Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - you have blood on your hands

737 replies

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:14

Am I being unreasonable to say that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - the Duke of York and member of the Royal Family has blood on his hands following the tragic suicide of Virginia Giuffre?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has faced zero consequences for his role in Virginia Giuffre‘s sexual abuse and trafficking because he’s rich and his powerful mummy paid off the victim and the British police failed to pursue charges against him. To be clear, while the age of consent in the UK is 17 years old this does not apply to trafficking victims and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has never faced criminal charges.

He probably thinks he’s got away with it now she’s gone.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14649791/Virginia-Giuffre-suicide-perth-mansion.html

OP posts:
Motherofalittledragon · 26/04/2025 09:33

Anonym00se · 26/04/2025 08:00

A 41 year old having sex with a 17 year old is a bad nonce in anyone’s book. I see the bootlickers are out in force.

Absolutely this, and now the poor woman has killed herself.

BlueSpikeyPearls · 26/04/2025 09:31

SnoozingFox · 26/04/2025 09:26

No I'm not. I am saying that the premise of this thread - that the suicide of this woman is all his fault - is factually untrue.

She would never have done it, had she not been abused. It's one of the worst things that can happen to a child and, no, I do not care that the age of consent is 16. She was still a child and Andrew is a damn pedophile.

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 09:30

SnoozingFox · 26/04/2025 09:26

No I'm not. I am saying that the premise of this thread - that the suicide of this woman is all his fault - is factually untrue.

I don’t see anyone saying it is ALL Andrew’s fault but due to his stupidly and that of the royals Andrew is the only one Im aware of who has given an interview about Epstein , denied all wrongdoing , and had his mother pay off his accuser .

NorthWestToWest · 26/04/2025 09:30

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 09:21

@SnoozingFox

you are defending Andrew

Andrew should answer for his crimes and so should all the men involved.

No crime has been proved.

NorthWestToWest · 26/04/2025 09:27

Puzzled4 · 26/04/2025 09:22

I guess ultimately no one will know the truth about any of it. But it never ever ceases to amaze me how people will fall over themselves in defending a group of people, a family of individuals who exist in a vacuum of unimaginable and unearned privilege and wealth, who, we are told, are this country’s symbol of this and that. That they represent our national values, history, identity etc. But in reality they have zero in common with the average citizen, and they cannot relate to us, their royal “subjects”, and because all of this they are untouchable in every single way. And yet we still throw money at them, to keep them where they are, and we pay them to be better than us, even though they are not.

I think that is unfair.
There are several members of the RF who are in fact commoners.
Catherine, Sophie, Camilla and 'Fergie'. Even the late Prince Philip was a relative commoner, albeit with distant royal relatives in Greece but he had a terrible life as a child passed from one family to another and arrived here almost as a refugee.

They bring influence. I think William is especially sensitive and will change the monarchy for the better in some ways.

They all do the best they can given their position, for various charities.

You can't ignore the Prince's Trust, the D of E award, and various other charities that they have established or are patrons of.

SnoozingFox · 26/04/2025 09:26

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 09:21

@SnoozingFox

you are defending Andrew

Andrew should answer for his crimes and so should all the men involved.

No I'm not. I am saying that the premise of this thread - that the suicide of this woman is all his fault - is factually untrue.

BlueSpikeyPearls · 26/04/2025 09:24

A friend of mine has dealt with the consequences of SA from a young age. Every couple of years she absolutely crumbles emotionally. Her foster-mom takes care of her during those episodes. But she cannot function from day to day. She gets put on medication and get additional therapy. We would usually see her a few months later, slowly coming out of it. I was shocked the first time I saw her again. She seemed like a different person.

It was done to her over 30 years ago. Her life is incredibly hard because of what was done to her as a child. Many victims never fully recover, or have severe mental set-backs from time to time, like my friend.

There should be no time limit on punishing the perpetrators.

Scentedjasmin · 26/04/2025 09:23

IDontHateRainbows · 26/04/2025 07:23

How can you be so very sure that this was the reason for her suicide and that nothing else had happened since however many years ago to make her want to end her life?

Of course it is linked. One thing causes another and then another and another. You can't set aside incidents like this neatly.

Puzzled4 · 26/04/2025 09:22

I guess ultimately no one will know the truth about any of it. But it never ever ceases to amaze me how people will fall over themselves in defending a group of people, a family of individuals who exist in a vacuum of unimaginable and unearned privilege and wealth, who, we are told, are this country’s symbol of this and that. That they represent our national values, history, identity etc. But in reality they have zero in common with the average citizen, and they cannot relate to us, their royal “subjects”, and because all of this they are untouchable in every single way. And yet we still throw money at them, to keep them where they are, and we pay them to be better than us, even though they are not.

Bathroomscales · 26/04/2025 09:22

Very sad

JandamiHash · 26/04/2025 09:21

HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 09:20

i think it is unfair to call Sarah Hideous and that ginger one

Personally I think it’s hideous when people loudly declare their support for sex offenders they cling on to, like she did, further enabling them, but different strokes for different folks I guess

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 09:21

@SnoozingFox

you are defending Andrew

Andrew should answer for his crimes and so should all the men involved.

HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 09:21

Ponoka7 · 26/04/2025 09:19

You don't think that we should speak out to stop the sexual abuse of children and the sex trafficking of vulnerable people?

i didnt ask that

JandamiHash · 26/04/2025 09:20

Futurehappiness · 26/04/2025 09:15

This is what you have to say about a woman who has just died in the most tragic circumstances? I don't know all the truth about this any more than anyone else but I do know what trauma can do to people, and being 'deeply disturbed' does not make her a liar.

I’m sure she was deeply disturbed and have all sorts of MH issues: it tends to be what’s happens when you spent your youth being raped.

I think people see victims like movie victims - they take deep breaths and find strength and peace by their mid-20’s. Some do. Most don’t.

HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 09:20

i think it is unfair to call Sarah Hideous and that ginger one

SnoozingFox · 26/04/2025 09:20

She also said in an interview that she was "passed around like a platter of fruit" by Epstein to his associates.

I'm not defending Andrew but this narrative that it's all his fault because he was the one who abused her is just factually untrue. He was one of many.

NorthWestToWest · 26/04/2025 09:19

PersephoneSeethes · 26/04/2025 09:15

This in buckets. I honestly don’t think PA is the malevolent sexual abuser or predator that he is being accused of. I don’t like the man particularly, he’s stupid, spoilt and entitled in the worst ways possible. I firmly believe that while he was not a victim of Jeffery Epstein, he was definitely a useful idiot, a vector to other people. That there were all these young women around behaving initially like normal staff would have been completely normal to PA, I completely believe that Epstein groomed him too; he wouldn’t have asked any of the girls to do anything sexual on the first few visits, only when he was comfortable.

We also have to remember that PA wasn’t the only man involved with Virginia’s abuse; Epstein used her, and many other girls, to get compromising material on rich and powerful men.

Exactly.

Andrew is not the sharpest tool in the tool box by a long way.
He was as 'vulnerable' as VG in some ways. He was used for many things, for his status and associations, just the same as he was by the 'alleged China spy'.
He's just too dim to see it.

He's surrounded by sycophants who won't tell him anything straight. He's lived in a bubble and all those years ago, he was a type of 'foolish playboy' indulged at home and by everyone else.

2dogsandabudgie · 26/04/2025 09:19

JandamiHash · 26/04/2025 09:10

A horrifically sad event, and it really shows that even the strongest of survivors can never ever escape their demons. Her poor family.

Now it’s time EVERYONE was named and consequences were delivered.

It continues to horrify me that although a woman is in prison for sex trafficking, not one man has been identified as her client. How can you jail as sex trafficker without naming the people she trafficked victims to. It certainly wasn’t just Epstein.

Whichever powerful figures are protecting the rapists, including Prince Andrew, needs to stop now, and the full force of the law needs to be imposed on every last one of them. Get the fucker deported. We know what he did. And I hope Charles fully complies in whichever way it takes to ensure this happens

That will never happen. I think there are some very powerful people involved, more powerful than Prince Andrew.

Ponoka7 · 26/04/2025 09:19

HelenWheels · 26/04/2025 08:59

who decided she should do this?

You don't think that we should speak out to stop the sexual abuse of children and the sex trafficking of vulnerable people?

JandamiHash · 26/04/2025 09:19

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 09:16

@JandamiHash

Dont hold your breath waiting for the Windsors to do anything re Andrew.
His right in the ( corrupt) bosom of that family and going nowhere
As far as the Windsors are concerned Andrew’s only crime was being caught

The only thing the Windsors are busy doing is name changing on mumsnet to spout royalist nonsense

Kidding!

I’m holding my breath for nothing I don’t think a single rapist will be jailed over this Epstein business. Maxwell was the scapegoat, though she’s where she should be.

I wonder how many more Virginias have lost their lives to disgusting predators. My hearts and thoughts are with them all today.

GreenApplesRedApplesYellowApples · 26/04/2025 09:19

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 26/04/2025 08:43

I'm hoping PA actual friends will take the same approach but considering,"Lady" Victoria Hervey put a IG post up with the word KARMA on top of VGs post about only having four days to live, I'm not holding my breath.

'Lady' Victoria did WHAT??!!

You know some in this uber-rich privileged class who think they're better than the rest of humanity need to think very seriously about how things like this come across to the 'poor unfortunates'.

Dumb thing to do publicly. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

SnoozingFox · 26/04/2025 09:17

HoskinsChoice · 26/04/2025 08:06

You're essentially glorifying in the death of a woman in order to put the boot into the royal family. That's pretty sick.

This woman was a victim of abuse way, way before she ever met Epstein. She had a horrific childhood which involved abuse, living on the streets and being passed from foster home to foster home. When Epstein and Maxwell got hold of her, she was lured into prostitution and potentially slept with hundreds of men for money and a high end lifestyle of luxury houses, international travel and private jets.

There is zero evidence that she slept with Andrew and of course there is zero evidence that she didn't. We will never know. What we do know is that Andrew was not even close to being the leader or instigator of anything that happened in her childhood or young adult life. He was possibly a very, very tiny cog in an enormous wheel.

Please don't use this woman's tragic life to push your anti-royal views. It's disgusting to use this to suit your agenda. 'That ginger woman' tells us everything we need to know about you. Go and do something nice and get over your prejudices and discrimination.

This sums it up perfectly. This was a very troubled woman who was sexually abused from the age of 7. She was street homeless as a teenager and again - underage - abused by a sex trafficker. All before she was anywhere near Epstein and Maxwell.

Andrew is a fool and there is no proof either way that what she said happened, happened. But to put 100% of the blame at his door is just madness and very unfair.

Ukisgaslit · 26/04/2025 09:16

@JandamiHash

Dont hold your breath waiting for the Windsors to do anything re Andrew.
His right in the ( corrupt) bosom of that family and going nowhere
As far as the Windsors are concerned Andrew’s only crime was being caught

The only thing the Windsors are busy doing is name changing on mumsnet to spout royalist nonsense

Kidding!

Futurehappiness · 26/04/2025 09:15

Themagicfarawaytreeismyfav · 26/04/2025 08:30

I think she topped herself because she exposed herself for the liar she is with the being dead in four days lie! She was obviously a deeply disturbed woman with lots of issues and anyone who believes 100% everything she said is more than a little bit naive and stupid.

This is what you have to say about a woman who has just died in the most tragic circumstances? I don't know all the truth about this any more than anyone else but I do know what trauma can do to people, and being 'deeply disturbed' does not make her a liar.

PersephoneSeethes · 26/04/2025 09:15

Tomatotater · 26/04/2025 08:41

can well believe Andrew to be arrogant, entitled, not very bright, a poor judge of character, too easily flattered but I do not believe he would have sex with anyone without consent. No-one in his position, with years of being in the public eye, and of the gutter press, would be that stupid.”
I can believe he is that stupid. Have you not seen his interview with Emily Maitliss? His litany of dodgy/spy friends? It seems every shady character/ dodgy oligarch/rich criminal in the world did see that he was actually, that stupid. He said in the Maitliss interview that he didn't notice or wonder why very young girls were there at Epsteins houses, ' massaging' rich old men, because ' people like him' don't see the staff- they are just there. So as far as he could see they weren't even worthy of consideration. Just there to bring him things, or service his needs.

This in buckets. I honestly don’t think PA is the malevolent sexual abuser or predator that he is being accused of. I don’t like the man particularly, he’s stupid, spoilt and entitled in the worst ways possible. I firmly believe that while he was not a victim of Jeffery Epstein, he was definitely a useful idiot, a vector to other people. That there were all these young women around behaving initially like normal staff would have been completely normal to PA, I completely believe that Epstein groomed him too; he wouldn’t have asked any of the girls to do anything sexual on the first few visits, only when he was comfortable.

We also have to remember that PA wasn’t the only man involved with Virginia’s abuse; Epstein used her, and many other girls, to get compromising material on rich and powerful men.

Swipe left for the next trending thread