Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To say the behaviour crisis in schools can't just be blamed on parenting

416 replies

Sendcrisis2025 · 19/04/2025 12:44

I speak as a mum of two children with EHCPs and someone who is a SENDIASS officer, name changed to protect my identity/job.

There is a strong rhetoric from the teaching unions this week about behaviour in schools and poor parenting. No mention of the bigger picture, just poor parenting.

My DC are 10 and 8, just two years behind them. When DC1 was a toddler there was a huge range of groups, support, targeted interventions through the local sure start centre. These were already being cut by the time my DC2 was a toddler. Then covid happened and the services and groups have just not returned. There is no early support anymore.

One of my DC is a challenge in school, fortuantly she is predominantly a flight risk rather than violent but still a behavioural challenge. We have had one physical incident where she shoved a teacher. Pure combination of factors that had led to DC being enclosed within a corner by several children and with nowhere to escape to she shoved to escape. Unacceptable but that was the reasoning of why and she was suspended for two days etc. She struggles to cope with the sensory demands of mainstream. Too many children, too much going on. They fly through the content whereas she likes to master things in depth before moving on. Too many low level behavioural issues like children who just don't ever stop talking. She can't navigate social dynamics. None of this DC can cope with. There is a lack of consistency in the school day and the routines. None of this is the school's fault but realistically how it is in every mainstream school. We are struggling to get her moved to a specialist setting. She has no learning needs and generally with the one exception, she isnt violent so the SEMH schools are not appropriate either.

My other DC would never dream of acting out, is not a behavioural issue at all despite his needs.

Based on the unions DC is entirely due to my poor parenting. It doesnt matter that DC2 is a behavioural dream. It doesnt matter that I have no behavioural issues with DC1 at home where it is quiet, the same rigid routine for the past 6 years and less social demands. It doesnt matter that she is in a completely wrong setting.

In my LA there are over 400 children like my DC1 who have specialist agreed but are stuck in mainstream with no setting to go to. There is nowhere for them to go. These are the children with specialist agreed by the LA. This doesn't include the many hundreds more who don't have specialist agreed or don't even have EHCPs yet.

Our health trust is on 3+ years for an initial appointment. CAMHs are almost non-existent. You are only considered for medication if you are already a behavioural problem in school, it doesn't matter if a child has severe ADHD until they are at the point they can no longer cope and it is at crisis point.

Early help, if accepted, offers 6 weeks of support. There is a huge gap between early help and child in need.

I speak to parents day in day out at work who are desperate for help as their children can not cope at school.

There will always be poorly behaved children due to poor parents but the majority? The majority are children who simply cannot cope in the setting they are in with nowhere to go to.

Over 400 children in my LA with specialist agreed but stuck in mainstream. That is an incredible number.

I know my DC spends 8.45am-2pm in a small cupboard with a 1-1 TA. She joins a much younger year group for the last hour a day. She does 95% of her schoolwork with me at home.

OP posts:
Needlenardlenoo · 21/04/2025 09:45

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 08:47

But this is symptomatic of parents thinking every deficiency in their child needs special attention, heavy investment, and the best bespoke education money can buy to address it.

I have seen a touch of Munchausen in some parents in the way they aggressively pursue a diagnosis. School says they’re fine; GP says they’re fine; so they shop around for a private assessor who eventually just about gets the diagnosis over the line as they’re paid to do so.

I think very few parents think like that (no doubt there are a few and no doubt they are over represented on Mumsnet, however!) The medics doing assessments are subject to professional guidelines and ought to be reported to their regulating body if they're in breach of those.

Most parents want their children happy, healthy and achieving at school.

But there are many, many cases where medical practitioners have said something is "fine" and ditto schools, when there was actually a serious problem that the patient/parent was aware of first. Hence the group "Not Fine in School".

Gatekeeping support heavily just means problems are bigger by the time they are addressed (if they ever are).

So there are false positives if you like (a few parents looking for unnecessary assessments) and false negatives (there is a serious issue but schools or doctors have dismissed it), but I think the latter group is much larger. The OP mentions 400 children in her local area alone needing a special school. it's hard to believe anyone would go down this route if they didn't need to. It's hardly fun or enjoyable getting to that point.

