Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To shriek from the rooftops that there is No Such Thing as “preferred pronouns”?

488 replies

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 13:23

That’s it.

They don’t exist - any more than preferred adjectives, adverbs or nouns exist.

Even people who don’t like them still seem to think they exist.

Language is a shared, collective endeavour that belongs to all. It’s not a pick’n’mix for individuals to choose and change at will. For words not to be garbage they have clear definitions - in this case she for females, he for males, they (singular) for sex unknown.

Saying my preferred pronouns are she/her, even if that doesn’t fly in the face of reality, is no different to saying my preferred species is human, my preferred adjectives are sporty and lush.

It’s nonsense. Nothing to do with being kind or they don’t affect me, or I don’t mind if others do but I won’t. It’s nonsense.

Let’s make 2025 the year we kick this nonsense into touch.

OP posts:
WhenDaisiesPied · 29/04/2025 18:56

JustFeedMeCake · 29/04/2025 18:46

It’s not about what they call themselves, it’s the fact that they’re expecting others to use them. I won’t call a man she.

Same here. That's lying. Lying is bad for your sense of integrity . It could affect someone's mental health being made to lie. That's why this demand for pronouns is unfair. It could affect the person being made to use the pronoun negatively whilst the one demanding the pronoun being used goes on their merry way.

WhenDaisiesPied · 29/04/2025 18:53

Why do we women have to set ourselves alight to keep transwomen warm? I just think people should have the freedom to use or not use preferred pronouns.

Live and let live. Nobody ever spontaneously combusted from not being called their preferred pronoun. It's hardly life and death.

tartyflette · 29/04/2025 18:50

It seems this is still very pertinent, as well as a good read:
"Pronouns are rohypnol"
fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/

CantStopMoving · 29/04/2025 18:47

Wingdings93 · 29/04/2025 18:44

This isn't the only time it's used. The whole be kind campaign started on social media after Caroline Flack killed herself because of internet bullies.

But that was connected though - it is where it started. don’t be mean on social media which was then used to silence anyone who disagreed as being unkind

JustFeedMeCake · 29/04/2025 18:46

Shegotanology · 29/04/2025 13:26

Why does it bother you what people call themselves?

It’s not about what they call themselves, it’s the fact that they’re expecting others to use them. I won’t call a man she.

JHound · 29/04/2025 18:45

Ok.

Wingdings93 · 29/04/2025 18:44

CantStopMoving · 29/04/2025 18:38

i have an issue with this ‘be kind’ mantra. We Never ever use it in any other situation do we?

do you give away all your income to the less fortunate to ‘be kind’?

do you always give up your seat on public transport to ‘be kind’?

it really grates on me that it is only used in this one specific situation in order to make people do something they feel uncomfortable doing.

This isn't the only time it's used. The whole be kind campaign started on social media after Caroline Flack killed herself because of internet bullies.

ThDanielDay · 29/04/2025 18:43

"Such a shame that there are still plenty of women who would be happy with a female victim of rape being forced to use the “preferred pronouns” of her rapist in court, and deny that that is abusive"

It's a real shame you made a different argument to the one you wanted to make in your OP.

This has aged badly in hindsight

" I would think they were quite stupid or didn’t know English very well."

CantStopMoving · 29/04/2025 18:38

StepAwayFromGoogling · 29/04/2025 16:29

Honestly, OP, you're coming over as a really nasty piece of work. Sex is immutable, yes. But identity isn't. If a transwoman would like to be referred to as she/her, why wouldn't you be respectful enough to use those pronouns? It's kind, it's inclusive, and it makes fuck all difference to how you live your life. I'm GC too but I'm not an arsehole.

i have an issue with this ‘be kind’ mantra. We Never ever use it in any other situation do we?

do you give away all your income to the less fortunate to ‘be kind’?

do you always give up your seat on public transport to ‘be kind’?

it really grates on me that it is only used in this one specific situation in order to make people do something they feel uncomfortable doing.

Winterwonders24 · 29/04/2025 18:37

Shegotanology · 29/04/2025 13:26

Why does it bother you what people call themselves?

Because pronouns aren't used by an individual, but someone talking about them; it literally involves you telling me his to falk about you,regardless of my thoughts,feelings,or perceptions.

NewsdeskJC · 29/04/2025 18:12

Happy for people to tell me what they want me to call them. Esp if it ain't obvious.
Absolute hard no at being asked to put mine on anything. More so in a professional setting.
Used the hard no at my current employer. The never mentioned it again.

BobbyBiscuits · 29/04/2025 18:05

WhySoManySocks · 29/04/2025 16:59

There are languages where third person pronouns are not gendered. Their speakers often struggle with “he / she” in the early stages of learning English.

I've never heard someone calling someone a man to their face when they're clearly female, even with incredibly poor language skills. I'm sure it could've happened.
But the fact remains that it does exist as a concept, if it didn't then bio men would be fine with being branded female and bio women would be cool with being referred to as a bloke.

WhenDaisiesPied · 29/04/2025 18:02

StepAwayFromGoogling · 29/04/2025 16:29

Honestly, OP, you're coming over as a really nasty piece of work. Sex is immutable, yes. But identity isn't. If a transwoman would like to be referred to as she/her, why wouldn't you be respectful enough to use those pronouns? It's kind, it's inclusive, and it makes fuck all difference to how you live your life. I'm GC too but I'm not an arsehole.

I don't think I could call a transwoman she/her, I think I would compromise and use they/them. Or perhaps I would use their name. That way everybody wins. Nobody is offended or hurt.

Septagenariandaisy · 29/04/2025 18:00

Why can’t we just use their name. It would save stop all this confusion.
why does it have to be a pronoun.

5128gap · 29/04/2025 17:59

MolkosTeenageAngst · 29/04/2025 14:29

Of course they do. People who prefer to go by the name Jim over their christened name James. Binmen who prefer to be called refuse collectors. People who have a preference over whether they are described as a person with autism or an autistic person. People who have a preference over whether they are referred to as mixed-race, bi-racial, mixed heritage etc. There are lots of situations where people may have a preference regarding the language they and others use to describe them.

But James wouldn't insist to Brenda that he was now to be called Brenda. Binmen wouldn't demand we call them nurses, and white people cannot decide they prefer to be called black. I think the frustration arises less from people's desire to be referred to in a certain way, and more from the fact that their preferred way may be one that is already in use by a different group. That and the pressure to participate on people who feel no need to state their pronouns, because they can be reasonably certain people would choose accurately if left to decide for themselves, and wouldn't feel it was that big a deal if someone did get it wrong.

Wingdings93 · 29/04/2025 17:58

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 17:35

Such a shame that there are still plenty of women who would be happy with a female victim of rape being forced to use the “preferred pronouns” of her rapist in court, and deny that that is abusive.

(And if you deny “preferred pronouns” in this or any other context, you know that they’re a nonsense).

But good to see that, as always, there’s a silent majority not supporting this nonsense, poll currently at 63% in agreement.

Over and out. Enjoy your evening, everyone.

This is hilarious.

Talk about sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting LA LA LA!

StepAwayFromGoogling · 29/04/2025 17:53

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 17:35

Such a shame that there are still plenty of women who would be happy with a female victim of rape being forced to use the “preferred pronouns” of her rapist in court, and deny that that is abusive.

(And if you deny “preferred pronouns” in this or any other context, you know that they’re a nonsense).

But good to see that, as always, there’s a silent majority not supporting this nonsense, poll currently at 63% in agreement.

Over and out. Enjoy your evening, everyone.

Good lord, not what anyone is saying, seriously, stop twisting everything to suit your own narrative. Over and out here too. You keep shrieking from the rooftops, OP.

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 17:35

Such a shame that there are still plenty of women who would be happy with a female victim of rape being forced to use the “preferred pronouns” of her rapist in court, and deny that that is abusive.

(And if you deny “preferred pronouns” in this or any other context, you know that they’re a nonsense).

But good to see that, as always, there’s a silent majority not supporting this nonsense, poll currently at 63% in agreement.

Over and out. Enjoy your evening, everyone.

OP posts:
AgnesX · 29/04/2025 17:32

You're not wrong but I think that ship has sailed, it's so embedded in some people's psyche.

Ignore the best you can and don't engage.

ladyamy · 29/04/2025 17:31

Shriek from the rooftops? On ye go then…

StepAwayFromGoogling · 29/04/2025 17:30

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 17:21

You’re happy that your young children are easily groomed into denying reality? Well - you do you.

Groomed?!?! What on earth are you talking about?!

StepAwayFromGoogling · 29/04/2025 17:28

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 17:17

“Words do not have an innate meaning”. They have definitions. We learn those definitions, as you say, through context (though not always - we’re not Humpty Dumpty: “words mean what I want them to mean”). Being required to refer to someone you can see is male using words that you have always known to refer to females is, in my opinion, abusive. It is even more abusive when you factor in those with learning difficulties or disabilities and those who don’t have English as a first language.

I find your interpretation of that cartoon, showing a child armed with nothing more than a catapult being told to be kind by armed males screaming abuse, interesting It’s a pretty accurate reflection of the last 10 years, and a clear picture that there is no “both sides”.

Transmen haven't been shouting at children. Even the extreme trans lobby haven't been shouting at children. Stop being aggressive and goady.

And of course there's "both sides". I am GC and think sex is immutable. I'm glad that it has been confirmed in law. I think it is incredibly important for women to be able to access spaces and services free of men.

Likewise, I think we need to look at creating services and spaces transmen and transwomen can access. We need to create a society that is tolerant and understanding of difference. We need to be respectful and kind to people we share space with. We need to talk to people in a way that makes them feel heard, safe and understood.

Neither of those positions contradict one another. It really isn't that hard.

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 17:21

Legomania · 29/04/2025 17:19

So much shrieking, I don't know how you ever get anything done @Ddakji

My primary-school children would be fine to grasp the concept of using someone's requested pronouns so I'm not sure why it requires such cognitive gymnastics from you

You’re happy that your young children are easily groomed into denying reality? Well - you do you.

OP posts:
Legomania · 29/04/2025 17:19

So much shrieking, I don't know how you ever get anything done @Ddakji

My primary-school children would be fine to grasp the concept of using someone's requested pronouns so I'm not sure why it requires such cognitive gymnastics from you

Ddakji · 29/04/2025 17:17

StepAwayFromGoogling · 29/04/2025 17:06

They really don't require cognitive gymnastics, it's not that hard. It's not a headfuck. Words do not have an innate meaning, words are given meaning in the context they are used. That's linguistics. Language morfs and changes over time and takes on new and different meaning.

Also, that image is vile and designed to provoke hate. Why? Sex has been defined in law. The GC have already 'won'. I see no reason why I can't modify my language a bit to make someone else feel seen and included. You obviously do. I think that says more about you than me.

“Words do not have an innate meaning”. They have definitions. We learn those definitions, as you say, through context (though not always - we’re not Humpty Dumpty: “words mean what I want them to mean”). Being required to refer to someone you can see is male using words that you have always known to refer to females is, in my opinion, abusive. It is even more abusive when you factor in those with learning difficulties or disabilities and those who don’t have English as a first language.

I find your interpretation of that cartoon, showing a child armed with nothing more than a catapult being told to be kind by armed males screaming abuse, interesting It’s a pretty accurate reflection of the last 10 years, and a clear picture that there is no “both sides”.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread