Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Do phalloplasties actually work?

562 replies

SilverTapz · 11/05/2025 22:38

After wondering about this for a while, I ended up searching phalloplasty online and ended up on a Reddit page where people post their progress. I had never seen one before an was curious, I guess. It was actually quite shocking. People with what looks like no muscle left on their forearms, someone with a necrotic 'scrotum', someone where the stitches were wide open and the tip has turned black and left a gaping hole etc etc. People seem to be commenting saying that they look great, they've made the right decision etc, but honestly they look absolutely butchered. It's scary. And I guess my question is, do they actually function? Some of these people are so young and it's scary what they've done to their bodies. I can't help but think a lot of them will regret the decision. Is it mainly cosmetic? Can they orgasm? Honestly just very shocked by what I've seen!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
BMW6 · 12/05/2025 15:14

I think in a few years there's going to be a LOT of lawsuits flying about.

Nameychangington · 12/05/2025 14:38

BundleBoogie · 12/05/2025 10:27

Yes. It occurred to me earlier - have some of these girls even seen a real penis?

I have seen this discussed at some length on the kiwi farms. The consensus (as much as there is ever consensus on KF) is that either:

A) these girls are so young and totally lacking in sexual experience that they have never seen or interacted with a real penis or

B) these girls have had such awful childhood experiences of penises that they believe that they are meant to be the size of two coke cans (phalloplasty creates huge flesh rolls which are later 'debulked' in other surgeries) because in the interactions they've had with penises, the penises were that scale to them.

Sad

Either of those possibilities being true is horrifying.

Deafnotdumb · 12/05/2025 14:20

"there is no structured, tested or widely accepted baseline for transgender health care."

This really stood out to me from the Scott Newgent article. Why? WTF do we allow trans health care to be more risky, with less research and follow up than any other medical sector?

If Stonewall is serious about serving the T community, this would be a useful place to start.

ArabellaScott · 12/05/2025 14:13

BundleBoogie · 12/05/2025 13:02

omg. The fallout for these kids is going to be unbelievable. I wish any of these flippant supporters of this barbarity that pop up on here could read and digest and understand what horrors they are condoning.

I just read a bit of that reddit, and there were several similar, and similarly heartbreaking stories.

In the past ten years, so many vulnerable teens and children were sold an absolute load of horseshit about how meds and surgery would 'fix dysphoria', based on a total paucity of evidence and a total lack of questioning that was the foundation of 'affirming' healthcare.

Of those who have gone onto a path to 'transition', the majority have been made sterile, and many will have lifelong medical problems stemming from using cross sex hormones and cosmetic surgeries, and the complications of both.

I sincerely hope that most of them don't desist, because the thought of that reddit board being filled with hundreds of similar stories is just unconscionable.

DecayedStrumpet · 12/05/2025 14:08

One of the things you learn from getting old is that once you've messed up a body part, it's never really going to be 100% again.

All our aching old injuries and scars and, oh yeah that wrist doesn't bend any more, I can't drink alcohol any more... Maybe you need to be young (and v naive) to believe that you can have major surgery like that and still feel ok afterwards.

And how little do you need to understand of anatomy to think that a lump of arm flesh is essentially the same as a penis? The mind boggles... Oh, don't worry about your liver failure, Mrs Brown, we'll just plumb one of your kidneys in there instead, an organ is an organ right?

LesserCelandine · 12/05/2025 13:21

*Ah, and sorry about "sex reassignment surgery". I used it out of habit. Is "gender-affirming surgery" better?

Isn’t ‘gender affirming surgery’ what the likes of Katie Price have? To match their female body to the harmful sexist stereotypes pushed by society (aka ‘gender’)

A more accurate term for these trans surgeries is ‘extreme body modification’.

BundleBoogie · 12/05/2025 13:19

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2025 12:04

More and more I find myself wishing MN had given us a tear reaction 😥

I know - it’s horrific when you start getting it all out to examine thoroughly. See also @ArabellaScott s post - my heart is breaking for these girls.

I remember being that age and my pure black and white thinking. I was happy to dismiss future consequences in my pursuit of what I wanted NOW. I held very strong ideas about important things for years from a very young age.

My youthful self could not have predicted the shape of my current adult life and that is fine because thank the lord, I wasn’t offered a simple solution as to why I felt a bit out of place all the time, didn’t make friends very easily and tended to fixate on certain ideas.

I grew up and mostly grew out of those feelings and came to no harm but these girls who have taken action and permanently changed their bodies to ruin their health and fertility don’t have the luxury of growing up healthy. They are going to be devastated when they understand what they have done to themselves and everyone who facilitates or condones it should be utterly ashamed. They are not kind. They are quite the opposite.

LesserCelandine · 12/05/2025 13:09

sashh · 12/05/2025 12:01

No.

Using them to delay puberty is exactly what they are designed to do. You still go through puberty once you stop taking them.

But if instead of stopping them you go on to take cross sex hormones that is a different thing.

We have no idea the impact this has on brain development, yet.

We do have some idea of the impact on bra8n development in that we know it lowers IQ significantly.

LesserCelandine · 12/05/2025 13:04

TheOriginalEmu · 12/05/2025 11:32

It’s no different to breast enlargements or nose jobs or labioplasty or any number of surgeries people have because they dislike how their body looks. Do you protest against those?

Whataboutery

BundleBoogie · 12/05/2025 13:02

ArabellaScott · 12/05/2025 10:51

Well, as pp suggested, I went and had a look on the reddit detrans thread. It's very, very sad. I hope the young people there get the support they clearly need.

This post (I don't want to link it so as to protect the privacy of the person making it) may be informative for the poster claiming that 'of course' trans people are aware of the risks:

'I need help I’m desperate, I was Ftm for 4 years and I used T for 3 and a half years. I had a hysterectomy and ovariectomy 3 months ago and I’m so sick, I feel desperate. No one had informed me well of everything that involved removing the uterus and ovaries. I want to detransfer. I’m so sick. Have any of you had experiences of detransition after hysterectomy and ovariectomy? I’m only 22 years old and I’m so sick. I was so traumatized by removing the uterus and ovaries that I woke up from past traumas and realized I was in a real nightmare. It was nothing real. My psychologist had given me in a single session of time and in 15 minutes of time the documentation to be able to access testosterone, I had recently turned 18 years old, despite knowing that I had a diagnosis of Borderline personality disorder for years and I had had a very difficult adolescence, with an attempted suicide and substance abuse. I was 16 years old at the time of abuse and before that moment I had never thought I wanted to be FTM. Then I met a trans friend right at a time when I was very sick and that seemed to me the only solution to be fine, I wanted to be saved from all that. I felt my beauty as a condemnation and finally I destroyed my body. I hate myself so much for this. I have been in therapy with a psychologist for 3 months and unfortunately we realized that my past traumas such as abuse and more had convinced me of all this and of being FTM because I simply hated my body for what had happened to me and for the attention they reserved for me. I didn’t want to exist anymore, but I was so beautiful and I loved myself. I thought that in that way men would stop reserving those things for me, so that I could be safe.'

omg. The fallout for these kids is going to be unbelievable. I wish any of these flippant supporters of this barbarity that pop up on here could read and digest and understand what horrors they are condoning.

Mrsbloggz · 12/05/2025 12:56

JasmineAllen · 12/05/2025 08:28

You're conflating 2 completely different things.

If someone has lost a body part because of injury or cancer they are having reconstructive surgery to attempt to replicate what they've lost.

If someone is having healthy body parts removed/inflated/tweaked etc without any physical need then that is cosmetic surgery. Cosmetic surgery is very sadly common place these days. Experimental genital surgery like phalloplasty and the male version, vagiplasty?, falls into the cosmetic class of surgery, it's just an extreme version of it.

No one is going to judge you for what you want your body to look like, but they will judge a system that operates on mentally ill people to unnecessarily remove and replace their genitals (or any other healthy body part) resulting in life long health problems.

I agree with your reply here @JasmineAllen
BUT, for a person who is aligned with trans ideology the starting point is that they have been born into the wrong body. Therefore they have lost the correct body and the genital surgery (in their mind) is restoring what they have lost.

Mrsbloggz · 12/05/2025 12:42

SALaw · 12/05/2025 00:39

With both phalloplasty and vaginoplasty threads on Reddit I have seen repeated mention of multiple corrective surgeries being needed. Why is the “failure” rate so high and why are people putting up with it? It seems to be relatively accepted that this would happen and people are left needing years and years of corrective procedures. It’s very upsetting to read.

I'd say part of the reason they are putting up with it is that they believe the ideology, ie that they have been born into the wrong body. That there is a right body which can be achieved and which is rightfully theirs. That there is a definite goal or destination waiting for them if only they are willing to endure the journey after which they will achieve the prize.

Lovelysummerdays · 12/05/2025 12:37

peachgreen · 12/05/2025 10:34

I agree. But the best place to get "a solid grounding in medical facts" about abortion would not be a forum for men which is notably anti-abortion, just like the best place to get medical facts about phalloplasty is unlikely to be Mumsnet.

Yes but I haven’t really learnt facts about phalloplasty direct from Mumsnetters it’s been through links to NHS websites and other providers and newspaper articles about individuals and their stories.

I’d never suggest anyone uses a discussion forum as a singular source of knowledge but it can be a helpful as a way to point yourself towards resources.

I wouldn’t suggest men wanting to learn about abortion looked solely at one thing either if it was me I’d look at a mix of sites that would explain to me the facts of medical and surgical abortion. Then what the criteria are for where I live and further afield. Sites that offer information and opinion and individual stories.

Then using the information available to me I’d form an opinion. In the old days you could take your opinions down to the pub and have a reasoned conversation with people. I miss those days.

Penguinsrus · 12/05/2025 12:21

TheOriginalEmu · 12/05/2025 11:32

It’s no different to breast enlargements or nose jobs or labioplasty or any number of surgeries people have because they dislike how their body looks. Do you protest against those?

Those of us in healthcare are concerned about anyone seeking surgery in order to correct what may be a psychologically driven issue because those internal dissatisfactions can persist despite surgical procedures https://bdd.iocdf.org/expert-opinions/cosmetic-treatments-and-bdd/…. “ do no harm” is a fairly crucial part of healthcare and we should have the research evidence to prove its value for any procedure that has the capacity to cause significant harm.

StellaAndCrow · 12/05/2025 12:18

CautiousLurker01 · 12/05/2025 11:37

Yes, actually many of us are concerned for people having those too, especially when they are botched or there is lack of informed consent as to the risks - especially as, by and large, many people are not happy afterwards and go on to have further elective cosmetic surgeries. For many therapy would be a wiser route. However, if a person choses to have those surgeries, they are a) self funded and b) usually reversible. So, Not. The. Same. Thing.

Yes, and it's exceptionally hard to get these funded on the NHS.

akkakk · 12/05/2025 12:14

@Seethlaw
Ah, and sorry about "sex reassignment surgery". I used it out of habit. Is "gender-affirming surgery" better?

It is neither...

  • You can't reassign sex - sex is immutable, you will always be what you were born.
  • it is not gender-affirming as gender is a fluid societal concept - as you always remain your sex, so any action you take simply expands and redefines what it means in this society to be your gender - so a man who cuts his willy off - still has sex = man, so all he is doing is expanding the societal understanding of a man to being either a man with a willy or a man with a willy cut off the gender boundaries for man expand. At no point does it suddenly move him to being a woman in either gender or sex.
ArabellaScott · 12/05/2025 12:14

akkakk · 12/05/2025 12:08

What a silly comparison!

I would not be on a thread about the environment complaining about war in the Middle East, nor would I be discussing local traffic on a thread about classical music - context is all!

As it happens, yes, I disagree with all of those - the fact that you don't like how your body looks is not a reason to mutilate it - that is the outcome of a society / online communities / social media all fixated on concepts of what looks right - rather than accepting that we are all different and loving the variety.

I am married to a consultant plastic surgeon who is qualified in many areas of surgery, but will not do cosmetic work - she spends her time rebuilding people and giving them their lives back - not destroying them.

These discussions are words based - remove the rubbish being said / noise that tries to validate and the fundamental underlying it is clear to all - if someone has their body chopped up / altered despite it being a working and functional body, that is mutilation.

When it happens with society's approval, then we are in a broken society

When it happens to children it is child abuse

When it happens to the vulnerable (autistic / those with mental health issues / those who have been abused in the past) then it is a safeguarding issue

Let's be clear- there is no justification in operating on a physically healthy male or female - mutilating their body and stacking up future issues - all in pursuit of a lie that somehow this will allow them to change sex - which we know as a society, we know at a legal level, we know morally and ethically - is impossible.

It is the time for blunt and clear talking - there is never going to be a valid reason for this surgery - anyone performing it should be struck off as a minimum, but preferably be facing criminal charges under safeguarding / abuse legislation.

Thank you.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2025 12:13

peachgreen · 12/05/2025 09:59

It's interesting that you're all assuming I'm pro-phalloplasty. For the record, I'm not. But I still don't think Mumsnet is the place to ask very specific questions about phalloplasties like "do they work" and "can they orgasm". Surely those questions would be better asked to people who have had this surgery?

I can't speak for the OP, but to jump into a forum and ask those very personal questions which sit in the nexus of both mental and physical distress out of curiosity (no matter how well meaning) is (1) incredibly rude and purient, and (2) only going to give a limited sample. Support forums are for the people who use them not a resource for curious others.

If I were OP I'd be looking for links to research and wider data rather than individual stories, which is something Mumsnet has to date been good at finding.

CautiousLurker01 · 12/05/2025 12:08

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2025 11:57

Wow - lot of projection going on in that post. Do you really think feminist women who raise concerns about the many ways the sexist concept of gender identity is harmful to women and children (and also men by the way) are going to be people who are on board with 23-year old having botox? Half of us don't even shave our legs for God's sake 😂

I think this is one you may need to educate yourself about.

Honestly I thought you were genuine at first and agreed you had a point, but the later posts have made it clear you don't care about those girls either, it's just the usual TRA "throw in anything that might work to delegitimise criticism of trans choices"

Agree - but actually, the current wave of feminism should/does allow for ‘my body, my choice’, so if a [young] woman wants to have a completely reversible aesthetic procedure like lip filler or botox, then it’s not my place to judge.

The poster you replied to clearly doesn’t do nuance or understand that temporary/reversible [self-funded] aesthetics are not in the same ballpark as: permanent, complex, irreversible surgeries and skin grafts, needing life long medical intervention, on otherwise physically perfect/healthy vulnerable and autistic young women. Or maybe I’m wrong and they are totally equivalent?!!

Naunet · 12/05/2025 12:08

.

akkakk · 12/05/2025 12:08

TheOriginalEmu · 12/05/2025 11:32

It’s no different to breast enlargements or nose jobs or labioplasty or any number of surgeries people have because they dislike how their body looks. Do you protest against those?

What a silly comparison!

I would not be on a thread about the environment complaining about war in the Middle East, nor would I be discussing local traffic on a thread about classical music - context is all!

As it happens, yes, I disagree with all of those - the fact that you don't like how your body looks is not a reason to mutilate it - that is the outcome of a society / online communities / social media all fixated on concepts of what looks right - rather than accepting that we are all different and loving the variety.

I am married to a consultant plastic surgeon who is qualified in many areas of surgery, but will not do cosmetic work - she spends her time rebuilding people and giving them their lives back - not destroying them.

These discussions are words based - remove the rubbish being said / noise that tries to validate and the fundamental underlying it is clear to all - if someone has their body chopped up / altered despite it being a working and functional body, that is mutilation.

When it happens with society's approval, then we are in a broken society

When it happens to children it is child abuse

When it happens to the vulnerable (autistic / those with mental health issues / those who have been abused in the past) then it is a safeguarding issue

Let's be clear- there is no justification in operating on a physically healthy male or female - mutilating their body and stacking up future issues - all in pursuit of a lie that somehow this will allow them to change sex - which we know as a society, we know at a legal level, we know morally and ethically - is impossible.

It is the time for blunt and clear talking - there is never going to be a valid reason for this surgery - anyone performing it should be struck off as a minimum, but preferably be facing criminal charges under safeguarding / abuse legislation.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2025 12:04

BundleBoogie · 12/05/2025 09:42

Just in case anyone isn’t clear on the full impact of a phalloplasty on the body, a requirement for the procedure is a full hysterectomy and oophorectomy (as they effectively seal up the vagina, sometimes also removing the vaginal canal).

These procedures are mostly carried out on girls from 18 and in their twenties (when the brain is still maturing) and a high proportion have autism or display undiagnosed autistic traits. As soon as the self diagnosis of ‘trans’ takes place, any exploration of the mental health issues causing that feeling is stopped.

In fact the government, pushed hard by Stonewall are trying to make such exploration to find alternative solutions to the distress illegal. This is the ‘affirmation only’ model as practised by gender clinics.

The NHS will not sterilise or perform medical hysterectomy on women under 30 except in immediately life threatening circumstances. Why do the NHS offer phalloplasty (with hysterectomy etc) to girls 18+? Their lives are not immediately in danger - they need mental health assistance.

More and more I find myself wishing MN had given us a tear reaction 😥

sashh · 12/05/2025 12:01

TheOriginalEmu · 12/05/2025 04:19

Were you this concerned about puberty blockers for precocious puberty?

No.

Using them to delay puberty is exactly what they are designed to do. You still go through puberty once you stop taking them.

But if instead of stopping them you go on to take cross sex hormones that is a different thing.

We have no idea the impact this has on brain development, yet.

Seethlaw · 12/05/2025 11:59

Gloriia · 12/05/2025 11:51

'Ah, and sorry about "sex reassignment surgery". I used it out of habit. Is "gender-affirming surgery" better'

'surgicical body alteration' might be more appropriate, or 'genital alteration'?

If we are honest with the often vulnerable people seeking these massive procedures we should call it what it is. You can affirm your believed gender by dressing and acting how you perceive to be the 'correct gender'. There is absolutely no need to endure extensive, mutilating operations as it doesn't affirm anything.

"There is absolutely no need to endure extensive, mutilating operations as it doesn't affirm anything."

Heh. I had top surgery, and it did help a lot. Bottom surgery wouldn't work, though, because it would never give me what I want.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 12/05/2025 11:57

MyOliveHelper · 12/05/2025 09:08

I find it funny that people would be spitting fury about some random teen getting surgery but forget their daughter is having botox at 23

Wow - lot of projection going on in that post. Do you really think feminist women who raise concerns about the many ways the sexist concept of gender identity is harmful to women and children (and also men by the way) are going to be people who are on board with 23-year old having botox? Half of us don't even shave our legs for God's sake 😂

I think this is one you may need to educate yourself about.

Honestly I thought you were genuine at first and agreed you had a point, but the later posts have made it clear you don't care about those girls either, it's just the usual TRA "throw in anything that might work to delegitimise criticism of trans choices"

Swipe left for the next trending thread