Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

9 yr old told off for calling non-binary teacher Sir

537 replies

Nowherecitizen · 12/05/2025 13:09

My friend’s son was told off by a teacher at his school for referring to them as ‘Sir’. The teacher is male but identifies as non-binary.

Their title is Mx which the children are aware of. But the little boy simply looked at an adult who is visibly male and used the term Sir.

I have seen this teacher and they are 'masculine' looking but will sometimes wear a skirt and heels.

Friend’s DS felt bad and can’t recall exactly what was said to them but said the teacher was ‘very cross’.

AIBU to think this was mishandled? Surely the child should be reminded gently of the preferred identity of this adult but should not face a telling off?

What is the non-binary version of Sir anyway?

OP posts:
TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:11

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:06

The problem with your argument in my view is that you start from the point of view it’s a mental illness - which I don’t agree with. Where do we stop? We don’t stop we continue forward that’s my point. We find a way to make women feel safe and trans feel safe. There is no stopping. As long as there are humans we will have to continue to adapt to new challenges and our job is to try to make groups that are more at risk safer.

You will never make women safer if you indulge any belief from a man that they are actually a woman.

If you cannot respect women's material reality, you have completely missed the point of how they are oppressed by society.

And you side stepped the point. If we should allow men to pretend they're women so they feel 'at peace', should we do exactly the same thing for white people who identify as African American? Or able bodied people who identify as disabled?

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 16:11

Barearse · 12/05/2025 15:40

The kid should insist on being called ‘The most esteemed and righteous….’ and see how the teacher likes having his speech compelled.

Some years back, after a particular Matt Smith 'Doctor Who' episode aired, one of the boys in my S1/Y8 class announced that he wanted to be known as Stormageddon.

"Fair enough!" I said.

A fortnight later, he was begging me to use his real name. "But you asked me to..." I pointed out.

"Yes, but I didn't think that you would do it!"

Nowherecitizen · 12/05/2025 16:10

FartyAnimal · 12/05/2025 15:31

Just a question - not sure how this works, but at the school I work at the staff are all referred to as Sir or Miss. What should the students actually say in that instance?

This is my question too! I suspect it should’ve been M(I)X?

OP posts:
EdithStourton · 12/05/2025 16:10

Haven't RTFT.

Anyone going into teaching needs to be clearly told that it isn't up to children to affirm their identity. Children will call you Miss when youve been married for 30 years, they will sometimes say Miss when they mean Sir. The appropriate thing to do is either let it go or laugh.

And if you really really really want children to accept you as a woman sometimes and a man sometimes, and get the terms of address right each time too, you need to grow up. Children arent there to stroke your ego. You're there to keep an orderly classroom and to teach them, not have your identity affirmed by compelling the speech of children.

Pawse · 12/05/2025 16:08

May I ask what they're suppose to call him if not Sir or Miss? Hey you?

LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:08

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:06

The problem with your argument in my view is that you start from the point of view it’s a mental illness - which I don’t agree with. Where do we stop? We don’t stop we continue forward that’s my point. We find a way to make women feel safe and trans feel safe. There is no stopping. As long as there are humans we will have to continue to adapt to new challenges and our job is to try to make groups that are more at risk safer.

OK, so, assuming this incident went as the OP tells it, if a child mistakenly says 'Sir' to a teacher who is male but who wishes to be seen as non-binary, what should happen?

DreamTheMoors · 12/05/2025 16:07

My mother taught 6-yr-olds and they occasionally got mixed up - they called her mum or mummy.
I don’t think she even bothered to correct them if it was an afterthought.

Guinessandafire · 12/05/2025 16:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:06

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:00

If it's about how individual perceive themselves, then how far do we go.

We know that people 'perceive themselves' to be different races, different ages, different species, even disabled when they aren't.

Do we acknowledge that and tell them
all lies so that they feel at peace with themselves? Or do we say, no, that's a mental illness, go and seek treatment.

And why would this be any different?

The problem with your argument in my view is that you start from the point of view it’s a mental illness - which I don’t agree with. Where do we stop? We don’t stop we continue forward that’s my point. We find a way to make women feel safe and trans feel safe. There is no stopping. As long as there are humans we will have to continue to adapt to new challenges and our job is to try to make groups that are more at risk safer.

Bromptotoo · 12/05/2025 16:06

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 15:22

I don't agree with you on Mx. Since when? And where are we going to draw the line?

All the arguments against Mx, not least the where are we going to draw the line one, were used 40+ years ago when Ms bean to see widespread usage.

Not sure I'd want to die in a ditch defending it but it fulfils a purpose.

ERthree · 12/05/2025 16:06

ClearHoldBuild · 12/05/2025 15:48

Most bigoted comment award goes to ☝️

Thank you and i am more than delighted to accept the award. I shall display it with pride.

thenoisiesttermagant · 12/05/2025 16:05

Keeping Children Safe in Education, p12, definition of emotional abuse, bolding mine.

Emotional abuse: the persistent emotional maltreatment of a child such as to cause severe and adverse effects on the child’s emotional development. It may involve conveying to a child that they are worthless or unloved, inadequate, or valued only insofar as they meet the needs of another person. It may include not giving the child opportunities to express their views, deliberately silencing them or ‘making fun’ of what they say or how they communicate. It may feature age or developmentally inappropriate expectations being imposed on children. These may include interactions that are beyond a child’s developmental capability as well as overprotection and limitation of exploration and learning or preventing the child from participating in normal social interaction.

The power balance is all one way. Humans see sex. He was being respectful and using standard language and it is highly inappropriate the school is making an issue of this. As previously mentioned, teachers get called all sorts and let it go because they're there to do a job and to put the wellbeing of the children first, not have their feelings validated and cause drama about their personal identity.

And also, what if the child is 'gender critical'? Those are protected beliefs. Compelled language and belief about something that makes as little sense as gender ideology in a school setting over a period of time is emotional abuse IMO. Children don't have any power in this situation.

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:00

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 15:56

I agree with you that scientific reality should be highly regarded. But this subject is more nuanced than that - it’s about how individuals perceive themselves and how they want others to perceive them. It’s about how they feel and think and how they can be at peace with themselves and the world.

it’s not about lying - that’s a very simplistic view of the matter in my opinion.

If it's about how individual perceive themselves, then how far do we go.

We know that people 'perceive themselves' to be different races, different ages, different species, even disabled when they aren't.

Do we acknowledge that and tell them
all lies so that they feel at peace with themselves? Or do we say, no, that's a mental illness, go and seek treatment.

And why would this be any different?

giantpurplepeopleeater3 · 12/05/2025 15:57

Seems very harsh if it wasn't in a nasty way, kids make mistakes I once called a teacher dad (the shame lingers).

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 15:56

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 15:48

Yes courts are legislating for it.

As you probably know, they have legislated that people's biological sex takes priority over any 'gender identity' in law. This is exactly as it should be.

Humans can't change sex or alternate between sexes. It is not beneficial for anyone to lie about that, directly or indirectly. We must hold scientific reality in the highest respect.

I agree with you that scientific reality should be highly regarded. But this subject is more nuanced than that - it’s about how individuals perceive themselves and how they want others to perceive them. It’s about how they feel and think and how they can be at peace with themselves and the world.

it’s not about lying - that’s a very simplistic view of the matter in my opinion.

Mymanyellow · 12/05/2025 15:51

No such thing as non binary.

GeorgianaM · 12/05/2025 15:51

My child would be taken out of that school immediately. You do not want your child being taught by these lunatics.

ClearHoldBuild · 12/05/2025 15:50

TangenitalContrivences · 12/05/2025 15:49

There is nothing bigoted about pointing out the truth.

So how exactly do you know that this teacher is getting sexual kicks from children? There’s nothing to even imply such a thing.

ClearHoldBuild · 12/05/2025 15:49

TangenitalContrivences · 12/05/2025 15:48

Spend a huge amount of time on things that would be less effective?

The barrier to entry has been lowered, thats not a bad thing.

Using AI for good - like this - is a brilliant use of tech, it's not a gotcha if you say "ooo look AI"

I use it all the time, I love it.

TangenitalContrivences · 12/05/2025 15:49

ClearHoldBuild · 12/05/2025 15:48

Most bigoted comment award goes to ☝️

There is nothing bigoted about pointing out the truth.

ClearHoldBuild · 12/05/2025 15:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Most bigoted comment award goes to ☝️

TangenitalContrivences · 12/05/2025 15:48

ClearHoldBuild · 12/05/2025 15:47

What would we do without ChatGPT?

Spend a huge amount of time on things that would be less effective?

The barrier to entry has been lowered, thats not a bad thing.

Using AI for good - like this - is a brilliant use of tech, it's not a gotcha if you say "ooo look AI"

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 15:48

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 15:44

That is your view - And of course that is fine. I don’t see it like that. I see human nature as intrinsically complex and always evolving. We don’t know where we will as race evolve and move to. You can simply tell children that no everyone sees themselves as it is and you don’t agree with it if that’s your wish. It’s not about obfuscating reality in my opinion - it’s about giving space to others.

and to think it’s not a society problem is short sighted - the reality it is a society problems. Courts are legislating over it, there are protests for and against - making it inherently a society problem. again - my view not more or less valid than yours. Just how I see it.

Edited

Yes courts are legislating for it.

As you probably know, they have legislated that people's biological sex takes priority over any 'gender identity' in law. This is exactly as it should be.

Humans can't change sex or alternate between sexes. It is not beneficial for anyone to lie about that, directly or indirectly. We must hold scientific reality in the highest respect.

ClearHoldBuild · 12/05/2025 15:47

TangenitalContrivences · 12/05/2025 15:44

Subject: Concern Regarding Compelled Speech and Protected Beliefs

Dear [Headteacher’s Name],

I am writing to raise a serious concern regarding an incident involving my child, [Child’s Name], who was recently reprimanded by a member of staff after referring to them as “Sir.” From what my child recalls, the teacher in question is biologically male but identifies as non-binary and uses the title “Mx.” My child addressed them as “Sir” instinctively and politely, based on their visible presentation.

While I appreciate efforts to foster an inclusive school environment, I must make clear that no child should be reprimanded for using respectful language, particularly when it is based on a reasonable and commonly understood social cue. My child did not intend offence and was clearly acting in good faith.

Compelling children to speak in ways that affirm ideological beliefs they may not hold or to penalise them when they do not, is not only inappropriate, but it may amount to discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. The belief that sex is binary and immutable, and that gender identity should not override biological sex, is a protected philosophical belief as confirmed in Forstater v CGD Europe and reinforced in subsequent case law.

Children have the right to hold and express such beliefs without fear of reprimand, provided they do so respectfully, which, by all accounts, my child did. Forcing them to use terms they do not believe in, or punishing them for using ordinary respectful language, risks crossing into compelled speech and undermines their rights.

I would like to request the following:

  • A formal apology to my child for the distress caused.
  • Assurance that no further disciplinary action will be taken in such cases where children speak respectfully but do not affirm gender identity beliefs.
  • Clarification of the school’s policy regarding pronoun and title usage, and how it aligns with the Equality Act and existing legal precedent.

I trust the school is aware that this is a legally complex and sensitive area, and that safeguarding all pupils, including those who hold gender-critical beliefs, is part of your public sector equality duty. I hope this matter can be resolved quickly and constructively.

Yours sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Contact Details]
[Your Child’s Name and Year Group]

What would we do without ChatGPT?

ERthree · 12/05/2025 15:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Swipe left for the next trending thread