Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Of course women will be safer

463 replies

HardyKoala · 20/04/2025 12:11

Following the Supreme Court ruling. I’m flummoxed by the amount of women I considered intelligent friends, posting rubbish about how women are actually no safer and this ruling is just anti-trans. I just don’t understand how intelligent women are coming to this conclusion.

The main argument seems to be that men will be men and will still rape and assault.

Of course they will.

But now, they can no longer just assert ‘I am a woman’ and automatically be able to enter women’s spaces unchallenged to do this. And this did happen, a few examples below.

They will no longer be able to enter women’s changing rooms and film teenage girls naked. They will no longer be able to enter the women’s toilets in Morrisons unchallenged and sexually assault a 10yr old girl. They will no longer be able to be housed in women’s prisons raping vulnerable women in the shower. This will all stop.

Yes, I do understand the negative impact on a few trans women and I feel for them, but why should ALL women put themselves and their daughters at risk for this tiny minority? I just don’t get it. If you’re campaigning for anything, campaign for 3rd spaces surely? But don’t campaign to allow any man the right to enter women’s spaces.

I have no issue with trans people in any way (I know a few) but I just can’t understand this argument that all women should be more at risk. Of course most trans women aren’t a threat. But men pretending to be women for access to women ARE a threat. And this ruling makes it harder for them to rape and assault us.

The amount of friends I’m seeing posting this rubbish has thrown me. I feel like I’m in an a weird alternate reality.

Of course women will be safer
OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
LittlerCharlotte · 20/04/2025 23:20

SternJoyousBee · 20/04/2025 23:17

trans men may some times be lawfully excluded from female-only facilities because they appear male.

And then it says "absent this exception" underneath, which means "unless an exception were made", which would mean "unless an exception is made because this is a biological woman".

LittlerCharlotte · 20/04/2025 23:18

Nameychangington · 20/04/2025 19:44

Well the practice worked fine until about 10 years ago so why do you think it'll be so hard now?

Up til recently, any man in any clothes who walked into a women's single space immediately outed himself as a wrong'un. Women could appeal for help eg from bar staff or security, and those people would help.

As soon as selfID came along that went out of the window, the women were afraid of being called a bigot, so were the bar staff/ security, and the man could just claim to be trans and the bar staff/security either didn't know he wasn't allowed in anyway or has actively been trained by the likes of Stonewall that he was.

This resets us to 10 years ago. Is it 100% guarantee of safety? No. Is it an important safeguard that makes us safer than we were last week? Yes

Absolutely this.

SternJoyousBee · 20/04/2025 23:17

trans men may some times be lawfully excluded from female-only facilities because they appear male.

Sensitive content
Of course women will be safer
LittlerCharlotte · 20/04/2025 23:16

OhWhistle · 20/04/2025 23:14

This is your response to same gender/same sex violence?

Sides?

Please link to the placards saying "the only good trans person is a dead trans person". The only violence comes from the side - and yes, it is a side - declaring that trans rights must be protected at the expense of EVERYTHING else. In short, men aren't taking "no" for an answer, again. What's astonishing is the number of women supporting them.

BundleBoogie · 20/04/2025 23:15

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 23:13

They’re not as smart as they think they are with the deflection. We see them.

Quite. They really are just pulling out the dregs of their arguments now. Maybe they’ll give up soon.

OhWhistle · 20/04/2025 23:14

LittlerCharlotte · 20/04/2025 23:10

Oddly enough, the violence is only coming from one side - the side you support. Think on it.

This is your response to same gender/same sex violence?

Sides?

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 23:13

BundleBoogie · 20/04/2025 22:40

It’s very strange that they’ve fixated on this ‘argument’ and are happy to be wildly racist to support men in women’s spaces.

They’re not as smart as they think they are with the deflection. We see them.

LittlerCharlotte · 20/04/2025 23:12

Maddy70 · 20/04/2025 17:25

Women will not be safer, this puts more women at risk my friend is very tall, has fairly masculine features. She will be questioned, ridiculed and asked to use men's spaces while any male predators will still be predators

Honestly, I doubt this. Unless you're saying your mate REALLY looks like a bloke.

LittlerCharlotte · 20/04/2025 23:10

OhWhistle · 20/04/2025 14:48

I've been seriously sexually assaulted and also perved at by women, including a bathroom incident at school. A lot of people I know have been assaulted e.g. by female childminders. It's often not as heavily violent as male assault nor can it cause pregnancy but it happens.

I'll only feel safer when there is more concern about addressing violence as such.

I feel less safe seeing the violence with which binaries are being enforced in the name of my rights. Not in my name.

Oddly enough, the violence is only coming from one side - the side you support. Think on it.

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 23:09

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

you actually want male presenting people in the ladies loos now.

Women, no matter how feminine or masculine they look, belong in the women’s toilets. It’s not about “wanting” them in - it’s about wanting men out

To just go in the women's toilets as a man and claim to be a trans man is far easier than putting enough effort in to be a convincing trans woman to get in to the ladies.

Like o say this isn’t a new problem - we’ve been dealing with men pretending to be women for years and the law didn’t back us. Now it does.

You made it easier for them!