The OP's example of different processing issues shows the difference access to an appropriate professional makes: to distinguish between what's in the normal range but delayed and what's a significant special need.

Those services are very difficult to access these days which is why those who can, are resorting to paying for them.

As a final note, state funded education and healthcare aren't there to "care" (hopefully individual practitioners do) but to make sure we've got an adequately healthy and educated population to sustain our standard of living.

The UK is falling down on that.

MumofCandRA · 21/04/2025 09:45

If Quentina is bored/ can't cope/ disordered/ dis-regulated or whichever new term is in vogue, Quentina needs to be taught to cope and behave appropriately by their PARENTS. It's called parental responsibility. The world doesn't revolve around Quentina and their special requirements, they need to be taught by their parents to adapt to the circumstance and society they live in.

Sendcrisis2025 · 21/04/2025 09:03

Superhansrantowindsor · 21/04/2025 08:26

Everything does have a label now. Children who take longer to grasp key pieces of information are labelled with a processing disorder for example. Is this label useful? I am not sure. Yes they need information presented in a different way and a good teacher will pick up on this. They also need longer to complete tasks but does it need a label?

It is helpful to know if a child physically can't process something at the same speed as others. It isn't a label, it is describing a need. There is also a difference between someone just being a bit slower and them being disordered.

For example, with processing you may have a child who is a bit slower at processing information and just need a bit longer. However, you have some children who can not process the verbal information at all and they, instead, need the information in either writing or pictures. These are the children who may be told the word cat and they hear hat and it means they can't follow what is going on.

Another example is my younger DC has a really severe speech disorder, he isn't delayed as if he were delayed it would be developing typically but just late. It is disordered as his speech has not developed typically, at all.

Disordered is not the same as being a bit slower.

OP posts:
CaptainMyCaptain · 21/04/2025 08:57

MumChp · 21/04/2025 08:43

I wish.

Our children have a high IQ. Wisc tested. They are bilingual and performance above. Polite and well-behaved. But 100% bored in state school.

Private and grammar have worked with them.

State doesn't care. At all.

Edited

Rubbish. They might have had a bad experience, who knows, but to make the sweeping starement 'state schools don't care' is ridiculous. Sure, there are big problems in the system but the teachers I know care very much.

It's like the often heard 'the NHS doesn't care' equally stupid.

Frowningprovidence · 21/04/2025 08:51

MumofCandRA · 21/04/2025 08:00

And that statement exemplifies a core issue - lots of children have SEND because they can't cope academically? There have always been less/more academically able students, just like there are less/ more able people in sports and all areas of life. Does that make it a medical condition requiring a label? No it does not, and is a key reason 'SEND is exploding ', when really parental expectations need managing. It's fundamentally a fashion, like Emu, Goth etc.

Not all send is a medical condition requiring a 'label'.

The 4.8% with ehcps will largely have medically diagnosed conditions but not all.

The group know as sen support which is the bigger group, just meet the requirement for needing support that is greater that what is ordinarily available in the classroom.

It's not a medical term, it's an education one and yes if the children cant cope academically in the classroom and need to have some extra help (over an above what is part of ordinary provision) they fall into that category, so making academic expectations higher and reducing the ordinary level of support in a classroom (which austerity has lead to) has pushed more children into this category.

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 08:47

Needlenardlenoo · 21/04/2025 08:40

The child has a problem with their leg and can't easily walk. Is something broken or is it a muscular problem? Does it need a label?

The child has a rash. Is it something contagious or something like excema? Does it need a label?

(Before anyone jumps in and says physical issues have definitely right "labels" - it's not actually that easy in practice is it? Medicine often requires a fair bit of informed guesswork before diagnoses can be made - hence all the dramas).

It is very useful to know what you're dealing with, especially as parents of SEND kids are often accused directly or indirectly of making the whole thing up.

That's a separate issue to what practically can be done about identified needs by a school, who pays for any necessary resources, and so on.

Legally, a school has to do their best to meet any special educational needs they've identified.

So it does rather create an incentive for needs not to be identified.

There are no "winners" here.

But this is symptomatic of parents thinking every deficiency in their child needs special attention, heavy investment, and the best bespoke education money can buy to address it.

