Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I don't understand how this is manslaughter and not murder

221 replies

lifeonmars100 · 08/04/2025 15:15

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/apr/08/two-teenagers-found-guilty- by of-manslaughter-of-80-year-old-man-in-leicestershire-park?CMP=sharebtnurl

I am sure I am not alone in being disturbed and upset by this awful case. I can't stop thinking about this poor man, setting off for a stroll with his dog and then to be the victim of a vicious unprovoked attack of such severity that he died as a result of it. I can't understand how the boy was found guilty of manslaughter and not murder. I appreciate that a murder conviction hinges on "intent" i.e what was in the defendant's mind when they committed the offence and of course I was not in court to hear all the evidence but as a layperson I just don't get it. Maybe things will be clearer when they are sentenced. I feel so sorry for the family, the details are so awful and will surely haunt them forever. The fact that the girl filmed the attack is truly sickening but seems par for the course these days. Mr Kohli must have been terrified and in so much pain, what a terrible end to his life

Two teenagers found guilty of manslaughter of 80-year-old man in Leicestershire park

Bhim Kohli, who was walking his dog, was racially abused, kicked and punched in ‘gratuitous’ attack

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/apr/08/two-teenagers-found-guilty-of-manslaughter-of-80-year-old-man-in-leicestershire-park?CMP=share_btn_url

OP posts:
Mistyglade · 09/04/2025 01:02

Exactly what I thought. Very upsetting.

IWillJustSayThis · 09/04/2025 00:58

Many people know exactly who they are. Their names have been on social media sites for months.

Leicester is obviously a large city but the area that the two killers are from is a shit hole IMO, it's not very nice and never has been. Everyone knows everyone's business and 'outsiders' are rarely welcome.

If you're from the area then yes you'd already know them / have heard of them but SM allows their names to be spread around so quickly.

KenAdams · 09/04/2025 00:51

Smallmercies · 08/04/2025 19:54

Perhaps if adults would stop tweeting incitement to violence against immigrants, children wouldn't get the idea that it's ok to hurt a "foreign-looking" person.

I'm local to this area and if you want to see the problem go onto any Leicestershire Live post on FB and look at the comments. Anything that could be blamed on anyone with brown skin is, to the point the page deliberately posts items that they know will incite hatred for the clicks.

Is it any wonder that local kids are seeing that as the rhetorical then thinking it's OK to act like this?

I really hope that they're named and their families don't get a free pass to carry on life as normal whilst the victims family are reminded of their loss every single day.

Isxmasoveryet · 09/04/2025 00:33

Horrific this is what gentle parenting gets u I guess their mum's must be proud as punch these two should be locked up named shamed n key thrown away that poor man

LillyPJ · 09/04/2025 00:08

QuirkInTheMatrix · 08/04/2025 15:52

Murder does not require intent to kill. There’s someone local to me who has been changed with murder after pushing someone over, one push, and they fell and banged their head and died. There is no argument even from the prosecution that there was any intent to kill. Murder can also be that there was an intent to cause grievous bodily harm (which then led to the death) which in this case is what the CPS decided there was. That if you shove someone over hard enough that he intended to cause GBH.

i am amazed that the case in the OP wasn’t murder.

I'm amazed that people who weren't in court, aren't legal experts and don't know all the details seem to think they know what the verdict should have been.

LillyPJ · 09/04/2025 00:01

Genevieva · 08/04/2025 15:25

I agree. If they intended to harm then it’s murder, even if they didn’t intend to kill. What they did was sickening.

That's not what the law says. Your view is irrelevant to the law.

LillyPJ · 08/04/2025 23:59

As you admit, you don't know the details or what was said in court, so I don't know why you question the verdict.

SkiAndTravelTheWorldWithMyDog · 08/04/2025 23:56

Hope someone sorts the little shits out when they are properly detained.

That poor man.

TheGrimSmile · 08/04/2025 23:20

Mielikki · 08/04/2025 22:06

There is no such thing as a plea bargain in the English criminal system. Prosecutors have no power to make sentencing recommendations.

The CPS and the defence often reach an agreement where they will reduce a charge eg from murder to manslaughter if the defendant pleads. They cannot guarantee a specific sentence but they can reduce the charge. That's a plea bargain.

TheGrimSmile · 08/04/2025 23:17

Mexicansky · 08/04/2025 22:42

And we don’t have plea bargaining in this country

Yes we do

JandamiHash · 08/04/2025 22:47

LizzieSiddal · 08/04/2025 19:04

“Unpleasant tweet”. You think threatening to commit arson so many people burn to death is “unpleasant”? Hmm

What on earth are you banging on about?!

Mexicansky · 08/04/2025 22:42

TheGrimSmile · 08/04/2025 21:32

Just read it and there was a trial so no plea bargain...

And we don’t have plea bargaining in this country

Mielikki · 08/04/2025 22:06

TheGrimSmile · 08/04/2025 21:32

Just read it and there was a trial so no plea bargain...

There is no such thing as a plea bargain in the English criminal system. Prosecutors have no power to make sentencing recommendations.

PaterPower · 08/04/2025 21:48

Two wonderful specimens of the human race.

