Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Benefit cuts will cost the economy.

614 replies

MistressoftheDarkSide · 29/04/2025 08:33

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/apr/29/labours-benefit-cuts-will-cost-uk-economy-billions-charity-says

Interesting article which repeats what some of us have been saying about the likely consequences of the proposed measures, including increased pressure on services.

Labour’s benefit cuts will cost UK economy billions, charity says

Trussell report finds that higher levels of poverty mean Britain is losing out on £38bn a year of potential output

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/apr/29/labours-benefit-cuts-will-cost-uk-economy-billions-charity-says

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:22

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:19

for the love of Christ, I posted a full breakdown per month, and what this would total per year. Nobody else has struggled to understand this, only you, and you keep repeating nonsensical things I didn’t even write. Go back and read my post.

No you didn’t.

I do, in fact, keep posting the screenshot of what you posted. So I don’t need to go back. I’m looking at it.

Wait a minute for the screenshot to be approved. Again. This isn’t a “full breakdown per month and what it would total per year”. Is this list supposed to be monthly or annual?

Benefit cuts will cost the economy.
RatalieTatalie · 29/04/2025 14:22

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:20

Here it is.

The entitlements per month, which over 12 months (as there are 12 months in a year), add up to around £40,000.

Do you understand this?

You're being rude for literally no reason. You've listed 4/5 of the figures as monthly amounts and 1 as a yearly amount. That wouldn't be apparently clear to anyone.

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:21

I love that everyone is suddenly pretending not to understand basic maths to avoid the actual figures and obfuscate them with incorrect interpretations.

RatalieTatalie · 29/04/2025 14:21

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:18

If these figures aren’t monthly, where is that high total coming from? Because the total of those figure is 8 thousand and some thing and, annually, that’s not a lot.

She's done the top 4 figures monthly, multiplied it by 12 and added the bottom figure (PIP) to the total.

Which isn't clear in the post.

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:20

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 13:47

Of course it’s possible.

I just used the ‘Entitled To’ calculator.

A family with 2 non working parents, where 1 is a carer and 1 on PIP, with 2 kids claiming DLA, is entitled to £40,000 in benefits per year.

£2300 UC
£360 carers
£145 council tax support
£262 child benefit
£4000 PIP

In the handful of families I mentioned above, there is a bit more at play (such as 3 DC on DLA, or both parents receiving PIP, or 1 parent caring for the other). So that would in theory be more.

Do you dispute the figures above?

Here it is.

The entitlements per month, which over 12 months (as there are 12 months in a year), add up to around £40,000.

Do you understand this?

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/04/2025 14:20

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:19

I bow to your better mental maths. 😁

It’s certainly not £40k, is it. I don’t know how you’d even feed and house a family on that. Let alone have spare funds.

I used a calculator 😅 I wish my mental maths was that good!

MistressoftheDarkSide · 29/04/2025 14:19

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:15

Because I never did claim an adult gets 4k in PIP a month. I said 4k a year, yet no matter how much I repeat this, they just ignore it and keep making up something I never said.

The way you presented your original figures implied monthly figures - you put 2300 UC. Did you mean 23000 pa? Whichever way you cut it, those figures don't stack up though.

OP posts:
Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:19

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:18

If these figures aren’t monthly, where is that high total coming from? Because the total of those figure is 8 thousand and some thing and, annually, that’s not a lot.

for the love of Christ, I posted a full breakdown per month, and what this would total per year. Nobody else has struggled to understand this, only you, and you keep repeating nonsensical things I didn’t even write. Go back and read my post.

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:19

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/04/2025 14:18

You said families get £40,000 a year and then listed benefits that add up to £7,067.

I bow to your better mental maths. 😁

It’s certainly not £40k, is it. I don’t know how you’d even feed and house a family on that. Let alone have spare funds.

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:18

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:15

Because I never did claim an adult gets 4k in PIP a month. I said 4k a year, yet no matter how much I repeat this, they just ignore it and keep making up something I never said.

If these figures aren’t monthly, where is that high total coming from? Because the total of those figure is 8 thousand and some thing and, annually, that’s not a lot.

Benefit cuts will cost the economy.
iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/04/2025 14:18

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:15

Because I never did claim an adult gets 4k in PIP a month. I said 4k a year, yet no matter how much I repeat this, they just ignore it and keep making up something I never said.

You said families get £40,000 a year and then listed benefits that add up to £7,067.

Miley23 · 29/04/2025 14:17

SereneSquid · 29/04/2025 13:45

The cost of a disability is not always much higher. My deaf friend says her only extra cost is hearing aid batteries. She got any other equipment for free.

Yes exactly. Some people on PIP are getting £170 a week with no extra costs. Most medical equipment is supplied free of charge by adult social care and does not need to be regularly repurchased. I appreciate some people do need to purchase big ticket items like electric wheelchairs but these are a one off. They should look at what expenses people actually have before they pay all this money out.

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:16

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/04/2025 14:14

I wouldn't hold your breath!

I’m not.

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:15

Because I never did claim an adult gets 4k in PIP a month. I said 4k a year, yet no matter how much I repeat this, they just ignore it and keep making up something I never said.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 29/04/2025 14:14

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:13

Well no. What is increasingly common is for anonymous posters to make unbelievable claims.

I’ve asked you to post screenshots of the benefits calculation that you say you did on entitled to. The one you say shows a single adult receiving £4k in PIP (which isn’t possible).

Please would you post the screenshot so that we can unravel that?

I wouldn't hold your breath!

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:13

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:08

4!!!! What even are the odds? It used to be unusual to have 1 child in receipt of disability benefits - 4 would’ve been unheard of. Yet it seems so common now, to have 2 or 3 out of 3 or 4 kids on DLA!

Well no. What is increasingly common is for anonymous posters to make unbelievable claims.

I’ve asked you to post screenshots of the benefits calculation that you say you did on entitled to. The one you say shows a single adult receiving £4k in PIP (which isn’t possible).

Please would you post the screenshot so that we can unravel that?

RatalieTatalie · 29/04/2025 14:12

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:04

Can you provide some figures as to how you would tax the rich who are already very taxed?

No, I can't, sorry. Which is probably why I won't run for MP ever. I don't believe in hoards of wealth for a very few individuals. I'm not talking about employees earning £100/£200k a year. I'm talking obscene wealth and companies that use loopholes to reduce their taxes.

I don't know of this would work in real terms because I'm not an economist. But I do know that I would want any government to go down those avenues before I tried to take money from disabled people.

In my (probably unpopular) opinion, those that CANNOT work should be given incomes matching the average UK wage, not hovering around NMW.

The myth that there the UK is teeming with workshy people who could go and get well paying jobs and be free from the welfare state if they were just hit a little harder with a stick, is just that...a myth.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 29/04/2025 14:11

TigerRag · 29/04/2025 14:10

If you do vouchers for pip you do the same for every other benefit

It would also cost a lot to administer. But hey, it might give a few disabled people jobs

Also, all employees perks, like MPs expenses and subsidies could be done by voucher too.

OP posts:
BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:10

Octavia64 · 29/04/2025 14:08

Ok, so

statement:

most people claiming don’t need specialist equipment.

as of Jan 25 there are approx 3.6 million people getting PiP.

1.8 million of them cannot walk 20 metres. They will definitely need a wheelchair.

an additional 1.1 million can walk 20 metres but not 50. They almost certainly have a wheelchair as well as 50 metres really is not far.

1.1 plus 1.8 gives 2.9

so 2.9 million out of the 3.6 million are almost certainly using a wheelchair.

probably some of the rest are as well, but if you can walk 50 metres you don’t get the mobility component.

so, yes, the vast majority of people getting PIP in this country need equipment.

data from the government statistics.

That accords quite closely with what I’ve seen.

TigerRag · 29/04/2025 14:10

User46576 · 29/04/2025 14:06

I know two families getting dla for four children. Their children aren’t any higher needs than mine (all have asd). It’s a huge amount of money to get from the state. I don’t see that we should award such significant amounts to people just because they have something we consider a disability unless there are actually additional costs.

Maybe it’s an idea to move to a voucher system to cover costs only. As a disabled person i can say its a good thing to work if at all possible and most disabled people can do some work

If you do vouchers for pip you do the same for every other benefit

It would also cost a lot to administer. But hey, it might give a few disabled people jobs

BottleBlondeMachiavelli · 29/04/2025 14:09

MistressoftheDarkSide · 29/04/2025 14:06

Also, UC has a LHA component which usually falls several hundred pounds short of actual market rents in an area, so a good chunk goes straight to landlords with a top up from the "what you need to live on" bit. Which has to cover all bills plus food. So what sort of rent did you put in for that calculation?

Yes. Thats apparently what’s driving the worst hardship. IDK how people keep their morale up in a trap like that.

LadyKenya · 29/04/2025 14:09

SereneSquid · 29/04/2025 13:45

The cost of a disability is not always much higher. My deaf friend says her only extra cost is hearing aid batteries. She got any other equipment for free.

That would depend on the disability though, does it not? So your friend is not a barometer for the higher cost of being disabled, that thousands of disabled people face.

Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:08

User46576 · 29/04/2025 14:06

I know two families getting dla for four children. Their children aren’t any higher needs than mine (all have asd). It’s a huge amount of money to get from the state. I don’t see that we should award such significant amounts to people just because they have something we consider a disability unless there are actually additional costs.

Maybe it’s an idea to move to a voucher system to cover costs only. As a disabled person i can say its a good thing to work if at all possible and most disabled people can do some work

4!!!! What even are the odds? It used to be unusual to have 1 child in receipt of disability benefits - 4 would’ve been unheard of. Yet it seems so common now, to have 2 or 3 out of 3 or 4 kids on DLA!

Octavia64 · 29/04/2025 14:08

Ok, so

statement:

most people claiming don’t need specialist equipment.

as of Jan 25 there are approx 3.6 million people getting PiP.

1.8 million of them cannot walk 20 metres. They will definitely need a wheelchair.

an additional 1.1 million can walk 20 metres but not 50. They almost certainly have a wheelchair as well as 50 metres really is not far.

1.1 plus 1.8 gives 2.9

so 2.9 million out of the 3.6 million are almost certainly using a wheelchair.

probably some of the rest are as well, but if you can walk 50 metres you don’t get the mobility component.

so, yes, the vast majority of people getting PIP in this country need equipment.

data from the government statistics.

Benefit cuts will cost the economy.
Kindersurprising · 29/04/2025 14:07

PlutoCat · 29/04/2025 14:05

Where did your £4k figure for PIP come from?

Anyway, as @MistressoftheDarkSide said, unless you have the entitlement letters of the people you know, you have no proof what their income is. The figure of £4k for PIP you quoted shows you have no idea what you are talking about.

Low rate for mobility and living.

Swipe left for the next trending thread