Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it was not an overreaction to call the police?

589 replies

hottubwhocares · 26/04/2025 17:12

We were out today at a family event. We were parked up in the car park of the venue and were getting in our cars to travel home. There was a man parked next to us in the (relatively narrow) bays, window down, chatting to his girlfriend. He was there when we came out and approached our car.

DD age 8 was getting into the back passenger side of our car, so on the same side as his car. I was on the other/driver’s side. As I was getting in, I heard DD start to scream. Basically the man next to us had started to move his car forward and his back wheel had run over the back of her ankle/foot.

I immediately ran round the back of the car, picked her up, helped her into the back seat and took her shoe and sock off to have a look. The top layer of skin had come off and it looked bruised so I went round to his car, said sorry, I think you have hurt her so I am going to need your details.

He and his girlfriend then said ‘Why? I haven’t done anything wrong’. I asked if he was refusing and he said he ‘didn’t even know what happened’ and started mouthing off.

So, I called 999 and of course the second he heard I was on the phone to the police, he started offering his details.

Two police cars then attended. DH is furious with me and says I completely overreacted as DD’s injury was minor (scrapes and bruises) and I ‘see the worst in everyone’. I am very upset about his lack of support when our child was hurt and upset.

FWIW I would never move my own car when a child was down the side and if I had ever done anything like this I certainly wouldn’t be mouthing off at the parent of the injured child!

So, was it an overreaction to call the police?

OP posts:
Sherararara · 26/04/2025 17:58

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 26/04/2025 17:54

The police clearly thought differently.

No they didn’t. OP said they said it was a police matter not that they said you did the right thing calling 999. If they had she wouldnt be on here asking if she did the right thing.
You have no idea what the police actually thought.

martinirossi · 26/04/2025 17:56

YANBU. Your husband most likely didn't like the fact that you were the one who sprung into action, while he was being ineffective. Men are socialized to see themselves as the protector of their family, and your husband realised in that moment he didn't know how to do that effectively. So instead of supporting you while you took appropriate steps, he tried to minimise the situation instead. I saw my dad do this a lot with my mum growing up. If a man acted rude to her or one of us kids, he would become frustrated not towards the man but towards my mum for 'making a scene'

CantStopMoving · 26/04/2025 17:56

BethDuttonYeHaw · 26/04/2025 17:23

YANBU to call the police

YABU to call 999

non emergency number was appropriate. 999 was completely wrong.

Why? he was about to do a hit and run

Sherararara · 26/04/2025 17:56

Being a police matter and being a 999 matter are two different things

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 26/04/2025 17:55

If it had been an over-reaction the police would have taken you aside and let you know. They would not have bothered to take him aside and look at cctv.

It was a shocking and frightening thing and we all react differently. You are a fighter, whereas your DH is more of an avoid escalation type.

ChocolateBiscuitsandaCuppa · 26/04/2025 17:55

You didn't have time to weigh up all the pros and cons, especially if your DH wasn't helping. You had to act quickly, which you did. Do NOT feel bad for doing the right thing by your child.
If the police had felt it was inappropriate that you'd called the emergency number, they would have told you afterwards, however politely.
The only person who did the wrong thing here is him.

KitsyWitsy · 26/04/2025 17:55

Someone ran over my foot when I was 14. I was fine but the woman ended up calling the police on herself. They arrived at my house later to check I was ok. The car definitely ran over my foot and didn't graze it and I was alright.

I think in hindsight, you should have just taken his reg but in the heat of the moment you thought it best to call the police. You were lucky they came. Some random hit my son with a steel pole once and the police wouldn't attend. He was 10.

Hoppinggreen · 26/04/2025 17:55

ShortyShorts · 26/04/2025 17:32

He couldn't possibly have actually run over her foot without breaking it.

It sounds as though the wheel scuffed her foot.

Painful but I'm not sure 999 was necessary. I would've just taken his car reg and given it to 101.

I hope your DD is feeling better.

yes, I would have done this
You were in no immediate danger and it was not an emergency. I am not sure what details you needed from him anyway.
I am very surprised The Police came so fast, I imagine that when you said a car had hit a child that got their attention

Sherararara · 26/04/2025 17:55

You overreacted and shouldn’t have call 999 as it clearly wasn’t an emergency.
Called the non emergency number and reported it yes, but not 999.

