Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Child's friend parent on sexual offender register

783 replies

springisspringing1 · 24/04/2025 13:57

I live in a smallish town - only one primary school and only one class per year. My DC is in reception. One of the children's fathers was found guilty of looking at child sex photographs and online grooming of a young teen girl. He is on the sexual offender register. The mother has retained a close relationship with the father (they may still be together - I don't know her well enough). We have kids' birthday parties all the time and eg when she hosts one, the father is likely to be there. I don't want my children near this man. I just don't. I think she's keen for him to be reintegrated into the (quite small) community. AIBU is, I suppose, to make it clear I don't want him to bring their child to my child's party? (I will just make an excuse for their party). Also - is this unfair on my child's friend (who is obviously only 4 too). This is not something that is going to go away -- and want to work out how to manage it now. Please be kind - I absolutely know it is not the mother or the child's fault.

OP posts:
ClaudiusTheGod · 24/04/2025 16:43

Gymmum82 · 24/04/2025 14:10

I can’t honestly imagine a time where he would be able to chat to your child at a party. Firstly at parties the kids are all off playing. Secondly you will be there and thirdly I don’t think I’ve ever seen any parents chat to children who aren’t there own at parties, surely you would be able to interject if you did see him trying to engage in conversation and tell him not to talk to your child. Or redirect your child to speak to you and send them off to join in. He’s not going to be able to start grooming your child at a 2 hour party while you are there watching his every move is he really? Whilst I wouldn’t want him near my kid you’re being hysterical because he won’t be able to be near your kid

You are naive in the extreme. The community should be shunning this man so that no children are EVER near him. Do you not understand how grooming works?!

Curioushoney · 24/04/2025 16:42

Mrsdyna · 24/04/2025 16:41

You won't be the only one who doesn't want him there so you'll be helping out plenty of other people if you don't let him come.

Indeed

but the op mentions absolutely no one else in this small community feeling same way about this party

Skrid · 24/04/2025 16:41

@springisspringing1 as someone whose husband turned out to be a paedophile, who raped small children, you are completely in the right not to want this man at your child's party. Anyone who tells you otherwise just doesn't understand Safeguarding.

It might be worth messaging the Mum before sending out invites to say that your DC loves seeing her child, and would be thrilled to see her and her child at their party but that, given the nature of dad's offences, it naturally wouldn't be appropriate for dad to attend. That way you aren't leaving her DC out, it's the mother's choice if she wants the child to attend the party or not. If she is offended by that, that's her problem.

With playdates, either meet up with Mum and child out and about, or always have the child at your house.

If you know he's a paedophile, he should not be near your child at any time for any reason, as paedophiles are slippery charming bastards and great at grooming children even in the briefest of moments. Also they tend not to get caught for everything they've done, so he's probably done worse than what he was convicted for

ViaBlue · 24/04/2025 16:41

I wouldn't accept the mother either. If she is his enabler or in deep denial she is as dengerous as him. There are women out there who find children gor peados. Some have no problem sacrificing their own. There are plenty of stories from kids who spoke up but weren't believed by their mothers.

Mrsdyna · 24/04/2025 16:41

You won't be the only one who doesn't want him there so you'll be helping out plenty of other people if you don't let him come.

RealEagle · 24/04/2025 16:39

neverbeenskiing · 24/04/2025 16:30

Sorry to be pedantic but there is no such thing as "child porn", it's images of child sexual abuse.

Wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment behind your post though!

you got what I meant,

BlueTitShark · 24/04/2025 16:38

Also anyone who is refusing to have the child at their house or to go to parties etc…. isn’t punishing the child.
The child is being punished by their parents. Parents who think it’s ok to expose other children to a known sexual offender. That’s their choice to do so. The consequence is also their responsibility. Not other people who decide to not trust him.

Milosc · 24/04/2025 16:38

No. Just tell the mom no and why. It is on her to provide a safe environment for her child and others she brings her child around. If she chooses to stay with him it will affect her child. Sad or not your child is your main concern, not hers. The whole problem with pedophiles is they build up familiarity and trust. It doesn't matter if your child is alone with them. Children are trusting and will be like oh it's so and so's dad so it must be okay. He was at the party and my mom is okay with him so it's fine. No amount of talking to your child will guarantee their safety. I cannot fathom the responses on here that think you are wrong for trying to keep your child away from a pedophile. It is truly unbelievable 🙄

InterIgnis · 24/04/2025 16:38

waterrat · 24/04/2025 15:49

Nobody is suggesting that the OP should ignore her perfectly sensible warning feelings about a potentially dangerous and predatory man.

