Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Teacher showing photos to kids of victorian dead children - slightly disturbing

585 replies

whyiwonderwhy · 25/04/2025 23:51

I am finding this so disturbing I can't sleep! However I might be being oversensitive, who knows. It is the "but - WHY?" bit which is bothering me most.

The lesson was about the industrial revolution, and the subject of photography came up, 2 of the earliest photos were shown to the class (13-14yo) and then....I wish I could say the teacher showed photos of some of the extraordinary engineering inventions of the day, or of busy streets, or China, or something wonderful and extraordinary...but no, the teacher showed 10 photos of dead children and talked about how the Victorians would photograph dead children as though they were still alive, with the rest of the family, in a commemorative way. I have seen some in the past (I didn't learn about it at school however) and they are moving and tragic and disturbing. Nothing else, just these photos.

Just wondering...why? why would the teacher do this? Any ideas?

This teacher has form by the way. A lot of it. But this has for some reason blindsided me.

OP posts:
Happyhappyday · 26/04/2025 02:26

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 00:16

My text books didn't include any disturbing photos. They included themes and analyses and facts and things like that. In fact, none of my degree level texts included disturbing photos either. I suspect you are younger than me, the trend for disturbing stuff is relatively recent.

Edited

Mine included a lot of WWII and more recent photos of the horrible things that happen in conflicts. I actually think the trend to protect our precious snowflakes from anything triggering rather than the other direction. I’m 40 so dunno how old you are but it’s pretty weird you didn’t have any WWII photos at least. I’m not sure a fact about 10 million people dying really gets the point across in the same way as a photo does.

pollyglot · 26/04/2025 02:01

DreamTheMoors · Today 01:41

Actually, Dreamy, it was I, Polly, who taught them Latin, and made them love it. DH, though not a trained teacher, but a Royal Navy gunnery expert, was a teacher to his very soul. Adored kids. Got through to young kids in a manner I have rarely seen, with his "reality learning". I wrote a course on teaching Latin through games and kinaesthetic activities...all great, provided the teacher has passion. So many of my ex-pupils went on to Public School, passionate about Classics. Latin should not be fusty and boring - it's fun and fascinating.

AmusedGoose · 26/04/2025 01:59

You sound victorian yourself. Have you come over with vapours from shock. Teen years are going to be a shock for you.

Lunde · 26/04/2025 01:58

During the industrial revolution death was much more of a fact of life than today. Death and mourning customs are a part of that and there was a rapid growth in death related industries. For the Victorians death customs expanded to incorporate the new technology of photography. So it was an industry that grew out of death

In the previous Georgian/Regency times mourning jewellery was popular with a whole industry evolving around Whitby to supply the manufacturers of mourning jewellery with jet stones. Many pieces such as rings and brooches etc featured intricate designs that were made with the hair of the deceased.

There were other death related industries that grew up - penny burial policies for example where insurance men came to your house and collected a penny each week on policies to pay for the burial of family members. It was the way for working class people to be able to afford to have a proper burial for family members. My grandparents used such a policy in the 1930s when their son died aged 2 of bronchitis.

JaneJeffer · 26/04/2025 01:51

.

#masterchef #foxtv #fox GIF by Masterchef
nyancatdays · 26/04/2025 01:47

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 00:05

Yes i see that but the subject was the industrial revolution - so the only way to engage the class is to show them photos of dead children and nothing else?! Really?!! Not about the actual amazing inventions of the industrial revolution? i mean showing photos of children working down mines would at least be on topic!

Photography is actually one of the most interesting and world-changing technological inventions of that period, and post mortem photography is a fascinating and relevant part of nineteenth century culture. Through it students can learn all sorts of things about the differences between modern and past cultures, including Victorian mourning culture, the spread of technological innovations like photography (which had the fastest global uptake of any visual technology ever), and so on. It’s a window into past customs that shows how the world was - especially in relation to domestic, children and family cultures of the period, which were often left out of the “great men and their machines” type of traditional history.

It’s also a damn sight more interesting as a lesson than Brunel or Disraeli or whatever. I teach postmortem photography to visual arts degree students studying that period, and I wish my history teachers had done more of that kind of cultural history at school rather than endless Tudor taxation acts, to be honest.

PyongyangKipperbang · 26/04/2025 01:44

@whyiwonderwhy So its creeped you out, and therefore you dont like it being taught to your teenagers?

I hate this phrase but in this case it works, its a "you" problem.

IndigoViolent · 26/04/2025 01:43

I am finding this so disturbing I can't sleep! However I might be being oversensitive, who knows. It is the "but - WHY?" bit which is bothering me most.

Yeah, you are being massively over sensitive and need to move into the real world.

DreamTheMoors · 26/04/2025 01:41

@whyiwonderwhy
You and your husband sound like amazing teachers.
My Latin teacher was an ex-priest, who left the church for a woman in another country.
Once they got settled in the US, she left him. All she wanted was US citizenship.
I think he must be the kindest person I’ve ever had the privilege of knowing.
And he also made learning fun.
Amo amas amat ❤️

Bowies · 26/04/2025 01:38

Spinning Jenny and the Industrial Revolution still give me nightmares.

Presumably they have pictures of eg Spinning Jenny in their text books. I find it hard to believe this wouldn’t have already been shown as an image in some form.

The Victorian photographs are interesting and you can’t know what context they were shown in, assuming you weren’t in the classroom.

I would be concerned if these were being shown to young primary school children, but not this age group.

It might help if you explain the backstory and why you can’t simply ask about the photographs. We don’t know the context but I’d be more concerned if my DC was at a school where I didn’t feel able to speak to a teacher, query things or voice concerns.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 26/04/2025 01:38

Learning needs to be memorable. that lesson was memorable

DreamTheMoors · 26/04/2025 01:33

PocketBattleship · 26/04/2025 00:08

Wait till they see the graphic car crash aftermath photos we got shown as a deterrent against getting involved in vehicle crime.

I saw graphic car crash live films as required in driver education class.
I was grossed out and they didn’t make me drive any more defensively.
My dad yelling at me worked like a charm.

pollyglot · 26/04/2025 01:22

whyiwonderwhy · Today 00:02

mmsnet · Today 00:00
its part ot victorian history, get over yourself

right back at you, my lovely

FFS. This response, so nasty and pointless, shocked me far more than any suggestion of ghoulishness on the part of the teacher.

Whyiwonderwhy

You are an unpleasant piece of work. Ever tried to engage kids of that age in history? No? Thought not.
When I was teaching Latin at a prep school and DH (ex-Royal Navy, delightful avuncular figure for the boarders) ran a Roman Legion, he taught them how to kill people with a gladius.(stick it between the ribs, pull it out and listen for the sucking noise) He re-enacted Roman battles, all good boys-own stuff, the kids made armour and functioning ballistae, carried out operations against the barbarians in the woods after dark, camp fires, route marches ... He was adored by the kids, who were inspired to carry on their fascination with Roman culture. The parents thought it was absolutely wonderful, too.
Oh, and we took them to Rome. For the day. Wearing their uniforms which I had had printed for them. Walking down the Via Corso, some carabinieri saw them coming, nudged each other, snapped to attention and presented arms. The little boys were walking half a metre above the pavement.

All this fucking clutching of pearls among these precious, ignorant parents.

Yep - get over yourself.

Azandme · 26/04/2025 01:19

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 01:07

The books you mention are interesting but they are special interest subjects. History should be taught giving a broad base level of knowledge first, and then specialising gradually, gradually narrow your field of study/specialised interests. A "powerful lens" is the wrong way round for children. They need the basic knowledge, the structure of the subject, the foundations, first.

This IS part of that "broad base" 🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️.

gillefc82 · 26/04/2025 01:17

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 00:05

Yes i see that but the subject was the industrial revolution - so the only way to engage the class is to show them photos of dead children and nothing else?! Really?!! Not about the actual amazing inventions of the industrial revolution? i mean showing photos of children working down mines would at least be on topic!

But child mortality was a huge issue during the Victorian era. Public health systems were either entirely lacking or woefully inadequate. Children particularly in the industrial towns and cities were being employed in incredibly dangerous jobs: chimney sweeps, clearing fallen cotton from beneath looms in textile factories, down in the coal mines, etc.

They were often living in squalid conditions in overcrowded tenements, malnourished and contending with poor sanitation and often inadequate infrastructure, resulting in awful and deadly events such as cholera outbreaks from contaminated water pumps (the Broad Street Pump outbreak in London killed over 600 people). And that’s assuming they weren’t especially unlucky and were in the workhouse.

