Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Baby at fertility show?

182 replies

Butterbly · 10/05/2025 13:39

I'm not sure if I'm just in the haze of ivf treatments

Today I went to a fertility/ family building event. It was some stands but mostly talks by a fertility clinic on treatment options for example an hour talk of iui medications and procedures etc and an hour on implications of ivf in a packed conference room (100+ people)

I've been sent a link to give some feedback.

I was surprised that a couple bought their baby along in a pram

The baby was fairly vocal (crying and chatting) which didn't feel right for any kind of indepth talk in that way so I would have taken it outside at that point. In breaks in the event, it was being walked along in the aisles, they were loudly playing with it

I think it's probably fair to feedback that I struggled to hear at points because of background noise, but is it also fair to say that it didn't feel like the right audience for a baby?

OP posts:
Millie90 · 10/05/2025 16:17

There is so much wrong with your behavior here...it's difficult to know where to start. Confused

openingtimes · 10/05/2025 16:15

AliBaliBee1234 · 10/05/2025 16:11

You've changed your tune slightly to your OP ...

I lost a baby in the second trimester and often babies and young children will be with their parents at her shared graveside. It doesn't get much more intense than that and I still don't have a problem with it. I see babies everywhere I go including on the ward where I lost mine.

Sorry if i'm being insensitive but I don't get it.

That must have been horrific and I take a different stance to you. The NHS being crass and insensitive doesn’t give carte Blanche to anyone to do the same.

I was barking mad when I had IVF though, so the OP seems mild to me.

HiddenInCubeOfCheese · 10/05/2025 16:14

I think it’s tone deaf as well as practically inappropriate.

I was in the packed waiting room on a fertility clinic (we’re talking 20 women) and a couple brought in their toddler…dad could have just gone to a coffee shop round the corner, but nooooooo. We had loud performance parenting and this kid watching cartoons, no headphones, off the dad’s phone.

FFS. Read the room.

openingtimes · 10/05/2025 16:13

greengreyblue · 10/05/2025 16:07

If the child is still a baby I don’t think secondary infertility is likely.

Edited

Some people will pick at anything 🤣 I’m not talking about the baby but the wider audience.

And some replies are unnecessarily twatty.

you can say you think someone is BU without being personal.

AliBaliBee1234 · 10/05/2025 16:11

Butterbly · 10/05/2025 15:37

I've not minded when I've seen them in clinic waiting rooms because I get childcare for appointments must be hard.

However this was an optional event, in a lecture based style.

I don't think it's excluding to say that having a soundtrack of baby laughs etc to some quite depressing lectures (at times women near me were crying)

If they'd been quietly in a corner I'd probably not notice which is a good point

You've changed your tune slightly to your OP ...

I lost a baby in the second trimester and often babies and young children will be with their parents at her shared graveside. It doesn't get much more intense than that and I still don't have a problem with it. I see babies everywhere I go including on the ward where I lost mine.

Sorry if i'm being insensitive but I don't get it.

eyeswide21 · 10/05/2025 16:10

That baby might have been an ivf baby, and those parents might have gone through their own years of struggle to have the baby and be attending with a view for a future baby.

I think it's understandable that you would feel it's inappropriate and not like seeing a baby at that kind of event, but I think that's a you problem to deal with those feelings rather than police babies at an event like that

greengreyblue · 10/05/2025 16:08

It’s a little insensitive I think.

AliBaliBee1234 · 10/05/2025 16:08

yeesh · 10/05/2025 15:44

I think saying they may have secondary infertility is a bit of a push as they can’t have had much time to even try for a second child if they only have a baby. Serious lectures are no place for a baby especially with the sensitive topics being discussed.

Their first child could have been a long journey to conceive and they are facing that prospect again?

greengreyblue · 10/05/2025 16:07

DefinitelyMaybe92 · 10/05/2025 15:26

They, amongst others there, could be experiencing secondary infertility. I don’t think a serious talk is the best place for a child in general, so I don’t think YABU for that reason (though it could be that their childcare fell through, I suppose.) However, you must come across children all the time in public? So I don’t agree that it was inappropriate from a sensitivity perspective, personally.

If the child is still a baby I don’t think secondary infertility is likely.

openingtimes · 10/05/2025 16:05

Problem is, fertility treatment isn’t just for the infertile.

It is also for secondary infertility, for same sex couples, for those with genetic disorders where they may need to use sperm/egg donors and single women.

So I do think YABU, although that’s said with kindness and a MN type fist bump, as I do get how gruelling it is 👍🏻 And I hope it works for you!

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 10/05/2025 16:02

You said ‘fairly vocal’ during the conference

so to me that doesn’t sound too bad. It wasn’t a university lecture. You can’t really complain about a baby being a baby, during the breaks …

KimberleyClark · 10/05/2025 15:57

Dearover · 10/05/2025 15:54

Perhaps the baby is living proof that fertility treatment works and worth the expense. Yes, the baby shouldn't be disrupting talks, but it's harsh to complain about them entertaining a baby during breaks.

It doesn't always work.

KimberleyClark · 10/05/2025 15:56

HoppingPavlova · 10/05/2025 15:48

Don’t think there was an issue with a baby being present, they are part of life whether you have one or not. But, as with any other event, if a baby or child is being disruptive they should be taken out.

Yes they are part of life, but if you are struggling with infertility, shouldn't a fertility show be the one place you can safely expect not to see babies?

Dearover · 10/05/2025 15:54

Perhaps the baby is living proof that fertility treatment works and worth the expense. Yes, the baby shouldn't be disrupting talks, but it's harsh to complain about them entertaining a baby during breaks.

Whooowhooohoo · 10/05/2025 15:51

Some people think that being around babies will help getting pregnant, they love and want babies, and are happy for others who have babies …

then there are people like you, who don’t want to see any babies while they learn about infertility and think seeing a baby or being exposed to one is “insensitive” to your feelings.

You should ask the provider to organize special environment for you.

B1indEye · 10/05/2025 15:50

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 10/05/2025 15:47

Your op said it was a ‘family building’ event

they did nothing wrong imo

Whatever the event not removing a crying baby that's stopping other attendees hearing the talk is inconsistent and selfish, surely that goes without saying

Would you stay where you knew your baby was ruining a talk for others?

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 10/05/2025 15:48

Butterbly · 10/05/2025 15:37

I've not minded when I've seen them in clinic waiting rooms because I get childcare for appointments must be hard.

However this was an optional event, in a lecture based style.

I don't think it's excluding to say that having a soundtrack of baby laughs etc to some quite depressing lectures (at times women near me were crying)

If they'd been quietly in a corner I'd probably not notice which is a good point

‘Quietly in a corner’

really?

HoppingPavlova · 10/05/2025 15:48

Don’t think there was an issue with a baby being present, they are part of life whether you have one or not. But, as with any other event, if a baby or child is being disruptive they should be taken out.

JoyousEagle · 10/05/2025 15:48

yeesh · 10/05/2025 15:44

I think saying they may have secondary infertility is a bit of a push as they can’t have had much time to even try for a second child if they only have a baby. Serious lectures are no place for a baby especially with the sensitive topics being discussed.

I agree it seems odd, but they must have some sort of fertility issue because it’s not like it’s somewhere you’d choose for a fun day out with your baby. No one would go if they didn’t feel like they would benefit from the information.

They should have taken a disruptive baby outside. But I think attending with a baby is generally fine - some could sleep through the whole thing and that would be ok.

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 10/05/2025 15:47

Your op said it was a ‘family building’ event

they did nothing wrong imo

yeesh · 10/05/2025 15:44

I think saying they may have secondary infertility is a bit of a push as they can’t have had much time to even try for a second child if they only have a baby. Serious lectures are no place for a baby especially with the sensitive topics being discussed.

Butterbly · 10/05/2025 15:37

I've not minded when I've seen them in clinic waiting rooms because I get childcare for appointments must be hard.

However this was an optional event, in a lecture based style.

I don't think it's excluding to say that having a soundtrack of baby laughs etc to some quite depressing lectures (at times women near me were crying)

If they'd been quietly in a corner I'd probably not notice which is a good point

OP posts:
AliBaliBee1234 · 10/05/2025 15:36

I don't really see the issue.

I haven't had fertility troubles thankfully but have suffered with miscarriages (late). I don't think i'd have a problem with a baby coming along to a discussion because people who are already parents can still be going through loss.

It might sound cruel but babies are everywhere you go.

JoyousEagle · 10/05/2025 15:34

I think fine to bring the baby if that’s what they had to do. Not fine at all to disrupt the talk - one of them should have taken the baby out.

CopperWhite · 10/05/2025 15:34

Secondary infertility is a thing, and families that need support with that shouldn’t be excluded.