Famlies of CSAM offenders are incredibly isolated and shamed in their communities and put in a very difficult position by these men and their offending. The mum may feel trapped, unable to leave, he may be abusive. you have no idea.

I would not want to further isolate this mum - particularly if her child is part of a small community. So I would tread warily and be vigilant but I would not personally be outwardly rude to this man or to anyone in the family.

That’s a whole lot of not OP’s problem. She owes the mother nothing.

whitewineandsun · 24/04/2025 16:37

YRGAM · 24/04/2025 16:25

YABU and punishing the child for the sins of the father

Well, maybe his father shouldn't be fucking gross and get off on child abuse.

BlueTitShark · 24/04/2025 16:35

Also there is a reason why there is a sex offender register. That’s to ensure that people in the community know the person has committed a sexual crime. That’s because, unlike let’s say theft, people are not seen as ‘having served their sentence and are rehabilitated’ by the end of it. Theyre seen as potentially dangerous. That’s the whole point of the register. A warning.

So I’m at loss as to why the OP should ignore that warning.
Im not quite sure why ANYONE should ignore it when that same person wouldn’t be allowed to work with children because they are on said register tbh….

Starblind19 · 24/04/2025 16:34

I know your saying poor woman. But honestly I can't think of anything other than how absolutely selfish she is. If she is unwilling to leave him is it fair her child is subjected to a lifetime of being bullied and ostracised because of his actions and her actions to be with a paedophile. It is disgusting and a stance should be taken against this why should he be accepted back in to society? I don't know why we should support these monsters. It isn't some minor offence. I feel like this is somehow starting to become normalised and poor kids like urs and his kid are stuck in an unfair situation but I wouldn't be going to parties unless I knew he wasn't there and I also would only accept the mum at the party and I would make it clear to her why. Although I doubt I could be friends with a woman like that.

HearthLight · 24/04/2025 16:34

Gymmum82 · 24/04/2025 15:53

There is zero risk if you are supervising a situation properly. Absolutely zero

You are dangerously wrong, both in the immediate instance and with a longer-term view in mind, as has been explained on this thread repeatedly.

Wise up.

And stop attempting to shame parents out of exercising their better judgement in protection of their children. It's part of the problem.

I seriously question the motives of anyone who does this.

MoveYourSelfDearie · 24/04/2025 16:33

Gymmum82 · 24/04/2025 15:53

There is zero risk if you are supervising a situation properly. Absolutely zero

What do you think grooming is? It starts as a friendly conversation. Perfectly ordinary. The adult presents themself to the child as a friendly, apparently safe person. The difference between this initial grooming and a normal child/adult conversation is only in the thoughts and intentions of the adult. But that can't be seen by an observer.

This can absolutely happen in a supervised public setting.

Now the child thinks the pedophile is a safe and friendly adult. In the future, with further opportunities for interaction/grooming, a relationship can develop of perceived trust/familiarity/friendship. In a number of months or years time abuse happens.

Simply the presence of the pedophile at a kids party presents him as being a normal safe adult, even if he doesn't speak to the OPs child on this occasion.

The pedophile needs to be kept away from the children.

The children need to be told in an age appropriate way (see my 1st post on this thread, it's on pg3) that he's not a safe adult.

anareen · 24/04/2025 16:33

A lot of these responses are baffling to me.

I wouldn't invite them to anything nor attend anything of theirs if invited.

Habbyhadno · 24/04/2025 16:33

I think it’s unfair for the child’s mother to be allowing the dad to be anywhere near the friend’s children. If that was my husband I would be very clear that I would do all the child-related activities and he needs to keep a low profile (not that I’d want me or my children anywhere near him ever again). If he’s on the sexual offenders register is he even allowed anywhere near a school or children?

GreenCandleWax · 24/04/2025 16:33

Gymmum82 · 24/04/2025 14:03

Obviously your child will never go to play dates at their house. But you can’t dictate who can bring the child to your child’s parties. All you can do is exclude the child. Which would be unfair

OP certainly can dictate who comes into her house and interacts with her DC. She said parents come in and stay for parties. There is no way he should come over her doorstep while there are children in her house. Maybe OP can ask the child's mother to be the one to bring her child - she will understand why the request is made.

wizzywig · 24/04/2025 16:32

Contact your local police forces PPU/ MOSOVO team and say that you're aware mr x is on the sor, he is present when there are children's party's going on. Let them deal with it.
I guess you'd never know if, eg, the order has expired or maybe the order prevents contact with female children of a certain age.

