Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefit cuts will cost the economy.

614 replies

MistressoftheDarkSide · 29/04/2025 08:33

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/apr/29/labours-benefit-cuts-will-cost-uk-economy-billions-charity-says

Interesting article which repeats what some of us have been saying about the likely consequences of the proposed measures, including increased pressure on services.

Labour’s benefit cuts will cost UK economy billions, charity says

Trussell report finds that higher levels of poverty mean Britain is losing out on £38bn a year of potential output

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/apr/29/labours-benefit-cuts-will-cost-uk-economy-billions-charity-says

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:07

frozendaisy · 29/04/2025 14:03

Or you could phrase it as once it stated to become a more equal responsibility for men to also do unpaid caring work, that's when expectations grew that it was for someone else to do, preferably paid for by the state because you know "we pay tax for this".

So yes in future, the care support required within families will have to be bore by both male and female parents and offspring.

Our mortgage doesn’t get paid if we need to reduce hours to provide unpaid care.

If I crash out of the jobs market, because, for example, my disability worsens, then not only does our mortgage not get paid, but there is no underemployed family member available to care for me.

User46576 · 29/04/2025 14:06

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:47

Of course it’s possible.

I just used the ‘Entitled To’ calculator.

A family with 2 non working parents, where 1 is a carer and 1 on PIP, with 2 kids claiming DLA, is entitled to £40,000 in benefits per year.

£2300 UC
£360 carers
£145 council tax support
£262 child benefit
£4000 PIP

In the handful of families I mentioned above, there is a bit more at play (such as 3 DC on DLA, or both parents receiving PIP, or 1 parent caring for the other). So that would in theory be more.

Do you dispute the figures above?

I know two families getting dla for four children. Their children aren’t any higher needs than mine (all have asd). It’s a huge amount of money to get from the state. I don’t see that we should award such significant amounts to people just because they have something we consider a disability unless there are actually additional costs.

Maybe it’s an idea to move to a voucher system to cover costs only. As a disabled person i can say its a good thing to work if at all possible and most disabled people can do some work

MistressoftheDarkSide · 29/04/2025 14:06

Also, UC has a LHA component which usually falls several hundred pounds short of actual market rents in an area, so a good chunk goes straight to landlords with a top up from the "what you need to live on" bit. Which has to cover all bills plus food. So what sort of rent did you put in for that calculation?

OP posts:
PlutoCat · 29/04/2025 14:05

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:01

Low rate PIP x 1 - £400 per month
Low rate DLA x 2 - £480 per month
Carers - £320 per month
UC of around £2,000 is absolutely not ‘far outside the maximum’ - seems a very normal amount

Even just those things - lower rate everything, everything rounded down - is over £3,000 per month, or £36,000 per year.

Where did your £4k figure for PIP come from?

Anyway, as @MistressoftheDarkSide said, unless you have the entitlement letters of the people you know, you have no proof what their income is. The figure of £4k for PIP you quoted shows you have no idea what you are talking about.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/04/2025 14:05

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:02

I didn’t say £40,000 in PIP. Did you even read my post?

You said £4000 PIP, which is what the poster you quoted said. This is the exact quote from your post:

"£2300 UC
£360 carers
£145 council tax support
£262 child benefit
£4000 PIP"

Anyway, ready to share your magical tip for managing living costs while choosing not to claim benefits yet? You can't care that much about getting people off benefits if you won't share it.

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:05

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:02

I didn’t say £40,000 in PIP. Did you even read my post?

You said £4000 for PIP. It’s nowhere near possible.

Benefit cuts will cost the economy.
Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:04

RatalieTatalie · 29/04/2025 14:02

Tax the rich more? Close loopholes for businesses and wealthy individuals? Reduce government spending in areas that can manage it?

What do you suggest? Forcing people with severely disabled families to leave them at home unattended for 9 hours a day while they work full time, then come home and care for them for the other 15 hours? The options are, we allow families to care for their relatives and pay them a pittance to do so, or we force these people out to work and force the government to pay for professional carers on NMW?

Can you provide some figures as to how you would tax the rich who are already very taxed?

frozendaisy · 29/04/2025 14:03

MistressoftheDarkSide · 29/04/2025 13:37

It's not that we expect the state to fund these things, the state offered to because they wanted a dual income economy meaning parents with less time for their children, and less time for (usually women) to help with elder care. We often get beaten with the stick that as women, we've hoist ourselves by our own petard by demanding equality. We wanted the choice, but didn't actually get it. There's a hugely sex based element to the economic shitshow on top of everything else.

Or you could phrase it as once it stated to become a more equal responsibility for men to also do unpaid caring work, that's when expectations grew that it was for someone else to do, preferably paid for by the state because you know "we pay tax for this".

So yes in future, the care support required within families will have to be bore by both male and female parents and offspring.

RatalieTatalie · 29/04/2025 14:02

User46576 · 29/04/2025 13:58

How do we afford to pay for this? Cut the NHS? Education?

Tax the rich more? Close loopholes for businesses and wealthy individuals? Reduce government spending in areas that can manage it?

What do you suggest? Forcing people with severely disabled families to leave them at home unattended for 9 hours a day while they work full time, then come home and care for them for the other 15 hours? The options are, we allow families to care for their relatives and pay them a pittance to do so, or we force these people out to work and force the government to pay for professional carers on NMW?

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:02

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:01

I don’t need to. This is the sister organisation of entitled to. These are the PIP rates. Lots of charities publish them. So do the government (usually buried in a long list of rates). Feel free to look at multiple sources. £4000 PIP isn’t an award that’s possible.

I didn’t say £40,000 in PIP. Did you even read my post?

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:01

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 13:58

It’s not. Thats so wrong it’s funny. Those figures are far outside the maximum.

Low rate PIP x 1 - £400 per month
Low rate DLA x 2 - £480 per month
Carers - £320 per month
UC of around £2,000 is absolutely not ‘far outside the maximum’ - seems a very normal amount

Even just those things - lower rate everything, everything rounded down - is over £3,000 per month, or £36,000 per year.

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:01

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:58

All you need to do is go to the Entitled To calendar and enter the scenario I did. I’ve closed the window now, but if you do the same and get a different amount, do let me know.

I don’t need to. This is the sister organisation of entitled to. These are the PIP rates. Lots of charities publish them. So do the government (usually buried in a long list of rates). Feel free to look at multiple sources. £4000 PIP isn’t an award that’s possible.

Benefit cuts will cost the economy.
PlutoCat · 29/04/2025 14:00

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:47

Of course it’s possible.

I just used the ‘Entitled To’ calculator.

A family with 2 non working parents, where 1 is a carer and 1 on PIP, with 2 kids claiming DLA, is entitled to £40,000 in benefits per year.

£2300 UC
£360 carers
£145 council tax support
£262 child benefit
£4000 PIP

In the handful of families I mentioned above, there is a bit more at play (such as 3 DC on DLA, or both parents receiving PIP, or 1 parent caring for the other). So that would in theory be more.

Do you dispute the figures above?

£4000 PIP?🤣

The absolute maximum for 1 adult and 2 children claiming top rate of PiP and DLA would be £2,249.40 every four weeks (£187.45 per person per week).

Chilena2022 · 29/04/2025 13:59

My son is getting DLA, and I am getting carers allowance for looking after him. I work part time as well, I wish I could work full time, but I can’t get child care for him

TigerRag · 29/04/2025 13:59

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:55

Ok. So given we have the equivalent of the population of Scotland on these benefits, and they’re rising every year by £10 billion, how do you propose to support that raise? And convinced somebody earning half that amount in a soul destroying job living in a mouldy flat that they should pay for it?

49% of UC claimants are working. Why isn't anything being done about that? O am aware that part of the issue is the amount of rent people pay.

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:59

TheCountessofLocksley · 29/04/2025 13:56

You won’t like this answer, but you can’t. Making the application criteria more stringent, cutting benefits or strengthening the sanctions regime only impacts the vulnerable.

More work needs to be done on the hidden economy (activities/jobs hidden from HMRC) and harsher punishments for employers who collude to defraud the state. Get more money coming - something the government set to be actively avoiding, instead targeting some of the most vulnerable because that’s a quick and easy win.

Much more investment is needed in supporting people into work, both for the individual and employers. I believe employers can (and should be required to) do more.

We can’t be a country of 40% unemployment propped up by a few highly taxed billionaires, no matter how much everyone seems to see this as the answer. Even recovering hidden tax and ending nondoms isn’t enough to fund the benefits mess. All low hanging fruit has been picked.

User46576 · 29/04/2025 13:58

RatalieTatalie · 29/04/2025 13:51

If a family has 1 adult and 2 children on High rate care and mobility for both PIP and DLA, I'd say £40k isn't enough. They'll be facing significant daily challenges. And the cost of professional carers would far outweigh the cost of carers allowance the other adult is getting

How do we afford to pay for this? Cut the NHS? Education?

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 13:58

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:55

Yes which is why I used lower rate for everything. This is the minimum award.

It’s not. Thats so wrong it’s funny. Those figures are far outside the maximum.

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:58

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 13:57

@Kindersurprisingi can’t tell if you’re somehow just mistaken, or if the benefit calculator is wildly malfunctioning.

Would you mind terribly posting screenshots of the calculation you did? Then we could unpick the misunderstanding.

All you need to do is go to the Entitled To calendar and enter the scenario I did. I’ve closed the window now, but if you do the same and get a different amount, do let me know.

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 13:57

@Kindersurprisingi can’t tell if you’re somehow just mistaken, or if the benefit calculator is wildly malfunctioning.

Would you mind terribly posting screenshots of the calculation you did? Then we could unpick the misunderstanding.

TheCountessofLocksley · 29/04/2025 13:56

WellINeverrr · 29/04/2025 09:31

Yes but I'm asking a genuine question. What do we do? How do we get people who can work to work?

You won’t like this answer, but you can’t. Making the application criteria more stringent, cutting benefits or strengthening the sanctions regime only impacts the vulnerable.

More work needs to be done on the hidden economy (activities/jobs hidden from HMRC) and harsher punishments for employers who collude to defraud the state. Get more money coming - something the government set to be actively avoiding, instead targeting some of the most vulnerable because that’s a quick and easy win.

Much more investment is needed in supporting people into work, both for the individual and employers. I believe employers can (and should be required to) do more.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/04/2025 13:56

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:50

Nobody is entitled to a promotion or whatever work they want anyway. Far from it, actually. These are not human rights.

"Disabled people, get a job"

"I keep getting knocked back from jobs I can do with my condition in favour of non-disabled applicants"

"Nobody is entitled to whatever work they want".

Make it make sense 🙃

User46576 · 29/04/2025 13:56

LadyKenya · 29/04/2025 13:09

Most? How would you know this? There may very well be the hidden cost of disability, that you would know absolutely nothing about.

According to the government the majority of claims for pip are for non physical disabilities. What “equipment” do you claim these people need?

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:55

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 13:54

The absolute maximum amount of PIP payable monthly for one individual, for context, is approx £750 a month, and that is a rare award with highest mobility and highest daily living.

Yes which is why I used lower rate for everything. This is the minimum award.

Swipe left for the next trending thread