Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dad using individual ladies loo to change baby – what’s the etiquette?

336 replies

horchatatresleches · 12/05/2025 17:36

We were at a small cafe we hadn’t visited before – just me, DH, and our baby DS. When DS needed changing, DH went to check the facilities but came back quickly saying the baby change was in the ladies so I changed him but it got me wondering about what is the etiquette.

The setup was one of those where the mens and women loos are both single-occupancy, self-contained rooms that open off the same hallway – not communal spaces with stalls. So it’s not like he’d be walking into a room with other women inside and making anyone uncomfortable. I’ve been to similar cafes where both loos are labelled gender-neutral, which seems simpler. Personally, I wouldn’t bat an eye if I saw a dad coming out of that kind of loo with a baby, but DH felt uncomfortable using the ladies even though there was no one else around. He wasn’t sure what he’d have done if I hadn’t been there to help.

Is there an etiquette about dads using the ladies in this kind of setup if that’s where the baby change is?
YANBU - he’s fine to use the baby change
YABU - he shouldn’t go in the ladies there

OP posts:
Boohoolol · 12/05/2025 20:18

I’m sure that Jersey airport only had baby shaming in the ladies toilets when we were there a few years ago. DH was completely baffled

FedupofArsenalgame · 12/05/2025 20:17

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 20:14

If a man is in the women’s then a woman who needs that bin can’t access it because it a man is where he shouldn’t be.

If another woman is using the single cubicle then the waiting woman who needs the sanitary bin won't be able to use it until the cubicle is free anyway.

FedupofArsenalgame · 12/05/2025 20:16

Arancia · 12/05/2025 19:48

Yes, there is: If you are a man, you do not enter a ladies' restroom. With or without a baby, it's just not okay. You might not "bat an eye" or feel uncomfortable about it, but many other women would. For instance, I have many Muslim friends who always like to adjust their headscarves when they are in public restrooms...they would absolutely not be impressed by your husband galavanting into the restroom with your baby.

It's a single cubicle. No one else would be in there

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 20:14

XenoBitch · 12/05/2025 20:07

I don't get what the issue is with sanitary bins. Yes, men wont need them, but they wont spontaneously combust if they see one either. I mean, disabled loos are for men and women, and have them in too.

If a man is in the women’s then a woman who needs that bin can’t access it because it a man is where he shouldn’t be.

FedupofArsenalgame · 12/05/2025 20:13

Dotjones · 12/05/2025 17:39

He should just ask the cafe owner whether he should use the ladies toilet, and if not he should demand they provide suitable alternative facilities or he will sue them for sexual discrimination. Often they'll just back down if you kick up a fuss and threaten them with legal action.

Because of course a baby changing station in the gents will be set up in 5 mins

horchatatresleches · 12/05/2025 20:12

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 20:04

In my workplace there are three self contained loos - one marked accessible, one marked men’s and one marked women’s. I would never use the men’s and I don’t expect the men to use the women’s (which contains the sanitary bin). That they are self contained is irrelevant.

Women are, of course, well-used to there not being enough facilities for them - just look at any theatre or railway station - huge queues for the women, men just waltzing through.

So I don’t see why they should have to give up their space to a man just because it’s self contained.

He can do what women did for years, and campaign for more changing tables in male spaces. This is my real
o section - that men simply won’t do the work needed but will hijack women’s work instead. And then it gets called equality.

Edited

Our experience so far has been that the baby change is in gender neutral places. Everywhere we go to frequently doesn’t need any work or campaigning. This is the first time we’ve encountered this, and because it’s not somewhere we’ll go back to, he probably won’t campaign for the signage on loos to change. As it seems to be more in independent businesses than large ones, there’s not really a joined up campaign. He’d talk to somewhere we go to frequently though. The mens was apparently significantly smaller than the womens so there would be no scope to add a baby change there - it would just be a case of having two gender neutral lavatories if it were to change. Like a lot of independent cafes, there’s not a lot of spare space.

OP posts:
aster10 · 12/05/2025 20:12

GlidingSquirrels · 12/05/2025 20:02

Not at all appropriate...
He can glance in himself and check if anyone is exposed and wait 10 seconds if need be.
How awkward to put your DH in that position he'll look like a creep that's using the DC as an excuse to go in.

But what if someone else comes in while the daughter is on the loo (or even if it is a constant stream of men)?

CheeseWisely · 12/05/2025 20:12

We were in a restaurant with this exact set up yesterday, it’s a small place and there’s just two entirely self-contained single occupancy units, one tiny one marked gents and one spacious one marked ladies / disabled / changing and fitted out as such. DH changed DS so obviously he used the one with the changing table. It’s a self-contained room onto a general access corridor, by no stretch of the imagination is it ‘going into the Ladies’ toilets’ as some on this thread are suggesting.

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 12/05/2025 20:08

XenoBitch · 12/05/2025 20:07

I don't get what the issue is with sanitary bins. Yes, men wont need them, but they wont spontaneously combust if they see one either. I mean, disabled loos are for men and women, and have them in too.

Yes.

XenoBitch · 12/05/2025 20:07

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 20:04

In my workplace there are three self contained loos - one marked accessible, one marked men’s and one marked women’s. I would never use the men’s and I don’t expect the men to use the women’s (which contains the sanitary bin). That they are self contained is irrelevant.

Women are, of course, well-used to there not being enough facilities for them - just look at any theatre or railway station - huge queues for the women, men just waltzing through.

So I don’t see why they should have to give up their space to a man just because it’s self contained.

He can do what women did for years, and campaign for more changing tables in male spaces. This is my real
o section - that men simply won’t do the work needed but will hijack women’s work instead. And then it gets called equality.

Edited

I don't get what the issue is with sanitary bins. Yes, men wont need them, but they wont spontaneously combust if they see one either. I mean, disabled loos are for men and women, and have them in too.

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 12/05/2025 20:07

They’re not giving up their space to a man. They’re waiting a couple of minutes for a parent to change a child, just as they’d have to if a mother was doing the changing. It really shouldn’t cause so much angst imo.

BogRollBOGOF · 12/05/2025 20:06

As it's a self-contained cubicle with no communal space, there is no compromise of female safety or privacy to other users.

Ideally there should be a changing facility clearly avaliable to men, but I wonder if the ladies' toilet has more space to accommodate the table and bins and it might not be practical to put provision in both toilets.

Dangermoo · 12/05/2025 20:06

A man knocked on ladies' toilet door in a pub and asked if there was a baby changing facility. I said yes and he asked if I could wheel it out to him. He took it into the men's toilets. That was how it should be imo. Although depends in whether the nappy station is fixed or not, of course.

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 20:06

horchatatresleches · 12/05/2025 20:00

I wouldn’t want my baby changed on the floor of public WC unless there was no other option. And changing him in the main bit of a restaurant is unhygienic and not private for the baby (he doesn’t care but I do). Speaking to the cafe owner would have been slower than coming back to me, handing me the baby and me doing the change judging by the static queue in the shop. If it was somewhere we planned to go back to I’d speak to them about either making both cubicles gender neutral or having the ladies be ladies & baby change. My able bodied privilege is speaking, but I didn’t notice if there was a disabled loo there. The first one in the corridor was the ladies/baby change and I stopped looking at that point.

If he was alone of course he’d have changed the baby somewhere, he just wasn’t sure if he’d have tried to get the attention of the owner to ask if he was welcome in the ladies, or tried to make it work in the men’s. But DS is EBF anyway, so I’ll almost always be there.

Interesting that you don’t see a changing space within the men’s as an option - just women giving up their spaces.

Is your DH going to raise the lack of changing tables in the men’s with the cafe?

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 12/05/2025 20:05

RawBloomers · 12/05/2025 20:03

Some women might because they aren't thinking of it as a baby change, they're thinking of it as the women's loo.

So what exactly would be uncomfortable about that? Man comes out of toilet with baby - ooh terrifying! Save me!!!

Nonsense.

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 20:04

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 12/05/2025 19:58

Sweet fucking Jesus. It doesn’t matter. Would you refuse to go into an individually locked unisex toilet if it said, ‘Penguins only’ on it? It’s just a word. You’re being absolutely ridiculous. It will be THE SAME PLACE if the cafe owner labels it penguins, men, women, aliens or fucking idiots. It doesn’t matter.

In my workplace there are three self contained loos - one marked accessible, one marked men’s and one marked women’s. I would never use the men’s and I don’t expect the men to use the women’s (which contains the sanitary bin). That they are self contained is irrelevant.