SerafinasGoose · 24/04/2025 16:31

WearyAuldWumman · 24/04/2025 16:12

I've just Googled the offender that I mentioned above.

To my shock, I've just discovered that he had a conviction in 1985 for 'lewd and libidinous practices'. That would be the same year that I reported that he was living in the same household as a woman and her daughters.

FGS, don't take chances around a sex offender.

Edited

Historical though this event was, thank you a million times for doing the right thing.

If only more people were this vigilant, as opposed to sticking their heads in the sand and deluding themselves either that it doesn't happen or that close supervision will 100% protect children.

It doesn't. The posters making these dangerously erroneous claims really need to read more about the typical modus operandi of these predators. They cannot be rehabilitated and they will not stop. They are clever, devious, good at playing the long game, capable of grooming parents as well as children, and hide in plain sight.

It depresses me beyond belief that these points have to be made on Mumsnet of all places.

Curioushoney · 24/04/2025 16:31

Outside of school, my child would have nothing to do with the other child and his ignorant mother and sexual deviant father.

Whilst I feel for the child, it is but a drop in the ocean as to why much I wouldn’t want my child within this family’s vicinity

neverbeenskiing · 24/04/2025 16:30

RealEagle · 24/04/2025 16:18

Can’t believe some of these responses,He was looking at child porn (those poor abused children being made to do these things ),also done for grooming.People saying he needs integrating back into village life FUCK OFF.

Sorry to be pedantic but there is no such thing as "child porn", it's images of child sexual abuse.

Wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment behind your post though!

BlueTitShark · 24/04/2025 16:29

@springisspringing1 I wouldn’t allow parties and playdates either.
I would allow them at my house IF the dad is nowhere near by. At 4yo, it’s still a bit early but very soon, no parent will stay anyway.

Nopersbro · 24/04/2025 16:28

NO ONE but you (and their other parent, if in the picture) is going to put your children's safety and well-being first. That's your job. It doesn't matter if anyone here thinks you're being unreasonable or "hysterical" (nice misogynistic dogwhistle) or mean or not upholding some imaginary responsibility for you and your 4yo to help a criminal reintegrate into the community. Imagine you give in to people telling you to be kind, distrust your instincts, etc. and something does happen to your child. Will you really feel then that you did the right thing to spare the feelings of the dad, the mum, and the other 4yo at the expense of your own child's safety?

Someone on the sex offender registry will be fully prepared to be excluded from events with small children. Adult relatives of that person - certainly, a wife and co-parent - will be fully prepared for that as well. They should be proactively and intentionally excluding themselves, especially this soon after the reported offence. Don't involve the 4yos, who cannot and should not have to understand - but make it clear that this dad is not welcome in your house and that your child will not go to the friend's house while he is there.

Of course you don't know if any specific stranger is a danger to your child; anyone could be, and you should use caution accordingly. But you also know that THIS specific person IS a danger - logically you're going to take special precautions based on that information. That is an intentional PURPOSE of the registry - yes, it lets the police, the schools, etc. take special precautions but it also informs the entire community that there's a red flag here. That doesn't mean lower your guard in terms of the way you generally handle safeguarding for your children - but in this particular case, of course it's absolutely reasonable to RAISE your guard. Don't be shamed out of it.

BlueTitShark · 24/04/2025 16:28

waterrat · 24/04/2025 14:23

He is allowed near his own child because firstly he will have been assessed as safe to be around them. We are seeing in society an absolutely enormous number of men arrested gor online child abuse offences sadly.

I really dislike judgemental vigilante style approaches. This man is being monitored by SS and police and those close to him know his risks.

He is zero risk on the doorstep of your house and you are just punishing his child

He isn’t zero risk. A lot of those men reoffend…

But more to the point, no one is entitled to people trusting them ‘just because’. The OP could have decided to act the same way just because he has the wrong hair co,our, the vibe wasn’t right. Whatever. Trust is something you earn.

So no, it’s not a ‘judgemental vigilantes’, it’s just a ‘I don’t trust you’ full stop.

beautyqueeen · 24/04/2025 16:27

Of course YANBU, does he fuck need reintegrating into society, he needs a long walk off a short cliff.

Unfortunately for his kid they would be getting no invites from us, nor would we be accepting any of their invites and to be frank, the mother only has herself to blame, if she continues to entertain a pedo she can’t expect people to want to be around her family.