It might seem morbid, but I think it’s an important aspect of that era for children to understand. So many children didn’t make it to adulthood, mainly due to the limitations in science and modern medicine (no vaccination programmes for childhood diseases in those days), hence the Victorians taking those commemorative photos. Today’s children will benefit greatly from understanding how very lucky they are to have been born when they have been.

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 01:15

Thank you to everyone. I am off to bed now, feeling much calmer, this thread was very therapeutic!

OP posts:
IdaPolly · 26/04/2025 01:15

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 00:29

It is interesting, I agree, but it is not relevant to what the teacher should have been teaching about. There were a lot of more important things which should have come first. And as I said, think about the extraordinary engineering developments of the period - incredible changes - no photographs of the engines, the bridges, the ships. No photographs illustrating the other key changes to society. The changes in buying power, the wealthy whose wealth came from the fact that children women and men were working 12 hour days down mines etc, the rise of the middle classes.

No, none of this. Just ten family photos which included a dead child which they presented as though they were still alive.

I'm sure the teacher will cover the curriculum. I don't think it's up to parents to dictate the content of one individual lesson. That's rather controlling. You weren't in the lesson to know exactly what was covered. I guess you could submit detailed lesson plans for how you think each topic should be covered if you wanted to share your expertise though.

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 01:14

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 26/04/2025 01:10

Says who? Sounds like bollocks to me. The human details can often be a good way in to the broader ideas.

As far as I know, if you want your dc to be able to pass exams well all the way up through degree level and to have a good grasp of historical context on present day world affairs, what I said was right, but just to clarify that human details are also needed as part of the base knowledge.

The specialist subjects (human details or otherwise) are very interesting too. Not knocking them. But they are probably even more interesting once you have context from the wider base knowledge.

OP posts:
Toseland · 26/04/2025 01:13

Bloody goths!

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 01:10

JMSA · 26/04/2025 01:05

If you can’t sleep because of this, then you need help.

Actually, i am really tired now, I will probably sleep like a rock - and I need to be up really early so I am thinking I should probably bow out.

OP posts:
murasaki · 26/04/2025 01:10

If you make it big deal, it will be a big deal to your kids, so don't.

RemusLupinsBiggestGroupie · 26/04/2025 01:10

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 01:07

The books you mention are interesting but they are special interest subjects. History should be taught giving a broad base level of knowledge first, and then specialising gradually, gradually narrow your field of study/specialised interests. A "powerful lens" is the wrong way round for children. They need the basic knowledge, the structure of the subject, the foundations, first.

Says who? Sounds like bollocks to me. The human details can often be a good way in to the broader ideas.

whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 01:09

seaelephant · 26/04/2025 01:03

Yeah morticians have debunked this - dead weight isn't something you can 'prop up' from behind a curtain, and cetainly not with a flimsy wooden frame. Adult corpses especially are heavy and unwieldy. Some of them are dead, but only the 'lounging' ones, and more likely children and babies as their bodies are lighter. All fascinating stuff! VIctorian death practises are a big interest of mine

The photos I have seen are mostly very little children being propped up or held up. The older children and adults were all sitting or "lounging", with eyes open, as though alive.

OP posts:
whyiwonderwhy · 26/04/2025 01:07

Ruthietuthie · 26/04/2025 00:59

@whyiwonderwhy, it doesn't seem that you have really taken in the many explanations of why this could have been a powerful lens to begin a discussion about all the other things which, in your estimation, were the more "important bits" of this period. Instead, you agree only with people who entirely affirm your opinion. Have you read books like historian (and Harvard President) Drew Faust's This Republic of Suffering, which won a Pulitzer Prize? Or Tom Laqueur's, Helen Fawcett Professor of History at Princeton's book, The Work of the Dead? I don't think you are understanding how powerful this topic is to understand this whole period. And what a compelling way it offers to being a broader discussion.

The books you mention are interesting but they are special interest subjects. History should be taught giving a broad base level of knowledge first, and then specialising gradually, gradually narrow your field of study/specialised interests. A "powerful lens" is the wrong way round for children. They need the basic knowledge, the structure of the subject, the foundations, first.

OP posts:
JMSA · 26/04/2025 01:05

If you can’t sleep because of this, then you need help.

Swipe left for the next trending thread