Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think maternity leave should be capped at 6 months to protect small businesses?

165 replies

YourOpalLeader · 04/04/2025 15:37

Hear me out before throwing things! I work for a small business, and every time someone goes on maternity leave, it causes massive disruption. Hiring temps who don’t know the role, training them, juggling workloads - it can’t always be absorbed. I completely understand that maternity leave is a right but should it really be up to 12 months? For SMEs, it’s almost impossible. AIBU to think six months should be the limit, with the rest unpaid or taken as shared parental leave?

OP posts:
Gogogo12345 · 04/04/2025 21:12

Ciaroscuro · 04/04/2025 18:06

If you are getting the impression that I think women should go back after 6 months you are mistaken. All I was doing was pointing out that it's been that way before, because some posters didn't seem to realize that to return to work with a breastfed baby or a baby that didn't sleep through was what a lot of us had to do in the past, and it is lucky and good that things are better now.

Another thing is that returning earlier the baby was often settled with the caregiver before they hit the clingy stage which usually is around 7 months to a year.

Ciaroscuro · 04/04/2025 21:12

0ohLarLar · 04/04/2025 20:47

Anyone with a child aged over 18 today managed to return to work at 6 months or less, or had to stop work. Yes it was worse, and yes we managed it. But this thread with people saying "how on earth would that be possible with a breast fed baby or one who doesn't sleep?" - just be aware, my generation of women did it and we survived.

Well no most simply stopped. I am 40. My mother and all her friends simply didn't work for 5+ years (longer if you had more children. She went back part time when i (youngest) went to playgroup at about 3.5 and probably had around 8-9 years off entirely across 3 children.

I am a big advocate of women working- the period when children are very young is a fraction of a 46 year working life from 22 - 68. We need to simply build it in as an interlude and support parents to retain skills etc to enable them to return when children are 3 or4.

Umm no most didn't. I and all my friends kept working as did my acquaintances, uni peers and so on. I know ONE contemporary who didn't work throughout primary years and one other who stopped for 5 years.

the7Vabo · 04/04/2025 21:10

Aliceglass · 04/04/2025 21:04

In my experience, I’m fed up of seeing people that own and run a “small business” act so entitled on every level. I will never work for one again, it was like working for a small dictator.
If you chose to run a business you have to run it by the rules and treat your staff fairly. Don’t expect them to treat you like you’re doing them a favour. If you can’t run a business properly then don’t run one. Maternity leave is a basic right.

Running an SME is running a business. You have to build certain things into your budget and if you can’t make it work it’s not viable.

We are always encouraged to support SMEs and I certainly prefer to do so than supporting Amazon etc but they are not charities.

Katemax82 · 04/04/2025 21:09

YourOpalLeader · 04/04/2025 15:58

Haha, honestly, I think some small business owners probably do quietly think like that, which is exactly the problem.

It shouldn’t come down to avoiding hiring women - it should be about having better systems in place to support everyone, so small businesses aren’t stuck between doing the right thing and barely surviving.

My cousin owns her own business and won't employ women of child bearing age

Gogogo12345 · 04/04/2025 21:05

RattyNeighbours · 04/04/2025 15:43

Neither of my babies were sleeping well by 6 months so I'd have been useless at my job and would have probably ended up screwing up your business.

My eldest didn't sleep all night until she was 3.5 YEARS!! I got 16 weeks maternity leave. Managed to still work.

I think maternity leave seems very long now but I don't think there's any good reason for shortening it. If people want to return earlier than that shouldn't be an issue

I do think it takes the piss though when women return already pregnant again , work a few months then take another year off.

Aliceglass · 04/04/2025 21:04

In my experience, I’m fed up of seeing people that own and run a “small business” act so entitled on every level. I will never work for one again, it was like working for a small dictator.
If you chose to run a business you have to run it by the rules and treat your staff fairly. Don’t expect them to treat you like you’re doing them a favour. If you can’t run a business properly then don’t run one. Maternity leave is a basic right.

Penguinmouse · 04/04/2025 21:03

YourOpalLeader · 04/04/2025 15:49

That’s a fair point - longer cover can allow for more continuity if the temp is good and stays the full 12 months. But in my experience, especially in smaller teams, the problem isn’t just the length - it’s that the temp rarely has the same level of investment, experience, or adaptability. Even after training, things often fall through the cracks, and the pressure lands on the rest of the team regardless.

