Should the police be arresting people carrying placards that encourage the hanging, burning or mutilating of Terfs ie women ??

Isn’t that a transvestite not a transsexual?

I think they want to be a sort of parody of a woman. Pictures show ridiculous costumes, fishnets, short skirts, pigtails, pantomime dame. Not real women at all in their everyday jeans and jumpers.

The Metropolitan Police said it had launched an investigation after several statues were vandalised and it was investigating the incidents as criminal damage.

Chief Superintendent Stuart Bell said it was "very disappointing to see damage to seven statues and property in the vicinity of the protest", adding: "We support the public's right to protest but criminality like this is completely unacceptable.

"We are now investigating this criminal damage and urge anyone with any information to come forward."

Let's hope someone provides evidence or are those protesters happy with crime committed in their names?

Does anyone know if any arrests were made by the carriers of hate filled signs?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14629659/Signs-shame-trans-London-march-TERFs.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton
Oh my god. Some of these placards are just vile.

Starmer managed it for the rioters/instigators. He even released prisoners early to make room for them.

The police managed to send EIGHT officers to a couple based on a WhatsApp moan about their dcs school.

They arrest people over Internet posts saying TW are not women.

They have the manpower and resources and the will when they want. They just don't want to.

I’ve been involved with this issue for a few years now and have seen numerous incidents of violence and aggression towards women completely ignored by the police, who have been brainwashed by Stonewall. I think this is the most dangerous period, they’re very angry at having what they think are rights taken away, as they’re too stupid to realise, or have been misinformed that those rights were never theirs in the first place. I have a small degree of sympathy for the original “transsexuals” trying to get on quietly in the life they’ve had for 30 years. However I don’t see any of them calling for the end of violence towards women, or the end of dragging children into what has become effectively a cult. The “trans community” brought this on themselves, not by campaigning for trans rights and trans spaces, but demanding and getting self-id and women’s rights for themselves (and vice versa for trans identifying women, who did not exist 30 years ago).

For anyone new to this issue, I recommend Trans by Helen Joyce, who explains how we’ve got to this point.

Just build third gender neutral toilets for those that want to use them.

Rather money spent on “everyone else” change rooms and toilets than on endless legal battles where lawyers try to change facts about what defines a female human: Chromosomes, not lack of penis.

They’re just a different face of the Andrew Tate incel mob.

Womens main attacker is men. All of this encourages violence against women they absolutely should be arrested

Can’t be said enough 👆

THIS IS WHY WE WANT MEN OUT OF OUR SPACES.

Look how they behave when they hear the word NO. They don’t want to be told what to do when it comes to women’s spaces.

Male aggression and violence.

Yes we’ll take single sex spaces thanks.

Have you considered the logistics here?

you know the police and courts are massively underfunded and have huge backlogs.

so to arrest, process, charge, file to the cps and bring to court every single one of these placard holders, and fast track them past existing cases would mean they go in front of rape, murder, stalking, robbery etc.

fairly sure Keir as a barrister will be aware of this.

it may have been done for the riots but that was nowhere near the scale, plus it did result in real violence.

to prosecute these people you’d have to prove they actually intended to do what their placards say, or to persuade other people to do so. That bar is going to be a high one.

so as I said leave them be, in public, showing what kind of person they are and what women are facing. The hypocrisy of them being allowed free speech yet threatening women who dare to exercise the same rights. Start arresting them for them to be nfa’d and it’ll just make them into martyrs.

there was a thing a while ago, can’t remember the cause, but the aim was to get themselves all arrested, clog up the police and the courts, and then take to social media when they were inevitably released, with “see, we’re just being harassed and unjustly accused”

We know starmer view anyway after Jane tackled him and the way he dealt with Rosie.

your jealous my dicks bigger than your bf and my tits are bigger than yours

Another placard from timid sweet scared trans people frightened of being made to use the correct loo.

Yes they need to be arrested.

TERFs are not a protected group though are they? You don’t have to be female to be a TERF.
I don’t think anyone should be making signs advocating for physical assault, obviously, and those who do that should be punished. But let’s not pretend that Terf= woman. That’s naive at best and disingenuous at worst.

Starmer is alas as weak as water.

In UK law, terrorism is defined as a violent act which

• Endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action
• Involves serious violence against a person
• Causes serious damage to property
• Creates a serious risk to the public’s health and safety
• Interferes with or seriously disrupts an electronic system

Carrying placards encouraging violence against terms would probably constitute extremism, not terrorism.

The amount of people, including some women, who go on about ‘both sides’ re aggression really needs to end.

We say no we don’t consent, FWS goes to the Supreme Court, they sing when they win.

We don’t use violence as men do.

"'Don't believe what you've just seen with your own eyes'...

My local force have always had the biological sex can only intimately search the same sex policy.

so no need to change it.

re. The signs, personally let them crack on. I’d rather they were there showing their true hateful colours than be silenced, and people start thinking that kind of hate doesn’t exist.

You're absolutely right OP, its disgusting and I've lost any last shred of sympathy I had for them, vile, woman hating, male supremacists.

It will depend how Starmer views it. Hundreds sent to prison last summer for expressing their views on migrants as Starmer wants migrants (even though statistics show certain groups of these cause excess sexual violence against women). But Starmer has never been on the side of women so expect a free pass on those protesting recently against women.

Mental health illness.

Yes, I know. Criminal damage (I assume that’s the crime part) because someone hates god/religion vs incitement to harm actual people - doesn’t stack up to me either.

The hate crimes legislation doesn’t map properly to protected characteristics defined in the Equality act.
It relates

• race or ethnicity
• religion
• sexual orientation
• disability
• transgender identity

Apart from the glaring omission of sex, it also omits age and replaces ‘religion or belief’ merely by ‘religion’. If it adhered to the same terms as the equality act then incitement to violence against ‘TERFs’ could be seen as a hate crime on that ground too.