BoundaryGirl3939 · 26/04/2025 17:55

Your daughter was fine in the end. You may have come across as aggressive if you were demanding his details without him even being aware something had happened. I would have approached him differently and taken his reg details should he have chosen not to cooperate.

IveGotAnUnusuallyLargePelvisISwear · 26/04/2025 17:54

I can understand why you rang the police- your child was hurt and he was mouthing off- people can be very aggressive when they get defensive. Did the police seem put out that you rang them about this just out of interest?

The driver sounds like a prick btw.

ShortyShorts · 26/04/2025 17:54

Leafy3 · 26/04/2025 17:52

It was, and the police themselves said so.

Possibly because the OP didn't bother telling them the driver was now offering his details, so there was no need to attend?

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 26/04/2025 17:54

SlagPit · 26/04/2025 17:51

This wasn't a 999 matter.

The police clearly thought differently.

kierenthecommunity · 26/04/2025 17:53

BTW I used to be a police dispatcher, I’d have graded it emergency too, and definitely NOT said you should have called on 101 and waited 20 minutes or more…

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 26/04/2025 17:53

IdaGlossop · 26/04/2025 17:24

At a time when we know that public services are run down, I think we all have a duty to think carefully about how we use them. 999 is a number for emergencies. This wasn't an emergency. You are also sending an odd message to your DD that the response to her being hurt and upset is to call the police. Why not an zmbulance?

There was a newspaper article a couple of weeks ago reporting on how no less than six police officers attended a private house because the occupant was deemed to be criticising their childrens’ school in a WhatsApp post. So clearly not every force is under staffed.

Nevermindkitten · 26/04/2025 17:53

Also agree with BillyBoe46, I would make sure she is checked out at minor injuries or similar, unless you are 100% sure she is OK. The mechanism of injury sounds scary. Hope you are all OK.

PuppyMonkey · 26/04/2025 17:53

This wasn't a 999 matter.

which is presumably why the police told her that and didn’t show up. Oh wait….

2chocolateoranges · 26/04/2025 17:52

hottubwhocares · 26/04/2025 17:48

Yeah, realistically though there wasn’t enough time for that and I had already said my daughter had been injured by a car in a car park so they would either have called me back or traced the call which would have been a greater waste of their time

Edited

Obviously the call handler would say it was a police matter if that’s how you explained it over the phone. “My daughter has been injured by a car in the car park” that could have been anything , for example, knocked over at speed or a light tap.

what were you going to do with the drivers details once you had them?

Leafy3 · 26/04/2025 17:52

SlagPit · 26/04/2025 17:51

This wasn't a 999 matter.

It was, and the police themselves said so.

JandamiHash · 26/04/2025 17:52

It probably didn’t need 999 but in a moment of panic and extreme protection of my child I’d probably have done the same on a whim. I think if he’s already driven over a child’s foot he may be dangerous on the road so calling 999 could have prevented a much worse accident.

Your DH is being a dick by caring more about what other people thought than his DD’s foot. I would most certainly think the worst of someone who’d run over a child’s foot and wasn’t the least bit sorry and didn’t wanna be held accountable.

dapsnotplimsolls · 26/04/2025 17:51

Your update suggests DH was there?

Nevermindkitten · 26/04/2025 17:51

I think if he had driven off, which it seems like he intended to, it would have been a hit and run. So I don't think it was an overreaction on your part. In fact you sort of did him a favour by scarring him with the phone call, so he didn't drive off. Not sure it was 100% necessary to call them, but I can see why you did.

SlagPit · 26/04/2025 17:51

This wasn't a 999 matter.

BillyBoe46 · 26/04/2025 17:51

@hottubwhocares did you take her to the hospital? My child hurt her ankle at soft play. It looked like a sprain but it turned out to be a fracture.

Apreslapluielesoleil · 26/04/2025 17:49

hottubwhocares · 26/04/2025 17:27

This is all very interesting and food for thought! The dispatcher said it was very much a police matter and they were there in minutes. I’m not sure what calling a non emergency would achieve where I had an injured child and the other driver refusing to provide details?

Then you did the right thing. The call handlers know exactly what to do.
I did the reverse, phoned 101 and was told it was a “ get police there right away” situation and was put through to the 999 call handler.
Hope your dd is ok.