Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Do you pay your nursery's essentials and extras fee?

181 replies

Brightyellowflowers · 01/04/2025 20:10

My DCs go to a private nursery and receive the 30 hours funding. We've just had notification that the fee they charge for extras is now "non-mandatory" (as per new government guidance). They charge £1.80 per funded hour, which doesn't sound much, but for two kids it's an extra £171 a month each... which is 4k a year!

I appreciate that government funding doesn't always cover their costs, but I can't afford to pay 4k if I don't have to. What is everyone doing? Do you pay this charge? I feel like the nursery is guilt tripping parents into paying it and just wanted to check what the norm is.

OP posts:
Swiftie1878 · 02/04/2025 11:35

Brightyellowflowers · 02/04/2025 11:28

You realise nurseries have just put the prices up to compensate for the "free" hours? Parents today aren't hugely better off. Fees have gone up more than £30 a day in the last 2 years.

Wow. You sound very entitled. Pay your way. Nurseries are closing left, right and centre. If you want your children to be well cared for, pay for it.

IVFmumoftwo · 02/04/2025 11:34

Wishing14 · 02/04/2025 11:18

As someone who just missed out on the new childcare hours and at the time thought, well annoying for me but really pleased for future parents, you are being extremely unreasonable! This money has to come from somewhere! Stay at home parents for example don’t get their children’s lunch paid and only have (usually) one salary to cover it.

That is a usually choice though? You could work if you want.

Gogogo12345 · 02/04/2025 11:31

CheeryOtter · 01/04/2025 22:01

Our nursery breaks down the extra charges into nappies, lunch, snacks, sun cream etc. I've always been happy to pay if I know what it's going towards. The care element is funded but the consumables are not, which feels logical. Nursery is expensive sadly, but you would be unreasonable not to pay.

When my DS was at nursery he was given breakfast lunch and smpnacks but I ( and the other parents) provided nappies and suncream etc. When did that change?

Brightyellowflowers · 02/04/2025 11:28

Wishing14 · 02/04/2025 11:18

As someone who just missed out on the new childcare hours and at the time thought, well annoying for me but really pleased for future parents, you are being extremely unreasonable! This money has to come from somewhere! Stay at home parents for example don’t get their children’s lunch paid and only have (usually) one salary to cover it.

You realise nurseries have just put the prices up to compensate for the "free" hours? Parents today aren't hugely better off. Fees have gone up more than £30 a day in the last 2 years.

OP posts:
Gogogo12345 · 02/04/2025 11:21

Sofiewoo · 01/04/2025 20:32

But it’s a private nursery that you are choosing to use?

How many non- private nurseries are there for working parents?

Wishing14 · 02/04/2025 11:18

As someone who just missed out on the new childcare hours and at the time thought, well annoying for me but really pleased for future parents, you are being extremely unreasonable! This money has to come from somewhere! Stay at home parents for example don’t get their children’s lunch paid and only have (usually) one salary to cover it.

DaisyChain505 · 02/04/2025 11:11

Brightyellowflowers · 01/04/2025 20:21

I don't know the ins and outs of the nursery's finances. We're already paying over £100 a day for non funded hours, so I resent paying a top up fee too when the government says this clearly isn't allowed.

I don't want to cause any trouble though... no idea what other parents are going to do.

What the Gov gives these nurseries to cover the free hours isn’t enough to keep the nursery running so they need to charge these fees to be able to offer the free hours in the first place.

IVFmumoftwo · 02/04/2025 11:08

Wouldn't your place be at risk of you don't pay? Lunches are not optional at the one my son uses, they cook them on site. The funding should kick in next week but I will still be paying for that.

TY78910 · 02/04/2025 10:40

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:54

How do primary schools manage allergies? My son took a packed lunch for years as he had a problem with eating the school lunches (many other children did too). The named lunch bag had an ice pack, lunch, snacks and a drink. It was hung on his peg each morning with his coat. Parents knew not to add things like nuts.
I think nurseries are using this as an excuse to charge unnecessary fees in some cases and may be detrimental to anyone claiming funded hours who can’t afford a £5 lunch for their child.

I realised this when my DD started school!!

She tells me they hand out cookies, hot chocolate when doing forest school etc, this would have been unheard of in nursery as they always cited allergies! I must say though, whenever I visited the nursery, loads of kids had some sort of allergen next to their picture on the wall.