For SMEs running on tight margins with little overlap in roles, even a well-trained temp isn’t a perfect fix - and the longer someone’s away, the more disconnected they often feel when they return, which adds another challenge.

I’m not anti-maternity leave at all - I just wonder if we’ve reached a point where the length of leave might need to be more flexible depending on business size and capacity.

“it’s that the temp rarely has the same level of investment, experience, or adaptability.“

How would this be fixed if maternity leave was six months? Sounds like you have a problem with recruitment and training.

lolly792 · 04/04/2025 21:00

@0ohLarLarthere isn’t a wealth of evidence that children under 2 are better off at home with a parent. That’s simply not true.

And the current generation of young people are the ones who’s mums had long mat leave since it was extended to a year about 18 years ago!!

fine that you don’t want to work until your children are several years old, but don’t invent spurious arguments!

0ohLarLar · 04/04/2025 20:47

Anyone with a child aged over 18 today managed to return to work at 6 months or less, or had to stop work. Yes it was worse, and yes we managed it. But this thread with people saying "how on earth would that be possible with a breast fed baby or one who doesn't sleep?" - just be aware, my generation of women did it and we survived.

Well no most simply stopped. I am 40. My mother and all her friends simply didn't work for 5+ years (longer if you had more children. She went back part time when i (youngest) went to playgroup at about 3.5 and probably had around 8-9 years off entirely across 3 children.

I am a big advocate of women working- the period when children are very young is a fraction of a 46 year working life from 22 - 68. We need to simply build it in as an interlude and support parents to retain skills etc to enable them to return when children are 3 or4.

0ohLarLar · 04/04/2025 20:41

But what a nasty attitude to have towards mums who had their babies years ago.

no one is judging anyone who did the best they could with what was available to them at the time!

It doesn't change that absent other factors, across a population, putting little babies in nurseries does not lead to the best outcomes.

That doesn't mean lots of children don't turn out fine. It does mean that on a population level, it has an impact.

Look at the current generation of young people. They suffer from a lack of resilience, a lot of mental health issues including anxiety. Maybe we've got it all a bit wrong.

0ohLarLar · 04/04/2025 20:37

Having the leave as unpaid wouldn't reduce your hassle of juggling temps etc. It would just save you money.

Unless you think it would force people back to work quicker. Do you think thats in the children's best interest?

There's a wealth of evidence that babies under 2 are better off at home with a parent than in a nursery. If anything we should be trying to provide longer paid leave as in Sweden etc.

Hedjwitch · 04/04/2025 20:29

I've been on all sides of this argument: a mother of 3 dcs, a small business owner, and a manager in a slightly bigger business. I'm in my sixties and I had little paid maternity leave for one dc,and none for the other two. I was self employed when I.had dc3 and back at work after a month.
In my current role I have had the same member of staff take 3 lots of maternity leave almost back to back. I barely remember what she looks like tbh,but remember the 3 temps we have had to employ and train,only to lose each time she briefly returned. There IS an impact on business,and I say this as a mother myself!
And before I get blamed for "abandoning" my offspring at way before they were 12 months old I now have 3 healthy adults,2 first class degrees and 1 professional.musician so I don't think they have been too damaged. There is no easy solution to this and turning on each other doesn't help.

IVFmumoftwo · 04/04/2025 19:44

JudgeJ · 04/04/2025 18:36

Only on very few occasions does it take a year!

It depends doesn't it on the type of birth you have. Both mine were traumatic.

Sortumn · 04/04/2025 19:37

lolly792 · 04/04/2025 18:54

Wow.

My children went to a childminder but friends of mine used nurseries, which often took babies from 3 months old.

like I say, I’m not advocating a step backwards. I think it’s great that maternity legislation is now way better. But what a nasty attitude to have towards mums who had their babies years ago.

Perhaps you’ll be relieved to hear that my 3 children are now all happy, well adjusted successful adults, so being in childcare from a few months old certainly hasn’t done them any harm! As I said, it’s physically hard work for a bf mum like I was, but emotionally, probably easier than leaving them after a whole year.

I'm my previous posts I described my baby. He had to be held upright all day long. A nursery couldn't possibly have met his needs. I apologise as he was my frame of reference.

lolly792 · 04/04/2025 18:54

Sortumn · 04/04/2025 18:23

Who looked after these 3-6 month old babies? Were there nurseries full of babies who barely got their needs met, or did grandparents step in?

Edited

Wow.