I have seen a touch of Munchausen in some parents in the way they aggressively pursue a diagnosis. School says they’re fine; GP says they’re fine; so they shop around for a private assessor who eventually just about gets the diagnosis over the line as they’re paid to do so.

MumChp · 21/04/2025 08:43

Tbrh · 20/04/2025 00:12

I was put up 2 classes (I also missed a year of school travelling so ended up only being one year higher). My DH also started university early as he was above average. But even if you're not smart enough to be put up, you are definitely given harder work or more work, there's really no need to be so bored you need to disrupt others

I wish.

Our children have a high IQ. Wisc tested. They are bilingual and performance above. Polite and well-behaved. But 100% bored in state school.

Private and grammar have worked with them.

State doesn't care. At all.

Needlenardlenoo · 21/04/2025 08:40

The child has a problem with their leg and can't easily walk. Is something broken or is it a muscular problem? Does it need a label?

The child has a rash. Is it something contagious or something like excema? Does it need a label?

(Before anyone jumps in and says physical issues have definitely right "labels" - it's not actually that easy in practice is it? Medicine often requires a fair bit of informed guesswork before diagnoses can be made - hence all the dramas).

It is very useful to know what you're dealing with, especially as parents of SEND kids are often accused directly or indirectly of making the whole thing up.

That's a separate issue to what practically can be done about identified needs by a school, who pays for any necessary resources, and so on.

Legally, a school has to do their best to meet any special educational needs they've identified.

So it does rather create an incentive for needs not to be identified.

There are no "winners" here.

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 08:39

Superhansrantowindsor · 21/04/2025 08:26

Everything does have a label now. Children who take longer to grasp key pieces of information are labelled with a processing disorder for example. Is this label useful? I am not sure. Yes they need information presented in a different way and a good teacher will pick up on this. They also need longer to complete tasks but does it need a label?

I feel like if any of us underwent a thorough psychiatric evaluation and testing we would be diagnosed with something.

Frowningprovidence · 21/04/2025 08:39

Superhansrantowindsor · 21/04/2025 08:26

Everything does have a label now. Children who take longer to grasp key pieces of information are labelled with a processing disorder for example. Is this label useful? I am not sure. Yes they need information presented in a different way and a good teacher will pick up on this. They also need longer to complete tasks but does it need a label?

I don't get the angst with labels at all. It's just words to describe things.

I think jts usefjl to have a term that describes an issue, that is widely understood and flagging it to all teachers. You way is saying it is probably better to describe it in a different way by using more different words 'take a bit longer to grasp stuff and could do with longer to complete stuff' and just hope they have good teachers that notice the problem. (Which is a bit of a gamble)

Maybe it's the medicallyness of the terms? Would people be happier if the ly were just seen as education terms for classroom learning

Superhansrantowindsor · 21/04/2025 08:26

Everything does have a label now. Children who take longer to grasp key pieces of information are labelled with a processing disorder for example. Is this label useful? I am not sure. Yes they need information presented in a different way and a good teacher will pick up on this. They also need longer to complete tasks but does it need a label?

Snakebite61 · 21/04/2025 08:12

Snorlaxo · 19/04/2025 12:53

Try not to take what the unions say seriously.

There is a definite unspoken rule that the different services don’t slag each other off. For example they wouldn’t blame social services for not monitoring parents who need support because SS are like education and firefighting due to lack of resources. Going after other services is going to bite them in the arse at a future date.

Of course there’s multiple reasons why behaviour in schools is poor. Parenting is a convenient stick to use because there’s no person speaking on behalf of all parents who can point to other issues in education.

Wrong.

Whistonia · 21/04/2025 08:07

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:52

Good grief.

It was 14.4% in total in 2017 if that helps as a comparison.

MumofCandRA · 21/04/2025 08:00

Sendcrisis2025 · 20/04/2025 22:53

We've gone up the league tables academically whilst hurtled into a SEND crisis at a catastrophic speed. I'm fairly certain if school was less intense my DC would be able to manage her social difficulties.

And that statement exemplifies a core issue - lots of children have SEND because they can't cope academically? There have always been less/more academically able students, just like there are less/ more able people in sports and all areas of life. Does that make it a medical condition requiring a label? No it does not, and is a key reason 'SEND is exploding ', when really parental expectations need managing. It's fundamentally a fashion, like Emu, Goth etc.

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:52

Whistonia · 21/04/2025 07:47

4.8% have an EHCP and 13.6%SEN with no EHCP so 18.4% in total in England and Wales. Not sure what data in France you are comparing it to.

Edited

Good grief.

Sendcrisis2025 · 21/04/2025 07:50

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:23

Please ditch the iPad. She doesn’t need it and they are linked with the behaviours you talk about.

30 minutes a day is not the cause of her issues 🙄 It does, however, mean she can access the online based learning her school use such as TTRS, educationshed and doodlemaths. No tablet and she accesses even less of her school learning than she currently does.

OP posts:
Whistonia · 21/04/2025 07:47

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:22

Other countries have far fewer children with SEN. France has under 3% compared with our 11%.

4.8% have an EHCP and 13.6%SEN with no EHCP so 18.4% in total in England and Wales. Not sure what data in France you are comparing it to.

Hercisback1 · 21/04/2025 07:43

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:22

Other countries have far fewer children with SEN. France has under 3% compared with our 11%.

The question is why would two very similar populations have such differences in SEND rates?

There's a difference somewhere, it can't be biological, therefore we need to look elsewhere.

Begs the question, are we over diagnosing? Is it a perfect storm of naff parenting, social media, early birth rate survival, older parents...?

Hercisback1 · 21/04/2025 07:41

Peony1897 · 20/04/2025 22:16

Yes I’ve heard many non-British or immigrant parents say how shocked they are at British parenting and how enabling, unhealthy and navel gazing it is.

We’ve encouraged introspection to a point where teenagers and young people know MH is key to everything and a way of avoiding anything they don’t want to do by using the buzz words every parent dreads.

So although apparently every other child has a mental health related condition, and we have skyrocketing rates of anxiety, suicides have actually been steadily decreasing since the 1980s and we have not seen, thankfully, any suicide spike relating to the MH ‘epidemic’ in young people.

We seem to think no teenager would lie, be dramatic, or exaggerate, even though this was literally what they were known for until 2015. When I was at school in the 2000s, being a bit depressed and self harm was actually a fashion (I know I’ll be shouted down but it WAS - I did it myself!). Everyone was ‘emo’ and cutting their wrists (not very deep) and posting pictures of themselves crying to MySpace while listening to sad emo songs. It was treated as a fad, and I’m happy to say all the girls I knew who went through this phase are alive today and doing well (and have ditched the huge side fringes).

Before emo there was goth, skater, punk etc - all subcultures showing rage, distress and depression in teenagers, because teenagers are a bit like that and it was an outlet.

But we don’t really have subcultures now - everyone is in a North Face jacket and leggings - so what’s left? Gender identity and other diversity labels, anxiety and school refusal. And while there have been a small core that are truly suffering, parents are no longer waving away their kids outbursts as teenage drama, they’re somewhat growing them by encouraging introspection and giving the results of keeping them off school and sending them to CAMHs etc.

AMEN!!

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:36

Sendcrisis2025 · 20/04/2025 22:53

We've gone up the league tables academically whilst hurtled into a SEND crisis at a catastrophic speed. I'm fairly certain if school was less intense my DC would be able to manage her social difficulties.

Correlation isn’t causation. I don’t believe it to be here.

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:23

Please ditch the iPad. She doesn’t need it and they are linked with the behaviours you talk about.

Peony1897 · 21/04/2025 07:22

Jenkibubble · 21/04/2025 07:17

From my limited knowledge of education in other countries , teachers teach lessons at one level and all children , regardless of ability / need , are expected to keep up .

Unsure how this would help those on EHCP or with SEN needs ?

Easier job for teachers though !
Maybe needs are less recognised / diagnosed in other countries ?

Other countries have far fewer children with SEN. France has under 3% compared with our 11%.

Jenkibubble · 21/04/2025 07:17

Hercisback1 · 20/04/2025 20:44

So let's stick kids in front of videos as that's worked well with your 3yo?

The top PISA countries have bigger classes, more respected teachers, more discipline and a more respectful society. Even the EEF research shows class size has minimal impact on outcomes. Schools need to be better funded and have more external SEN support. They also need a societal shift where parents back schools and their consequences, and schools are allowed to give out consequences that have an impact (ie exclusion).