Mightymoog · 02/04/2025 09:02

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:54

How do primary schools manage allergies? My son took a packed lunch for years as he had a problem with eating the school lunches (many other children did too). The named lunch bag had an ice pack, lunch, snacks and a drink. It was hung on his peg each morning with his coat. Parents knew not to add things like nuts.
I think nurseries are using this as an excuse to charge unnecessary fees in some cases and may be detrimental to anyone claiming funded hours who can’t afford a £5 lunch for their child.

you are bob on.
They need to manage allergies as other places do.
They are breaking their terms and need challenging on it

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:54

Mightymoog · 02/04/2025 08:05

they are lying and breaking the terms of the funding agreement.
They have to give you the option of providing your own food

How do primary schools manage allergies? My son took a packed lunch for years as he had a problem with eating the school lunches (many other children did too). The named lunch bag had an ice pack, lunch, snacks and a drink. It was hung on his peg each morning with his coat. Parents knew not to add things like nuts.
I think nurseries are using this as an excuse to charge unnecessary fees in some cases and may be detrimental to anyone claiming funded hours who can’t afford a £5 lunch for their child.

willsandnoodle · 02/04/2025 08:23

Consumables/ top up fees have always been optional. The only thing that’s changed is nurseries now have to be transparent about it.

The nursery provides home cooked meals, milk, alternatives for allergies. Resources, outings. Outside companies to come in for the children. Summer parties, leaving parties. All of this costs money. To keep your nursery at the standard it is, you need to continue to pay.

Not to mention wages, overheads and everything else.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 02/04/2025 08:16

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:13

I’m not saying private nurseries can’t exist - they just won’t be eligible to give funded hours which are lot are doing anyway.

Clearly this would be a huge programme but one we need to sort as things are not sustainable as they are.
We should have invested into this while interest rates were at historic lows.

We should, we didn't. Anything we do now just massively impacts the parents with nursery attending kids and so you'll find most, logistically and financially, can't just "not pay".

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:13

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 02/04/2025 08:05

What's your plan while the nurseries are closed and the government realise they need to set something up, then actually do it? Cos if my nursery closes, by the time they sort out the alternative, my daughter will be at school and I'll have had to give up work to look after her til then and we'll be in the crap because we need my wage.

I also have no issues with paying for things my child eats or uses. Why would I have an issue with paying for my child?

Edited

I’m not saying private nurseries can’t exist - they just won’t be eligible to give funded hours which are lot are doing anyway.

Clearly this would be a huge programme but one we need to sort as things are not sustainable as they are.
We should have invested into this while interest rates were at historic lows.

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:09

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 02/04/2025 08:05

What's your plan while the nurseries are closed and the government realise they need to set something up, then actually do it? Cos if my nursery closes, by the time they sort out the alternative, my daughter will be at school and I'll have had to give up work to look after her til then and we'll be in the crap because we need my wage.

I also have no issues with paying for things my child eats or uses. Why would I have an issue with paying for my child?

Edited

I would increase the fees for childminders for 3 and 4 year olds (with the provision that they operate from their own residence) and a maximum of 6.
Existing preschools could be better funded and offer more hours with decent rates of pay for staff.

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:06

Daisydiary · 02/04/2025 07:45

Really surprised at the number of people saying just pay! Don’t just pay. You don’t have to and there’s legal precedent not to! There needs to be a collective revolt, no one pays and the government is forced
to pay more. Take a look at Companies House and see just how wealthy the owners of the top nursery chains are. It’s no coincidence that they’ve all put up fees as the funding has come in in general, before we look at the top ups. It’s the responsibility of the childcare sufficiency team/officer at your LEA to ensure that there is adequate early years provision. Lobby them for more if the service isn’t adequate. Don’t give extra money you don’t have to to some of the wealthiest people in the land. You don’t find a poor nursery chain or old people’s home owner.

Yes this! Completely agree!
Plus most of that money is going into offshore accounts and that is bad for the economy.

We need to have more teacher led, wrap around state nursery provision that pays a decent wage and retains staff.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 02/04/2025 08:05

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:02

If nurseries close it would force the government’s hands into opening affordable provision. We can’t go on paying this much - we are one of the most expensive countries in the world for childcare and if other countries manage it, then so can we. Having mainly private nurseries is not a model we should have and the government needs to borrow to invest in state sustainable nursery school infrastructure and could be ran with any profits crucially put back into education - perhaps free for core hours but then charge reasonable fees for extra.
The government have already created a degree for the early years leaders so this fits in well.

Nowadays due to the cost of living, both parents are forced to work and for many there is no choice.

We shouldn’t be paying up and shutting up.

What's your plan while the nurseries are closed and the government realise they need to set something up, then actually do it? Cos if my nursery closes, by the time they sort out the alternative, my daughter will be at school and I'll have had to give up work to look after her til then and we'll be in the crap because we need my wage.

I also have no issues with paying for things my child eats or uses. Why would I have an issue with paying for my child?