My children went to a childminder but friends of mine used nurseries, which often took babies from 3 months old.

like I say, I’m not advocating a step backwards. I think it’s great that maternity legislation is now way better. But what a nasty attitude to have towards mums who had their babies years ago.

Perhaps you’ll be relieved to hear that my 3 children are now all happy, well adjusted successful adults, so being in childcare from a few months old certainly hasn’t done them any harm! As I said, it’s physically hard work for a bf mum like I was, but emotionally, probably easier than leaving them after a whole year.

JudgeJ · 04/04/2025 18:36

IVFmumoftwo · 04/04/2025 15:39

Sometimes it takes a long time to recover from a birth.

Only on very few occasions does it take a year!

MoodEnhancer · 04/04/2025 18:33

UrinalCake · 04/04/2025 16:36

It's a suspiciously glaring blind spot, isn't it? OP talks of wanting a wider discussion, but ignoring the issues of recruitment and of losing qualified staff once they're trained up doesn't suggest the desire is genuine.

Agree. I think it’s a troll and thus I can’t be bothered to engage further with the OP.

Ciaroscuro · 04/04/2025 18:33

Sortumn · 04/04/2025 18:23

Who looked after these 3-6 month old babies? Were there nurseries full of babies who barely got their needs met, or did grandparents step in?

Edited

Nurseries generally took babies from 3 months. Mine took them from 12 weeks.

My children's grandparents live 200 miles away (I stayed in my uni city).

JHound · 04/04/2025 18:28

As a society we need to encourage people to have babies.

Wafflesforbreakfast · 04/04/2025 18:25

You are being unreasonable. I think statutory maternity pay should be paid for the full year and all employers should be offering enhanced maternity pay (and sick pay but that's a different argument). The needs of the Mum and baby come before work.

Sortumn · 04/04/2025 18:23

Who looked after these 3-6 month old babies? Were there nurseries full of babies who barely got their needs met, or did grandparents step in?

lolly792 · 04/04/2025 18:20

I’m an oldie who actually went back to work with a 3 months old because that’s how long paid mat leave was. I breast fed too and it was damn hard returning to work - not that I regret it though, I wanted to keep up with my career.

However, we can’t move backwards, it’s good that mat leave is more reasonable now. That said; the two big advantages of returning to work earlier were that separation anxiety was non existent, whereas I see quite a few mums now who have a real struggle settling one year olds in childcare for the first time. Also, I didn’t feel at all out of the loop with work - it felt more like an extended break whereas a year out of it might have felt harder to settle back into.

so all in all, I don’t think mat leave should be shortened, I think although many of us years ago just got on with it, we didn’t know any different whereas to shorten it now would feel like a very backwards step for many.

What I really do wish (and which I and many of my friends back in the day would have given our right arm for) is that transferable leave would be more widely used. I think it’s brilliant that now, mums have the option of transferring some leave to the dad. So good for the child and dad.

User79853257976 · 04/04/2025 18:19

Children and mothers matter more than your business.

Ciaroscuro · 04/04/2025 18:17

DontCallMeKidDontCallMeBaby · 04/04/2025 18:11

I think the problem with describing it as ‘lucky’ and a ‘privilege’ is that it implies it’s just a nice to have, and not something we should continue to expect. I don’t consider it ‘lucky’ that I have indoor plumbing, or that children are no longer forced into the workforce at 14. Society improves over time, and so should our expectations.

I think modern women are lucky and privileged compared with my generation to get a year's maternity leave. And that is a good thing. On the other hand I think my generation was lucky and privileged in terms of relative housing costs and student loans. I think counting your blessings is ok to do. You don't have to agree of course.

Ciaroscuro · 04/04/2025 18:11

FateReset · 04/04/2025 17:57

Hardly any women would return after mat leave if you halved it. And small businesses with short mat leave policies would be boycotted by parents of young families, as you might scrap things like emergency leave to care for dependents (even NHS provides 10 days within 12 months to parents or gaurdians) so recruiting would be even harder.

Mat leave isn't a holiday, it's a year to bond with the new human you've birthed and recover from pregnancy and birth. It puts a huge strain on the body. Some birth injuries and pregnancy illnesses take over a year to recover from.

Since covid I don't think the problem is mat leave, which is only used about twice and only by a small percentage of staff. It's covering sick leave when people take 6 months or a year off for stress or other vague reasons.

On the contrary, most women returned when it was 6 months.
That doesn't mean it was better that way.