Women are, of course, well-used to there not being enough facilities for them - just look at any theatre or railway station - huge queues for the women, men just waltzing through.

So I don’t see why they should have to give up their space to a man just because it’s self contained.

He can do what women did for years, and campaign for more changing tables in male spaces. This is my real
o section - that men simply won’t do the work needed but will hijack women’s work instead. And then it gets called equality.

RawBloomers · 12/05/2025 20:03

Catapultaway · 12/05/2025 19:46

Why would any woman feel uncomfortable about aan walking out of a baby change area holding a baby?
I can't see the issue, it's clearly a toilet and a baby change area, it isn't a single sex space only for women to change female only babies.

Some women might because they aren't thinking of it as a baby change, they're thinking of it as the women's loo.

GlidingSquirrels · 12/05/2025 20:02

aster10 · 12/05/2025 19:49

When it’s DH’s turn to take my boy and girl twins to the toilet, upon some consideration I started to ask him to take them to the ladies’ toilet. Ladies’ toliets always have individual cubicles, so nobody is exposed. Men are more exposed, I didn’t want my daughter to see them urinating. But I can understand that men might be uncomfortable going into the ladies’ toilet.

Not at all appropriate...
He can glance in himself and check if anyone is exposed and wait 10 seconds if need be.
How awkward to put your DH in that position he'll look like a creep that's using the DC as an excuse to go in.

Arancia · 12/05/2025 20:02

TheNightingalesStarling · 12/05/2025 19:56

Bit there is no open space its just one room with a locked door. Like a disabled toilet!

Ah! I thought she meant individual closed cubicles in a shared bathroom. I mean, it wouldn't be great for a man to use a female cubicle, but with a baby I wouldn't be bothered I think.

GrammarTeacher · 12/05/2025 20:01

TheNightingalesStarling · 12/05/2025 19:57

So you don't think your daughter should have a single sex toilet when she's older, and that any random man could go in?

There isn’t a forcefield on the door. The SC decision doesn’t protect anyone from an assailant.
Also the toilet in the OP isn’t a shared space anyway.

horchatatresleches · 12/05/2025 20:00

I wouldn’t want my baby changed on the floor of public WC unless there was no other option. And changing him in the main bit of a restaurant is unhygienic and not private for the baby (he doesn’t care but I do). Speaking to the cafe owner would have been slower than coming back to me, handing me the baby and me doing the change judging by the static queue in the shop. If it was somewhere we planned to go back to I’d speak to them about either making both cubicles gender neutral or having the ladies be ladies & baby change. My able bodied privilege is speaking, but I didn’t notice if there was a disabled loo there. The first one in the corridor was the ladies/baby change and I stopped looking at that point.

If he was alone of course he’d have changed the baby somewhere, he just wasn’t sure if he’d have tried to get the attention of the owner to ask if he was welcome in the ladies, or tried to make it work in the men’s. But DS is EBF anyway, so I’ll almost always be there.

OP posts:
GrammarTeacher · 12/05/2025 19:59

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 17:49

I wouldn’t like it.

He should ask about the cafe having a changing table in the men’s for dads like him, or vote with his feet and go elsewhere.

It’s self contained. He wouldn’t be in there with anyone. Yes, there should be changing facilities in both and you should complain but it’s no big deal.

TheGoogleMum · 12/05/2025 19:59

For single occupancy ones I think it's fine for hin to use it to change the baby, but I too would be complaining (probably to myself because im pretty shy) about sexist facilities because men should be able to change the baby without going in the ladies toilets!

GlidingSquirrels · 12/05/2025 19:58

In that situation it would be fine. If it was in the main area of the communal women's toilets and he's alone with her in another situation then he could always lay the pushchair flat to change her in there instead. Usually if it's communal toilets then the changing table is in the disabled cubicle though.

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 12/05/2025 19:58

Ddakji · 12/05/2025 19:48

It is if it’s labelled Ladies/women/female.

Sweet fucking Jesus. It doesn’t matter. Would you refuse to go into an individually locked unisex toilet if it said, ‘Penguins only’ on it? It’s just a word. You’re being absolutely ridiculous. It will be THE SAME PLACE if the cafe owner labels it penguins, men, women, aliens or fucking idiots. It doesn’t matter.