Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Romesh Ranganathan - School Places & Entitlement

282 replies

FightingFish · 25/04/2025 17:39

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgj1ry9x7o.amp

I’ve seen this story popping up a lot on social media and we are only seeing one side of the story. Schools publish their allocations policy and apparently RR has moved house since his older children were allocated a place. He obviously didn’t consider the implications of moving outside of catchment at that point. There are only so many places, AIBU to wish that he would acknowledge that? I also feel sorry for the kid, if my father was a multi millionaire, I’d rather he shelled out on a place at a private school instead of bleat on about how hard done by he is!

Romesh Ranganathan looks on from the grid during the F1 Grand Prix of Monaco at Circuit de Monaco

Romesh Ranganathan criticises West Sussex council over son's school place - BBC News

He says his son's allocated school is "on the other side of town" to the one his siblings attend.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewgj1ry9x7o.amp

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Annoyeddd · 28/06/2025 13:06

Interesting to look into how some schools are better than others.
It is basically a big building with lots of rooms - teachers are qualified to pgce - the curriculum is roughly similar everywhere.
Is it the children who make a school good or bad?
Highly selective - so children will tend to want to learn and end up with good results so parents want to send their children there school is labelled as fantastic.
In an area of high deprivation parents unsupportive children with behaviour and other problems school is labelled as poorly performing.

FishfingerFlinger · 28/06/2025 07:43

dottiedodah · 28/06/2025 06:00

I think he has a valid point here.His older DC are at the same School.Its normal here in our local area to have siblings as priority. Looked after DC first,siblings 2nd .the fact he has moved is irrelevant. How can you get 3 children to 2 different places. The younger one will be going by himself to a School further away. I admire RR,as a former Teacher he is upholding the State system. My DD bestie came from private to DD secondary (not Grammar) Didn't get on well there.RR is quite entitled to use State and also has grounds to complain. DD Bbestie liked the secondary and flourished

But this school doesnt have a sibling priority. If everyone with a sibling at the school could successfully appeal on the basis thry HABe a sibling, it would make a mockery of the idea that the school can set its own admissions policy.

We lost a secondary appeal on what I consider to be much stronger grounds than RR had. It’s really hard to win appeals otherwise everyone would be able to use the appeal system to get into their school of choice, which would be unworkable for obvious reasons

Maybe we should just move to the Scottish system where everyone gets their catchment school, no choice in the matter.

dottiedodah · 28/06/2025 06:00

I think he has a valid point here.His older DC are at the same School.Its normal here in our local area to have siblings as priority. Looked after DC first,siblings 2nd .the fact he has moved is irrelevant. How can you get 3 children to 2 different places. The younger one will be going by himself to a School further away. I admire RR,as a former Teacher he is upholding the State system. My DD bestie came from private to DD secondary (not Grammar) Didn't get on well there.RR is quite entitled to use State and also has grounds to complain. DD Bbestie liked the secondary and flourished

Poppins21 · 28/06/2025 05:37

clary · 25/04/2025 21:32

A PP said they couldn't think why they would want their DC at different schools and that would be the same for most parents. So OK, not all parents. But in fact I know lots of parents who don’t agree.
Possible reasons:

  • Wanting single-sex education
  • School having a speciality that suits DC 1 but not DC 2 (maths, tech)
  • SEN catered for at a specific school
  • Academically focused school, again not suitable for different DC
  • School with very strong drama or music offering that is only of interest to one DC
  • School offering other specifics such as particular MFL, sporting facilities, strong textiles or art depts

My 3 DC are very different; one is very sporty, one is very keen on music and drama, one had an interest in a specific MFL, one has LD, one is ND, one is very keen on food tech, one is very academic in STEM, one is very academic in humanities ... (some of these apply to more than one!). So different schools might well have suited them.

Tho I agree it’s not unreasonable to want your DC to go to the same school. But if that is specifically important to you then you may need to make sure it happens.

Edited

I only have one but I would imagine I would pick a school that suited each child. Finding the right fit for my daughter was our top priority.

Poppins21 · 28/06/2025 05:35

CleaningSilverCandlesticks · 26/04/2025 09:11

So, unsurprisingly, the issue is not still having children at two schools (which would also be the case with his other three preferences); he doesn’t like the school he has been allocated. As a parent, of course he can be disappointed with a school. But what he can’t do is point to his children as evidence and say ‘see I support state education’ if it is conditional on them going to specific above average schools.

But nobody should have to accept sending a child to an under performing school. I do not know how the system can be fixed but again it is failing kids every day.

Poppins21 · 28/06/2025 05:29

privatenonamegiven · 25/04/2025 18:47

I disagree it is flawed - that doesn't mean I can come up with a better system, but we have to acknowledge that every year parents and children across the country feel let down by this system - as system that pretends you have choice.

Here we don't know whether the parents involved read the admissions criteria or not - you can't assume they did not.

As an outsider looking in - the system does seem flawed and the most shocking part is the apparent disparity between what different state schools provide. How can one school be outstanding and another one a few miles away be failing with the same funding? (Of course life is more complex and educational policy is not my area of expertise but it seems very odd). When we were interviewing schools for our daughter, the schools had different “personalities” but the same high standards and I would have been very upset if I could not have sent our daughter to the school which would be the best fit for her. But I think it is good he is highlighting it as many children seem to not get a place in a decent school and no child should legally be made to go to a failing school - surely the clue is in the name. Don’t know the answers but UK education system is failing many children and families.

Annoyeddd · 27/06/2025 14:22

Xenia · 26/04/2025 13:17

Although it is catchment that allows rich parents to choose a school by house price and it is bussing as I think Brighton did at one point of poor children into rich for schooling that perhaps achieves a purer fairness.

Do they have money to spare to provide coaches when not really necessary

FishfingerFlinger · 27/06/2025 13:40

FightingFish · 27/06/2025 13:14

I’ve just read on Facebook that the son didn’t get a place on appeal. I think it reflects well on the council that they didn’t cave to celebrity pressure and stuck to the admissions policy.

It won’t be the council it’s an independent admissions panel that decides when you take it to appeal.

it doesn’t sound like there’s any suggestion that the admissions criteria were applied incorrectly, only that he didn’t know what they were.

And it is quite difficult to argue that you should have priority on the grounds you have a sibling at the school when the school has explicitly adjusted its policy so that siblings don’t have priority.

so it isnt a big surprise he lost.

IamnotSethRogan · 27/06/2025 13:32

If you listen to him in his podcast, you'll see that they changed the policy. It used to, like many school, take siblings into the school as one of the top considerations so he moved based on this rule and then they changed it. So yes, I'd be annoyed.

FightingFish · 27/06/2025 13:14

I’ve just read on Facebook that the son didn’t get a place on appeal. I think it reflects well on the council that they didn’t cave to celebrity pressure and stuck to the admissions policy.

OP posts:
Arlanymor · 28/04/2025 18:47

ThirdSector · 27/04/2025 19:27

No where in Crawley is THAT posh 😂

Maidenbower.

Arlanymor · 28/04/2025 18:46

ThirdSector · 27/04/2025 19:21

Maidenbower.

Exactly.

FishfingerFlinger · 28/04/2025 13:14

TheodoraCrumpet · 28/04/2025 11:17

@FishfingerFlinger Quite. In my experience even headteachers don't always know the ins and outs of their own admissions policies, especially if the school isn't its own admissions authority and they don't oversee the process directly. It's no wonder parents often get confused about oversubscription criteria and make assumptions about what works and what doesn't.

Oh god don't get me started - the school we didn't get into has fairly convoluted admissions criteria and (outside of the actual admissions criteria document itself, which isn't easy to comprehend) almost every piece of information the school shared (verbally and in writing) about it's own admissions was factually inaccurate. Documents with whole priority groups missing, false reassurances about 'guarantees' of admission, incorrect stats. And in this case they are their own admissions authority so should have no excuse! And then parents get the blame for not understanding.

TheodoraCrumpet · 28/04/2025 11:17

@FishfingerFlinger Quite. In my experience even headteachers don't always know the ins and outs of their own admissions policies, especially if the school isn't its own admissions authority and they don't oversee the process directly. It's no wonder parents often get confused about oversubscription criteria and make assumptions about what works and what doesn't.

Lifestooshort71 · 28/04/2025 08:07

LindorDoubleChoc · 26/04/2025 17:20

No, not always the case. Perhaps read the full thread and educate yourself.

Unnecessarily snippy!

FishfingerFlinger · 28/04/2025 07:49

I can sympathise with him. Clearly he should have been aware of the rules but I can understand how you could have a good understanding of the admissions criteria at one point but then not be aware they have changed. The school has a duty to consult on changes to the criteria and failure to do so adequately can be raised with the school adjudicator (no idea whether the school in this case did an adequate job here, but there should have been letters home etc).

We've been in the position of not getting into a school we had a reasonable expectation of getting into and it was absolutely devastating, it's not just an "ah well shucks" thing, it's 5-7 years of your child's life, their wellbeing, education, future that is suddenly all thrown up in the air. However rich or famous or whatever you are it's not something I'd wish on anyone.

Hagl3y · 27/04/2025 20:07

ThirdSector · 27/04/2025 19:27

No where in Crawley is THAT posh 😂

Crawley is awful. You couldn’t pay me to live there. All power to Romesh choosing to use the state system.

NeedAnyHelpWithThatPaperBag · 27/04/2025 19:40

Geoff Norcott did a programme on the BBC about how some middle class parents gamed the school system. It's not currently available to watch, but he had points iirc.

ThirdSector · 27/04/2025 19:27

CuttedPearPie · 26/04/2025 09:52

I don't think its commendable to use the state schools when you live in a posh area.
It's just buying your kids education in a different way

No where in Crawley is THAT posh 😂

ThirdSector · 27/04/2025 19:21

LlynTegid · 25/04/2025 18:22

I have some sympathy for him about this, the policy could be the issue.

I don't understand this idea of the 'posher part of Crawley'? Is this a new name for Horsham??!!

Maidenbower.

Arlanymor · 27/04/2025 19:14

FortyElephants · 25/04/2025 18:06

He used to teach my friend maths. I wonder if the school he's been allocated is the same one he used to teach at 😆
Actually I assume he's talking about primary school since he's worrying about school runs.

Yes maybe primary. Ha! Interesting question!

Arlanymor · 27/04/2025 19:09

So many people have missed the obvious point here. He lives in a £3m house. And chose to MOVE OUTSIDE the area for his preferred choice of school. FFS.

LindorDoubleChoc · 26/04/2025 17:20

OneBadKitty · 26/04/2025 13:19

It's perfectly acceptable to request that a child attends the same school as their siblings, being famous doesn't change that desire. I though most schools prioritised siblings unless it is a selective school.

No, not always the case. Perhaps read the full thread and educate yourself.

DeafLeppard · 26/04/2025 15:27

CuttedPearPie · 26/04/2025 11:18

By living in a posh area, you're spending big bucks on your housing to buy your kid a place at a top performing state school.

It's the exact same mindset and expense as someone paying fees. Sorry if I hit a nerve

Posh areas do not equal good schools - I live in an expensive area and our local comp is inadequate.

CurlewKate · 26/04/2025 14:04

CleaningSilverCandlesticks · 26/04/2025 13:37

Neither was his.

Apologies. Got my dates a bit muddled. “During the election campaign.”