Because it would have been so hard before! Stop gaslighting feminists - the ruling changed the game for women for the better and the toilet issue is a drop in the ocean compared to what else this ruling will bring.

The only way this would be a victory would be if trans men had to stay out of women's spaces too, but they don't, for some reason you all want male presenting people in the women's. You couldn't make it up!

Well you have made it up - who says anything about “wanting”? This is about protecting women and correctly defining sex.

jetlag92 · 20/04/2025 23:06

It's fine - don't worry we'll sort it out.........

Pippinsdiary · 20/04/2025 23:04

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:56

That’s great, good for you’ But it bothers a lot of us. Many of us who’ve been sexually abused, raped and assaulted by men. Other women are Muslims or Orthodox Jews. can you understand that not everyone is like you, not everyone has the same needs and that sharing an intimate space would be triggering or impossible?

What part of ‘it doesn’t personally bother me’ suggests I’m speaking for anyone else but myself? That’s just my opinion that I wouldn’t feel threatened in that situation and that’s you knowing absolutely nothing about me and my experience with men.

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:59

drspouse · 20/04/2025 21:06

Our gym has open changing areas, one single cubicle, four showers with those pathetic curtains like you had at school.

Mine has showers that are see through glass but a middle bit is tainted glass but you can still see a blur. They also have huge gaps on the bottom, and the tainted bit isn’t that tall. i’m quite tall so my boobs nearly go above the tainted bit. I’ve complained, I’m convinced they have them to put people off using them.

OhWhistle · 20/04/2025 22:58

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:55

I’m correctly sexing men. There’s no such thing as cis. And yes I’m protecting women - even ungrateful man-centric deluded ones, because I’m even if someone is a dick or has internalised misogyny, women deserve safety.

Queening gender is a feminist act.

I don’t speak Word Saladnese, you’ll have to sue English terminology.

Wow.

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:56

Pippinsdiary · 20/04/2025 20:54

Fair enough, it just isn’t something that would bother me personally

That’s great, good for you’ But it bothers a lot of us. Many of us who’ve been sexually abused, raped and assaulted by men. Other women are Muslims or Orthodox Jews. can you understand that not everyone is like you, not everyone has the same needs and that sharing an intimate space would be triggering or impossible?

BundleBoogie · 20/04/2025 22:55

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:48

If you want a sensible conversation perhaps don’t minimise the actions of sex offenders by saying there only 150 to worry about.

Do you have a source for your “only” 60 sex offenders?

However if we are being sensible the absolute factual reality is that trans women did not pose a significant threat to women so we are not significantly safer. If we want to be significantly safer

Thats obviously subjective because I completely disagree with you. Our very safety, agency and privacy was on the line. Women are an oppressed group. Men are our oppressors. For men to colonise and appropriate us is hugely significant - not just in terms of safety but privacy and dignity. I’ve said before my DD is 11 and is a boxer. Knowing she’ll never have to compete with a man, is hugely significant.

What makes us think this ruling stops anyone from doing anything??

I’ve no doubt the toddler strapped inside a man’s body will still disrespect women - I mean they’ve never respected us before so why would they start now - and many will still enter. But the law is on our side and they can be kicked out - and if a sexual assault happens, people will actually be held accountable rather than shrugging and saying “Well she said she was a woman so we didn’t stop her going on the ward/in the toilets/in the prison cell”. We have power over this, finally - and the accusations of bigotry will stop.

*A trans woman doesn’t stroll brazenly into a busy woman’s bathroom and attack a woman and a ha ha no one can stop me because I’m trans and I’m allowed in here 🙄

Oh dear you clearly haven’t been doing enough reading. It has happened. Do you want to actually know when and the impact on the victim who was gaslighted throughout?

Raping another human has always been illegal. That’s why it’s always done in secret.

Which is why we prevent at every possible step including getting men out of women’s spaces

Yes, I think the father of ‘Katie’ Dolotowski’s 11yr old victim was actually waiting outside the ladies toilets (because he’s a normal human being) and ‘Katie’ was permitted to go in the ladies by his escorting social worker. He was being escorted in public by a social worker as part of his bail conditions for his previous sex offence of filming another young girl in the ladies toilets.

Totally brazen, totally predictable and totally preventable.

The people who argue in support of rules that will allow more of these situations should be ashamed of themselves.

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:55

OhWhistle · 20/04/2025 20:54

I mean what I say. Cismen. Why are you telling me what I mean? Are you a man? Or the kind of woman who'll keep me 'safe' provided I agree with you?

Cismen who have never questioned their gender have privilege going right back to Athens.

Queening gender is a feminist act.

I’m correctly sexing men. There’s no such thing as cis. And yes I’m protecting women - even ungrateful man-centric deluded ones, because I’m even if someone is a dick or has internalised misogyny, women deserve safety.

Queening gender is a feminist act.

I don’t speak Word Saladnese, you’ll have to sue English terminology.

