Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder what Starmer was thinking with this one

236 replies

sideeyes · 06/05/2025 19:39

Indian nationals being cheaper to hire in the UK? Not paying NI contributions? What is the massive gain we get from this? As a life-long Labour voter this is just another policy that makes me want to cry. He just doesn’t get it, does he?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
BalladOfBarryAndFreda · 07/05/2025 08:32

Was just about to post similar @Neemie . @CamillaMacauley, you've got the wrong end of the stick on @Keirawr's post. That poster was saying that your lefty opinions are off putting and just add fuel to the Reform fire.

FWIW, I am a left leaning voter who is more demographically 'Islington' but thinks we BADLY need to re-engage on the (former) Red Wall's issues and communicate effectively and respectfully about it.

(edited because it cleared the quoted post and my standalone made no sense out of context)

Bluebellwood129 · 07/05/2025 08:28

CamillaMacauley · 07/05/2025 08:24

@HellsBalls i hope it doesn’t cost IT jobs. Maybe it will but the overall benefit to the economy will be worth it. So 5000 IT jobs lost but 10000 export jobs increased? Plus extra sales and manufacturing jobs? Obviously numbers are made up off the top of my head.

if for some reason it doesn’t work out then the deal can be rescinded in the future 🤷🏻‍♀️

But Starmer hasn’t made this deal up with no thought or on his own. Actual economists and experts will have been involved which is where the £4.8 billion economy benefit figure comes from.

Would they be 'economists' like Rachel Reeves? Others are putting the potential benefit at a fraction of this. Yet another dismal Labour failure.

CamillaMacauley · 07/05/2025 08:24

@HellsBalls i hope it doesn’t cost IT jobs. Maybe it will but the overall benefit to the economy will be worth it. So 5000 IT jobs lost but 10000 export jobs increased? Plus extra sales and manufacturing jobs? Obviously numbers are made up off the top of my head.

if for some reason it doesn’t work out then the deal can be rescinded in the future 🤷🏻‍♀️

But Starmer hasn’t made this deal up with no thought or on his own. Actual economists and experts will have been involved which is where the £4.8 billion economy benefit figure comes from.

GlutesthatSalute · 07/05/2025 08:23

I'm a foreigner here (spouse). I pay NI. I cannot access benefits or pensions here and I also pay a large, compulsory NHS surcharge just in case I were able to access the health system (hollow laugh).

Why exactly should foreigners like me pay NI? Why do you need us to subsidise your social systems that we cannot access?

Keirawr · 07/05/2025 08:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

HellsBalls · 07/05/2025 08:19

JassyRadlett · 07/05/2025 08:12

What difference does it make to "jobs here"?

It extends the period that an Indian firm will be exempt from NI for a seconded worker from an Indian company operating in the UK from one year to three years. What impact has the one year exemption had on UK jobs?

Meanwhile, "jobs here" - automotive, spirits, aerospace, machinery and medical manufacturing - have much greater access and competitiveness to sell in the world's fastest-growing large economy.

It means the Indian outsourcing companies can offer cheaper people on projects to the UK companies. Cheaper Indians means they are more likely to get the work over UK resourcers or employing UK nationals internally.

We had to get a trade deal with India. It was obvious for years that Indian trajectory is up and ours will struggle to stay flat. We must be a partner with India as they literally are the future consumer, even more so now America has faltered and we had Brexit.
Whether this deal is the best one we could get is yet to be seen. It will cost IT jobs in the UK.

CamillaMacauley · 07/05/2025 08:18

Keirawr · 07/05/2025 08:03

Why’ thankyou. Glad you’re following so closely. You might learn something.

Are you actually a bot? I’ve seen you post this exact same phrase to someone else before as well as your previous repeated phrase. Or do you just have a limited vocabulary?

Hopefully you’re also following closely and possibly you might learn something if you engage your brain rather than just flinging out rude half baked insults 😁👍🏻

JassyRadlett · 07/05/2025 08:18

HellsBalls · 07/05/2025 07:18

Which British workers in India? All the travel to India that I know about is managers doing couple of weeks per year seeing the offshore teams.

Interestingly, the deal appears to remove quite a few barriers to services firms being able to access India. Given the structure of our economy and the nature of eg auditing and accounting, you could then expect the number of longer secondments to India increase in line with other growing markets in large economies. Huge potential benefit.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 08:16

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 08:12

No, I actually find it interesting if people disagree with me if they are capable of engaging in intelligent and informed discussion and debate. It is the ignorance and prejudice which depresses me.

What depresses me is that in 4 years time we will have a Reform government and it will be because of people who are unable to see anything outside their little world and who are happy to sling insults at anyone who disagrees with them.

And it won’t be me or you cracking open the champagne I’m
afraid, love. I will be Farage.

JassyRadlett · 07/05/2025 08:12

What difference does it make to "jobs here"?

It extends the period that an Indian firm will be exempt from NI for a seconded worker from an Indian company operating in the UK from one year to three years. What impact has the one year exemption had on UK jobs?

Meanwhile, "jobs here" - automotive, spirits, aerospace, machinery and medical manufacturing - have much greater access and competitiveness to sell in the world's fastest-growing large economy.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 08:12

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 08:08

So you only like it when people agree with you?

The party line is the only true line.

No, I actually find it interesting if people disagree with me if they are capable of engaging in intelligent and informed discussion and debate. It is the ignorance and prejudice which depresses me.

Neemie · 07/05/2025 08:11

CamillaMacauley · 07/05/2025 07:41

I only said that because I was accused sneeringly of being a Reform voter first. Feel free to go and tell that poster off for her intolerance.

I was just trying to defend myself as I genuinely can’t understand how someone who is supportive of a trade deal with India is accused of being a Reform voter first b

You misunderstood what they said. They didn’t mean you were a Reform voter. They were suggesting that calling people thick alienates them and encourages them to vote for Reform, therefore doing Farage’s job for him. No one would want to align themselves with some who holds them in contempt so you won’t win them over.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 07/05/2025 08:11

Netamount · 06/05/2025 19:51

It’s impossible to comment on this without understanding what the wider deal is. He’s also not going to beat Reform by imitating them - Reform-supporters will always back the full fat version.

Whilst I agree with your first sentence, I think you've missed some critical information in the second. I don't know where you are, but where I am Reform just cleaned Labour's clock. Absolutely massive shift of solid Labour voters to Reform. These are not dyed in the wool right-wing racists. They are scared and betrayed working class people who have had their communities and families ground down for decades - and I am talking 40 years, so not just "austerity" - and who have finally snapped. It makes no sense at all - these are decent people, average people. Yes, as with many places they will have worries and concerns about immigration etc., and they might not always be "politically correct" in their views about the world, but they are not "Reform supporters". They are desperate people who have never voted Conservative or Lib Dem etc., who have placed their faith in Labour and repeatedly been kicked in the teeth. I am not even sure that many of them actually want Reform - but they are sure that they don't want this version of Labour, and they told Labour that in no uncertain terms. Labour isn't listening.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 08:08

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 08:07

No champagne for me. I have nothing to celebrate because I'm too depressed right now by the levels of ignorance and racism that I see in my fellow citizens.

So you only like it when people agree with you?

The party line is the only true line.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 08:07

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 08:02

We shall see.

A bit early for champagne for me, but maybe that’s what you need in the morning?

No champagne for me. I have nothing to celebrate because I'm too depressed right now by the levels of ignorance and racism that I see in my fellow citizens.

Catsandcheese · 07/05/2025 08:05

HellsBalls · 07/05/2025 08:02

Having a husband, wife and two kids is adding to the NHS burden.
Indians often bring their retired parents over for up to 6 months to holiday/help with the kids, usually less time than this though. Old people statistically use more health services. They may be insured, they are still going to the NHS though.

As for the no more visas, let’s see what the statistics say in 4 years time.
The visa quota is unlimited. If they’d said a number like 100,000 or 200,000 maximum active visas at any one time, it could be made a lot more palatable than unlimited numbers.

If they come here either they will have private healthcare or they will pay the immigration health surcharge.
If their parents come on holiday they will need to have travel insurance.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 08:04

HellsBalls · 07/05/2025 08:02

Having a husband, wife and two kids is adding to the NHS burden.
Indians often bring their retired parents over for up to 6 months to holiday/help with the kids, usually less time than this though. Old people statistically use more health services. They may be insured, they are still going to the NHS though.

As for the no more visas, let’s see what the statistics say in 4 years time.
The visa quota is unlimited. If they’d said a number like 100,000 or 200,000 maximum active visas at any one time, it could be made a lot more palatable than unlimited numbers.

So how are the visa rules going to be relaxed to allow in all of these extra Indian workers that can't come in under the current rules,, exactly?

Keirawr · 07/05/2025 08:03

CamillaMacauley · 07/05/2025 07:17

😂. You think you’re so witty. I saw that exact same insult on another thread yesterday. Was that you too, is that your stock insult when you disagree with someone? Or are you copying someone else? Oh dear.

Most people on here happily discuss opposing views without flinging insults and being so rude. But you came right out the gate being nasty. You should really reflect on that. Are you this horrible to people in real life?

Why’ thankyou. Glad you’re following so closely. You might learn something.

HellsBalls · 07/05/2025 08:02

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 07:48

How is it more people through the door? They haven't introduced free movement and they haven't relaxed the visa rules, they have merely introduced reciprocal arrangements with regards to NI for Indian staff working on short term secondments with Indian companies.

Dependents will also pay the NHS surcharge. And for the record, modern Indian women really don't have "loads of kids". The average is 2. But feel free to carry on with your scaremongering.

Having a husband, wife and two kids is adding to the NHS burden.
Indians often bring their retired parents over for up to 6 months to holiday/help with the kids, usually less time than this though. Old people statistically use more health services. They may be insured, they are still going to the NHS though.

As for the no more visas, let’s see what the statistics say in 4 years time.
The visa quota is unlimited. If they’d said a number like 100,000 or 200,000 maximum active visas at any one time, it could be made a lot more palatable than unlimited numbers.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 08:02

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 08:00

Crack open the champagne now, love. You're very clearly wrong because you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

We shall see.

A bit early for champagne for me, but maybe that’s what you need in the morning?

Catsandcheese · 07/05/2025 08:01

The thing is this is a deal that has been 3 years in the making. Keir has just signed it, but the legwork will all have been done by the conservative party.
So all this faux outrage is directed to the wrong place.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/05/2025 08:00

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 07:59

Let’s see.

I’ll be happy to be proven wrong, but I doubt I will.

Crack open the champagne now, love. You're very clearly wrong because you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 07:59

Let’s see.

I’ll be happy to be proven wrong, but I doubt I will.

Guinessandafire · 07/05/2025 07:59

Just because middle class right wing mumsnet doesn't understand or know the details of the deal, doesn't mean Starmer is a bad politician.

Crikey if you think he's bad you must have had kittens when Johnson, Truss and Sunak were in charge .

CamillaMacauley · 07/05/2025 07:58

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 07/05/2025 07:51

They will be seconded. Temporary, no NI contributions.

They’ll still need a visa. This is not an open door policy. The existing (Tory) visa requirements remain.