Mightymoog · 02/04/2025 08:05

Brightyellowflowers · 01/04/2025 20:15

This is what I don't understand. Apparently we can't provide food due to allergies. But they still aren't legally allowed to charge for lunch without giving you the option to not pay it.

they are lying and breaking the terms of the funding agreement.
They have to give you the option of providing your own food

BurntBroccoli · 02/04/2025 08:02

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 02/04/2025 06:08

We need them, yes, but we don't have them.

It might be the case that more women are impacted by this cost, but the alternative is that they decide not to pay, everyone's costs go up, nurseries either close or don't accept funded hours anymore, then you're either out of work to care for your child (further impact) or scrabbling trying to find a more expensive place.

You don't win by not paying for the things your child uses while they're there.

If nurseries close it would force the government’s hands into opening affordable provision. We can’t go on paying this much - we are one of the most expensive countries in the world for childcare and if other countries manage it, then so can we. Having mainly private nurseries is not a model we should have and the government needs to borrow to invest in state sustainable nursery school infrastructure and could be ran with any profits crucially put back into education - perhaps free for core hours but then charge reasonable fees for extra.
The government have already created a degree for the early years leaders so this fits in well.

Nowadays due to the cost of living, both parents are forced to work and for many there is no choice.

We shouldn’t be paying up and shutting up.

crumblingschools · 02/04/2025 08:00

@Daisydiary is that why nurseries are closing across the country, and not all areas have nurseries run by chains

Daisydiary · 02/04/2025 07:45

Really surprised at the number of people saying just pay! Don’t just pay. You don’t have to and there’s legal precedent not to! There needs to be a collective revolt, no one pays and the government is forced
to pay more. Take a look at Companies House and see just how wealthy the owners of the top nursery chains are. It’s no coincidence that they’ve all put up fees as the funding has come in in general, before we look at the top ups. It’s the responsibility of the childcare sufficiency team/officer at your LEA to ensure that there is adequate early years provision. Lobby them for more if the service isn’t adequate. Don’t give extra money you don’t have to to some of the wealthiest people in the land. You don’t find a poor nursery chain or old people’s home owner.

Swiftie1878 · 02/04/2025 06:11

Brightyellowflowers · 01/04/2025 20:21

I don't know the ins and outs of the nursery's finances. We're already paying over £100 a day for non funded hours, so I resent paying a top up fee too when the government says this clearly isn't allowed.

I don't want to cause any trouble though... no idea what other parents are going to do.

If you and others don’t pay, the nursery will likely have to close. Pay up. They’re not ripping you off. This is what it costs to look after your children.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 02/04/2025 06:08

BurntBroccoli · 01/04/2025 22:19

Exactly!
We need more state funded childcare options that cover wraparound care
and more infrastructure built to implement this. More women can then afford to return to work and continue their career and families won’t be spending a massive proportion of their income on childcare. This will be good for the economy and an investment for the future as the low birth rate is a ticking time bomb.

Some of the chain nurseries are making huge profits with bank accounts held offshore.

OP - look up the landmark ruling on nursery fees - this is why the nursery is having to ask for more money instead of charging you directly:
https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/governance/396-governance-news/59965-high-court-judge-rejects-legal-challenge-by-council-over-ombudsman-report-in-nursery-fees-case

We need them, yes, but we don't have them.

It might be the case that more women are impacted by this cost, but the alternative is that they decide not to pay, everyone's costs go up, nurseries either close or don't accept funded hours anymore, then you're either out of work to care for your child (further impact) or scrabbling trying to find a more expensive place.

You don't win by not paying for the things your child uses while they're there.

PassOnThat · 01/04/2025 22:39

Our nursery only offers the 15 hours not the 30. It's very popular and has a waiting list so that's obviously not putting parents off.

If you're not entitled to the 30 hours for whatever reason, it's actually cheaper to use a nursery that doesn't offer them as you're not cross-subsidising supposedly "funded" places while getting no benefit from the scheme yourself. It's much better to have your children in a nursery where everyone largely pays their way and therefore it's properly funded and a viable business rather than relying on derisory government funding rates.

BurntBroccoli · 01/04/2025 22:24

readingupsidedown · 01/04/2025 22:04

Ok so here’s another way of looking at it. Our charity run setting has just cut the hours of all staff due to this change. The mandatory fee was used for snacks, drink - some kids have special diets so particular snacks were catered to at a higher cost, messy play resources, flour etc for playdough etc etc.
We are all paid minimum wage (despite some being highly qualified).
This is causing lots of excellent staff to look for other work.
I just wish the new system was for private run nurseries and not charity run ones. It’s incredibly difficult for these fantastic settings to stay open.

I do think that charity daycare should be exempt from this.
Childminder rates also need increasing for ages 3 and 4.