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:52

Pippinsdiary · 20/04/2025 20:49

I’m absolutely against trans women in women spaces, but honestly after a proper transition I wouldn’t expect someone with a vagina (surgically made or not) to use the men’s toilets/changing rooms, especially as the men wouldn’t know she is a trans women. The risk towards them is still the same

Which is why 3rd spaces are crucial. Stonewall could have spent the years and money they spent shitting all over women campaigning for 3rd spaces instead, but they didn’t.

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:50

redbusbeepbeep · 20/04/2025 20:46

Hmm no, but she looks like a women, speaks like a women, has breasts and a ‘vagina’ so it’s unlikely people would question it. I have no issue and trust her because I know her, fair enough other people wouldn’t but I also understand why she isn’t going to go into the men’s changing room when she has characteristics of a women

Apart from the inverted penis that is

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:49

TheKeatingFive · 20/04/2025 20:45

I'm not sure what the relevance of that point is. No they won't be able to use unisex changing rooms. They won't be able to use female changing rooms that men can infiltrate. Can't we do the decent thing and ensure there is a space to accommodate them? Not necessarily in every pool, but some?

In unisex changing villages there’s usually ample cubicles. Also - I EXPECT mixed sex spaces and choose to use them. I shouldn’t have men in my changing rooms that I’m not expecting when I’m single sex spaces

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:48

LucyMonth · 20/04/2025 20:43

God I would LOVE just one sensible conversation about this without hyperbole.

Those 150 (it’s not more actually, it’s less. I’m rounding up) are the number in prison. Not all 150 are violent rapists. 60 were convicted of sexual crimes, most of them not rape.

I think the judges got the ruling 100% correct. I fully support it. However if we are being sensible the absolute factual reality is that trans women did not pose a significant threat to women so we are not significantly safer. If we want to be significantly safer we have to broaden this conversation instead of going on and on and on about trans women.

We are overwhelmingly attacked in our women’s spaces by cis gendered men. So clearly saying men are not allowed in our spaces (whether trans women or cis men) doesn’t keep us safe. So what now? How do we actually stop men, of any kind, from entering our spaces. Because cis men have never been allowed to come in our spaces but they’ve been doing it anyway. What makes us think this ruling stops anyone from doing anything??

Oh the barista at Starbucks can intervene now if they see a trans woman enter the women’s bathrooms?

Oh guess what? When a man (trans woman or otherwise) wants to enter a woman’s bathroom to attack woman they don’t just stroll in before a crowd and attack someone with witnesses around. They sneak in, undetected and harm lone women. So whether they snuck in dressed as a women or as a man it doesn’t matter. They pick a moment when no one can see, hear or know what’s happening.

A trans woman doesn’t stroll brazenly into a busy woman’s bathroom and attack a woman and a ha ha no one can stop me because I’m trans and I’m allowed in here 🙄 Raping another human has always been illegal. That’s why it’s always done in secret.

If you want a sensible conversation perhaps don’t minimise the actions of sex offenders by saying there only 150 to worry about.

Do you have a source for your “only” 60 sex offenders?

However if we are being sensible the absolute factual reality is that trans women did not pose a significant threat to women so we are not significantly safer. If we want to be significantly safer

Thats obviously subjective because I completely disagree with you. Our very safety, agency and privacy was on the line. Women are an oppressed group. Men are our oppressors. For men to colonise and appropriate us is hugely significant - not just in terms of safety but privacy and dignity. I’ve said before my DD is 11 and is a boxer. Knowing she’ll never have to compete with a man, is hugely significant.

What makes us think this ruling stops anyone from doing anything??

I’ve no doubt the toddler strapped inside a man’s body will still disrespect women - I mean they’ve never respected us before so why would they start now - and many will still enter. But the law is on our side and they can be kicked out - and if a sexual assault happens, people will actually be held accountable rather than shrugging and saying “Well she said she was a woman so we didn’t stop her going on the ward/in the toilets/in the prison cell”. We have power over this, finally - and the accusations of bigotry will stop.

*A trans woman doesn’t stroll brazenly into a busy woman’s bathroom and attack a woman and a ha ha no one can stop me because I’m trans and I’m allowed in here 🙄

Oh dear you clearly haven’t been doing enough reading. It has happened. Do you want to actually know when and the impact on the victim who was gaslighted throughout?

Raping another human has always been illegal. That’s why it’s always done in secret.

Which is why we prevent at every possible step including getting men out of women’s spaces

RedHelenB · 20/04/2025 22:45

baddrivers · 20/04/2025 16:47

However men can just say ‘I’m a trans man’ and enter female spaces, this just makes it easier for the actually dangerous men now.

No, because again a woman's right to challenge this has been reiterated by the SC. Another will be chucked out because they are male.

BundleBoogie · 20/04/2025 22:44

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

It is not relevant to the fact that men do not belong in women’s spaces, no.

And as I say, the only people I see comparing black women to men to further their argument are trans activists.

I wish you would end that particular ‘discussion’ as it’s racist.

BundleBoogie · 20/04/2025 22:40

JandamiHash · 20/04/2025 22:37

I know what misogynior is - pretty sure saying black women look like men is part of it

No idea what it has to do with this ruling though

It’s very strange that they’ve fixated on this ‘argument’ and are happy to be wildly racist to support men in women’s spaces.

GooseDays · 20/04/2025 22:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.