From my limited knowledge of education in other countries , teachers teach lessons at one level and all children , regardless of ability / need , are expected to keep up .

Unsure how this would help those on EHCP or with SEN needs ?

Easier job for teachers though !
Maybe needs are less recognised / diagnosed in other countries ?

Summer9990 · 21/04/2025 00:03

Sendcrisis2025 · 20/04/2025 23:41

Her life outside of school is predictable and routine led. She has a brother. She does have a tablet but uses it for maybe 30 minutes a day, if that. She loves to read (upside down!) And she spent this evening writing fact cards on the European countries, she did about 12 tonight and will do the rest tomorrow. Last week she wrote an entire project on Henry VIII.

She doesn't have a huge amount of independence as she is a massive safety risk. I'm not talking minor issues, in this sense if you wouldn't leave a 2 year old unsupervised to do something you wouldn't leave her. She isn't able to access non-SEN holiday clubs or after school activities. She does have independence in that she has her daily routines at home that she does without fail.

She accesses short break activities run by the LA where they also have her on a strict 1-1 following their own risk assessment. It is the flight risk that is the issue. As an example, school had to relocate all of their door release buttons as she could let herself out of school with ease. It is all over her reports and assessments by various psychologists (not stated by me) that her flight response is out of her cognitive control.

Socially she has significant problems with her understanding, she has been in consistent social programmes and receiving SALT since she was 2, she's nearly 11 now. It hasn't made any difference. Her entire social interaction at school is when she spends an hour in the foundation class. She has no issue with the 4 and 5 year olds as they are at the same level as her socially.

She can't cope with busy, she never has been able to even from toddlerhood. She can't cope with things being too fast paced, possibly due to her auditory and information processing being so weak that it takes her twice as long to take the information in. She struggles with too much noise, but noise like people chatting not huge loud noises. She is good at self regulating in that her self regulation is she leaves the space and finds somewhere to hide but obviously this is a big issue in another way. She can't self regulate within the classroom. She hasn't been in her classroom since before Christmas, not because she is disruptive or not allowed but because she is so overwhelmed by it she just won't enter.

I'm so sorry that sounds like such a difficult situation for her and for you. You've probably already thought of this but would interhigh or another online school be any good for her? (They offer primary as well). The LEA can pay for it if you can get it named on a ehcp, or you can pay privately if that's doable.

Sendcrisis2025 · 20/04/2025 23:41

Peony1897 · 20/04/2025 22:54

What’s her life like outside of school? Does she have siblings? Does she have a tablet? Does she have any independence?

Her life outside of school is predictable and routine led. She has a brother. She does have a tablet but uses it for maybe 30 minutes a day, if that. She loves to read (upside down!) And she spent this evening writing fact cards on the European countries, she did about 12 tonight and will do the rest tomorrow. Last week she wrote an entire project on Henry VIII.

She doesn't have a huge amount of independence as she is a massive safety risk. I'm not talking minor issues, in this sense if you wouldn't leave a 2 year old unsupervised to do something you wouldn't leave her. She isn't able to access non-SEN holiday clubs or after school activities. She does have independence in that she has her daily routines at home that she does without fail.

She accesses short break activities run by the LA where they also have her on a strict 1-1 following their own risk assessment. It is the flight risk that is the issue. As an example, school had to relocate all of their door release buttons as she could let herself out of school with ease. It is all over her reports and assessments by various psychologists (not stated by me) that her flight response is out of her cognitive control.

Socially she has significant problems with her understanding, she has been in consistent social programmes and receiving SALT since she was 2, she's nearly 11 now. It hasn't made any difference. Her entire social interaction at school is when she spends an hour in the foundation class. She has no issue with the 4 and 5 year olds as they are at the same level as her socially.

She can't cope with busy, she never has been able to even from toddlerhood. She can't cope with things being too fast paced, possibly due to her auditory and information processing being so weak that it takes her twice as long to take the information in. She struggles with too much noise, but noise like people chatting not huge loud noises. She is good at self regulating in that her self regulation is she leaves the space and finds somewhere to hide but obviously this is a big issue in another way. She can't self regulate within the classroom. She hasn't been in her classroom since before Christmas, not because she is disruptive or not allowed but because she is so overwhelmed by it she just won't enter.

OP posts: