Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To NOT feel guilty that my kids are in childcare?

807 replies

Kanfuzed123 · 10/04/2025 17:47

Inspired by the childcare eating a £45k salary and the anti nursery sentiment from a few posters on there as being inferior for a child.

anyone else not feel in the slightest guilty that there kids are in nursery and have been post maternity leave?

yeah when they cried at drop off was rough and I called into the check out they were but that soon settled. They do lovely events for the parents and upload lots of amazing activities they do, they’ve made fantastic friends.

I could’ve reduced my hours but I didn’t, we could’ve maybe managed on one salary (glad we didn’t when rates shot up) but I went back FT when dc 1 was 15 months (used annual leave for part time before then) and dc2 was 13 months.

anyone else just not feel guilty? I like the lifestyle we can get when we’re working, especially since the 15 funded hrs and now 30, it’s so affordable. (Eldest is in school and youngest now has the 30 hrs) bill is less than £400 a month inc club etc. I like having something else to focus on too.

im not alone or am I?

OP posts:
Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 13:48

melua · 12/04/2025 13:44

No thanks. I did an MSc in a similar field many years ago.

But you can’t remember your sources, struggle with the concept of outcomes in research? It’s a shame you didnt take it further, it’s clearly something you’re very passionate about

OP posts:
melua · 12/04/2025 13:44

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 13:41

Maybe you should do a PhD on it and update us in 4 years time

No thanks. I did an MSc in a similar field many years ago.

TheKeatingFive · 12/04/2025 13:43

melua · 12/04/2025 13:31

It happens though @TheKeatingFive and it's legal. I think some nurseries can take babies as young as 8 weeks, full time.

But how frequently? That young and full time? I've never seen it happen among people I know.

gattocattivo · 12/04/2025 13:41

Who are these mums being forced to put tiny babies into full time child care?

maternity legislation is the best it’s ever been in the U.K.

I did actually have dc1 back in the days of 12 week maternity leave, so he was in childcare from that age. Not ideal from my point of view as I was breast feeding early morning, pumping for day time feeds and then bf again evenings and overnight. Very tiring! But it was what it was, and ds has grown into a very happy, well adjusted adult. (As he no doubt would have done if I’d given up work)

I wouldn’t propose a return to those days because as I say, physically very tough. Emotionally perhaps a little easier because at that age there’s none of the separation anxiety which can happen if don’t start leaving a child with other care givers until one year, 2 or even older. (I remember having to be peeled off my mother when I started school at 4.)
But maternity leave is a decent length now; there is also the option of transferable parental leave. Of course, I’m a great advocate of nurseries being the kind of one my kids went to with plenty of outdoor activities, home cooked food etc, they need to be quality environments. But this scare mongering about childcare which isn’t based on evidence is really not helpful and you do have to question the motives of posters who do it.

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 13:41

melua · 12/04/2025 13:40

@Kanfuzed123 call it what you will. I'm saying that, as a society, we need to ask questions about the actual, lived experiences of very small babies in full time childcare. And ask if this can ever be in their best interests. How stressful is it for them? How are their bodies responding? How long is too long?

The govt won't do this though because they know what the recommendations would be and they're not prepared to implement support for families as alternatives.

Maybe you should do a PhD on it and update us in 4 years time

OP posts:
melua · 12/04/2025 13:40

@Kanfuzed123 call it what you will. I'm saying that, as a society, we need to ask questions about the actual, lived experiences of very small babies in full time childcare. And ask if this can ever be in their best interests. How stressful is it for them? How are their bodies responding? How long is too long?

The govt won't do this though because they know what the recommendations would be and they're not prepared to implement support for families as alternatives.

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 13:40

Itssofunny · 12/04/2025 13:30

People are most definitely able to say why full-time nursery is 'bad' for under 2s (though like I've said many times, something can be not ideal and yet still the best option given a family's individual circumstances).

This graph for example, taken from the article I linked to earlier.

As taken from the article: "The normal pattern (blue line below) is for cortisol levels to start high in the morning and decline during the day.

In daycare (pink line above) cortisol levels go up and up through the day. That is, children become increasingly stressed throughout whole-day daycare. This finding is very consistent and turns up in studies in (at least) the US, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Norway.

The graph above is for children in daycare morning and afternoon: children who are in for half-days show a less elevated cortisol response or even a normal one."

Actually most aren’t able to say why FT nursery for children under two is bad, they’ve just said generic motherhood statements.

Have you read around that and the counter research because there’s also another study that observes the inverse and attributes elevated cortisol to naps.

that research isn’t also to prove day care is bad it’s to ensure practices in childcare are optimal for children

OP posts:
Itssofunny · 12/04/2025 13:32

Not sure if the photo didn't post it if it's just being delayed. I'm trying again:

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 13:31

melua · 12/04/2025 13:25

@Thepeopleversuswork - 'outcomes' will be mediated through so many other intersecting factors in childhood. My point is, there needs to be more focus on the 'getting there' -ie. quality of life from an infants point of view in the critical early years. Childhood is what happens while you're waiting for outcomes.

To be clear, It's not about making anyone feel guilty or trying to paint nurseries are inherently bad. It's asking for a more nuanced perspective on the 'best' way to use nurseries - not solely from the parents' perspective, but from the baby's. Change the lens.

Obviously, an 18 month-old who goes to a nursery for a few days a week, is a totally different proposition to a three month old baby who is in 8-5 every day. This goes without saying.

It's a very triggering subject because everyone needs to think they're doing their best for their children. But that shouldn't mean we should shy away from a discussion that directly concerns the day-to-day lives of the most vulnerable in society.

For instance - Are we ok with mum's being forced to put tiny babies into full-time childcare? Is this acceptable in our society 2025? Where do we draw the line? Do we really believe this can ever be in a child's best interests, even if mum argues it's in hers? How can governments give families more choice and flexibility? These kinds of questions need to be addressed, and it's where the govt should be focusing, in my view. But they won't, because they are more concerned with managing GDP figures.

Outcomes can exist in childhood too.. come on.

OP posts:
melua · 12/04/2025 13:31

It happens though @TheKeatingFive and it's legal. I think some nurseries can take babies as young as 8 weeks, full time.

Itssofunny · 12/04/2025 13:30

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 10:58

Because the rhetoric is that nursery is ‘bad’ for under 2s…. But no one is able to say why?

weve had the ‘naturally’ argument. Well that doesn’t hold much water because school in and as of itself isn’t a natural phenomenon so all children would be with their parents. We also know that in hunter gathering societies, they are generally a lot more equal and child rearing is seen as much more of a communal task.

weve had the ‘attachment theory’ except that outdated study from the 1950s looked at children in foster care for extended periods of time returning to their parents, not modern children in a British nursery. So its inappropriate to draw conclusions from that.

weve had object relations psychoanalysis from the 70s. The flaw in that logic is hopefully very clear as psychoanalysis is all supposition and has deeply problematic roots.

so we’ve be asking what is the proof point that it’s not good or ideal for children. Well the only proof would be long term outcomes, in a subject and control group when the results are adjusted for variables

People are most definitely able to say why full-time nursery is 'bad' for under 2s (though like I've said many times, something can be not ideal and yet still the best option given a family's individual circumstances).

This graph for example, taken from the article I linked to earlier.

As taken from the article: "The normal pattern (blue line below) is for cortisol levels to start high in the morning and decline during the day.

In daycare (pink line above) cortisol levels go up and up through the day. That is, children become increasingly stressed throughout whole-day daycare. This finding is very consistent and turns up in studies in (at least) the US, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Norway.

The graph above is for children in daycare morning and afternoon: children who are in for half-days show a less elevated cortisol response or even a normal one."

TheKeatingFive · 12/04/2025 13:27

There seems to be lots of reference to edge cases here to make a point against nurseries.

How many 3 month old babies in the uk are in full time nursery? I'd hazard that number is minuscule if it exists at all.

melua · 12/04/2025 13:25

@Thepeopleversuswork - 'outcomes' will be mediated through so many other intersecting factors in childhood. My point is, there needs to be more focus on the 'getting there' -ie. quality of life from an infants point of view in the critical early years. Childhood is what happens while you're waiting for outcomes.

To be clear, It's not about making anyone feel guilty or trying to paint nurseries are inherently bad. It's asking for a more nuanced perspective on the 'best' way to use nurseries - not solely from the parents' perspective, but from the baby's. Change the lens.

Obviously, an 18 month-old who goes to a nursery for a few days a week, is a totally different proposition to a three month old baby who is in 8-5 every day. This goes without saying.

It's a very triggering subject because everyone needs to think they're doing their best for their children. But that shouldn't mean we should shy away from a discussion that directly concerns the day-to-day lives of the most vulnerable in society.

For instance - Are we ok with mum's being forced to put tiny babies into full-time childcare? Is this acceptable in our society 2025? Where do we draw the line? Do we really believe this can ever be in a child's best interests, even if mum argues it's in hers? How can governments give families more choice and flexibility? These kinds of questions need to be addressed, and it's where the govt should be focusing, in my view. But they won't, because they are more concerned with managing GDP figures.

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 13:21

daffodilandtulip · 12/04/2025 13:10

@Kanfuzed123 it's what the government think too. It's what people say to my face as well.

I don't care, I have a degree, I have lots of CPD qualifications, and we get inspected on our curriculum so people can judge away, I know I provide a good education.

Really important info for all those maligning nursery workers and I bet you’re not the minority with your qualifications and experience either

OP posts:
daffodilandtulip · 12/04/2025 13:10

@Kanfuzed123 it's what the government think too. It's what people say to my face as well.

I don't care, I have a degree, I have lots of CPD qualifications, and we get inspected on our curriculum so people can judge away, I know I provide a good education.

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 13:07

daffodilandtulip · 12/04/2025 13:01

I'm a childcare provider and a lot of my parents say how lucky they feel that the children get so many opportunities with me, that they wouldn't otherwise get.

How do you feel about the comments in the thread that staff in your profession are barely qualified (only a few GCSEs I think was the claim) disinterested and teenagers?

OP posts:
daffodilandtulip · 12/04/2025 13:01

I'm a childcare provider and a lot of my parents say how lucky they feel that the children get so many opportunities with me, that they wouldn't otherwise get.

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 12:56

melua · 12/04/2025 12:24

There is a lot more to child development theory than Freud OP, But I think you know this.

You don't want to engage with anything to do with child development theory or infant psychology. You just want to ridicule the entire disciplines. All you seem to want is a piece of paper projecting ok 'outcomes.' Ok then.

But one poster quoted that children under 2 are in the ‘paranoid schizoid’ state of development that is wholly psychoanalysis which is not evidence backed and is just supposition, the groundwork and founding discourse of psychoanalysis is Freudian aka deeply misogynistic and problematic. Psychoanalysis is basically continental philosophy wrapped in the language of science.

you’ve not brought forth infant psychology. You brought a 1950s study on foster care and then said that was representative of all toddlers in nursery.

man you really don’t understand the concept of outcomes do you? It’s the proof points of all this infant psychology you’re claiming to reference 🤦‍♀️

OP posts:
Gogogo12345 · 12/04/2025 12:41

Stripeyanddotty · 10/04/2025 18:09

So far 2 posters have said their kids do 3 days and another poster’s child goes term time only. Both of which are very different to 8am to 6pm 5 days a week.

My DS did 8-5 . I didn't feel guilty either

Thepeopleversuswork · 12/04/2025 12:38

@melua

You can't predict 'outcomes' though. All anyone can try to do is what's best for their baby in the here and now.

But if you can’t predict outcomes (which I agree with - the data is still inconclusive), what on earth is to be gained by making women feel guilty about doing something they can’t control?

melua · 12/04/2025 12:24

There is a lot more to child development theory than Freud OP, But I think you know this.

You don't want to engage with anything to do with child development theory or infant psychology. You just want to ridicule the entire disciplines. All you seem to want is a piece of paper projecting ok 'outcomes.' Ok then.

gattocattivo · 12/04/2025 12:15

It’s important to acknowledge too that parents who use childcare remain the primary care givers and central influence. We don’t hand our children over to nursery at a few months old and pick them up several years later!

The entire parenting journey involves constantly observing, evaluating, making decisions, adapting, to ensure we are doing our best in raising our children. I made the decision to return to work after mat leave, we researched different nurseries and forms of childcare. If ds had struggled to settle, dh and I would have discussed, reconsidered, looked at whether a different environment would be preferable… As parents we know our own children best, whether we work or not.

Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 11:53

Doolallies · 12/04/2025 11:52

I don’t know it just feels a bit ‘the lady doth protest too much’

Ah another generic platitude. Nice work

OP posts:
Kanfuzed123 · 12/04/2025 11:53

melua · 12/04/2025 11:37

You can't predict 'outcomes' though. All anyone can try to do is what's best for their baby in the here and now.

Theories on child development are relevant because they can help people understand their baby's lives experience at given stages, from an infant perspective. For instance, when people say things like "oh nobody remembers the early years anyway, so it doesn't really matter where they are"... if they had a better understanding of infant development they would realise that this kind of statement spectacularly misses the point.

But nobody is going to make a decision on using or not using childcare based on some academic paper purporting to identify 'outcomes.' Nobody would say, "oh my child is miserable in daycare, but no worries, I have a study to prove x,y,z outcome in a sample population.' Or, "My child seems ok in nursery right now, but I've seen a study about negative 'outcomes' so henceforth, I'm going to be a SAHM, even though it will make me depressed and we won't be able to afford anything."

I don’t think you understand research.

if there was evidence that said children who go to nursery under 2 have an absolute risk of xyz of developing mental health problems in childhood, then yeah, you can make an informed decision on evidence. Same with why I rear face my children and will do until they are at least 6, because there is evidence to show that in the event of an accident they have the best outcomes.

there is evidence to show that married women with children do have worse outcomes and worse mental health and don’t live as long as single women. So can acknowledge that as being an observed trend and to take steps to mitigate those risks.

theres a lot of theories on childhood development, Do you take the Oedipus complex and penis envy seriously in your day to day life? Because those are the foundations of object relations? I think it’s really important to know that the authors of attachment theory who studied children in 1950s foster care didn’t intend for the research to be bundled up and applied for nursery in 21st century Britain. That’s what happens when journalists who don’t understand research pick up on catchy headlines

OP posts:
Doolallies · 12/04/2025 11:52

I don’t know it just feels a bit ‘the lady doth protest too much’