I’m sure they’d have turned into productive, hard working members of our society, if it hadn’t been for this ‘unfortunate’ incident 🙄

At the risk of sounding like a Daily Fail opinion piece, it scares the shit out of me that ‘we’ are producing so many of these feckless and violent kids. I’d be unsurprised if their family members, having seen and heard all the evidence in court, STILL think that their progeny should have been let off or that the poor victim deserved it. The two picked up their racism from someone.

TheGrimSmile · 08/04/2025 21:32

Just read it and there was a trial so no plea bargain...

TheGrimSmile · 08/04/2025 21:30

KrisAkabusi · 08/04/2025 15:29

No, that's quite literally the definition of manslaughter- intending to harm but not kill, but the victim is dead at the end of it. Murder requires intent to kill from the outset, something that would be very difficult to prove.

Murder requires intent to kill, or to commit serious bodily harm. So of you intend to seriously hurt someone and they die as a result of that, it's murder - even if you didn't actually intend to kill them.

I don't know the details of this case. If they pleaded guilty then they probably did some kind of plea bargain ie CPS drop the charge from murder to manslaughter on understanding that they admit to it and plead guilty.

Pigsears · 08/04/2025 21:15

PassingStranger · 08/04/2025 21:05

But is it really punishment...

You clearly aren't thinking straight.

These are 13 and 15 year old children. They have been convicted of manslaughter. They will get a custodial sentence. I think it's a dreadful travesty that this has happened. Everyone loses.

I wouldn't want to give the children personal notoriety by advertising their names. To me, it serves no purpose.

Save the space for speaking about the victim. For his family, friends and community.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 08/04/2025 21:15

TulipBlooms · 08/04/2025 20:49

How do you know they are white?

She can't, unless she lives locally and knows who they are. All the rest of us know at the moment is that they racially abused Mr Kohli, which suggests they are a different ethnicity, but not necessarily white.

DuesToTheDirt · 08/04/2025 21:07

FOJN · 08/04/2025 20:45

I have some sympathy with your view. By your colleagues logic there is no point in having a judicial system because being convicted and sentenced doesn't undo any crime.

I met a young woman who had participated in an attack which killed someone when she was 15 or 16. The other participants were 3 boys, they were all convicted and given custodial sentences. 5 years after the offence she showed no remorse and still thought it was funny. I'm unconvinced about the possibility of rehabilitating offenders who commit crimes of extreme violence at a very young age.

I don't know if it's a question of age - I would have assumed the younger they are, the more ignorant of life, and there is more hope for change? - but I can't see how the woman in your story has any prospects of becoming a civilised member of society.

PassingStranger · 08/04/2025 21:05

But is it really punishment...

🙄

PassingStranger · 08/04/2025 21:05

Pigsears · 08/04/2025 17:10

I don't think the children should have their names released.

Those who are local will know who they are- the victims family, their family, etc etc I don't think it benefits the victims family for the whole country to know their names. And I can't see how it benefits anyone. They are already being sentenced- and that will be their punishment.

But is it really punishment...

TulipBlooms · 08/04/2025 20:49

HPFA · 08/04/2025 19:29

And you notice there haven't been any riots people trying to burn down secondary schools. Almost like other white teenagers aren't held responsible for what this horrendous pair did.

How do you know they are white?

FOJN · 08/04/2025 20:45

Yesterdaywassunny · 08/04/2025 20:31

A colleague of mine was on a jury for a knife crime, young man killed another young man, went armed to his victims home, as part of a gang.

She told us she voted for manslaughter, as he was young and had his whole life ahead of him, and a murder charge wouldn't bring the victim back.

No regard for the victims family, society as a whole when the knife weilder got out in 10 years, or the deterant effect, but then she doesn't live in an area where young men are in gangs and carry knives, so she could 'be kind'.

Put me off juries to be honest.

I have some sympathy with your view. By your colleagues logic there is no point in having a judicial system because being convicted and sentenced doesn't undo any crime.

I met a young woman who had participated in an attack which killed someone when she was 15 or 16. The other participants were 3 boys, they were all convicted and given custodial sentences. 5 years after the offence she showed no remorse and still thought it was funny. I'm unconvinced about the possibility of rehabilitating offenders who commit crimes of extreme violence at a very young age.

ANDisayWhatsGoingon · 08/04/2025 20:40

It is murder, and there isn't remorse. They are clearly more concerned about their freedom and what it means for them. Individuals that show this level of violence don't change over night because they've been arrested. They're guilty and their names should be out there. This poor lovely man, my heart breaks for his family. What world do we live in that people can be so cruel, so evil, nevermind children. One day they will he elderly and I hope if they make it to an old age, their crime haunts them every time they look in the mirror.

Edited to say, this was a vulnerable elderly man, who they knew wouldn't stand a chance. They had no regard for human life and didn't care if he lived or died. They took his life while laughing. It is murder. The case makes me feel sick.

3amamama · 08/04/2025 20:36

asrl78 · 08/04/2025 15:22

It comes down to what can be proved beyond reasonable doubt in court. To convict a defendant of murder requires proof of intent to kill. Without that manslaughter is the only option.

It is not about respect, or lack of, for elders, it is about respect for people and life in general. Elderly people do not automatically deserve more respect than others just because they have existed for longer.

That’s slightly incorrect - it’s intent to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm.