 13/05/2025 10:00

So you think OP was reporting on a TERF? How bizarre. Terfs aren’t idiots. The trouble is, so many people are.
Gender critical women fought for safeguarding the vulnerable! And that would be not allowing a child to go to the gents alone and to keep Ladies free of adult males. Who unfortunately, statistically, are the sexual risk.

I don't know what you mean by 'reporting on a TERF'. But I suspect you didn't understand my meaning. I really can't elaborate as troll hunting isn't allowed on here.

I agree though. Gender Critical people aren't idiots. We are very reasonable people (I am, anyway). Smile

SapphireSeptember · 13/05/2025 10:01

@Butchyrestingface Seems a lot of people are slow on the uptake this morning. Grin

Storynanny1 · 13/05/2025 10:01

I took all of mine into the ladies toilets until they were at least 8 or 9 then used to stand outside of a men’s public toilet talking loudly to them for another year or two. Because in the early 80’s when mine were little there was a horrendous sickening story of something that happened to a young boy who went into a men’s public toilet. Don’t google it

Noononoo · 13/05/2025 10:00

Butchyrestingface · 13/05/2025 09:04

I am showing solidarity with the totally believable OP, you cynics.

So you think OP was reporting on a TERF? How bizarre. Terfs aren’t idiots. The trouble is, so many people are.
Gender critical women fought for safeguarding the vulnerable! And that would be not allowing a child to go to the gents alone and to keep Ladies free of adult males. Who unfortunately, statistically, are the sexual risk.

Butchyrestingface · 13/05/2025 09:58

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 13/05/2025 09:56

Sure Jan.

Careful.

I got accused of being a TRA for that kind of #wrongthink cynicism. Grin

Thelnebriati · 13/05/2025 09:58

''I am simply pondering the question about why it's ALWAYS women who have to accommodate males in their facilities.''

In this case its mothers with their young/unborn children, so the issue is should they have to create yet more separate facilities, just because some adult men want to be in there with all of us?

Shelby1981 · 13/05/2025 09:58

8 years is the general rule, I do find this difficult though as my 8 year old is autistic & doesn’t feel comfortable going into the men’s alone, but I also don’t want to make girls uncomfortable in the ladies!

ThisSillyBeaker · 13/05/2025 09:57

When I am out with my friends eight-year-old who is autistic, I bring him with me into the ladies if I am not changing him. If I am changing him, I do bring him to the disabled toilet but don’t use the toilet in the disabled toilet for myself after a bad experience where he opened the bathroom door and legged it in a very public space. At least in the ladies toilet cubicle, I can keep my foot against the door.

Jujujudo · 13/05/2025 09:56

SheRasBra · 13/05/2025 09:53

I think it's a bit different taking a child into the ladies' toilets where everyone is using cubicles and taking boys over 8 into changing rooms. Most women's changing rooms are open plan as there is a presumption that all the occupants are female.

Little boys DO often stare at women changing and however innocently, women should not have to put up with this.

I agree. But if there are private changing cubicles he’d come with me.

Butchyrestingface · 13/05/2025 09:56

funinthesun19 · 13/05/2025 09:50

OP’s son is five though. So yes you should accommodate him. It’s a no brainer for me that little boys go in with their mums and is always the done thing.

My boys used to come in to the ladies with me when they were little and it didn’t have any impact on their ability to go in to the mens later on.
The fact that you would willingly accommodate a man just because he’s bringing his daughter in makes me think you mustn’t be that bothered really. And just enjoy being awkward toward these pesky mums with boys.

I don't think you understand what I am saying despite the fact I've repeated it several times and (think) I've been clear.

I am not in favour of men coming into the women's toilets with their daughter. But I acknowledge it is something that happens. I would strongly prefer it didn't.

I am simply pondering the question about why it's ALWAYS women who have to accommodate males in their facilities.

MN literally abounds with tales of men coming into women's facilities with their daughters and saying they don't want to take them into the male toilets.

But women don't take their sons into the men's. So it's always WOMEN who have to tolerate male presence in their facilities on the grounds of "well, he's only 10" or "he's 15 but he's disabled").

Really just an observation that the same never happens in reverse.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 13/05/2025 09:56

LoveFridaynight · 13/05/2025 08:52

At what age would people feel uncomfortable to have a child of the opposite sex in the "wrong" toilet?
I was told off yesterday for taking my nearly 5 year old son in to the ladies. A woman in there said he should use the men's. No-one has ever said anything like this to me before. I could understand if he was a teenager or something but a young child?
Really? On his own? At 5? Not that he could anyway as he's autistic and not toilet trained so I needed to change his nappy.
I thought afterwards I should have used the disabled toilet but I try to avoid that incase someone who can only use the disabled toilet comes along. I think I will just do this in future though.
But regardless of disability I don't think children under the age of 9 should be in the toilet on their own.
What are your thoughts on the age a child should be using the "right" toilet?

Sure Jan.

Sure Jan GIF
LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 13/05/2025 09:56

Another thread about things that didn’t happen, it’s getting ludicrous now 😂😂

Iceandfire92 · 13/05/2025 09:56

purpleme12 · 13/05/2025 09:01

I would think 5 years old is ok
Does he look older than he is maybe?

My mate's just turned 13 year old boy still goes in the lad women's changing rooms at swimming (in his own cubicle) as he doesn't feel comfortable in the men's on his own yet. He's (high functioning) autistic -if that makes any difference - but I often think about discussions on here about it

Your friend should speak to the pool to find an alternative changing space or she should not take him swimming. Regardless of the autism, her son's requirement for a changing space doesn't trump the privacy and dignity of girls and women using the space. A teenage boy, regardless of disability does not belong in the women's changing rooms.

Jujujudo · 13/05/2025 09:55

I take my son into the women’s’ toilet if he needs to go. I’m not sending him alone into a place where he can see grown men standing at urinals. If another women says something then I’d either wait outside til she’s finished or I’d smile and take him into the cubicle.

Swipe left for the next trending thread